Commons:良質な画像の推薦

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 44% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted though Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.
Shortcut
COM:QIC
推薦一覧に移動
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Canadian English • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Nederlands • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎latviešu • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎македонски • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎मैथिली • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語
float

ここは「良質な画像」を選定するため候補画像を集めたページです。 「秀逸な画像」とは違う事に注意して下さい。 Additionally, if you just want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at Commons:Photography critiques.

Contents

目的

「良質な画像」の目的は、コモンズのの活動の基盤となっている人々、すなわちコレクションの拡大につながる独特の画像を提供している個々の利用者を応援することにあります。 While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons.
Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

ガイドライン

良質な画像への推薦はコモンズユーザー自身が作成したものに限ります。

画像を推薦する方へ

以下の説明は良質な画像への全般的なガイドラインです。より詳しい評価基準は画像のガイドラインを参照して下さい。


画像に要求されるもの
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.


作者

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

撮影技術

さらに詳細な評価基準はイメージガイドラインを参照して下さい。


解像度

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.


画像品質

デジタル画像は取り込みや処理において様々な問題が生じている可能性があります。予防可能なノイズ、JPEG圧縮の際の問題、シャドウ、ハイライト部分の情報不足、色の取り込みにおける問題、これらの問題はすべて正しく処理されている必要があります。


構図と照明効果

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.


価値観点

我々の目標は、コモンズを通して行われる、ウィキメディアの他のプロジェクト群において有用となる良質な画像の投稿を、奨励することにあります。


推薦方法

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list の候補画像リストの節に以下の行を追記するだけで推薦することが可能です。

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination|簡潔に画像の説明を記入  --~~~~ |}}

画像の説明は簡単で構いません。また、ひとつ前の候補画像との間には何もない行を一行残しておいてください。

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


推薦数

推薦に際しては、あなたが最高と評価する画像を慎重に選んで下さい。一度に二枚を超える画像を加えた場合”多すぎ”と見なされ、他利用者から難色を示されたり、直ちに枚数を減らされたりすることがあります。


画像評価

評価資格は登録ユーザーであれば誰でもあります。
評価者は推薦者と同様にイメージガイドラインを基準に画像の評価をしてください。


評価方法

How to update the status

画像の評価は慎重に行って下さい。画像は等倍サイズで開き、品質基準が満たされているかどうかを確認して下さい。

  • その画像が品質を満たしていると判断したら、下記の様に該当箇所を書き換えます。

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 |}}

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Promotion| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 | 評価理由 --~~~~ }}

つまりテンプレートを /Nomination から /Promotion へ切り替え、署名をし、可能ならコメントを記入するのみです。

  • 画像が基準を満たしていないと判断した場合は、下記の様に書き換えます。

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 |}}

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Decline| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 | 評価理由 --~~~~ }}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first and, if possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.


評価猶予期間から決定まで

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.


How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red


評価を受けなかった画像(青枠のまま)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 21 2019 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.


Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.


Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 07:06, 21 3月 2019 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

add nomination below this line, inside the gallery tags, in the following form — new nominations


March 21, 2019

March 20, 2019

March 19, 2019

March 18, 2019

March 17, 2019

March 16, 2019

March 15, 2019

March 14, 2019

March 13, 2019

March 12, 2019

March 11, 2019

March 10, 2019

March 9, 2019

March 8, 2019

March 4, 2019

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Papaver_pseudocanescens_-_polar_poppy_in_the_Altai_Mountains_03.jpg

Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains 03.jpg

  • Nomination Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains --Alexandr frolov 07:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but this plant was misidentified and misnamed; not a poppy, but something from the Asteraceae--Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Horse_licks_salt_in_the_Altai_Mountains_01.jpg

Horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg

  • Nomination A horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains. Jazaor village --Alexandr frolov 13:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now. Please add geocode or fix the name of the village. Google doesn't know Jazaor --Podzemnik 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 23:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Kurai_Range,_Yantrek_Top_04.jpg

Kurai Range, Yantrek Top 04.jpg

  • Nomination Kurai Range, Yantrek Top --Alexandr frolov 15:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO a possaible QI, but please use better categories to show that this a paining and give the name of the painter --Michielverbeek 19:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is this irony or just a lack of glasses? I think here we need a clearing about the nature of this picture --PtrQs 01:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I'm not seeing this as a painting but as a quite seriously noisy and posterized photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Ermell 23:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Erdene_Zuu_Monastery_04.jpg

Erdene Zuu Monastery 04.jpg

  • Nomination Erdene Zuu Monastery is a Buddhist monastery in Mongolia --Alexandr frolov 05:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can you add geocode and remove CA? --Podzemnik 09:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 23:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Leontopodium_ochroleucum,_эдельвейс_в_Горах_Алтая_06.jpg

Leontopodium ochroleucum, эдельвейс в Горах Алтая 06.jpg

  • Nomination Leontopodium ochroleucum, edelweiss in the Altai Mountains, the valley of the river Elangash --Alexandr frolov 15:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Double nomination. --Palauenc05 18:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 23:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Basilica_di_Santa_Maria_Maggiore_altare_maggiore_a_Roma.jpg

Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore altare maggiore a Roma.jpg

  • Nomination Apse of the Santa Maria Maggiore church in Rome. --Moroder 14:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. It's too noisy; especially the lower part. --Tournasol7 11:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Considering the file's size, I think the picture is of at least adequate quality for QI. Sure, it's unfortunate that the right and left sides are less focused than the rest of the article, but the chapel itself looks pretty amazing. I hope you're not influenced too much by looking very closely at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 10:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 22:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Kurai_Range_in_the_Altai_Mountains_02.jpg

Kurai Range in the Altai Mountains 02.jpg

  • Nomination Kurai Range in the Altai Mountains, Kosh Agachsky Aimak --Alexandr frolov 05:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think that the camera share is significant, especially on the left side. --Podzemnik 13:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Podzemnik --Palauenc05 18:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Billy69150 10:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Irisbus_Agora_L_n°653_DK'Bus_-_Amirauté.JPG

Irisbus Agora L n°653 DK'Bus - Amirauté.JPG

  • Nomination Bus in Dunkerque --Billy69150 22:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
    right part is leaning to the right --Michielverbeek 08:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done --Billy69150 17:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC) It looks better now, so no opppose --Michielverbeek 19:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 10:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Reino_Nordin_-_Ilosaarirock_2018_-_04.jpg

Reino Nordin - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 04.jpg

  • Nomination Finnish singer Reino Nordin performing. --Teevee 21:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it's a problem with his hairs. --Tournasol7 23:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slight overexposure, but acceptable. --Smial 09:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 00:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Lea_Schneider_bei_Fokus_Lyrik_2019_01.jpg

Lea Schneider bei Fokus Lyrik 2019 01.jpg

  • Nomination The poet and translator Lea Schneider at a panel discussion for Fokus Lyrik 2019 in Frankfurt --Kritzolina 08:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose her head is cropped in --MB-one 16:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I disagree. Composition and cropping are obviously intended and contribute positively to the picture's message. --Smial 22:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per MB-one --Sandro Halank 15:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 15:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per MB-one --Billy69150 17:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cropping a portrait like this is intended to create closeness and for me the partition of the pic is perfect. --PtrQs 19:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --PtrQs 19:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

水 13 3月 → 木 21 3月
木 14 3月 → 金 22 3月
金 15 3月 → 土 23 3月
土 16 3月 → 日 24 3月
日 17 3月 → 月 25 3月
月 18 3月 → 火 26 3月
火 19 3月 → 水 27 3月
水 20 3月 → 木 28 3月
木 21 3月 → 金 29 3月