Commons:Návrhy na kvalitní obrázky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 37% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.
Přeskočit k návrhům
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎日本語 • ‎latviešu • ‎मैथिली • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文
float

Zde najdete obrázky navržené na zařazení mezi Kvalitní obrázky. Prosím povšimněte si, že jde o něco jiného než Nejlepší obrázky. Pokud chcete ke svým fotografiím nějaké obsáhlejší komentáře a kritiku, je vhodnějším místem stránka Photography critiques.

Cíl

Cílem projektu kvalitní obrázky je podpořit ty, kteří jsou skutečným základem Wikimedia Commons - jednotlivé uživatele, kteří přispívají k rozšíření Commons svými jedinečnými příspěvky. Zatímco Nejlepší obrázky shromažďují to absolutně nejlepší a nejpůsobivější z veškerého obsahu Commons, cílem Kvalitních obrázků je podpořit uživatele v tvorbě obrázků s definovanou úrovní kvality, a identifikovat obrázky ji splňující.
Kvalitní obrázky nejsou soutěž.

Pravidla

Všechny navržené obrázky musí být vytvořené přímo uživateli Commons.

Pro navrhovatele

Níže popsaná jsou přibližná kritéria pro Kvalitní obrázky, podrobný popis je v Quality images guidelines (zatím v angličtině).


Požadavky na stránku s popisem
  1. Autorská práva. Kvalitní obrázky musí být na Commons nahrané přímo držitelem autorským práv s přijatelnou licencí.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.

Kvalitní obrázky musí být zařazené v odpovídajících kategoriích, mít výstižný název a popis. V případě rostlin a zvířat by měl popis obsahovat systematické jméno.

  1. Kvalitní obrázky nesmí obsahovat reklamu či podpis autora v samotném obrázku. Informace o autorovi a autorských právech by se měly nacházet na stránce s popisem, a mohou být v metadatech souboru (EXIF a pod. ), ale neměly by narušovat vlastní obrázek.


Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technické požadavky

Přesnější specifikace je v textu Commons:Quality images guidelines.


Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule exclude vector graphics (SVG) and images computer generated and constructed using a free licensed source code available in the image description.


Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.


Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.


Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.


How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations

Carefully select your best images to nominate. No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.


Hodnocení obrázků

Kterýkoli přihlášený uživatel může vyhodnotit nominace.
Při hodnocení se užijí stejná kritéria jako při nominace,


Jak provést hodnocení

How to update the status

Důkladně si prohlédněte obrázek. Otevřete si jej v plném rozlišení a zkontrolujte, jestli splňuje jednotlivá kritéria pro kvalitní obrázky

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria splňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Promotion| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | Čím je obrázek obzvlášť dobrý. --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Promotion a přidejte popis, případně velmi krátké zdůvodnění.

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria nesplňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Decline| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | velmi krátké zdůvodnění --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Decline přidejte podpis, případně kritéria na kvalitní obrázky, která navržený obrázek nesplňuje. (Používejte názvy sekcí z kritérií). Pokud obrázek nesplňuje větší množství požadavků, stačí uvést 2-3 nejvážnější chyby, zmínit "multiple problems". Když zamítáte nominaci, je přínosné na stránce navrhovatele vysvětlit důvody - ale vždy přívětivě, žádné kousavé poznámky.

Prosba: Hodnoťte nejdřív nejstarší nezhodnocené obrázky.


Zhodnocení a

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.


How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red


Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 23 2017 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.


Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.


Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache


Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 08:17, 23 duben 2017 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎日本語 • ‎latviešu • ‎मैथिली • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文

April 23, 2017

April 22, 2017

April 21, 2017

April 20, 2017

April 19, 2017

April 18, 2017

April 17, 2017

April 16, 2017

April 15, 2017

April 14, 2017

April 13, 2017

April 12, 2017

April 11, 2017

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:View_of_Stockholm-170349.jpg

View of Stockholm-170349.jpg

  • Nomination View from Stockholm City Hall, Stockholm, Sweden. --Josve05a 04:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion

Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong oppose. Insufficient quality. The alignment isn´t correct. And it´s full of artefacts. Especially the sky is very noisy. --Milseburg 13:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Milseburg. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 07:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2017_Przystanek_kolejowy_w_Ławicy_3.jpg

2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 3.jpg

  • Nomination Ławica train station 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The sky is completely washed out. The other photos at least had some hint of cloud, not this one.--KTC 08:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 22:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's still completely washed out I'm afraid, so I'll decline. --KTC 18:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • I disagree, please discussion --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 07:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img2 Amtsgericht.jpg

Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img2 Amtsgericht.jpg

  • Nomination Senftenberg (Brandenburg): courthouse --A.Savin 10:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The lens flare in the sky should be removed IMO--Ermell 10:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't understand the objection and hereby ask for third opinion. --A.Savin 22:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ... as I can't see any lens flare. @Ermell: Could you mark the lens flare with a note, please? This could make me change my mind and would help to fix the image if necessary. Thanks in advance! --Basotxerri 08:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks Johann Jaritz for the note. --A.Savin 09:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
U r welcome A.Savin-- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Johann Jaritz! I thought it was a cloud Face-smile.svg --Basotxerri 17:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Ermell 10:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good now. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 06:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ναός Αγίας Ζώνης, Δαφνές 9177.jpg

Ναός Αγίας Ζώνης, Δαφνές 9177.jpg

  • Nomination Church in Dafnes, Crete. --C messier 08:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose renomination without correction the problems I stated last time (white balance, colour noise in the blue part of the sky) --Carschten 12:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I made a WB correction, but I can't tell if it is better, in my screen the former WB looked at least reasonable. Also removed some chroma noise. --C messier 19:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just a little difference, but much better to me now. --Carschten 13:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok to me.--Sandro Halank 11:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - It looks like the church may be leaning up to the right a bit. Does it, or are my eyes being affected in a funny way by the stone supports on the left side? Other buildings, telephone poles, etc. seem to be straight. -- Ikan Kekek 12:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Sandro Halank 11:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Metro_de_São_Paulo,_Brazil.jpg

Metro de São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

  • Nomination Metro de São Paulo --The Photographer 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rolling stock needs identification --A.Savin 23:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done --The Photographer 18:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Billy69150 16:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am really sorry, but before promotion please categorize it properly. There are plenty of subs in Category:Rail vehicles of CPTM; which type of train is on the picture? And no, I don't know it either... --A.Savin 20:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 11:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


Časový rozvrh (kdy uplyne 15 dní od nominace)

so 15 4. → ne 23 4.
ne 16 4. → po 24 4.
po 17 4. → út 25 4.
út 18 4. → st 26 4.
st 19 4. → čt 27 4.
čt 20 4. → pá 28 4.
pá 21 4. → so 29 4.
so 22 4. → ne 30 4.
ne 23 4. → po 01 5.