Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 22 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Isla_Ko_Phi_Phi_Don,_Tailandia,_2013-08-19,_DD_13.JPG[edit]

Isla Ko Phi Phi Don, Tailandia, 2013-08-19, DD 13.JPG

  • Nomination Bay and rocky beach at Ko Phi Phi Don Island, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noticable haloing around the hills. Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ New version uploaded, better? Poco a poco 11:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment By doing this, the image in general lost a lot of its sharpness. Maybe you should only remove the haloes next to the hills by using some kind of a filter. DerHexer 22:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
    Well, yes, I could, but I am not convinced about its need. I have reverted to the original version and move to CR with the hope to hear some more opinions Poco a poco 10:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO it's acceptable, Diego, when I have this problem, the only solution which I found is of decreased the clarity and the sharpening with a very small brush Christian Ferrer 18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
    I would have used the brush with a decrease of sharpening (I take note of your advice to do the same with the clarity, thanks!) but I am not really sure whether this is needed, I never was asked to do it earlier and to me it does not look bad. Poco a poco 19:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course yes!!. I added some note about blue channel --The Photographer 21:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
    I fixed the WB Poco a poco 22:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Supportrepeted vote Well done --The Photographer 00:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cccefalon 05:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Volucella bombylans (AF)-right.jpg[edit]

Volucella bombylans (AF)-right.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 05:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Volucella bombylans (AM)-right.jpg[edit]

Volucella bombylans (AM)-right.jpg

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 05:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Osterwieck_Altstadt_by_Stepro_DSC_5355.JPG[edit]

Osterwieck Altstadt by Stepro DSC 5355.JPG

  • Nomination denkmalgeschützte Häuser in der Altstadt von Osterwieck --Stepro 20:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blown sky, check the histogram --A.Savin 21:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
    • ✓OK you're right; color and brightness adjusted --Stepro 22:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
      • Seems better, but I'm still not sure if it's OK for QI, I'll ask for CR --A.Savin 14:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice pic, colours and sky are OK for me, however the loss of detail (see the "Nikolaistraße" sign) exceeds what I expect from a QI at only 6 megapixels. Visible CA on left side (timber framework) is quite unusual for a not-so-fast 50 mm prime. --Kreuzschnabel 05:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 05:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Our_Lady_of_the_Rosary_of_Chiquinquirá.jpg[edit]

Our Lady of the Rosary of Chiquinquirá.jpg

  • Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary of Chiquinquirá --Beria 11:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Too tight a crop IMO. --Mattbuck 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
    * Considering the place where the table is and that is covered by a glass, is almost impossible to get a decent shot with a wider frame. Can you reconsider? Beria 19:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reality sometimes makes a QI impossible, this may well be one of those times. Mattbuck 21:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As per Matt. The quality is too poor for QI. --Cccefalon 10:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We evaluate the results, we can not rely on circumstantial arguments as the photo was taken. --The Photographer 15:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 10:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Rösrath_Germany_Old-townshall-01.jpg[edit]

Rösrath Germany Old-townshall-01.jpg

  • Nomination Old townshall of Rösrath in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --Cccefalon 19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for the moment, until the correction of the slight tilt, and the slight perspective distortion at right.--Jebulon 21:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Done A hint would have been good enough, rather than sending it to CR. Anyway. --Cccefalon 22:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Sorry, the picture could have been promotted "in abstentia" of yours, as it had already a "pro" vote. A sending to CR is not a personal attack, it was just in order to "freeze" the situation. Opposition removed now, of course.--Jebulon 18:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO, it's ok now, in more I think the walls of this house are not straight and if you correct more, windows will tilt to the outside --Christian Ferrer 08:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cccefalon 05:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

File:People_at_Sunset_Cliffs_Natural_Park_San_Diego_2013.jpg[edit]

People at Sunset Cliffs Natural Park San Diego 2013.jpg

  • Nomination Sunset Cliff Natural Park in San Diego --Tuxyso 21:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • see notes --A.Savin 11:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the hint, I will correct it in 2 days. --Tuxyso 18:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done, A.Savin, please take another look. --Tuxyso 21:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
      • There is still a very big dustspot at the top in the left part --A.Savin 22:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but the foreground feels slightly odd - oversharpened maybe? Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
        • ✓ DoneA.Savin, please take another look. I see no dustspots anymore. Please note that the image becomes darker to the edges due to the bright sun and its radial light. If you disagree, please marke again if possible. Mattbuck, why decline? Sharpness is imho OK. --Tuxyso 21:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK to me now. --A.Savin 07:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sharpness is just but ok IMO, but the horizon is a bit tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Surely? In which direction, Christian? I used the note tool here and grid tool in LR and could not see a tilt. --Tuxyso 12:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
      • To see it Tuxyso, I open it at full resolution, I put the top left corner of the horizon (it' easy there is a darker straight at top of the horizon) at top left of the window and I use the scrollbar and you will see on the right a very little gap, it's not big I know. --Christian Ferrer 12:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the hint, I will look at it later. --Tuxyso 12:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
        • @Christian: ✓ Done. --Tuxyso 07:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tuxyso, ok for info there is a little outline around the girl in red, and the red is maybe a bit oversatured --Christian Ferrer 08:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --A.Savin 07:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Isla_Phi_Phi_Lay,_Tailandia,_2013-08-19,_DD_14.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis), Phi Phi Lay Island, Thailand --Poco a poco 10:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed (foliage is burned out) --Christian Ferrer 17:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't see any overexposure (I judge by histogram and lost highlights, not by heart) --Moroder 14:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Esta imagen realmente me gusta, podria ser corregida facilmente. --The Photographer 15:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid not because of the water unless you retouch it, the composition is good --5.86.57.200 Moroder 16:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is not clear to me what issues do I need to address to get support, can somebody tell me? Poco a poco 12:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's blurred --Moroder 20:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree, horrible blur and clearly overexposed (but remapped). Mattbuck 18:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
    Please, don't use expressions like "horrible", it doesn't sound respectful Poco a poco 19:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 22:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Christian_Lindner_(Martin_Rulsch)_1.jpg[edit]

Christian Lindner (Martin Rulsch) 1.jpg

  • Nomination Christian Lindner, North Rhine-Westphalian politician (FDP) and member of the Landtag of North Rhine-Westphalia. --DerHexer 11:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose left is unsharp --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Does that really matter? It's not a studio photograph. DerHexer 00:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. f/2.8 is not the best choice in such a situation, but the eyes are sharp enough. -- Smial 22:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
    To express the situation: It was a shot taken by hand when he gave an interview. Cheers, DerHexer 15:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
    It's always the problem of making the best job: higher ISO and somewhat more DOF or less noise and less DOF ;-) -- Smial 16:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
  • zu mittig, nicht dicht genug dran, Offenblende... aber trotzdem Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me --Stepro 01:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cccefalon 05:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Nottingham railway station MMB 31.jpg[edit]

Nottingham railway station MMB 31.jpg

  • Nomination Nottingham station western throat. Mattbuck 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeImo too unsharp. DerHexer 13:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
    I request a second opinion. Mattbuck 10:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me Pleclown 11:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Tuxyso 09:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)