Commons:Visszaállítási kérések

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 42% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
العربية • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎magyar • ‎日本語 • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted[edit]

Először is nézd meg a törlési naplót, hogy miért törölték a fájlt. Ha a Commonson a képhez találsz egy piros linket, és arra kattintasz, akkor megnyílik egy szerkesztési ablak, de a baloldali navigációs menü Mi hivatkozik erre pontjából utánajárhatsz, hogy hol említették meg a fájlt (például egy törlési vitában). Másodsorban pedig olvasd el a Commons feltételeit, a licencfeltételeket és a törlési irányelveket.

Ha a törlésre adott indoklás nem érthető, vagy ha nem értesz vele egyet, akkor felveheted a kapcsolatot a képet törlő adminisztrátorral. Magyarázatot kérhetsz tõle vagy akár új bizonyítékot is benyújthatsz be a törlés indoka ellen. Felveheted továbbá a kapcsolatot egy másik adminisztrátorral is – a magyarul beszélő adminisztrátorok ebben a listában vannak. Ha a törlés hibás volt, akkor a fájlt visszaállítják.

Fellebbezés[edit]

Ha a törlés a jelenlegi Commons feltételek és licencfeltételek szerint indokolt volt, akkor az adott feltétel vitalapján emelhetsz panaszt a feltétel ellen.

Ha úgy gondolod, hogy a kép nem sértette a szerzői jogokat és a Commons feltételeinek is megfelel:

  • Először a vitát lezáró adminnal lenne érdemes kapcsolatba lépni. Megkérheted, hogy a bővebben fejtse ki az indoklását, vagy hogy mutasson be bizonyítékokat.
  • Ha nem szeretnél senkivel se közvetlenül kapcsolatba lépni, vagy ha egy adminisztrátor megtagadta a visszaállítást, esetleg több embert szeretnél bevonni a vitába, akkor a lentiek szerint ezen az oldalon kérvényezheted a visszaállítást.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Átmeneti visszaállítás Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion[edit]

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project[edit]

A fair use elvet engedélyező projektek felhasználói kérvényezhetnek egy két napos átmeneti visszaállítást, hogy a letörölt fájlt átvihessék a saját projektjükbe. A szerkesztőnek meg kell mondania, hogy melyik projektbe szeretné a fájlt átvinni, és be kell linkelni az adott projekt fair use állásfoglalását. A magyar Wikipédia nem fogad be fair use fájlokat. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Új kérés beadása[edit]

Kattints ide, és megnyílik az az oldal, ahova a visszaállítási kérésedet írhatod be. Ugyanezt kézzel is megcsinálhatod, ha a mai dátum melletti "szerkesztés" hivatkozásra bököl. A kérésedet a lap aljára írd be, és ne feledkezz meg az alábbiakról:

  • A Subject/headline: mezőbe írj be egy megfelelő témát. Ha csak egyetlen egy fájl visszaállítását kéred, akkor melegen ajánlott az [[:Image:TöröltFájl.jpg]]. (Ne feledkezz meg az első kettőspontról, az hivatkozik a képre.)
  • Sorold fel a fájlt vagy fájlokat amire a visszaállítási kérésed vonatkozik, és mindegyik képhez adj meg egy hivatkozást (lásd feljebb). Ha nem emlékszel a fájl nevére, akkor a lehető legtöbb mindent adj meg. Ha egy kérésből nem derül ki, hogy mit is kellene visszaállítani, akkor az a kérés nagyon hamar archiválásra kerülhet.
  • Sorold fel indokaidat a visszaállításra.
  • Írd alá a kérésedet négy hullámvonallal(~~~~). Ha a Commonsban van felhasználói fiókod, akkor jelentkezz be. Ha te töltötted fel a képet, akkor így az adminok sokkal hamarabb megtalálják.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below.

Archives[edit]

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Nyitott visszaállítási kérések[edit]

Watch Edit

File:Brasão de Itatira.jpg[edit]

Solicito o restauro do arquivo Brasão de Itatira.jpg. A figura é o brasão real do Municipio, é de uso público e não tem direitos autorais conhecidos. Favor verificar em: http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valberto Silva (talk • contribs) 13:20, 26 June 2015‎ (UTC)

A figura é de uso público. Foi recortado de uma figura já existente no site http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/ ou https://www.facebook.com/Prefeituraitatira. Ninguém tem direitos autorais sobre essa figura. Além disso esta no meu álbum particular no flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/59682926@N05/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.6.140.39 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 27 June 2015‎ (UTC)

This request has been sitting around for nearly a month now. Pinging the six admins that we have that are native Portuguese speakers (Beria, Dantadd, Darwinius, Érico Júnior Wouters, Teles and Waldir).
If I understand the request correctly, the uploader claims that the coat of arms in question "is for public use and has no known copyright", but this claim seems to be unsubstantiated. It is possible that {{PD-BrazilGov}} applies, but it would need to be demonstrated that the coat of arms was first published prior to 1983. LX (talk, contribs) 15:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Maldita Ramona.jpg File:Nahiara.jpg[edit]

son fotos sacadas por mi y tengo derecho hacer lo que quiera con ellas

(Franco Ramono (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC))

File:Nokia N1 tablet (16928811487).jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Images are licensed as cc-by-2.0 and were verified as suitable for use on commons by the Flickr2Commons upload bot.

It seems the user who deleted the files (User:1989) has been blocked for misuse of these tools.

- RaviC (talk) 11:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose These are COM:DW of copyrighted software screens. INeverCry 19:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
That isn't true. The icons are actually from the open source Numix Project (circle theme - see here). The rest is just AOSP. --RaviC (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Umberto Boccioni arciere BS[edit]

Ich habe das Foto selbst aufgenommen. Die Rechte gehören mir. --Itabak (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:SuzukaNH01.jpg[edit]

This file is deleted as "Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing http://medical.ohmineya.com/national-hospital/?p=659 " but the image in [1] is linked to a thumbnail of File:SuzukaNH01.jpg. This is not copyvio. --KurodaSho (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Win8 infographic final.png[edit]

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i would love restoration of this file i know i went here once but the file was not restored if it was actual copyright i would not be here again here is the entire conversation below

i am request restoration of this file and i know it is not a copyright infringement the file came from here http://static.fsf.org/fsforg/graphics/win8_infographic_final.png

i know it is under a free licence Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US)

i have requested undeletion and it has not happened here is the entire undeletion conversation

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC) The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

It looks like it's a "CC BY 3.0 US" image embedded in a "CC BY-ND 3.0" page, in which case the image itself should be OK. --ghouston (talk) if that is the case can you restore the image. or find an administrator who canJonnymoon96 (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please don't start multiple sections concerning the same file. I've moved your second post up here under the existing heading. LX (talk, contribs) 17:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:amauris.jpg[edit]

Este es un archivo personal creado por Mi, para la información.

File:Nokia N1 tablet (16948668010) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i do not believe these are a copyright violation the person got them from here https://www.flickr.com/photos/pestoverde/16928811487/in/photolist-rPPhPK-ragwhU-rPFexE-rMWzS8-ragw9C-rPGmvY-ragvMf-7Rrvkm

At most it is AOSP with GAPPS and the uploader said they were actually numix icons https://numixproject.org/

i have reviewed this also the numix icons are under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US

the images from flicker are under this license Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

File:General Satyawant Mallana Srinagesh.jpg and others[edit]

The Image was property of Government of India and was released officially by Press Information Bureau of India and it provides free license to use that was media published by them .Please View the Copyright Policy Copyright policy of Press Information Bureau of India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • contribs) 05:48, 25 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. There is absolutely no mention of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license on that page, contrary to what you claimed. And the terms that are listed on the page are not at all compatible with that license or any other free license. It's been established multiple times that those terms are non-free. LX (talk, contribs) 07:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I asked for more information at [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
It's at least close to an acceptable license. The usual question is if the "reproduce accurately" parts strictly related to moral rights (the wording seems to indicate that), or do they really mean to prevent derivative works altogether. They may well be trying to follow the lead of some other governments (UK, Australia) recently to try to license stuff more freely, but that license is just vague enough to make it arguable that it's not "free", as the intent isn't entirely clear. If there was some explicit note that derivative works are allowed that would help, but without it, then it would seem it has not gotten enough consensus here as a free license. It pretty much rests on that issue. If we can get clarification (thanks Yann) that would be great. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I wrote to Wikimedia India about this. Yann (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Velaga Venkatappaiah with AVS.JPG and others[edit]

The Photo is of my grand father's and I have full rights on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • contribs) 05:59, 25 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Being related to a person depicted in a photograph does not make one the copyright holder of a photo. What makes you the copyright holder of these? LX (talk, contribs) 07:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I have Photographed himKrishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 12:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why is this person in project scope? Or better: why should we keep any of your uploads? Where is the educational value? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Can't get you Explain India flag-XL-anim.gif Krishna Chaitanya Velaga Talk 07:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored by Yann Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Tayforth UOTC Crest.jpeg[edit]

Regimental cap badge of Tayforth UOCT, a UOTC unit of the British Army. This logo is ineligible for copyright, alongside all other unit cap badges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cottrill93 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 27 July 2015‎ (UTC)

What year has this badge been created? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Restitución de imagenes[edit]

Solicito la restitución de las imágenes abajo relacionadas, ya que las mismas han sido cedidas por la Dirección General de la Guardia Civil Propietaria de los derechos de autor de las mismas. Envió la autorización pertinente (licencia Reconocimiento-compartir igual 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)) a la dirección permissions-es@wikimedia.org.

--Pepeito grillo (talk) 06:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting question.svg Question @Pepeito grillo: Could you please fix the links above, like I did on the first picture? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

DONE Yann --Pepeito grillo (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:OB 0198.jpg File:FP 0065.jpg[edit]

Als Neuling verstand ich das Hochladen von Bildern auf Wikimedia bezüglich Lizenzierung nicht. Hatte mehrere Versuche gemacht, scheiterte aber jedesmal. Mittlerweile habe ich die Vorschriften der Lizenzierung mehrmals gelesen, und ich meine jetzt auch zu wissen, was ich machen muss. - Deshalb ersuche ich, die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder OB 0198 und FP 0065 wieder zu aktivieren, damit ich sie ordnungsgemäss in den Text einfügen kann. - Mit bestem Dank, Sofia König (Sofia König (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC))

File:Admiral Sureesh Mehta handing over the baton of Chaiman, Chiefs of Staff Committee to Army Chief, Gen Deepak Kapoor, the new Chairman of the COSC.jpg and others[edit]

These work are created by the Indian Navy and it is present at http://indiannavy.nic.in/ and are licensed under {{Indian navy}}

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ARR: http://indiannavy.nic.in/footer-links/website-policies-0 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes, there is a ticket, but I have some doubt. The permission does not seem to come from an official from the Indian Navy. See also Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Template:Indian navy. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:©LIVE1017777777@Panoramio いかなる理由でも画像(写真)使用禁止.JPG[edit]

これは私の写真です。 そのため、Wikipedia用にアップロード元のアカウント名を記載しました。 ただし、現在は名前が違います。— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuyaun (talk • contribs) 11:12, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Files uploaded by Dina Panayotis[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: permission from artist: ticket:2015041910013595 Максим Підліснюк (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The ticket is not in English. Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Not sure why I deleted this files back than but likely because I overlooked the comment about the OTRS-ticket or perhaps it was becase it wan't excactly made clear which files are covered and which are not. Perhaps @Ahonc: wants to take a peek? The first question that pops my mind is how the agent validated the artists indentity. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Barbara Baarsma in 2014.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission has been received in ticket:2015072910010921 Mbch331 (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

    • Symbol support vote.svg Support - ticket looks valid. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Daniel Ghita.jpg[edit]

Author is copyright holder as per ticket:2010021110030754. Also note that the wrong editor was informed of this deletion, since the author was renamed. - Taketa (talk) 20:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Marko-Pantelic.jpg[edit]

Author is copyright holder as per ticket:2010021110030754. - Taketa (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Ruud-van-Nistelrooy.jpg[edit]

Author is copyright holder as per ticket:2010021110030754. - Taketa (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Nagano 2000 Yudanaka 20060531.jpg[edit]

The file File:Nagano 2000 Yudanaka 20060531.jpg was speedy deleted as a claimed copyright violation with the comment that "the same picture was published in 2008, http://www.geocities.jp/fuji36fuji9/sub89.html". However, if my memory serves me correctly, the image I uploaded was transferred from this image on Japanese Wikipedia. While it is very similar, and appears to have been taken at the same location, it is pretty clear that it is not the same image (the position and colour of the banner to the left of the train is different), and was taken in 2006 - before the date (2008) the blog image was published. --DAJF (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support - Clearly a different image (The blue sign, the roof of the house, etc.). Taketa (talk) 06:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo - Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG.jpg[edit]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich beantrage hiermit eine Entlöschung des oben aufgeführten Bildmaterials. Das aufgeführte Bild gehört zwar rein rechtlich der Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG, jedoch habe ich in Absprache mit dem Unternehmen für diese Datei eine Freigabe erhalten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen --FabianErnst185 (talk) 06:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo FabianErnst185, die freigabe muss zum Wikimedia emailed werden. Bitte sehe Commons:OTRS/de. Unsere E-Mail ist permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org. Viele dank, Taketa (talk) 07:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Luftbild Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG.jpg[edit]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich beantrage hiermit eine Entlöschung des oben aufgeführten Bildmaterials. Das aufgeführte Bild gehört zwar rein rechtlich der Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG, jedoch habe ich in Absprache mit dem Unternehmen für diese Datei eine Freigabe erhalten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen --FabianErnst185 (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Produktportfolio.jpg[edit]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich beantrage hiermit eine Entlöschung des oben aufgeführten Bildmaterials. Das aufgeführte Bild gehört zwar rein rechtlich der Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG, jedoch habe ich in Absprache mit dem Unternehmen für diese Datei eine Freigabe erhalten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen --FabianErnst185 (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Verwaltungsgebäude Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG.JPG[edit]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich beantrage hiermit eine Entlöschung des oben aufgeführten Bildmaterials. Das aufgeführte Bild gehört zwar rein rechtlich der Spier GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugwerk KG, jedoch habe ich in Absprache mit dem Unternehmen für diese Datei eine Freigabe erhalten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen --FabianErnst185 (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Urangarilla Wiki Image.jpg[edit]

If the image is copy righted, Please remove the image, not the wikipedia page.