Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 08 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image --LuisArmandoRasteletti 16:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC
  • Decline
  • Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not eligible, not a work of a wikimedian! --C messier 08:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @C messier: By the way, this is a type of nomination I'd be comfortable changing "promotion" straight to "decline." --King of Hearts 05:57, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy closure, not a wikimedian work, nothing to discuss --Ezarateesteban 12:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue of John of Nepomuk near Saint Matthew church in Wrocław (Breslau).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk, Saint Matthew church in Wrocław (Breslau), Silesia --Pudelek 16:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The head of the statue is out of focus or blurred Ezarate 23:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment In my opinion is OK --Pudelek 09:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Good all over sharpness. --C messier 16:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support IMHO it's ok -- DerFussi 07:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Fährstieg8_4.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Ensemble Fährstieg 8 (Wohnhaus, Bauernhaus, Scheune); historical building in lower saxony --M. Krafft 08:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Weak  Support May be oversaturated. --XRay 14:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak oppose The colour of the sky is IMHO wrong (cyanotic). Please discuss. --C messier 08:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Not too unnatural for me. --King of Hearts 05:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak oppose as C messier. I love colors, but it looks a bit unnatural. -- DerFussi 07:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier.--Jebulon 19:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Δυτική τάφρος Χανιά 8794.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The west moat of Chania, Crete. --C messier 08:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Insufficient quality. Checked this image twice. Sorry. IMO too noisy and unsharp. Disturbing branches with CAs top right. --XRay 14:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Denoised, sharpened and colned out the branches. --C messier 10:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
     Neutral Better, but now it looks oversaturated.--XRay 16:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --C messier 06:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

 Support IMO OK now.--XRay 12:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 23:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dunas e lagoas dos Lençois Maranhenses (cropped).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dunas e lagoas dos Lençois Maranhenses (by Heris Luiz Cordeiro Rocha). --ArionEstar 17:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Nice, but the water has not detail, blurry. Chromatic noise. Proposal not in English. --Lmbuga 19:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • to me its  Support QI and prosposal can be in every language --Ralf Roletschek 21:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. I see no lacks. -- Spurzem 18:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit noisy but fine. --King of Hearts 23:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Binnenhof,_The_Hague_1836.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Binnenhof, The Hague --Hubertl 05:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion There's a lot of colour noise in the image; I left two notes as example. --Cccefalon 08:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC) I hope it´s ✓ Done, I was able to reduce some parts, but I´m afraid, not eliminating it completely. If it´s not enough for your pro decision, I will withdraw it.--Hubertl 08:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    Honestly, the colour noise on the top left side is beyond my acceptance level. Should we move it to CR, perhaps there are different opinions? --Cccefalon 15:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC) *  Comment nein, Uwe, es ist leider das einzige Bild von dieser Ansicht, aber auch mit einem Crop werden die anderen Probleme (abgeschnittene Turmspitzen) überdeutlich. Danke für dein Bemühen! --Hubertl 16:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC) *  Comment Ich habe nun doch einen Ausschnitt genommen, der diesen Teil des Ritterhauses zeigt. Danke trotzdem --Hubertl 16:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Autumn in Caucasian mountains1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Autumn in Caucasian mountains. Caucasus Biosphere Reserve --Sergei Kazantsev 09:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. Jpeg artifacts. --Halavar 10:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
    *  Comment I disagree - it´s oversharpend, try a reprocessing with less sharpening. Waiting for new version --Hubertl 11:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC).
  • New version uploaded.--Sergei Kazantsev 06:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still over-sharpened. --El Grafo 17:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Really nice composition and lighting, but  Oppose as others, sorry. -- Smial 08:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

 CommentReverted to old (first) version.--Sergei Kazantsev 16:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 15:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)