Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 03 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review



  • Nomination Modernist architecture: Perla resort - Lateral view (Nova Gorica) --Terragio67 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unnatural tint --Lallint 16:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Too unreal -- Spurzem 09:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Neutral A interesting building. It's leaning out and the image shows the rare form of the building good. But: IMO too less space around and the sharpness is low too. The categorization isn't good enough (too common). --XRay 10:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Regarding the resolution the sharpness is borderline, but still acceptable. But the WB is way off. The verticals are vertical, isn't that exactly what most people here are always asking for? --Smial 11:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Hello, I really appreciated your comments. I shot the picture with a 4K Action Camera (I was on my way on a bike), I know it is not perfectly sharpened but the architecture is really interesting (that's why I decided to share it with the others). The subject is 9x22 metres, I went to a narrow street and I assumed to be enough far from the subject. Honestly the WB was terrible (it was my fault due to the sudden changing weather). I uploaded a new version reducing primary blue (-24%) and primary red (6%). Now, I believe it should be looking better. Thanks for your time. --Terragio67 21:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)