Commons:Valued image candidates/Burgruine Hauenstein in Seis von Norden.jpg

Burgruine Hauenstein in Seis von Norden.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2013-03-12 07:44 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Castle Hauenstein, Seis, Süd Tyrol (exterior)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC) But scope is unusual. Instead of prefix Overview, postfix (exterior) is comm. If needed for this ruin at all. --Ikar.us (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC) I agree, the scope could be simply "Castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis". This image would satisfy it as well. --Myrabella (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)  Oppose Till scope is fixed.  B.p. 21:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)  Info Changed scope wording --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC) ---- Scope changed from Overview of the castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis to The castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis --Myrabella (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC) on behalf of the nonimator Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support Good scope now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC)  Support (new scope, new vote) --JLPC (talk) 07:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Please standardize scope.  B.p. 13:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Agree with B.P.--Jebulon (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)  Done--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC) ---- Scope changed from The castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis to The castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis, exterior --Myrabella (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC) on behalf of the nonimator Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". ,  Support Good scope too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment IMO, the good scope should be: Castle Hauenstein, Seis, Süd Tyrol, (exterior). That's what and how we do usually. And I think that the "exterior" is not really necessary.--Jebulon (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)  Done hope an end comes soon --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC) ---- Scope changed from The castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis, exterior to Castle Hauenstein, Seis, Süd Tyrol (exterior)--Myrabella (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC) on behalf of the nonimator {{{3}}} Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support New scope, new vote --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment I added the appropriate "scope changed" templates and allowed myself to sligthly adapt the latest scope wording on behalf of Moroder, according to Jebulon's suggestion. However I wonder what could be a valuable image for the interior scope of such a ruin. Here are two previous examples of VIs for castle ruins with simpler scopes, without (exterior) extension: Commons:Valued image candidates/Urquhart Castle distance 2.jpg and Commons:Valued image candidates/Zamek w Mirowie 12.08.08 p4-k.jpg. --Myrabella (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Fully agree with Myrabella. Thanks to her.--Jebulon (talk) 12:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Per Myrabella too. --JLPC (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Agree with her and thus  Neutral. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)