Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:UNDEL)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:UND · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎башҡортса • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
  • Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch View Edit

File:Alishan Taiwan Xiang-Lin-Elementary-School-03.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: COM:FOP Taiwan accepts 2-dimensional works A1Cafel (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose for files like File:COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention Notice of a Cram School in Hsinchu.jpg and File:COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention Information Board at Campus Bus Stop in National Tsing Hua University.jpg. By the file names these depict COVID-19 information boards which IMO may not fulfill the requirement at COM:FOP Taiwan ("Artistic works or architectural works displayed on a long-term basis on streets, in parks, on outside walls of buildings, or other outdoor locales open to the public, may be exploited by any means..."). Are COVID-19 information boards/announcements for long-term basis? I doubt they would. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Agreed. Also File:Doraemon 2007 poster on CTS Kuang-fu Building.jpg seems to be an indoor photo. Few others may need to be verified by Chinese-speaking users as they may refer to some temporary events. Also content of bilboards unlikely can be considered permanent. I suggest temporary undeletion of the images for discussion. Ankry (talk) 15:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
      • Support for temporary undeletions. Since I'm from the Philippines, I hope Wikipedians from Taiwan (and perhaps from PRC) to conduct thorough individual reviews on each of the files indicated. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
        • Pinging users like @Solomon203, KOKUYO, Taiwania Justo, Kai3952, Reke, 廣九直通車: for discussion.--A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
          • @A1Cafel: All images are deleted, then I can't see what the problem is in this situation. If you need to discuss further, please restore these images as they are vital to the discussion. By the way, I have patiently and calmly discussed this issue with Reke many times, but the result was 'no consensus'.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
            • If you ping me about the FOP-Taiwan part, I hope you'll consider my situation seriously. Because I was told by reke that I'm an annoying person and accused me of doing a destroy user pictures using DR (see: special:diff/514139241). In fact, he previously said that you (Kai) have Asperger's syndrome, and he also stressed that any disputes between me and someone else could be a problem for the disease. My plight in talk or communication with is similar to that of most users at Commons. It's very difficult to avoid disputes with users, and everyone should understand. I think...don't let them (including me) go away from Commons by the stigma of being labeled “Asperger.” I know it is hard not to become frustrated and the frustration just made it worse, but can't bear the stigma of choosing such a notoriously mental illness or psychiatric disorde. I impacted by the stigma of being labeled “Asperger,”so please don't ping me about COM:FOP Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Temporary undeletion per Kai3952, unless I can see what they were, I'm not sure if they are photographed indoorly or outdoorly. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Temporary undeletion. Per above. SCP-2000 13:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

For the "勞基法..." one, @Reke: is that TIPO article requires permanently placed, or temporary ones are also applied? The second one may fall under COM:CHARACTER so indeed shouldn't apply --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: as a nominator, do you agree me to "non-admin closure"-like remove the temporary undeletion tag here? That isn't even a 2D work, it's a 3D work. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: as it seems COM:FOP Taiwan now permits photos of exterior fixed 3D works, I support undeletion, but removal of temporary undeletion tags should wait for consensus here.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
  • I deleted most of images that doubts were raised about. The only remaining is File:勞工是我心中最軟的一塊 20191214.jpg where User:Liuxinyu970226 opposes basing on TOO, while we are discussing permanence. I do not understand how TOO is relevant here. I assume, all others can be considered kept already. Ankry (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Note also that natural destruction of medium is generally not considered an argument against permanence. Not permanent = intended to be removed or replaced after some period of time. Not because of natural destrution of medium (eg. paper) due to weather conditions. Ankry (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
    @Ankry: For "勞工是..." one, that has an animation/a cartoon-like artwork, so the question should be answered by the author @Solomon203:: Is this artwork really "your own work"? See also COM:CHARACTER. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
    @Solomon203, KOKUYO, Taiwania Justo, Kai3952, Reke, 廣九直通車: is the illustrated advertisement at File:Hsinchu City - panoramio.jpg still exists (or has it already been replaced by another ad)? If replaced (just like most billboard ads), I'm sorry - this should remain delsted until it falls public domain. Most billboard ads are temporal in nature. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
    JWilz12345, I told you guys before that I'm not going to speak about the FOP-Taiwan part because Reke claims that he is more familiar with the policy than I am. You can look at his edits to see how 'claim' he is.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    "勞工是..." is an outdoor political sticker on Section 3, Xinsheng South Road, Da'an District, Taipei City. --Solomon203 (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
    So we can assume it is intended to be shown during an election campain or another temporary action, not permanently. Am I right? Ankry (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry reply so late. In my opinion:
  1. File:多個單位善心捐助高市圖通閱、故事書車_05.jpg is a bookmobile and it may not meet "long-term basis" since it has visited to school sometimes per this article
  2. File:Hsinchu City - panoramio.jpg is a advertising board, which was placed temporary in common sense, thus we can presume it is not meet "long-term basis" FOP requirement.
  3. There is no evidence can demonstrate File:The Art decoration in Chung-Wen Elementary School 01.jpg is in public domain at present and that should be deleted per COM:EVID.
Thank you. SCP-2000 02:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
  • @SCP-2000: Nothing is late while the case is open. However, I think that we need some clarification of your comments.
    (Ad. 1) Why visited to school sometimes is relevant? Do you mean that the car decoration is dedicated per visit (or per few visits) or that Taiwanese FOP does not apply to art placed on vehicles per general? While I doubt the first, I have no opinion about the latter.
    (Ad. 2) Being an advertisement does not contradict being permanent (cf. signboards); that is why I asked for help here: is there any element in the content of the advertisement qualifying it as temporary? The board does not seem to be a displayboard for rent. Note, that removal of an art due to its weather-related destruction or even vandalism, does not contradict permanence. BTW, the copyright notice may mean that COM:CHARACTER applies here.
    (Ad. 3) Why we need an evidence that the art is still present? Do you mean that FoP did not apply at the time when the photo was taken, or something else? Note that permanence is not based on measured time that something was displayed, but on the intention. Even if the wall was destroyed in an accident few minutes after creation, it still can be considered permanent. Ankry (talk) 10:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Then I think that these are very likely permanently "set": File:Mackaystatue.jpg, File:Public art at the junction of Provincial Highway 20 and Provincial Highway 21.jpg and File:The Art decoration in Chung-Wen Elementary School 01.jpg, while others may not, so we can only permanently restore these 3 files. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Android Marshmallow Logo.svg

This logo was included with Android Marshmallow which is avilable under Apache 2.0 licensing as Android Open Source Project. link —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.111.129.153 (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not think we can rely on pages that require login as they cannot be archived. Ankry (talk) 17:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
There is temporary problem with site thats why it is asking for login. Here is today's archive link —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.111.129.153 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support: As avilable under Android Open Source Project. Haideronwiki (talk) 11:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose The licensing page has clear restrictions: “Google's trademarks and other brand features (including the Android new logo 2019.svg stylized typeface logo) are not included in the license.” --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Android Marshmallow Logo neither trademarked by Google nor a brand logo of Google. And this page haven't restrictions for such a logo. Haideronwiki (talk) 11:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
@Haideronwiki: You marked this logo as trademarked: so whose is the trademark if not Google's ? Ankry (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
I wrongly marked it as trademarked logo. I added template to file under it is available. Haideronwiki (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Files under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Hong Kong

All files under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Madame Tussauds Hong Kong:

According to COM:CRT/Hong Kong#Freedom of panorama, FOP applies to premises that are open to the public. Per Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 528) (consolidated version of May 27, 2016), "it is not a copyright infringement to make graphic representations, take photographs, or broadcast the images of buildings, sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if the object is permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public." The CRT page adds, "Because Hong Kong was a territory of the United Kingdom until 1997, Hong Kong law is modeled on UK law, and in the absence of any specific case law to the contrary it is reasonable to assume that the rules will be similar." Various images of British wax figures inside the London branch of Madame Tussauds have been restored because of their FOP provision. Thus it is reasonable to say that Hong Kong FOP applies also to indoors, as a territory that follows British heritage of copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

For a recent restoration request for Madame Tussauds London wax figures, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#File:Ron Mueck head.jpg and Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#File:InSapphoWeTrust - Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts at Madame Tussauds London (8481389580).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
@Wcam: agree or not? At least some were 3D artworks (sculptures and 3D-printed models?!) iirc. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Kizuna AI artwork.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The image was taken from a video source that is licensed under CC Attribution Sharealike 3.0 (File:Kizuna AI 新種のSCPが怖すぎる件【SCP Foundation】.webm), which was confirmed by reviewer User:Techyan in 2020. The video, and by extension the image, was released under this license intentionally by the original author, being Kizuna Ai k.k. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for a decision in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kizuna AI 新種のSCPが怖すぎる件【SCP Foundation】.webm. Ankry (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Bupati Bekas dari Masa ke Masa.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Source: http://portal.bekasikab.go.id:8080/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/d3b366ec-1a19-4eda-9351-1be05e751650/BUPATIDARIMASA.jpg. License {{PD-IDGov}} A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:University of the Philippines (UP) Risesat.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File was collaterally deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SMX Convention Center. However, by the title I assume this doesn't focus on the copyrighted building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: Indeed, not a building. But what does the image present in your opinion?: is this an utilitary object (i.e. the original satelite) or its model? And, if it is the latter, why is it not copyrighted? Ankry (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: I don't know since the image is invisible to me. I'll try to ping @Pandakekok9: who launched that DR. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping JWilz12345. I don't think this satellite model is protected by Philippine copyright. From COM:CRT/Philippines#Works not protected: No protection shall extend to any idea, procedure, system, method or operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data as such, even if they are expressed, explained, illustrated or embodied in a work. So yeah, the inclusion of this file in the DR is a mistake. pandakekok9 03:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
All, it's just a Scale Model - RoyKabanlit (talk) 04:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Hmm, but Philippine copyright law is very similar to U.S. copyright (except for FOP), right? U.S. courts would probably say that this satellite model (is it even a model? The text description seems to imply otherwise) is utilitarian, and therefore not copyrightable. pandakekok9 05:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Although not policy, User:Elcobbola/Models lays out in some detail the copyrightability of models. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion IMO, this copy has certainly a utilitarian purpose, even if it is on a different scale than the original. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
    • I may second to Yann for this. This scale model is more utilitarian than for "aesthetic" purpose (ex. the likes of Las Vegas Statue of Liberty). I cannot see any artistic or creative properties here. Ping @Pandakekok9: for some input. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
      I concur with Yann and you here. pandakekok9 04:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Frances Farrand Dodge: Trees by the river (oil painting)

We own this painting which is currently part of our collection. If we are allowed to enjoy it every day and wish to share such joy with others, does copyright get into it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artemisia5! (talk • contribs) 07:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • Most likely about File:FFD Trees by the river.jpg
  • Painting ownership does not grant anybody to claim painting authorship; we have no evidence that Artemisia5! is Frances Farrand Dodge as claimed at upload
  • Painting ownership is in most cases unrelated to copyright ownership. If copyright has been transferred by the painter to the painting owner in a contract, we need an evidence of this.
  • The painting may be {{PD-US-no notice}} if there is no copyright notice on the painting (both sides); but we need reliable information when and where the painting was initially published (eg. a gallery or auction catalogue or an exhibition where visitors were allowed to make photos). We sometimes consider that publishing date = creation date (which is also not provided - declared 2021 in the description) if there is no evidence that the painting was hidden from the public since creation (eg. in a non-pubic collection) - we have to know more about the painting history in such cases.
  • Note also, that providing false or incorrect information at upload makes other your declarations unreliable - and we need an evidence for them. Ankry (talk) 09:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: no response to above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Gilberto Perin dirigindo A Ferro e Fogo - Tempo de Solidão 2006 - foto Veronica de Giacomo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket: 2020121310008327 looks good. Chico Venancio (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Serra Negra - Mananciais Hídricos.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Uploader is author and retains copyright over the image. Chico Venancio (talk) 09:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Nat, I have to see the images to be sure, but the ticket does seem to have enough. Chico Venancio (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Canonical color matching functions.png

This is a graph I have made myself and the underlying datasets are from, well known, scientific papers. I went through the wizard, so I am surprised that it isn't marked 'own'.Maneesh (talk) 15:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

In fact the upload edit summary says it clearly "Uploaded own work with UploadWizard". I do not understand why this file was deleted.Maneesh (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pop-2020.jpg

created the photo and it was used on multiple sites thereafter; not a copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedman22 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File is currently deleted, wondering the status — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedman22 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedman22 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Freudenberg Bhf. um 1935.jpg

Hallo, Herr Wolfgang Kiessling, der Inhaber des Fotoateliers Kiessling in 97896 Freudenberg/Baden ist einverstanden, dass das Foto unter seinem Namen auf WikiCommons veröffentlicht wird, d.h.:

Urheber=Kiessling

Quelle/Source=Fotoatelier Kiessling, Freudenberg

Unter diesem seinem Namen "Kiessling" war das Foto (aus dem Jahr 1935) im Fotoband "Die Eisenbahn im Main-Tauberkreis" im Frankonia-Verlag Tauberbischofsheim veröffentlicht worden. --W-R-Hesse-Fotos (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo W-R-Hesse-Fotos,
falls der erwähnte Herr Kiessling tatsächlich der Fotograf des Fotos von 1935 (erstaunlich) oder zumindest der Rechteinhaber ist, dann müsste er uns eine Bestätigung der gewählten freien Lizenz senden. Vorbereiten müsstest du die auf Basis dieser Vorlage Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). Falls er kein Email benutzt, du aber mit ihm in Kontakt bist, kannst du die Erklärung auch ausdrucken, ihm zur Unterschrift vorlegen, sie dann einscannen und an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org senden. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Túrelio. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shatru.jpg

Hi,

This image is original photo of Shatru, Indian film actor. Pls refer https://twitter.com/shatruactor?lang=en It is only being tried to put his photo on wikipedia page. Kindly allow the file to be restored.

Rgds — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amshumanths (talk • contribs) 05:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Unambiguous NETCOPYVIO: No evidence of a free licence at source] @Amshumanths: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Peter Cornell.jpg

Please restore. We got permission with Ticket:2021050310008821. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Peter Marggraf (Bildhauer, 1947)

Guten Tag, auf der Seite "Peter Marggraf (Bildhauer, 1947)" wurden viele, aussagekräftige Fotos gelöscht. Ich bin selbst der Künstler und habe wohl beim Hochladen der Bilder meiner eigenen Werke etwas falsch gemacht. Ich bitte Sie, die Löschung rückgängig zu machen und meinen Fehler zu korrigieren. Danke und herzliche Grüße. Peter Marggraf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Marggraf (talk • contribs) 14:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)