Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 28 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Iglesia_de_El_Sagrario,_Quito,_Ecuador,_2015-07-22,_DD_104.JPG[edit]

Iglesia de El Sagrario, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 104.JPG

  • Nomination Church of the Tabernacle, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, not very sharp probably camera shake. Sorry --Moroder 06:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    [reply]
  • ✓ New version Poco a poco 13:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
    [reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's better now but on top still blurred --Moroder 17:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Both sharpness issues after perspective correction and high ISO noise issues of the high resolution Canon 5D R could be addressed by meaningful downscaling after other image processing is finished. Unfortunately this is strictly forbidden at QIC... --Smial 12:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I'd probably be banned from the Wikimedia movement for at least 10 years if I dare such a thing, criminals must be punished! :) Poco a poco 17:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Most of my images are downscaled. For reasons. --Smial 18:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Just out of couriosity. I guess you used a tripod, but than why ISO 1250? If not you must have a firm hand with exposure time 1/10 nonetheless there is I guess a shake blur on top. Cheers --Moroder 06:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The camera was of course handheld, otherwise I'd have used ISO 100 Poco a poco 17:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Peulle 21:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rheinland-Pfalz,_Ludwigshafen_am_Rhein,_Landschaftsschutzgebiet_07-LSG-7314-013,_Rehbock_002.jpg[edit]

Rheinland-Pfalz, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Landschaftsschutzgebiet 07-LSG-7314-013, Rehbock 002.jpg

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Peulle 21:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rheinland-Pfalz,_Ludwigshafen_am_Rhein,_Landschaftsschutzgebiet_07-LSG-7314-013,_Storch_Landung_004.jpg[edit]

Rheinland-Pfalz, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Landschaftsschutzgebiet 07-LSG-7314-013, Storch Landung 004.jpg

  • Nomination European white stork (Ciconia ciconia) landing on a tree. --TheSyndicate94 12:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposeunsharp and branches in the way. Charlesjsharp 17:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Charlesjsharp: Another stork was on the tree when I first saw it. The stork flew away so I waited and hoped for the next one to land. The branches are there on purpose. I could have moved one meter to the front and the branches wouldn't be there. This is evident in the picture. I added them for composition purposes. It just looks way better in my humble opinion. I took ten photos when the next one landed and while it tried to keep it's balance. Furthermore this was shot with manual focus on the "tree top", since I didn't want the autofocus to jump between the branches and the stork. The sharpness is sufficient imho for a moving object with manual focus and the resources I have (this isn't a top of the line lens). You can read the numbers on the leg band. --TheSyndicate94 14:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice! Please put the taxa name in the file description.--Moroder 11:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks --Moroder 07:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, but the branches are not my concept of good composition. And presumably they stopped you using autofocus may be why it is blurred. Also 1/500 sec not fast enough to freeze motion blur. Higher ISO and higher shutter speed woul be better IMO. Charlesjsharp 16:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The branches don't bother me, they are part of the natural environment. Sharp enough imo. --Cayambe 06:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Peulle 21:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]