File talk:4 puffy cheeks.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
To Lesion: This file is widely used on the ru.wiki. Next time pls take the trouble to talk before you decide how to crop it. Sealle (talk) 04:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Sealle. I did not mean to offend, and respectfully, I did check ru.wiki before I cropped it. I think there were 4 pages all in connection with the article about the buccal fat pad, and this had been a DYK article which is why there were other pages using the image as a preview of the buccal fat pad page. Firstly I question how much this image really adds to the article, nd secondly there are few problems with the image:
- It is blurry
- It personally identifies people. Who are these people? Did they consent to this use of the image or is the photo taken from somewhere online? There are insufficient details when the image was uploaded about this.
- I am just wondering why the image is not focused on the infant's face, since it is trying to illustrate the prominence of the buccal fat pad in infants? This at least reduces the issue of identifying another person unnecessarily in the photo. There are likely many other better resolution images of an infant's face on commons than here. Lesion (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- First of all, this image is trying to illustrate that not only infants but children have clearly visible buccal fat pads. You can see at the file description page, who made this shot, so I would like to know the reason to consider this photo "taken from somewhere online". If you have a better image, feel free to replace this one with it. In the article, but not in this file. Sealle (talk) 14:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- I see now you want both persons of different ages. I did not know where the photo came from, but it was already tagged with a personality rights warning. If indeed a better image could be found, then this image would have no purpose, but yet you would still want it untouched. I think you have another reason for including this image, and I think it is unprofessional, but never mind. Lesion (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
