Commons:Návrhy na kvalitní obrázky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 37% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.
Shortcut
COM:QIC
Přeskočit k návrhům
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎日本語 • ‎latviešu • ‎मैथिली • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文
float

Zde najdete obrázky navržené na zařazení mezi Kvalitní obrázky. Prosím povšimněte si, že jde o něco jiného než Nejlepší obrázky. Pokud chcete ke svým fotografiím nějaké obsáhlejší komentáře a kritiku, je vhodnějším místem stránka Photography critiques.

Cíl

Cílem projektu kvalitní obrázky je podpořit ty, kteří jsou skutečným základem Wikimedia Commons - jednotlivé uživatele, kteří přispívají k rozšíření Commons svými jedinečnými příspěvky. Zatímco Nejlepší obrázky shromažďují to absolutně nejlepší a nejpůsobivější z veškerého obsahu Commons, cílem Kvalitních obrázků je podpořit uživatele v tvorbě obrázků s definovanou úrovní kvality, a identifikovat obrázky ji splňující.
Kvalitní obrázky nejsou soutěž.

Pravidla

Všechny navržené obrázky musí být vytvořené přímo uživateli Commons.

Pro navrhovatele

Níže popsaná jsou přibližná kritéria pro Kvalitní obrázky, podrobný popis je v Quality images guidelines (zatím v angličtině).


Požadavky na stránku s popisem
  1. Autorská práva. Kvalitní obrázky musí být na Commons nahrané přímo držitelem autorským práv s přijatelnou licencí.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.

Kvalitní obrázky musí být zařazené v odpovídajících kategoriích, mít výstižný název a popis. V případě rostlin a zvířat by měl popis obsahovat systematické jméno.

  1. Kvalitní obrázky nesmí obsahovat reklamu či podpis autora v samotném obrázku. Informace o autorovi a autorských právech by se měly nacházet na stránce s popisem, a mohou být v metadatech souboru (EXIF a pod. ), ale neměly by narušovat vlastní obrázek.


Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technické požadavky

Přesnější specifikace je v textu Commons:Quality images guidelines.


Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.


Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.


Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.


Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.


How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations

Carefully select your best images to nominate. No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.


Hodnocení obrázků

Kterýkoli přihlášený uživatel může vyhodnotit nominace.
Při hodnocení se užijí stejná kritéria jako při nominace,


Jak provést hodnocení

How to update the status

Důkladně si prohlédněte obrázek. Otevřete si jej v plném rozlišení a zkontrolujte, jestli splňuje jednotlivá kritéria pro kvalitní obrázky

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria splňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Promotion| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | Čím je obrázek obzvlášť dobrý. --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Promotion a přidejte popis, případně velmi krátké zdůvodnění.

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria nesplňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Decline| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | velmi krátké zdůvodnění --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Decline přidejte podpis, případně kritéria na kvalitní obrázky, která navržený obrázek nesplňuje. (Používejte názvy sekcí z kritérií). Pokud obrázek nesplňuje větší množství požadavků, stačí uvést 2-3 nejvážnější chyby, zmínit "multiple problems". Když zamítáte nominaci, je přínosné na stránce navrhovatele vysvětlit důvody - ale vždy přívětivě, žádné kousavé poznámky.

Prosba: Hodnoťte nejdřív nejstarší nezhodnocené obrázky.


Zhodnocení a

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.


How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red


Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 18 2018 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.


Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.


Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 00:56, 18 červen 2018 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

June 18, 2018

June 17, 2018

June 16, 2018

June 15, 2018

June 14, 2018

June 13, 2018

June 12, 2018

June 11, 2018

June 10, 2018

June 9, 2018

June 8, 2018

June 7, 2018

June 6, 2018

June 5, 2018

June 4, 2018

June 3, 2018

June 2, 2018

May 29, 2018

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:2013_10_05_13-30Rallye_France,_Parc_assistance_Colmar,_Jonas_Andersson.JPG

2013 10 05 13-30Rallye France, Parc assistance Colmar, Jonas Andersson.JPG

  • Nomination Jonas Andersson in parc d'assistance of Colmar during the Rally France-Alsace 2013 (by Florival fr). --Gzen92 10:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose I think the bottom right and bottom left dark blobs should be cropped out --Trougnouf 14:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
    ✓  Done I did not see, Gzen92 10:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Good now.--Peulle 12:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek 08:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Peulle 11:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Merzouga_sahara_01.jpg

Merzouga sahara 01.jpg

  • Nomination Man in Merzouga Desert, Morocco. By User:Kdouri omar --Reda benkhadra 04:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 09:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose I disagree. Person is unsharp, focus too much behind. --Basotxerri 15:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Basotxerri is right. There are also CA.--Peulle 09:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Peulle, --Fischer.H 17:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: Please remember to change the "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline" when you execute these decisions. Also make sure to wait the full 48 hours. :) --Peulle 11:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Peulle 11:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:VW_82_JM_1.jpg

VW 82 JM 1.jpg

  • Nomination Volkwagen Typ 82. --Johannes Maximilian 09:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Good quality. (Ich hätte aber die Soldaten nicht so sehr in die Unschärfe gesetzt.) -- Spurzem 10:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose I disagree. Transition from sharp to unsharp too sloppy. --Tsungam 11:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
@Spurzem: en:Strafgesetzbuch section 86a. The Obersturmbannführer wearing the „stylish Hugo Buss uniform“ was proudly presenting swastikas and other illegal symbols to the photographers. Therefore, I decided to blur them out. --Johannes Maximilian 15:30, 11 June 2018
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - I'd allow it, since this is a good photo of the front and one side of the vehicle and the soldiers, even disregarding Nazi symbols, are in the background. -- Ikan Kekek 04:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support auch wenn der Übergang zur Unschärfe zu abrupt ist. --Ralf Roletschek 07:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Magnus. Overprocessed. --Smial 20:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Magnus --Billy69150 09:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose no objection against the blurring itself, but in this case is was done sloppily and thus looks strange. --El Grafo (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per others --Cvmontuy 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Peulle 11:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:2018_Hyundai_Kona_SE_1.0.jpg

2018 Hyundai Kona SE 1.0.jpg

  • Nomination 2018 Hyundai Kona SE 1.0 --Vauxford 22:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Discussion Tilted, please fix. --Basotxerri 07:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
    ✓  Done @Basotxerri: --Vauxford 13:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
    Sorry, it's still tilted, check the verticals on the left and the right. However you might get problems because the crop is quite tight. --Basotxerri 11:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
    ✓  Done @Basotxerri: I redone the cropping since I have the raw version and did it with less tight cropping as well as a slight straighten but comparing to the other versions, that as straight I can do it. Do I tilt it clockwise or anti-clockwise? --Vauxford 14:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose The tilt/perspective correction hasn't been made. I've downloaded the image and tried to fix it myself in Lightroom, however as the image crop es very tight, the left and right borders get cut off. IMO the image isn't good enough for a QI but as it's a car shot, I'd like to hear more opinions. --Basotxerri 15:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Just so you know that I reverted to the version where it was less tightly cropped. --Vauxford 15:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
  • (waiting)Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose blanked numberplate --Ralf Roletschek 07:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Per Ralf Roletschek --Billy69150 11:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment @Ralf Roletschek: @Billy69150: I don't see why the number plate being blanked out would make the whole image insufficient quality. This was placed in discussion to discuss if the image is fine as it or need to be tilted or have the perspective fixed etc. My other image of the Kia Picanto got promoted and that had it registration plate blanked out. I blank out the plate in respect of the owner's privacy. One of my images got deleted by the owner of the vehicle via a OTSR ticket request because the registration plate wasn't blanked. Fortunately I manage to get it restored but with the registration plate blanked --Vauxford (talk) 18:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
    • A blurring of the license plate is not required. There is no right to the image of one's own cause. White license plates are a serious deterioration of the photo. When I see it, I always give a oppose. It may be that other users see it differently. When I see such pictures in articles in Wikipedia, I trade them for photos with number plates. --Ralf Roletschek 19:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
      • @Ralf Roletschek: It might not be required but I do it to respect the privacy of the owner of the vehicle, especially with newer vehicles, classics or older than 25 years old I leave unblanked. Another problem is that the majority of photographer's fields aren't really cars and vehicles. It usually landscapes, buildings etc and when it is a vehicle is used mostly for artistic purpose rather than practical. These images that (although not all) often get promoted as QI tend to have lots of backgrounds to enhance the tone and scene of the picture. Also there hundreds of mine and others images that are being used on articles related to automobiles and they all got there registration plate blanked but it still high quality all round, it barely leaves any distortion or distraction in the picture in my opinion, (Unless if I misinterpret your comment then my apologises.) --Vauxford 20:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Other than that. It would be best to discuss about the tilting or perspective of the photo, rather than declining just over the number plate? --Vauxford 08:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
    • @Vauxford: for QI it is usual to expect things that are vertical in reality to be vertical in the photo. In this case that means that the vertical features in the building behind the car should be parallel to the left and right edges of the photo. As Basotxerri mentioned above, this may be possible to correct if you have a bit more border available on the un-cropped original image. As for the number plates, I came across the same problem here in QI. The solution I found was to fake the registrations rather than blanking or blurring them (examples: File:Land Rover Series III Lightweight 1979 - front.jpg, File:Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography 2016.jpg) and adding the 'Retouched picture' template to the image description. DeFacto 09:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
      • @DeFacto:I have recropped it once. Although I can't decide whether to leave it and have it declined. I still have the original version. When it come blurring out the reg plate. I always think the way you done it is too tricky. Like placing the letters in line with each other. --Vauxford 10:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
        • Here you can see, how it works. But sorry, it's in german. --Ralf Roletschek 18:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
          • @Ralf Roletschek: I will take a look into it. Is there like any detailed steps. I use Photoshop CC. --Vauxford 18:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
            • If you like, I'll complete the tutorial with your example, I'll try to write that in English - but then I'm guaranteed to make mistakes. But I would need your original picture. - Ralf Roletschek 20:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓  Done --Vauxford 22:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support and now i think its QI ;) --Ralf Roletschek 22:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Looks OK to me. I think the slanted perspective is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 22:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment It still should be more cropped IMO since the perspective are fixed. --Vauxford 22:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support OK now! Good work done! --Basotxerri (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Ok :-) --Billy (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- DerFussi 08:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --DerFussi 08:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


Časový rozvrh (kdy uplyne 15 dní od nominace)

ne 10 6. → po 18 6.
po 11 6. → út 19 6.
út 12 6. → st 20 6.
st 13 6. → čt 21 6.
čt 14 6. → pá 22 6.
pá 15 6. → so 23 6.
so 16 6. → ne 24 6.
ne 17 6. → po 25 6.
po 18 6. → út 26 6.