The fact is I didn't manage to find one picture meeting the specifications to be a decent competitor: full view, in the wild, geo-referenced (or easy to geotag). And being a male, too :-). I've noticed: 1 (but legs hidden and no precise location); 2 (but feet cut, poor quality); 3 (but in a park and against the light); 4 (could be roughly geocoded I guess but sub-species with peculiar patches. So, the last thing I have to say is: Support ! --Myrabella (talk) 21:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
