Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Current requests[edit]

Shortcut: COM:UDR · COM:UDELC · COM:UNDELC

Request undeletion

Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:

This is a dashboard widget.

Contents

File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png[edit]

As Natuur12 indicated on Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-01#File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png, it was well sourced.

Considering this was a rather poor speedy deletion tag by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 who doesn't understand Dutch and deletion by Jcb, I also request undeletion of everything else in the batch:

If needed, those can go through a regular DR process. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I rechecked several and all of them miss vital source information. E.g. PDF documents with several images in them without any source/authorship information. Jcb (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
No offense but I'm not taking your word on this kind of thing. I've been burned a few too many times on that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I left some notes behind the file names. Most files if not all files have dubious own work claims. Natuur12 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: thanks! Files like File:Emigratie vroeger en nu.jpg seem like they are strictly educational, but the quality (hand-written text, no professional-looking illustrations, as far as I can tell from the Google thumbnail) makes it unlikely to be useful. I wonder where the obvious violations for the PDF documents were taken from? I can't see those at all. Knowing that may aid in finding sources for PD-simple files. File:Aandeel lezers en niet-lezers in een week, bevolking van 13 jaar en ouder, naar enkele achtergrondkenmerken.png was not claimed as own work either, but looking anything up is troublesome for deleted files, so a DR would help. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: I left more notes. Strakhov (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: also thanks! I think it'll take one or more people who understand Dutch and Dutch culture to sort all of these out. I'm willing to go over them in a DR, I think Donald Trung also won't mind. The obvious copyvios Natuur12 identified and Homer could potentially remain deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, most files are just plain garbage and undeleting them would be a waste of resources. The files seem to be part of some middle school project. The copyright violations are low quality teaching material. The non copyright violations are CBR graphs or self created drawings. While the deletion reason for most files is faulty there's little point in undeleting them. (CBS graps exlcuded). Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: I'd be okay with undeletion of the CBS graphs and leaving everything else. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

File:JANDI DAVID (1893-1944).jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sabnic Artist as stated in the file name died in 1944. Been public domain in Hungary since 2015. Abzeronow (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is upper-left image from this site. While it is likely to be PD in Hungary, we cannot be sure as we know nothing about the painting history (if it was published first time less than 25 years ago, it may be copyrighted in EU, including Hungary). Also, we know nothing about its US copyright status. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Ankry (talk) 10:05, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Yeah, I can't find any info on that particular painting from a web search. It looks like it could have been published in the 1920s (1930s also possible). Or it could have been unpublished, which could mean some issue with publication right in the EU but now public domain in the US due to author death date. Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info I am waiting for another admin opinion before final decission here. Ankry (talk) 06:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Unjustified nominations by User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2[edit]

I made some review of images recenly nominated by this user and found many that are doubtful IMO. While the most appropriate license templates might be different, they were not totally incorrect, and I found requesting OTRS permission here as an incorrect action that totally misleads uploaders.

  • Old PD book scans:
    • a 1889/1908 books by
Taras Shevchenko  (1814–1861) Blue pencil.svg wikidata:Q134958 s:en:Author:Taras Hryhorovych Shevchenko q:en:Taras Shevchenko
Taras Shevchenko
Alternative names Tarass Chevtchenko
Description Ukrainian poet and painter
Date of birth/death 9 March 1814 (25 February 1814 in Julian calendar) 10 March 1861 (26 February 1861 in Julian calendar)
Location of birth/death Moryntsi Saint Petersburg
Authority control
creator QS:P170,Q134958
  • a 1858 photo (likely from a 1858 book):
  • photos of a 1912 medal:
  • photos of a 1713 medal:
  • photos of a 1761 medal:
  • photos of a 1838 medal:
  • photos of a 1902 medal:
  • photos of a 1821 medal:
  • a non-copyrightable cover:

The photos seem to be amateur, non-professional, with EXIF. @Jcb: if you see any reasons to doubt these images to be PD, please elaborate. While some images of this uploader are clear copyvios, many of the above are not even copyrightable. IMO, the PD/copyvio ratio among deletion nominations here is too high. Ankry (talk) 11:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

You will normally see that such a file is uploaded by a user uploading e.g. 90% blatant copyright violations. (I checked some of the above, were this turned out to be the case). If a user uploads a batch of copyright violations, most admins here just flush the batch, without carefully examining file by file to see if one or two files can be saved. I think this is totally justified as pragmatic use of our limited volunteer resources. If it turns out that some can be undeleted, no problem. Jcb (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: I know that this is common practice, and my reservations concerned rather initial nominations than final deletions. But let's focus on these particular files, which IMO are either just PD (regardles of their origin) or cases where there is no clear doubts whether they are own works of the uploader. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No evidence that these files are copyright violations. Yann (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Just curious – how may “П'ЯТА СЕСІЯ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ РАДИ. 1962. На чужині.jpg” be {{PD-UAGovDoc}}? Is Ankry serious about Ukrainian jurisdiction extending to that event? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: No idea. IMHO it does qualify for PD-Text, though. Strakhov (talk) ~
I think I found somewhere the information that it applies also to Ukrainian SSR law; but maybe indeed my mistake. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

I was recently contacted by Albinfo regarding an upload by Cunolf who is his mentee in German Wikipedia's "adopt-a-user" program. Apparently, although with a somewhat problematic upload history, Cunolf is among those affected by questionable "no permission" tagging by this user. Specifically, this is about File:14 Kundelfingerhof um 2000.png. It's apparently a self-scanned older photograph from a slightly crumpled original in an album (even the photo corners are visible). Cunolf's "own work" declaration therefore seems plausible enough for such a 2000 photograph (it's not unusual to have own older photographic prints and to scan them now) - at least plausible enough for a regular deletion request, it seems to me. Pinging Ellin Beltz who deleted that image, what do you think? Undelete it and convert to DR, would you agree? Gestumblindi (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Gestumblindi: how does this affect undeletion process of the above mentioned images? If you wish to undelete another image, create a separate request. Ankry (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: I added it here because it is another case of the nominations by User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, so I thought this is the most fitting place. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Gestumblindi: If you are not asking for undeletion nor expressing an opinion about undeletion then it is not. Ankry (talk) 08:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, personally I would undelete (and I agree with you regarding the other files), but I would like to hear Ellin Beltz' opinion first. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Gestumblindi Restored file, sent to DN per your request, please see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:14_Kundelfingerhof_um_2000.png. I did not look at any other image in this list, and have no current opinion other than I agree with Jcb as above. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Roza-Shanina profile.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Roza-Shanina profile.jpg circa 1944 photograph. Could be {{PD-Russia}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per {{PD-Russia}} (anonymous photo). Ankry (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Reposição de ficheiros de João Justiceiro (2)[edit]

Dando prosseguimento aos pedidos de reposição por partes, solicito o restauro destes arquivos, sinalizados como "violação de direitos autorais":

São mapas de minha autoria derivados de trabalhos já existentes no Commons (os originais estão na descrição). O último é um mapa retirado da web com a devida referência.

João Justiceiro (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: can you shed some --MB-one (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)light on this?

The maps come from non-free sources, e.g. here. Jcb (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: Por favor, pare de ficar distorcendo as coisas. O mapa original (do exemplo que você citou) é este, e inclusive está citado no mesmo arquivo como eu já disse ali em cima. Obviamente, para fazer o desenho tem que ter a fonte, que é esse link que você colocou. João Justiceiro (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Jmabel, você deu uma ajuda da última vez. Poderia faze-lo de novo, se possível? João Justiceiro (talk) 04:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I'm confused. None of these much resemble http://especiais.g1.globo.com/mg/minas-gerais/eleicoes/2018/apuracao-estado-governador/1-turno/, which you link. For which map are you saying that is a source? I'm guessing File:Mapa da Eleição estadual em Minas Gerais em 2018 por município (2.º turno).svg since it is the only map of Minas Gerais among those listed above. Obviously, any district-by-district outline map of Minas Gerais is going to have some close resemblance, but I don't see anything to suggest that particular map was its source. Could you be more specific? The uploaded file was described as deriving from File:Brazil Minas Gerais location map.svg, which might need more explicit attribution of authorship than was given, but which is certainly free-licensed. Do you have some basis to say that in fact it derived from the globo.com file rather than the one that was attributed? - Jmabel ! talk 05:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: pinging you again, hoping to get a response. - Jmabel ! talk 23:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
It was linked in one of these files. Jcb (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion if no clear copyvio evidence concerning any of the above maps. Ankry (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support ditto to Ankry. - Jmabel ! talk 21:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Wittstock.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Wittstock.jpg

I think Commons applies PD-Art worldwide now, correct? Abzeronow (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Image description page says this is from 2007. No information about who the painter is. Thuresson (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The painting is certainly contemporary from the 30 Years War. The style and arrangement also reminds me of Pieter Snayers, but I'm not an expert. De728631 (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No information about author or date of first publication. ”Made in 17th century style” is not a license. Thuresson (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

File:РумянцевЕВ.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Good afternoon, we changed the site, now on it: CC BY-ND 4.0 https://ivgpu.com/ Iseewb (talk) 10:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Iseewb: Non-derivatives license is not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. However, I see another license info on the above-mentioned page. Is it your mistake or there is a non-intended license declaration there? Ankry (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Good afternoon, we changed the license to meet the requirements, we are trying to do everything so that our materials are not deleted!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iseewb (talk • contribs) 07:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support then. Ankry (talk) 07:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Treintañeras Cañeras.jpg[edit]

I own every right to use this picture as I please since it's my band lol --WikiCMDW (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The right "to use" is not enugh to publish a photo in Wikimedia Commons nor it allows to claim autorship. Ankry (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

How can you determine who the author is? --WikiCMDW (talk) 07:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Who took the photo? That's the author. - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Ourselves, as stated when uploading it --WikiCMDW (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't look like a selfie. Appears to require OTRS permission. Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

{{OTRS pending}}--WikiCMDW (talk) 22:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

And this is the right way, IMO. Let OTRS people handle this photo and the one previously uploaded here. Nothing to do but to wait. Ankry (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:HoM Kestutis.webp[edit]

This is the photo of the Head of EU Advisory Mission (EUAM) Ukraine posted on EUAM web-site. And this is where this photo first appeared - http://www.euam-ukraine.eu/our-team/head-of-mission/. Please undelete it and allow using

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Euamppid (talk • contribs) 06:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not see a free license there nor information that User:Euamppid is the photographer. Ankry (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Euamppid is a collective account registered on the EUAM Ukraine's PPID (Press & Public Information Department). And we are developing a Wiki page dedicated to EUAM. using photos from our web-site only. Please undelete.--Euamppid (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

First, anybody can say that; we have no evidence that any web-based action taken by this account can be considered a legal contract signed by the organization and that it would be considered such by a Ukrainian and/or US court in case of dispute.
Second, an organization cannot grant that they "personally created the entire original image". Creator is always a human, or a team of humans, not an organization. So any use of {{own}} template by this account should be considered invalid and trigger a DR. Ankry (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
@Euamppid: Please contact OTRS so they can verify you are who you say you are. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you :@Alexis Jazz: I've emailed OTRS. let's see what they say. It's the first time I'm doing this. I did create pages in the past, but the process back then was far less complicated than this time around.--Euamppid (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Alcoholika_La_Christo.jpg[edit]

Hi,

I would like to ask you for undelete File:Alcoholika_La_Christo.jpg because I am the owner of the file also I am in the picture and I have the rights for the use of the image, please do not delete this file.

Best Regards

Victor Paredes

Sixundersix (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Sixundersix: Right "to use" is not enogh. You need to be the exclusive copyright holder in order to license the photo. I see nothing about your rights on this page. Nor about free license. Ankry (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ankry:Well this is my oficial site on facebook : https://facebook.com/alcoholika/ Im the owner of the image you can see https://facebook.com/vitoparedes also. Sixundersix (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

We cannot verify this on-wiki. Also, if you are not the photographer, we need an evidence that you own copyright. I suggest contact COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Schauffele Molly young.jpg[edit]

Dear Wikimedia Commons: Please note that I am the grandson of Richard Schauffele. Photos relating to Richard Schauffele are historical photos in the ownership of our family and have been published with permission by the family in the past 50 to 100 years. They are indisputably in the public realm. Sincerely, Stefan Schauffele (stefantast)--Stefantast (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Stefantast: Ownership of photos is unrelated to copyright that belongs to authors until expired or transferred in a contract. Are you the photographer as you claimed during upload? If not, who is? Unpublished photos of unknown photographers are copyrighted in US 120 years since creation. And we cannot store photos with unclear copyright status due to COM:PCP. Ankry (talk) 04:59, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Designer Phuong My.jpg[edit]

The file is Wiki Commons CC0 Waiver and can public on the sites.Fashion Asian (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Take note that the current backlog for OTRS is 181 days, OTRS depends completely on volunteers, who work as hard as they can.
"© PHUONG MY Design Company" is not a free license declaration. Ankry (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Phuong My flagship store.jpg[edit]

The photo is aFashion Asian (talk) 06:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC) usable media files to which anyone can contribute

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above: no free license at the source page. Ankry (talk) 07:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:PHUONG MY logo.jpg[edit]

The file photo Fashion Asian (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)can use in public

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above: no free license at the source page. Ankry (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Barehand Knitting - Bird Pinch.gif[edit]

The image file: Barehand Knitting-Bird Pinch.gif is a scan of an illustration by Elizabeth Auer who is illustrator of this this original artwork and provided it to me, Aleshanee Akin, with permission by Elizabeth Auer as of 5/10/2019 to use it for this Wikipedia page on Barehand Knitting. Feel free to cotact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com if you have any further questions.

--Aleshaneeakin (talk) 17:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 01/25/2019

Did she also suggest you that you should declare yourself as the author of the image? We need a written free license permission from the author in order to restore the image. The procedure is described in COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Egidio De Maulo.jpg[edit]

Questa tela di mio bisnonno che ho ereditato con altri lavori da Lui eseguiti, tela fu’ fatta nel 1861 e si trova anche in altri della sua citta materna Giulianova (TE)

grazie

Roberto Cani De Maulo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanrome (talk • contribs) 17:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support The painter died in 1904, clearly PD. Ankry (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Blue Ball.jpg[edit]

The image file:Blue Ball.jpg is an original photograph taken by me, Aleshanee Akin on December 14th, 2016 of a knitted object created by me, Aleshanee Akin as an example of barehand knitted artwork. For further information contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com

--Aleshaneeakin (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019

File:Barehand Knitting - Coyote Pinch.gif[edit]

The image file:Barehand Knitting - Coyote Pinch.gif is a scan of an illustration by Elizabeth Auer who is illustrator of this this original artwork and provided it to me, Aleshanee Akin, with permission by Elizabeth Auer as of 5/10/2019 to use it for this Wikipedia page on Barehand Knitting and specifically for Barehand Knitting. Feel free to contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com if you have any further questions. --Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019

File:2. Thumb to Middle finger--Fox Pinch.gif[edit]

The image File:2. Thumb to Middle finger--Fox Pinch.gif is a scan of an illustration by Elizabeth Auer who is illustrator of this this original artwork and provided it to me, Aleshanee Akin, with permission by Elizabeth Auer as of 5/10/2019 to use it for this Wikipedia page on Barehand Knitting and specifically for Barehand Knitting. Feel free to contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com if you have any further questions. --Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019

File:4. Thumb to Pinky-- Peacock Pinch.gif[edit]

The image File:4. Thumb to Pinky-- Peacock Pinch.gif is a scan of an illustration by Elizabeth Auer who is illustrator of this this original artwork and provided it to me, Aleshanee Akin, with permission by Elizabeth Auer as of 5/10/2019 to use it for this Wikipedia page on Barehand Knitting and specifically for Barehand Knitting. Feel free to contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com if you have any further questions. --Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019

File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-6.jpg[edit]

The image File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-6.jpg is an original photograph taken by me, Aleshanee Akin on February 13th, 2017 of a knitted object created by me, Aleshanee Akin as an example of barehand knitted artwork. For further information contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com --Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee AKin 05/25/2019

File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-2.jpg[edit]

The File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-2.jpg is an original photograph taken by me, Aleshanee Akin on December 14th, 2016 of a knitted object created by me, Aleshanee Akin as an example of barehand knitted artwork. For further information contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com 

--Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 05/25/2019

File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-2.jpg[edit]

The image File:Barehand Knitting - IMG-2.jpg is an original photograph taken by me, Aleshanee Akin on December 14th, 2016 of a knitted object created by me, Aleshanee Akin as an example of barehand knitted artwork. For further information contact me at aleshaneeakin@gmail.com --Aleshaneeakin (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Aleshanee Akin 5/25/2019

@Aleshaneeakin: it is up to the uploader to provide a free license evidence in the way that it can be verified by any of milions Wikimedia Commons users at any time (even in 70 years). If you can't do it on public COM:OTRS is the only way. Making multiple requests without providing information where the license is, is pointless. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Fullsizeoutput 1f1c.jpg[edit]

This file has been deleted today. Someone claims "Copyright Elite Prospects 1999-2019". I can't see the file now, but as far as I know it is a picture of Alex Ek and Markus Palmberg together. It's part of a bigger picture I took last fall. It was uploaded to the Internet for the first time today. If you compare time, place and camera with my other pictures, you can see that the photo is taken at the same time and place as my other hockey pictures. I also have the original larger photo if anyone wants to compare. I have searched with Google and the images that came up is not possible to confused with mine. Elite Prospects has no picture of Alex Ek and on the pictures of Marcus Palmberg he is dressed in other team uniforms. I don't even understand why the file was nominated for deletion. Please restore the file. No one except me has the rights to this image. / Machatjkala (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Ping @Túrelio: Thuresson (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket#2019042310009343[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019042310009343 regarding File:Justice Thomas Walther.jpg and File:Thomas Walter Max Eisen and Eli Rubenstein.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Done Ezarateesteban 22:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: by User:Ezarate. --4nn1l2 (talk) 09:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lighthouse Point.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019042310000931 regarding File:Lighthouse Point.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes:. Ankry (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Udit Narayan in 2018.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019010910008153 regarding File:Udit Narayan in 2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes:. Ankry (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Angelika Augusta Diamond at the Union of Excellence Event in Cap Estel.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019011010008043 regarding File:Angelika Augusta Diamond at the Union of Excellence Event in Cap Estel.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: Please go ahead and process the ticket. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Schwäbisch Gmünd, Archiv der Münsterpfarrei Bestand 1 X 3 Nr. 51.pdf[edit]

This is a scan of a manuscript with a chronicle of the city of Schwäbisch Gmünd (“Rauchbeinchronik”), created c. 1600. This has been scanned and uploaded by the David Schnur, head of the city archives (see here). The file description refered to

Graf, Klaus: Gmünder Chroniken im 16. Jahrhundert. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichtsschreibung der Reichsstadt Schwäbisch Gmünd, Schwäbisch Gmünd 1984, S. 235f.

which provides a more detailed description. This is obviously {{PD-old-100}} as it was created more than four centuries ago and ought to be undeleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

I've undeleted the file and done David Schnur's work for him. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Scans from a 15th-century court record from Schwäbisch Gmünd[edit]

The following two files were deleted in the context of this deletion request:

Both are photos of the front and rear of a court record dating from 15 March 1483. The file description provided following citation:

Regest nach NITSCH, Alfons (Bearb.): Das Spitalarchiv zum Heiligen Geist in Schwäbisch Gmünd. Inventar der Urkunden, Akten und Bände (Inventare der nichtstaatlichen Archive in Baden-Württemberg 9), Karlsruhe 1965, Nr. 584, S. 106f.: Vogt und Richter des Gerichts zu Ruppertshofen in der Waibelhub verhandeln über die Klage des Christian Zech zu Durlangen (Durnungen), dessen Fürsprecher Lienhard Mangolt ist, gegen Hans Hartmann, Klaus Hartmanns Sohn daselbst. Der Beklagte, der auf des Klägers Acker genannt Bruckacker eine Eiche umgehauen hat, erklärt durch seinen Fürsprecher Lienhard Kißling, er habe dies getan, als dieser Acker noch seinem Vater gehörte. Das Gericht entscheidet, daß der Beklagte dem Kläger eine Entschädigung zahlen soll. Siegler: Peter Schönleber, öff. Notar

Fortunately, a scan of the cited reference is accessible under a free license. This court record is more than five centuries old and thereby {{PD-old-100}} applies for the depicted work. This ought to be undeleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Undeleted. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Praha Mala Strana Saska 3 Muzeum Karla Zemana kulisa.jpg[edit]

It is a photo of someone else's picture, however, it was shot in a freely accessible public space, therefore I believe it falls under the Freedom of panorama, in the same way as public sculptures, street art and public advertising. JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@JiriMatejicek: Is it a work permanently located on a square, in a street, in a park, on a public route? It does not look so. Ankry (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:پوستر فیلم دگال.jpg[edit]

با سلام خدمت شما این پوستر فیلم دگال هست ساخته ندا کیایی یک فیلم کوتاه که امسال ساخته شده و برای جشنواره ها ارسال شده این پوستر فیلم هست که طراحی اون بر عهده ندا کیایی بوده حق انتشار داره برای استفاده در صفحه ندا کیایی تعبیه شده که بنا هست ایجاد بشه لطفا حدف نکنید چون برای معرفی فیلم این پوستر منبع هست و لازمه متششکرمNedkiaei (talk) 08:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

@Nedkiaei: سلام. کپی‌رایت پوستر متعلق به طراح آن (یا شاید تهیه‌کنندهٔ فیلم) است. لطفاً از ایشان بخواهید با permissions-commons@wikimedia.org تماس بگیرند و طبق COM:OTRS/fa آن را با مجوز آزاد منتشر کنند. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Shaheer & erica 20190526 000701.jpg Re-upload the picture[edit]

How this picture is inappropriate for Wikipedia page but not my picture. This is a screenshot from a video and I already mentioned original video link. Please don't delete this. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sriti_jha.png#mw-jump-to-license

How this kind of picture free to use but not my picture?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ABTHEBOSS (talk • contribs) 10:13, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
@ABTHEBOSS: There is no evidence of {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}-compatible license at the source site (or if it is, point me out where), so the license you declared is unjustified. We need a written free license declaration from the video copyright owner concerning either the whole video or this particular screenshot in order to store it in Wikimedia Commons under the mentioned license. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose undeletion without this. Standard YT license does not allow DW to be CC-BY-SA-licensed. Ankry (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)