Commons:Návrhy na kvalitní obrázky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 37% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.
Přeskočit k návrhům
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎日本語 • ‎latviešu • ‎मैथिली • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文
float

Zde najdete obrázky navržené na zařazení mezi Kvalitní obrázky. Prosím povšimněte si, že jde o něco jiného než Nejlepší obrázky. Pokud chcete ke svým fotografiím nějaké obsáhlejší komentáře a kritiku, je vhodnějším místem stránka Photography critiques.

Cíl[edit]

Cílem projektu kvalitní obrázky je podpořit ty, kteří jsou skutečným základem Wikimedia Commons - jednotlivé uživatele, kteří přispívají k rozšíření Commons svými jedinečnými příspěvky. Zatímco Nejlepší obrázky shromažďují to absolutně nejlepší a nejpůsobivější z veškerého obsahu Commons, cílem Kvalitních obrázků je podpořit uživatele v tvorbě obrázků s definovanou úrovní kvality, a identifikovat obrázky ji splňující.
Kvalitní obrázky nejsou soutěž.

Pravidla[edit]

Všechny navržené obrázky musí být vytvořené přímo uživateli Commons.

Pro navrhovatele[edit]

Níže popsaná jsou přibližná kritéria pro Kvalitní obrázky, podrobný popis je v Quality images guidelines (zatím v angličtině).


Požadavky na stránku s popisem[edit]
  1. Autorská práva. Kvalitní obrázky musí být na Commons nahrané přímo držitelem autorským práv s přijatelnou licencí.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.

Kvalitní obrázky musí být zařazené v odpovídajících kategoriích, mít výstižný název a popis. V případě rostlin a zvířat by měl popis obsahovat systematické jméno.

  1. Kvalitní obrázky nesmí obsahovat reklamu či podpis autora v samotném obrázku. Informace o autorovi a autorských právech by se měly nacházet na stránce s popisem, a mohou být v metadatech souboru (EXIF a pod. ), ale neměly by narušovat vlastní obrázek.


Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technické požadavky[edit]

Přesnější specifikace je v textu Commons:Quality images guidelines.


Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule exclude vector graphics (SVG) and images computer generated and constructed using a free licensed source code available in the image description.


Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.


Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.


Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.


How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

Carefully select your best images to nominate. No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.


Hodnocení obrázků[edit]

Kterýkoli přihlášený uživatel může vyhodnotit nominace.
Při hodnocení se užijí stejná kritéria jako při nominace,


Jak provést hodnocení[edit]

How to update the status

Důkladně si prohlédněte obrázek. Otevřete si jej v plném rozlišení a zkontrolujte, jestli splňuje jednotlivá kritéria pro kvalitní obrázky

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria splňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Promotion| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | Čím je obrázek obzvlášť dobrý. --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Promotion a přidejte popis, případně velmi krátké zdůvodnění.

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria nesplňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Decline| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | velmi krátké zdůvodnění --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Decline přidejte podpis, případně kritéria na kvalitní obrázky, která navržený obrázek nesplňuje. (Používejte názvy sekcí z kritérií). Pokud obrázek nesplňuje větší množství požadavků, stačí uvést 2-3 nejvážnější chyby, zmínit "multiple problems". Když zamítáte nominaci, je přínosné na stránce navrhovatele vysvětlit důvody - ale vždy přívětivě, žádné kousavé poznámky.

Prosba: Hodnoťte nejdřív nejstarší nezhodnocené obrázky.


Zhodnocení a[edit]

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.


How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red


Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2017 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.


Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.


Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache


Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 03:00, 29 duben 2017 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎日本語 • ‎latviešu • ‎मैथिली • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文

April 29, 2017[edit]

April 28, 2017[edit]

April 27, 2017[edit]

April 26, 2017[edit]

April 25, 2017[edit]

April 24, 2017[edit]

April 23, 2017[edit]

April 22, 2017[edit]

April 21, 2017[edit]

April 20, 2017[edit]

April 19, 2017[edit]

April 18, 2017[edit]

April 17, 2017[edit]

April 15, 2017[edit]

April 13, 2017[edit]

April 12, 2017[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Widespread_forester_(Euphaedra_medon)_male.jpg[edit]

Widespread forester (Euphaedra medon medon) male.jpg

  • Nomination Widespread forester (Euphaedra medon medon) male, Ghana --Charlesjsharp 13:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI imo. --ArildV 13:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree; the whole bottom part of the butterfly is out of focus. Honestly, I'm used to seeing much better work from this user.--Peulle 19:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Hebes_pink_forester_(Euphaedra_hebes).jpg[edit]

Hebes pink forester (Euphaedra hebes).jpg

  • Nomination Hebes pink forester (Euphaedra hebes), Ghana --Charlesjsharp 13:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not for me, sorry, the DoF is shallow and the top part is out of focus as a result.--Peulle 19:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2016-12-15_Sebastian_Gemkow_by_Sandro_Halank.jpg[edit]

2016-12-15 Sebastian Gemkow by Sandro Halank.jpg

  • Nomination Sebastian Gemkow (CDU) --Sandro Halank 21:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks OK. --Peulle 08:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (for now) Sorry, I have a Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question: is this "police photo" really eligible for publishing? Did Mr.Gemkow approve for uploading it on Commons? From my own experience with "Wiki Loves Parliament" (I did it in Berlin back in 2013), such photos are only for identification purposes, and not for publishing. I miss educational value here, unless there are no further photos of this person on Commons; which is not the case. --A.Savin 11:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Interesting. What you're saying is that when shooting these projects, the photographer uses these photos for ID purposes so that he can later enter the correct information on the files that are going to be published? It will be interesting to hear the reply of @Sandro Halank:.--Peulle 07:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2017_Przystanek_kolejowy_w_Ławicy_3.jpg[edit]

2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 3.jpg

  • Nomination Ławica train station 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The sky is completely washed out. The other photos at least had some hint of cloud, not this one.--KTC 08:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 22:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's still completely washed out I'm afraid, so I'll decline. --KTC 18:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • I disagree, please discussion --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support - the sky does look a bit grey, but looking at the trees in the distance this may be attributed to a cloudy weather effect. Given that everything else in the photo looks good, I'll go with support.--Peulle 15:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Compare with the other two images in the series. [1, 2] There were clouds, but there should also be areas of blue sky. -- KTC (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Not if the whole sky was covered with mist. Since the fog also partly clouds the trees in the far background, I guess that's the case.--Peulle 19:28, 23 April 2017

(UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Peulle 19:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


Časový rozvrh (kdy uplyne 15 dní od nominace)[edit]

pá 21 4. → so 29 4.
so 22 4. → ne 30 4.
ne 23 4. → po 01 5.
po 24 4. → út 02 5.
út 25 4. → st 03 5.
st 26 4. → čt 04 5.
čt 27 4. → pá 05 5.
pá 28 4. → so 06 5.
so 29 4. → ne 07 5.