Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 15 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Chiesa_San_Marziale_da_ovest_Fondamenta_Misericordia_Venezia.jpg[edit]

 Comment The foreground is the object of the picture; the "small bridge" and the background are irrelevant. Besides that it is technically ipossible to obtain focus on the whole depth. How many birds, butterflies etc do we have on QIC with the backgrond not in focus? ;-) --Moroder 21:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I consider the opposition inappropriate --Moroder 12:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --СССР 01:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinneberg (Helgoland) 2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pinneberg on Heligoland --Milseburg 18:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose A relative easy photo to make, so for me it's not sharp enough for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Other opinion please. To me sharpness is equivalent to the average of landscape-QI --Milseburg 14:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. The sharpness could be better, especially towards the borders. --Basotxerri 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Ezarate 19:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)