Commons:Valued image candidates/Angels at the St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Angels at the St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin

promoted to Valued image set: Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin

Angels created by sculptor Josef Limburg (1874-1955) for the St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin.

Nominated by Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2012-03-01 08:25 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Actually they are two statues, aren't they! Well, this is a good example of set presentation containing photos of one and the same style which is big advantage. The types of the images included are also good: one informative general view of the situation + quality close-ups of each of the objects. So the set is ready for promotion but I have remarks. First of all of course, it is the scope name. It should be clear that the Angels are statues (sculpture work) and their place in case that there are other Angels statues by Limburg (who knows). I think good name is «Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery» that's enough, imo. Alas, the second remark concerns the notability. I would like to read other opinions. There are many statues in every town in the world - in the parks, in the cemeteries, on the streets and squares, statues as building attachments... So, should we create sets for all of them? You know, as I said above, the set is well completed but... Josef Limburg has no article even in the German wiki. OK? I'm almost ready to support but at the same time I wonder about it.--MrPanyGoff 09:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree totally. Now there is an article on de:Josef Limburg in the german WP. He deserved it urgently. Regards and many thanks for the review --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think that it meets the criteria.--MrPanyGoff 19:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- MrPanyGoff 15:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)