Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
العربية • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎magyar • ‎日本語 • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject/headline: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:Image:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch Edit

File:Brasão de Itatira.jpg

Solicito o restauro do arquivo Brasão de Itatira.jpg. A figura é o brasão real do Municipio, é de uso público e não tem direitos autorais conhecidos. Favor verificar em: http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valberto Silva (talk • contribs) 13:20, 26 June 2015‎ (UTC)

A figura é de uso público. Foi recortado de uma figura já existente no site http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/ ou https://www.facebook.com/Prefeituraitatira. Ninguém tem direitos autorais sobre essa figura. Além disso esta no meu álbum particular no flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/59682926@N05/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.6.140.39 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 27 June 2015‎ (UTC)

This request has been sitting around for nearly a month now. Pinging the six admins that we have that are native Portuguese speakers (Beria, Dantadd, Darwinius, Érico Júnior Wouters, Teles and Waldir).
If I understand the request correctly, the uploader claims that the coat of arms in question "is for public use and has no known copyright", but this claim seems to be unsubstantiated. It is possible that {{PD-BrazilGov}} applies, but it would need to be demonstrated that the coat of arms was first published prior to 1983. LX (talk, contribs) 15:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Maldita Ramona.jpg File:Nahiara.jpg

son fotos sacadas por mi y tengo derecho hacer lo que quiera con ellas

(Franco Ramono (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC))

File:Nokia N1 tablet (16928811487).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Images are licensed as cc-by-2.0 and were verified as suitable for use on commons by the Flickr2Commons upload bot.

It seems the user who deleted the files (User:1989) has been blocked for misuse of these tools.

- RaviC (talk) 11:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose These are COM:DW of copyrighted software screens. INeverCry 19:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
That isn't true. The icons are actually from the open source Numix Project (circle theme - see here). The rest is just AOSP. --RaviC (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Umberto Boccioni arciere BS

Ich habe das Foto selbst aufgenommen. Die Rechte gehören mir. --Itabak (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:SuzukaNH01.jpg

This file is deleted as "Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing http://medical.ohmineya.com/national-hospital/?p=659 " but the image in [1] is linked to a thumbnail of File:SuzukaNH01.jpg. This is not copyvio. --KurodaSho (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Win8 infographic final.png

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i would love restoration of this file i know i went here once but the file was not restored if it was actual copyright i would not be here again here is the entire conversation below

i am request restoration of this file and i know it is not a copyright infringement the file came from here http://static.fsf.org/fsforg/graphics/win8_infographic_final.png

i know it is under a free licence Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US)

i have requested undeletion and it has not happened here is the entire undeletion conversation

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC) The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

It looks like it's a "CC BY 3.0 US" image embedded in a "CC BY-ND 3.0" page, in which case the image itself should be OK. --ghouston (talk) if that is the case can you restore the image. or find an administrator who canJonnymoon96 (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please don't start multiple sections concerning the same file. I've moved your second post up here under the existing heading. LX (talk, contribs) 17:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:amauris.jpg

Este es un archivo personal creado por Mi, para la información.

File:Nokia N1 tablet (16948668010) (cropped).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i do not believe these are a copyright violation the person got them from here https://www.flickr.com/photos/pestoverde/16928811487/in/photolist-rPPhPK-ragwhU-rPFexE-rMWzS8-ragw9C-rPGmvY-ragvMf-7Rrvkm

At most it is AOSP with GAPPS and the uploader said they were actually numix icons https://numixproject.org/

i have reviewed this also the numix icons are under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US

the images from flicker are under this license Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Tayforth UOTC Crest.jpeg

Regimental cap badge of Tayforth UOCT, a UOTC unit of the British Army. This logo is ineligible for copyright, alongside all other unit cap badges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cottrill93 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 27 July 2015‎ (UTC)

What year has this badge been created? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Restitución de imagenes

Solicito la restitución de las imágenes abajo relacionadas, ya que las mismas han sido cedidas por la Dirección General de la Guardia Civil Propietaria de los derechos de autor de las mismas. Envió la autorización pertinente (licencia Reconocimiento-compartir igual 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)) a la dirección permissions-es@wikimedia.org.

--Pepeito grillo (talk) 06:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting question.svg Question @Pepeito grillo: Could you please fix the links above, like I did on the first picture? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

DONE Yann --Pepeito grillo (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:OB 0198.jpg File:FP 0065.jpg

Als Neuling verstand ich das Hochladen von Bildern auf Wikimedia bezüglich Lizenzierung nicht. Hatte mehrere Versuche gemacht, scheiterte aber jedesmal. Mittlerweile habe ich die Vorschriften der Lizenzierung mehrmals gelesen, und ich meine jetzt auch zu wissen, was ich machen muss. - Deshalb ersuche ich, die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder OB 0198 und FP 0065 wieder zu aktivieren, damit ich sie ordnungsgemäss in den Text einfügen kann. - Mit bestem Dank, Sofia König (Sofia König (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC))

Ich bitte höflich um Entlöschung der beiden im Betreff genannten Bilder. Als Neuling machte ich beim Hochladen von Bildern auf Wikimedia bezüglich Lizenzierung nur Fehler. Mir war leider nicht klar, weshalb die Nennung des Copyrights in der File-Beschreibung (siehe unten das falsche Beispiel) nicht ausreiche für die Veröffentlichung. Mittlerweile habe ich die Vorschriften der Lizenzierung mehrmals gelesen, und ich meine jetzt auch zu wissen, was ich machen muss. - Deshalb ersuche ich, die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder OB 0198 und FP 0065 freizuschalten, damit ich sie ordnungsgemäss in den Text einfügen kann. - Mit bestem Dank, Sofia König (Sofia König (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC))]]

Hier das falsche Beispiel:

File:FP 0065.jpg
A.M. Jehle: Selbstporträt mit Eierohrringen, n.d., S/W-Fotografie, 4.9 x 4.4 cm, Copyright: Anne Marie Jehle Stiftung, Vaduz

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofia König (talk • contribs) 14:37, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Please don't start multiple sections concerning the same file. I've moved your second post up here under the existing heading. LX (talk, contribs) 14:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:©LIVE1017777777@Panoramio いかなる理由でも画像(写真)使用禁止.JPG

これは私の写真です。 そのため、Wikipedia用にアップロード元のアカウント名を記載しました。 ただし、現在は名前が違います。— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuyaun (talk • contribs) 11:12, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Files uploaded by Dina Panayotis

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: permission from artist: ticket:2015041910013595 Максим Підліснюк (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The ticket is not in English. Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Not sure why I deleted this files back than but likely because I overlooked the comment about the OTRS-ticket or perhaps it was becase it wan't excactly made clear which files are covered and which are not. Perhaps @Ahonc: wants to take a peek? The first question that pops my mind is how the agent validated the artists indentity. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Barbara Baarsma in 2014.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission has been received in ticket:2015072910010921 Mbch331 (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

    • Symbol support vote.svg Support - ticket looks valid. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Urangarilla Wiki Image.jpg

If the image is copy righted, Please remove the image, not the wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.244.50 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

This is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. Wikimedia Commons does not host Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia pages are on Wikipedia. Also, no file by the name File:Urangarilla Wiki Image.jpg has ever existed on Commons. And since you're posting without being logged in and without signing or telling us who you are in any other way, there is no way to tell what files you may have uploaded to Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 13:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:SEGUNDO FESTIVAL.jpg

Solicito la restauración del archivo en representación del festival puesto que es una creación propia de nuestro equipo de imagen corporativa

I request the restoration of the file in representation of the festival since it is an own creation of our equipment of corporate image

--Johanesbc (talk) 12:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Cordialmente ; Director de Calidad FITMO

Image:Lighting McQueen.jpg

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lighting McQueen.jpg. A skilled automotive customiser has taken a drivable vehicle and replaced the standard body panels with customised ones that make the vehicle look like a cartoon character, but the car remains drivable. Image is not a sculpture but a {{Useful-object-US}} (or whichever country the photo was taken): one cannot remove the customised body from these vehicles and leave nothing in its place without affecting the utilitarian aspects of the motorcar, as these body parts are not merely decorative - they protect the mechanical workings of the car from the elements, just like the standard body panels would have. As such, the deletion of the image is erroneous. Furthermore, the image does qualify for fair use on en.WP as w:Eddie Paul discusses this specific group of automotive customisations, including this specific vehicle. Clearly, en.WP should be hosting these images locally instead of here if the result of upload here is that legitimate content which is in active use is disappearing in this manner. Please undelete this to upload it to en.WP directly, fair use for w:Eddie Paul as an encyclopaedia article which discusses the making of this specific three-dimensional article. K7L (talk) 13:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Morena Baccarin na Comic-Con Portugal 2014.jpg

EN→ I think the file should not have been deleted, because it was one of the most recent photo of Morena, and just didn't find any option from the given that correctly identified the non-copyright violation, it doesn't means there isn't one, so I request peacefully that you undelete my picture, thanks...

PT→ Eu acho que o ficheiro não deveria ter sido eliminado, porque era uma das fotos mais recentes da Morena, e lá porque eu não encontrei nenhuma opção das dadas que corretamente identificava a não violação dos direitos de autor, não significa que não há uma, portanto eu peço pacificamente que retornem a minha imagem, obrigado...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Petnog (talk • contribs) 15:06, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Multiple standards being followed. English Wiki page Yakub Memon still contains an image File:Yakub Memon.jpg having the same video snap origin since 2009 and the page is locked from editing. This evidence not enough for restoring the recent File:Yakub Memon.jpg ???? So restore the latest file File:Yakub Memon.jpg that was deleted. JBDVIJASDVI (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:سونقور شهر شکیلی.jpg

Sources added that they had not been identified photos [2]، [3] ، [4]،[5]،[6]،[7]--Amir a57 (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Phillip Rhee photo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photo was provided to me by Mr. Phillip Rhee with express permission to use for Wikipedia. I can forward the email he sent me. If this is not allowed please advise what photo I can use. Bailong88 (talk) 00:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Capricornie.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I made this. It is not copyrighted. AmericanEnki (talk) 04:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Capricornffd.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Its not copyrighted. I made this, please restore. AmericanEnki (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Uncharted Waters Online.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Current publisher OGPlanet has made the file to be used as game logo for Uncharted Waters Online. No copyright issue. Coolwindfm (talk) 06:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done : OGPlanet as the copyright holder has to give permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Zuckerberg.jpg

At Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Zuckerberg.jpg, it looks like this image was deleted because the source page went dry. It seems to be up now at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30054436&id=4&l=ae012 and clearly says "Mark Zuckerberg this photo is released under the creative commons attribution 2.5 license." For obvious reasons, a personally released image of the founder of Facebook is a very valuable image for us to have. --GRuban (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure what the original evidence had, but a source page going dry does not mean a work should be deleted (though it would be best to go through Commons:License review so that the license at the source is confirmed). The current link, if that is indeed the same photo, clearly shows a {{CC-BY-2.5}} license though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We do have File:Zuckerberg cropped.jpg but we may as well have the original photo too (if that is what the file in question is). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Marlon Tábora.JPG

Please help me up to recover the picture I've uploaded; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modant333 (talk • contribs) 15:24‎ and 15:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Paula Parisot.jpeg

A autora Paula Parisot, não é muito conhecida ainda. E existe pouco material sobre ela na internet. Então, ela pediu para criar uma página na Wikipedia, contendo as informações e tudo mais. Porém, preciso que a foto seja incluída novamente, pois não adiantaria nada eu fazer o upload da mesma e vocês deletarem de novo. Não sou uma usuária ativa, pois criei a conta somente para fazer a página dela.

Obrigada Aguardo retorno, --Mizue14 (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Eunhyuk from Acrofan.JPG

I think this deletion is a mistake. There is a lot of files from Acrofan, and none of them were deleted. See:

From the same URL source:

More from "acrofan.com" here.

The file is from the same source, and it was the only deleted.

I hope you can fix it.

JewELFish (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per this: {{acrofan.com}} --Puramyun31 (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Pedro Marcos Volf.jpg

En la imagen aparezco únicamente yo y mi bateria, por favor sugiero que no eliminen cosas sin saber su autenticidad, si requieren mi DNI, se lo mandare sin duda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Pedro Marcos Volf (talk • contribs) 08:53, 1 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Google translation: In the image appear just me and my battery, please do not suggest you remove things without knowing its authenticity, if they require my ID, it is certainly so commands
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: That only confirms the reason it was deleted. It was uploaded solely for use in es:Pedro Marcos Volf/es:Mr.Pedro Marcos Volf, which has been deleted multiple times for being unencyclopædic self-promotion and because the subject does not meet Spanish Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Commons is not a place to advertise. LX (talk, contribs) 09:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Rebel Heart Tour - Billboard in Stockholm.png

  • Español: Vamos a ver, porque esto ya parece una broma pesada… esta imagen cumple los requisitos de Wikipedia, fue extraída de Flirk bajo la licencia correcta, y lo del copyright ese es una tontería… se trata de una imagen de un cartel promocional de la gira de Madonna en las calles de Estocolmo… desde cuando eso es violar los derechos de autor? Si los carteles son promocionales por el amor de dios! Están hechos para esto! Para que la gente lo vea y lo comparta! Por favor, deshacer el borrado, os lo pido por favor, esta imagen no debió ser borrada… por favor…
  • English: Let's see, because it already seems a joke ... this meets the requirements of Wikipedia, was extracted from Flirk under the correct license and copyright that is nonsense ... it is an image of a promotional poster for the tour Madonna on the streets of Stockholm ... since when that is violating copyright? If you are promotional posters for the love of god! They are made for this! For people to see and share! Please undelete, I would ask you please, this should not have been deleted ... please ...


les dejo el link para que vean que no es una imagen que viole ningún tipo de derecho. // I leave the link to see that is not an image that violates any law.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/perolofforsberg/20129956112/

Gracias / Thanks. --SergiSmiler BCN (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


In normal situations, since it is a photograph focusing on a poster, the photograph is a derivative work of the other photograph on the Madonna poster. In that case, we need a license for both the photograph (which Flickr provides) plus a license for the underlying work (which we do not have). Some countries have freedom of panorama, which can allow photographs of public works. For this case, we would have to be able to apply {{FoP-Sweden}}, which states that A work of art may be depicted if it is permanently placed on or at a public place outdoors. Buildings may be freely depicted. The Madonna photo is a work of art, and it is in a public place outdoors. However, the question here is permanently placed, which usually is not true if there is a time where the work is intended to be removed. I'm not sure the poster qualifies for that (see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Posters). While it is true such posters are made to be seen as much as possible, that does not mean something is free -- similar to Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Press_photos, that often does not include permission to make derivative works, use commercially, etc. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Super Junior from Acrofan.jpg

I think this deletion is a mistake. There is a lot of files from Acrofan, and none of them were deleted. See: 1 2 3

Thank you.

JewELFish (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)