Commons talk:Categories for discussion/editintro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

This is not Deletions Requests[edit]

{{editprotected}} These instructions says "insert it in Deletion requests", but it should say "insert it in Categories for discussion". /Ö 19:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks. --Steinninn ♨ 04:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of "Current requests" subpage[edit]


Both occurences of "/Current requests" need to be removed to update this in accordance with Commons _talk:Categories _for _discussion#"current _requests" subpage and keep it working. -- User:Docu at 17:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC), updated 18:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done Rocket000 (talk) 19:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. -- User:Docu at 19:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Unclear usage of {cdw}[edit]

{{editprotected}} The use of {{SUBPAGENAME}} as a parameter name in the cat-creator notification warning doesn't work with the {{tls}} template. It's appearing to users as:


instead of, say:


- dcljr (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like you can just change "tls" to "tlsp" to make it work. - dcljr (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Indeed. Done. -- RE rillke questions? 18:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)



The "manual" explaining the next steps is often transcluded on files including a CFD based on this editintro. After fixing that many times by either blanking the explanation or hiding it with <noinclude>…</noinclude> I suggest to hardwire this business here, IIRC that's how it's already done for deletion requests.

Disclaimer: untested, the following gibberish means "just enclose everything with noinclude and let's see what happens":

 {{msgnw:Commons:Categories for discussion/editintro}}

Possible Plan B:

 {{msgnw:Commons:Categories for discussion/editintro}}

Be..anyone (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

 Not done It's not clear how your suggestion improves anything. DR doesn't do this, despite your suggestion otherwise (see Commons:Deletion requests/editintro). I'm happy to revisit this if you have a more concrete proposal. —RP88 (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)