Talk:BSicon/Renaming
![]() | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||
Threads older than 6 months may be archived. |
Talk:BSicon/Renaming/ABZ,
Talk:BSicon/Renaming/k,
Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Canals and
Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Roads
Page need updating to reflect correct icon names[edit]
On BSicon/Catalogue/formations, (
lhvSTR-Rq
) & (
lhvSTR-Lq
) should be changed to the correct names (
lhvSTR(r)q
) & (
lhvSTR(l)q
) (I don't know how to change it on that page). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 09:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Also need to change
(
vBRIDGEv
) to it's correct name(
lvMKRZvo
). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Right icon names needed[edit]
I created (
utKRZ3tul+4
) and k versions of (
uKRZ3ukl+4
) & (
utKRZ3tukl+4
). I based what I think the name would be on (
KRZ3ul+4
), but I am absolutely not sure as it's getting a little confusing. Would someone be able to confirm/fix the files with the right naming convention? - oahiyeel talk 13:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Oahiyeel: They are named correctly. Also, the convention has been to use a
!
suffix to indicate that an icon is experimental. Useddenim (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
"e" and "x" prefixes for double-width forks[edit]
I'm looking at (
bSHI2rxl
)/ (
ubSHI2rxl
), (
bSHI2lxr
)/ (
ubSHI2lxr
), (bbSHI2+rxl
)/ (
ubSHI2+rxl
) and (bbSHI2+lxr
)/ (
ubSHI2+lxr
), and I'm wondering why those shouldn't be named with the "e" and "x" prefixes for (
bSHI2lr
) and (
bSHI2+lr
), considering that (
exbSHI2lr
) and (
exbSHI2+lr
) are valid (along with their "u" versions). Am I completely off base here that those would be far more intuitive names? Is there some hidden reason behind (
ubSHI2lxr
) and (
ubSHI2rxl
) for a single out-of use track instead of (uebSHI2lr
) and (uxbSHI2lr
) when (
uexbSHI2lr
) for both tracks being out of use is valid? VanIsaac (en.wiki) 21:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanisaac:
x
indicates the primary route is out of use, ande
indicates the secondary route is out of use. For thebSHI2
icons, because the branches mirror each other they are considered equal and there is no primary and secondary route.ex
is valid because everything is out of use. Useddenim (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)- That is not followed by the through and 90° curve icons, double curves, shift and curve, etc. which pretty clearly indicate the "e" prefix for the right line and "x" for the left:
e | x | ex | t | et | xt | ext | u | ue | ux | uex | ut | uet | uxt | uext | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vSTRr-STR | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
etvSTRr-STR | xtvSTRr-STR | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
uxtvSTRr-STR | ![]() |
to right – straight |
vSTR+r-STR | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
etvSTR+r-STR | xtvSTR+r-STR | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
uxtvSTR+r-STR | ![]() |
from right – straight |
vSTR-STRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
etvSTR-STRl | xtvSTR-STRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
uetvSTR-STRl | uxtvSTR-STRl | ![]() |
straight – to left |
vSTR-STR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
etvSTR-STR+l | xtvSTR-STR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
uetvSTR-STR+l | uxtvSTR-STR+l | ![]() |
straight – from left |
Double curves | |||||||||||||||||
vSTR+r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
from right both |
vSTRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
to left both |
vSTR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
from left both |
Shift and curve | |||||||||||||||||
vSTRr-SHI1r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
turn to right – shift to right |
vSTR+r-SHI1+r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
turn from right – shift from right |
vSHI1l-STRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
shift to left – turn to left |
vSHI1+l-STR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
shift from left – turn from left |
Mixed | |||||||||||||||||
mvSTRr-SHI1r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
tmvSTRr-SHI1r | etmvSTRr-SHI1r | xtmvSTRr-SHI1r | extmvSTRr-SHI1r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
utmvSTRr-SHI1r | uetmvSTRr-SHI1r | uxtmvSTRr-SHI1r | uextmvSTRr-SHI1r | turn to right – shift to right |
mvSTR+r-SHI1+r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
tmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | etmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | xtmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | extmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
utmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | uetmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | uxtmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | uextmvSTR+r-SHI1+r | turn from right – shift from right |
mvSHI1l-STRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
tmvSHI1l-STRl | etmvSHI1l-STRl | xtmvSHI1l-STRl | extmvSHI1l-STRl | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
utmvSHI1l-STRl | uetmvSHI1l-STRl | uxtmvSHI1l-STRl | uextmvSHI1l-STRl | shift to left – turn to left |
mvSHI1+l-STR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
tmvSHI1+l-STR+l | etmvSHI1+l-STR+l | xtmvSHI1+l-STR+l | extmvSHI1+l-STR+l | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
utmvSHI1+l-STR+l | uetmvSHI1+l-STR+l | uxtmvSHI1+l-STR+l | uextmvSHI1+l-STR+l | shift from left – turn from left |
e | x | ex | t | et | xt | ext | u | ue | ux | uex | ut | uet | uxt | uext |
- A bunch of these were named that way by you over the course of several years around a decade ago. If the "rules" for BSicon names are utilitarian, and not simply rules for rules' sake, then I am having a lot of trouble with why this pretty simple convention shouldn't be applied to forking icons. If it's a question of formalizing the convention, then let's do it. Formalized or not, we are already using this convention, why not do it right? VanIsaac (en.wiki) 04:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vanisaac: You're trying to compare apples and oranges. The forks are single-line icons, whereas the new examples you cite are for parallel lines. And yes, I named them, following conventions that were already in place (although I never understood why the left line was considered primary and the right secondary). But by all means go ahead and draw up a formal proposal for consideration. Useddenim (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:BSicon/Categorization#Limited