Commons:Valued image candidates/Lotus cytisoides.jpg

Lotus cytisoides.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Lycaon (talk) on 2009-03-17 09:29 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil)
Used in	Global usage ca:Llista de plantes de Catalunya, es:Parque Natural del Delta del Ebro
Review (criteria)	Support OK for me. I made a slight modification in the scope format. --Eusebius (talk) 08:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Hmmm... According to COM:VISC I would say we should stick to a species scope as the plant is not of sufficient notability to warrant a subscope (flowers) - and speaking of which I am honestly in doubt if this or its other version in the species cat us the best illustration of the species. --Slaunger (talk) 23:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Vote cancelled after scope change. --Slaunger (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC) A discussion of "When are species subscopes warranted?" (my words) was moved to Commons talk:Valued image scope[1] Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Scope changed from Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil), flowers to Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil) Lycaon (talk) 10:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Question I'm inclined to support File:Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg because it shows the leaves as well as the flowers. The leaves seem to help distinguish it from Lotus creticus. Why do you think this one is more valuable? Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)  Neutral I echo Walters question, this one does not seem like a clear winner to me, so I am opening an MVR. --Slaunger (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Lotus cytisoides.jpg: 0 3. Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: +1 => File:Lotus cytisoides.jpg: Declined. File:Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)