User talk:A.Savin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User:A.Savin/TP)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

See also: User:A.Savin/Archive.

Senftenberg und Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz[edit]

Hallo Alex! Hier ist etwas ziemlich komisch! Category:2022 in Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz ist die Oberkategorie von Category:2022 in Senftenberg. In Category:2022 in Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz wird mir Category:2022 in Senftenberg aber nicht angezeigt. Hast du eine Idee, woran das liegt? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gefixt. Musste wie so oft noch einmal ein Nulledit gemacht werden bei der Unterkategorie. Warum auch immer. LG--A.Savin 17:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hallo @A.Savin,

ich habe jetzt erst bemerkt, dass ich dir ja auch auf Deutsch schreiben kann. Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit bereits bzgl. fehlender/falscher Lizenzen von einigen Dateien zu Modellbauanlagen geschrieben. Da ich keine falschen Markierungen mit den Templates setzen möchte, wollte ich dich noch mal bitten. In den Artikeln sind es folgende Dateien: Auf Commons finden sich aber noch ein paar mehr entsprechende Bilder unter dem Suchbegriff "Modellbahnwelt". Danke schon mal und viele Grüße Bildersindtoll (talk) 09:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Erledigt. --A.Savin 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reason for blocking Лобачев Владимир[edit]

Hi. As I'm sure your aware I asked you why you blocked Лобачев Владимир on his talk page. For some reason I haven't received an answer yet though, which seems weird considering you claim on your user page that your open to discussion. So, if you don't mind I'd like to reiterate the question and actually have it answered this time. And preferably without Pofka playing defense for you or otherwise acting like your spokesperson. Why did you block indef block Лобачев Владимир? If there was a legitimate reason for the block then it should be pretty easy to just say what it was. Otherwise, I'd appreciate it if the block was either shortened to be proportional to what he actually did or completely reversed if he didn't do anything to justify it. In the meantime it should go without saying that his behavior on other Wikimedia projects aren't relevant to this. Let alone is how he's acted on other projects a valid reason to block him. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As already stated on the relevant ANU thread, the block was because of long-term trolling, freqent editwarring and aggression and conflicting behaviour which ended in numerous ANU threads and that huge waste of community's human resources, and yes also the fact of previous Commons' and crosswiki blocks. I'm not related to Pofka in any way no matter what you may think to yourself, and if Lobachev wants to be unblocked, he may place an unblock request on his talk page (and this is the only possible way). Regards --A.Savin 04:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the answer. That said, I was expecting something a little more substantive then just a reiteration of the vague comments that were already made by Pofka. For instance, you say he was blocked for "long-term trolling, frequent edit warring and aggression and conflicting behavior", which I'm sure he was doing before Yann blocked him September 2022. But I don't see any evidence of him continuing the behavior since the original block. All I can see from his edit history between September and now is that he uploaded some random files. I don't see any evidence of him edit warring anyone or being aggressive in the interim either and Pofka didn't provide any evidence in the ANU complaint. So can you at least provide some specific diffs of the behavior your claiming he continued doing after the block? I'm sure you'd agree that someone shouldn't be blocked for actions they aren't currently doing simply because they were blocked in the past.
Also, I find it hard to believe your not related to Pofka when he's playing defense for you in random discussions and your using admin tools in a way that clearly favors his side of the disagreement. Same goes for your connections to Yann, Guido den Broeder, and Ymblanter to a lesser degree. If the same small group of people keep popping up in the same disputes and playing defense for each other repeatedly, there's probably a reason behind it. That said, I'm not here to litigate whatever conflict of interests you or anyone else might have related to this whole thing. I'm sure Лобачев Владимир and Kazimier Lachnovič have their own conflicts to. I just don't want people to be blocked for things that they shouldn't be blocked for. I have no agenda here outside of that though and I'd be asking the same question if it was Pofka, Guido den Broeder, or anyone else that was indeffed simply for being randomly mentioned in an ANU. All I'm asking for is diffs of the behavior he supposedly did. That's it and I don't think it's an unreasonable request either. While I'm aware that Lobachev can just do an unblocked request, I don't think he should have to do one if there wasn't a valid reason to block him in the first place. I'm more then willing to appeal the block at ANU or some other forum on his behalf though if your unwilling to provide diffs of the behavior that he was supposedly blocked for. Maybe MetaWiki? Unfortunately this isn't really my wheel house, but I'm sure I can figure it out if need be. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If I would argue with difflinks, surely you would then claim that I was partisan, which however I'm not. So once again, I did nothing more than closing an ANU which even had come to some consensus. Every ANU complaint has to be closed at some point with some result, so if not me this would have been done by s/o else and there's surely no guarantee that the result you would have liked more. It doesn't matter that the thread was started by Pofka, because, as already said, I'm not related to them. However indeed, apparently they're far more familiar with the issues regarding Lobachev+Lachnovič, and surely can provide all necessary diffs whenever needed.
As for appealing an unblock, as stated, this should be done by Lobachev himself: {{Unblock}}. I didn't prevent him from editing his TP. If an other admin decides to shorten or lift the block, be it. Please EOD here, this is going nowhere. Regards --A.Savin 12:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Доброго времени суток. Прошу удалить перенаправление Category:Karaimskaya Street, 53 (Yevpatoria) для переименования категории по названию улицы. Mitte27 (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bir yıldız da sizin için![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png Özen Yıldızı
Hi A.Savin. Thanks to your attention and warning, many files incorrectly uploaded to Commons were deleted. Túrelio spent really much effort to fix my mistake. So, I also wanted to thank you for your sensitivity! Gargarapalvin (talk) 12:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
yeah a.savin. you are great man. thank you so much. everytime i see your photos i admire it. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jean Michel Jarre B10-2016.jpg[edit]

Not a fan on putting depicting men on images of named men? I was a bit unsure about adding that. Trade (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TBH, the point of such generic WD statements I don't get and probably never going to. d:Q104326 already has "instance of" human and "sex or gender" male. Regards --A.Savin 03:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request to block an account...[edit]

...for vandalism. Please check: Ivar (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Goslar asv2022-06 img29 Rathaus.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Goslar asv2022-06 img29 Rathaus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Goslar asv2022-06 img29 Rathaus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Фотографии ЖД станций России[edit]

Добрый день!
Я создаю отдельные категории для каждой ЖД станции России, для которой есть хотя бы одна фотография. Скажите, почему вы отменили мою правку? Michgrig (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Потому, что вы постоянно нарушаете COM:OVERCAT, оставляя в файле те категории, которые вместо этого необходимо переносить в новую категорию. --A.Savin 14:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
И поэтому вы сначала отменяете мои действия, а потом делаете правильно? Не проще ли доделать то, что я упустил из виду? Michgrig (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Если один раз, то проще. Если же чуть ли не ежедневно видеть такие правки в своём списке наблюдения, то надо как-то привлекать ваше внимание, так как по умолчанию вам лично явно пофиг, что после вас всё приходится исправлять. --A.Savin 01:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Если "чуть ли не ежедневно", то почему было только 3 отмены? Или на этот раз вам пофиг?
И вы считаете, что отмена без какого-либо комментария меня чему-то должна научить? Извините, я курсы телепатов еще не закончил. Michgrig (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ну, есть же и не столь нерадивые коллеги, если за ними что-то исправить, они стараются впредь учесть это и совершенствоваться. Иной раз и благодарность посылают. Впрочем, вряд ли такое уважительное отношение я могу ожидать от админа русской википедии. --A.Savin 18:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ай спасибо за столь лестную оценку моего вклада. Какой пример уважительного отношения вы показываете коллегам, что аж хочется поступать ровно так же. Michgrig (talk) 19:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
И насчет этого. Вся Нижегородская область относится к Горьковской железной дороге, поэтому Category:Gorky Railway указана тут и не требуется для каждой отдельной станции. Michgrig (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
В этом есть резон, но вот что-то я совсем не уверен, что это касается прямо вот всех станций в этой области. Как минимум станции Нижегородского метро и трамвайные остановки (да-да, не поверите, но всё это тоже ж.д. станции...) имхо не имеют отношения к РЖД. --A.Savin 01:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Вот это нормальный адекватный аргумент, а не наезды и какие-то непонятные демарши. Просто я привык, что в рувики метро и трамваи не относятся к железной дороге, поэтому выпустил их из виду. Значит, сейчас еще раз пройдусь по подобным категориям по регионам и поправлю. Michgrig (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Пожалуйста, не надо мне ставить лайки. Обойдусь без них. Michgrig (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
У нас нет лайков. Я отправил благодарность, потому что вы на этот раз всё корректно сделали. Естественно, я не собираюсь никому отправлять их массово, уж точно не вам, если вдруг вы это подумали. А вообще, ваша реакция на обыкновенную благодарность выглядит скорее, как у той самой "обиженной ливерной колбасы", простите. --A.Savin 19:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
> А вообще, ваша реакция на обыкновенную благодарность выглядит скорее, как у той самой "обиженной ливерной колбасы", простите.
Как вам будет угодно. Michgrig (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img17 Marienkirche.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img17 Marienkirche.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img17 Marienkirche.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Rüdersdorf asv2022-06 img7 Museumspark.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rüdersdorf asv2022-06 img7 Museumspark.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rüdersdorf asv2022-06 img7 Museumspark.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Equine category[edit]

Hello A.Savin, I just come here to justify adding these categories for your images. I will do this quite concisely, my level of English is quite limited.

Having embarked on a vast project to reorganize the categories dedicated to horses by country, and as is already the case in a certain number of other States, there is no need for the physical presence of a horse to classify these images in the relevant categories. A drawing, a sports venue, a horseshoe or even a logo are logically enough to do this. Otherwise, the "ramification" with the equine theme cannot be done. Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 15:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

You're wrong, because, as you easily can see, all three images are in Category:Nuwara Eliya Racecourse, which is a subcat of Category:Horse racing in Sri Lanka, which is connected with "horse racing" and "horses" categories, that means it is a violation of COM:OVERCAT to add "Horses of Sri Lanka" to any image from this racecourse category additionally -- and it should not be added anyway if a horse is not on the picture, or is so little depicted that is clearly de minimis. --A.Savin 18:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Göttingen asv2022-06 img37 Altes Rathaus.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Göttingen asv2022-06 img37 Altes Rathaus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Göttingen asv2022-06 img37 Altes Rathaus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Swing rides and Chair-O-Planes[edit]

Hallo Alex. Würdest du vielleicht hier vorbeischauen. In einigen Fällen wurden Kategorien von Chair-O-Plane in Swing rides umbenannt, wie etwa hier. Teilweise ist bei anderen Ländern Chair-O-Plane die Unterkategorie von Swing rides, wie bei Japan. Da ist wohl einiges durcheinander geraten. Was denkst du darüber. Es sollte schon einheitlich für jedes Land geregelt werden, wenn du mich fragst. Gruß! Lukas Beck (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Shāntián Tàiláng: What do you say on this? What is the difference between "swing ride" and "chair-o-plane", and if there isn't any, why then different level? --A.Savin 01:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I changed my mind after I found that Category:Chair-O-Planes redirects to Category:Swing rides, so I started redirecting or moving all the "Chair-O-Planes" categories. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I had to rename some more categories. Now everything should be categorized uniformly. Lukas Beck (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Rügen asv2022-08 img27 Lauterbach Mole Bahnhof.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rügen asv2022-08 img27 Lauterbach Mole Bahnhof.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rügen asv2022-08 img27 Lauterbach Mole Bahnhof.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Karlsruhe asv2022-10 img19 Hauptbahnhof.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Karlsruhe asv2022-10 img19 Hauptbahnhof.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karlsruhe asv2022-10 img19 Hauptbahnhof.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hello @A.Savin I hope you're doing well. I came here to apologise for my misclick rollback edit. Sorry, I don't intend to do such mistakes. I will be more cautious the next time before using rollback. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

HerzbergAmHarz asv2022-06 img05.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:HerzbergAmHarz asv2022-06 img05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HerzbergAmHarz asv2022-06 img05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My request for adminship[edit]

Hello Alexander. I want to thank you for your participation and input in my recently failed request for adminship. I take every word everybody said in the most constructive way and it is my intention to not only do my best for Commons (as long as time and real life allows me to), but to continue learning and helping out whenever I can. I don't take your oppose vote as something negative, much on the contrary, it is certainly enlightening. I did not take into consideration the necessity of creating a local user page; in fact, I did not even notice I did not have one here. On the other hand, although my edit count is low, I do not think the number of edits means an editor has contributed more or less positively to the project. I do accept, however, that admins and potential aspirants to the role should be more participative. Once again, thank you for your vote and I hope to see you again, collaborating around Commons. Have a good day. Bedivere (talk) 03:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Guten Morgen Alex! Was hälst du von dieser Kategorie? Siehst du hier Handlungsbedarf? Lukas Beck (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Tallinn asv2022-04 img70 Russalka Memorial.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img70 Russalka Memorial.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img70 Russalka Memorial.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mahim Bay[edit]

Maham Bay is a real body of water so what is wrong with placing images that depict one part of the bay or another into the Category:Mahim Bay? This is completely normal categorization in Commons and is regardless of what other items the images may include. Hmains (talk) 22:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This does not depict Mahim Bay (look at the infobox map of Category:Haji Ali Dargah). This does, but is COM:OVERCAT for Category:Bandra–Worli Sea Link, because the Bandra–Worli Sea Link crosses the Mahim Bay. --A.Savin 22:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We are supposed to categorize images by all applicable categories. This not over categorization; this is normal throughout the work of commons. You are correct about Category:Haji Ali Dargah; I was taking info from one of its images. Hmains (talk) 22:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please name the guideline you are referring to. I'm referring to the guideline COM:OVERCAT. Thank you! --A.Savin 22:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Привет! Не мог бы ты удалить этот файл? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Привет. А почему? Он используется в статье ru:Гимаев, Зуфар Фаатович и OTRS тикет вроде тоже есть. На каком основании его следует быстро удалить? --A.Savin 18:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Потому что загрузил другой файл более лучшего качества. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
А может быть, лучше оба файла объединить? Я не знаю, как именно там у них в OTRS, но вполне возможно, что тикет должен сохранять привязку к старому названию. По мне, так ничего не мешало просто загрузить новую версию поверх старой. В общем, если не возражаешь, я просто объединю обе версии под старым названием. Ну или под новым, если тебе угодно. --A.Savin 01:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply] - загрузил новое, и тикет поставил. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Würdest du dir dieses Bild bitte mal anschauen. Das hat schon seit Anfang Februar keine Lizenz. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mehrtägige Ausstellung[edit]

Der Panzer stand dort vom Morgen des 24.2. bis zum Abend des 26.2. ihn nur in die Kategorie für den 24.2. zu schieben ist daher falsch, weil dann die nächsten beiden Tage unter den Tisch fallen würden. GPSLeo (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Das ist keineswegs falsch, allenfalls ungenau. Dass du diesbezüglich keine Verbesserung anbieten kannst/willst, sondern nur stur die Kategorie entfernst, spricht wohl für sich. --A.Savin 13:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Die Kategorie für die Tage Category:Demonstrations and protests on first anniversary of Russian invasion of Ukraine in Berlin passt doch eigentlich. Alles was dort liegt würde ich gar nicht weiter verschachteln sondern direkt in diese Kategorie einsortieren. Unter einer Kategorie mit der Bezeichnung 2023-02-24 Fotos ein zu sortieren die nicht an diesem Tag aufgenommen wurden würde ich aber nicht nur als Ungenau sondern ganz klar als falsch bezeichnen. GPSLeo (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Erstens, wenn du die Events am 26 Feb in die Category:Demonstrations and protests on first anniversary of Russian invasion of Ukraine in Berlin einordnest, machst du doch offensichtlich das Gleiche. Zweitens, noch einmal: wenn du willens bist die Kategorienstruktur in diesem Bereich zu verbessern nur zu. Einfach nur entfernen geht gar nicht. --A.Savin 14:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Veranstaltungen zu Jahrestagen sind ja regelmäßig nicht nur am eigentlichen Jahrestag sondern am Wochenende davor oder danach. Auch habe ich bei dem Wort "on" eher an die Bedeutung "zu diesem Thema" und nicht die Übersetzung "an diesem Tag" gedacht. Eigentlich war die Bezeichnung ursprünglich ja auch "Events", weil etwa beleuchtete öffentliche Gebäude ja keine Proteste im eigentlichen Sinnen sind. Ich habe die Kategorie bei Panzer0 bei ersten mal einfach geändert weil ich von einem versehen ausgegangen war, am Anfang waren ja nur Fotos vom 24. in der Kategorie. Ich verstehe auch tatsächlich nicht was bei der Einsortierung des Panzers direkt in Category:Demonstrations and protests on first anniversary of Russian invasion of Ukraine in Berlin an Information verloren gehen sollte. GPSLeo (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Verloren gegangen war jeglicher Bezug zur Russischen Botschaft, das habe ich in der Edit-Zusammenfassung erwähnt und verstehe nicht, was daran so schwer zu begreifen sein soll. Der Rest ist m.M.n. Strohmann-Argumentation, ich habe nämlich nie behauptet, die Einordnung all der Demos in die "Anniversary" sei falsch gewesen, und halte sie sogar für richtig. --A.Savin 01:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Ich habe das Bild aus der Kategorie entfernt, weil diese überfüllt ist und da das Bild noch in 4 anderen Kategorien aufgeführt ist, dieses für ausreichend gehalten. Die Kategorie 'Buildings....' als Oberbegriff trifft auf sicherlich fast 10.000 Bilder zu. Mfg Clausne. ClausNe (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Falscher Ansatz. Wenn du die Kategorie für überfüllt hältst, erstelle eine Unterkategorie -- aber wir entfernen keine Bilder ersatzlos aus Kategorien, *nur* weil diese überfüllt sind. MfG --A.Savin 14:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Добрый день. Помогите разобраться с этим фото, загруженным мною. Автором указан Алексей Нестеров (Aleksey Nesterov), который со своей почты ( немедленно отправил в Викимедию ( своё разрешение на публикацию данного фото, написанное по форме. Тем не менее фото было удалено. Я обращался с вопросами к Krd, но не получил пояснений, отчего произошло удаление. Не могли бы вы разобраться с этим делом? Floridorus (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Здравствуйте. У меня нет доступа в корреспонденцию службы поддержки, для этого вам следует обратиться к одному из её агентов, и, как я понимаю, из русскоязычных там остались на данный момент только Lvova и Vladimir Solovjev. --A.Savin 01:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Благодарю. Так и сделаю.--Floridorus (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Пардон, ещё вопрос. Автор фото Алексей Нестеров получил ответ из Викимедии: "присланное Вами разрешение содержит ссылку на копию материала, размещенного в Википедии, а не на первоисточник публикации. Нам необходима ссылка именно на первоисточник для того, чтобы подтвердить Ваше авторство". - Что понимается под первоисточником? То, что это фото должно быть опубликовано на сайте Нестерова или где-то ещё? И нужна ссылка на эту публикацию? Верно понимаю?--Floridorus (talk) 12:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Скорее всего, да. Логика в этом есть -- мало толку от разрешения, подлинность которого неочевидна. --A.Savin 13:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Luzern asv2022-10 Pauluskirche img3.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Luzern asv2022-10 Pauluskirche img3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luzern asv2022-10 Pauluskirche img3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Last editions[edit]

Savin, our friend has died yesterday and I'm trying to organize his files. I'll review all files in his category. I'm sorry for the trouble... Wieralee (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry about his passing. --A.Savin 22:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Москва, Крымский мост, 2017[edit]

Здравствуйте. Увидел, что вы в снимали его сверху (File:Moscow 05-2017 img13 Krymsky Bridge.jpg). Справа, у самой набережной, на этом снимке здание дирекции парка Горького (обрезано). Вопрос - а не было ли в той серии этого здания целиком? Собственно нужно даже не всё здание, а вид растущих внутри его деревьев (в центральную часть 80 лет назад упала бомба, и так она и стоит без кровли, уже внутри лес вырос). Retired electrician (talk) 14:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Здравствуйте, выяснилось, что у меня осталось три снимка той серии, кадр у всех примерно один и тот же, и нигде не видно внутреннего двора этого здания, увы. --A.Savin 15:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Valdai IverskyMon asv2018 img48 - kopie.jpg[edit]

Uvazaemyj kollega! Ne ponimaju, po kakomu povodu Vy udalili kopiju Vasej fotografii Valdai IverskyMon asv2018 img48.jpg na Commons, kotoruju mozno ispolzovat ljubim sposobom, kak tam (daze po russki!) jasno napisano Использование фотографии бесплатно, согласование не требуется. Dirillo (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I never published it under CC-zero. Please do not violate Licensing terms. --A.Savin 14:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dies und das[edit]

Hallo Alex, ich bin in Moment weder telefonisch noch per SMS zu erreichen, vorerst wohl also nur hierüber und per Mail. Andere Sache: Ich habe bei diesem Nutzer [1] eine schöne Babbel über Warrior Cats gefunden und versucht, dise für mich nachzubasteln. Hast du das vielleicht etwas mehr Erfahrung und könntest bei Gelegenheit mal auf meiner Benutzerseite nachsehen. Würde mich wahnsinnig freuen. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 17:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lukas. Leider stehe ich gerade auf dem Schlauch. Wie so oft, reicht es leider nicht, den Quelltext zu kopieren, denn oft enthalten Vorlagen andere Vorlagen, die wiederum andere Vorlagen usw. Ich weiß daher nicht, wie der passende Quelltext gebastelt werden könnte. Hier müsste jemand gefragt werden, der sich mit Babelbausteinen gut auskennt. Soweit ich weiß, sind zudem auf Commons Benutzer-Babel eher unüblich (abgesehen von Basis-Infos wie Sprachen oder Wohnort). In der deutschen Wikipedia sind die schon wesentlich beliebter, aber immer noch nicht vergleichbar mit der russischen Wikipedia. Hier sind die Suchergebnisse, wenn man nach Erwähnungen dieser Buchreihe im Benutzernamensraum der deutschen WP sucht, und es scheint, die alle erwähnen es nur wörtlich, aber nutzen keine solche Babelbausteine. LG --A.Savin 20:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Habe jetzt doch noch eine Lösung gefunden, allerdings ist die Box, wenn man sie bei dir einfügt, etwas nach rechts versetzt, kann das leider (noch) nicht fixen. --A.Savin 15:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wahnsinn! Das sieht echt super aus. Danke! Lukas Beck (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]