Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2017/Winners

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Evaluation process[edit]

For more information about the selection procedure please go here.

National finalists and winners[edit]

In this table you can find all information about national finalists (and eventually, national winners) of WSC2017.

Algeria · Australia · Austria · Bangladesh · Belgium · Brazil · Bulgaria · Chile · China · Colombia · Czech Republic · Egypt · Estonia · France · Georgia · Germany · Greece · India · Indonesia · Iran · Iraq · Ireland · Italy · Jordan · Mexico · Oman · Philippines · Poland · Romania · Russia · Saudi Arabia · Serbia · Singapore · Spain · Sweden · Switzerland · Thailand · Ukraine · United Arab Emirates · United Kingdom · United States ··· The rest of the World


Click on these page to know all information related to local jurors, timelines and finalists.

Countries with local organization will decide autonomously their finalists to send to the main jury, and among them they can also decide the type of winners for their local competitions. Such winners can be listed also in their local competition pages. Entries that are also national winners are marked by a laurel icon Crystal Clear Silver Star with Laurel Wreath.svg, but this title gives no advantage at the international jury level.

During the final revision, few files in national selection can be added by the second-level jury and are marked by a this information icon Information icon.svg. This is done when it is possible to give more uploaders are chance.

Like with Wiki Loves Monuments, international and national juries can show different taste, especially when some juries are small. For this reason it possible that the second finalists is evaluated better than the winners at the international level.

For the categories processed with Montage (people in science, microscopy images and general category), only the images with more than 6 out of 10 avaraged votes are showed in this summary. All jurors gave a vote for 0.0 to 1.0 to every images.

The other categories (non photographic media, set of images) were processed with a xls file, and a different scale was used where all the jurors gave votes 10 to 1 to their first ten choices. Files that were not selected by the jurors were assigned "0.0". The avarage is lower than in the previous case, and the ten most voted choices are shown.

Winners[edit]

People in Science[edit]

All the finalists

Microscopy images[edit]

All the finalists

Under construction!

Non-photographic media[edit]

All the finalists

Image sets[edit]

All the finalists

General category[edit]

All the finalists See also the category Under construction!