Commons:Valued image candidates/The Four Evangelists in Les Grandes Heures d Anne de Bretagne

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

The Four Evangelists in Les Grandes Heures d Anne de Bretagne

promoted to Valued image set: The Four Evangelists in ''Les Grandes Heures d'Anne de Bretagne''

The miniatures of the Four Evangelists in Les Grandes Heures d'Anne de Bretagne

Nominated by Jebulon (talk) on 2013-02-08 17:05 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
The Four Evangelists in Les Grandes Heures d'Anne de Bretagne.
From the Bibliothèque nationale de France, a series of very delicate miniatures by Jean Bourdichon, dated 1503-1508, showing the Four Evangelists. Uploaded, stitched, and restored by me. Very high resolution, please take time for details. Studio shot, no geocode needed. Whole manuscript to be seen here.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful and useful set. I would rather present the files in the standard order of the canonical gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. --Myrabella (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Thank you, ✓ Done, you are right, even if the "Livre d'Heures" begins with John's Gospel...--Jebulon (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Great work, but the scope is not linked to a category but rather a gallery. Please create the appropriate scope in Wikimedia Categories. Without this the VISC can not be promoted. Thanks -Godot13 (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for compliment, but a gallery is a fully appropriate scope. Some times ago, it was even highly recommended to link pictures or sets to a gallery rather than to a category, because of many reasons, among them because the VI tag appears automatically after promotions on pictures in galleries, and not in Categories. Previous discussions we had here about this are interesting. Sorry, but I'll change only if a promotion is technically impossible.--Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
      • You know these thing far better than me ;-) I can try and process the VIS, but the templates are looking for specific categories and the VIS tags for each image will, I suspect, have red-lettered sections. I will try, and let you know. - Godot13 (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I'll change if any problem.--Jebulon (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)