User:Polaris999/workspace01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

February 21[edit]

File:0186 Hershey - Antique Automobile Club of America Museum - Flickr - KlausNahr.jpg[edit]

Low quality, not sure that this would ever be useful for anything. OSX (talkcontributions) 02:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting question.svg Question Do we have equivalent better images of this part of the museum? If we don't, Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. And keep in mind that low quality alone is not a reason to delete.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

We have File:0194 Hershey - Antique Automobile Club of America Museum - Flickr - KlausNahr.jpg. Would either of these images fail copyright standards because of COM:TOYS? The blow-up Santa Claus car does not appear to have a utilitarian aspect (not a useful object) and may fall under the art definition. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:EXID LE.jpg[edit]

1대1 대응하지 않는 넘겨주기 Dever (Talk · Contribution) 13:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Florian briquet.JPG[edit]

la personne concerné par cette page souhaite supprimé celle ci pour des motifs profesionnels Guillaumejaffeux (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Aslan Ahmadov.jpg[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE A.Savin 15:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Я не знаю зачем этот файл был номинирован Савиным на удаление ("манечка" видно такая у человека - файлы удалять), но права на размещения данного изображения в Вики мне были переданы правообладателем данной фотографии, т.е. самим Асланом. Ежели кому не нравится - пишите/звоните Аслану или его пресс-секретарю, они дадут Вам все пояснения касаемо этого фото. --RenJJ (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Daniela Franco.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

I can provide a better resolution, thought a smaller one was best. User:Warburg Aby 17:59, 26 February 2015

@Warburg Aby: Yes, please. This one is very small. Yann (talk) 11:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Estadio Ferro Carril Oeste.jpg[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

According to Template:PD-AR-Photo copyright term for photographs in Argentina is 25 years. We don't have exact dates for this image, but according to es:Estadio_Arquitecto_Ricardo_Etcheverri#Imágenes it's about 60 years old, and likely published long ago.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)



Files uploaded by Charles Jeffrey Danoff (talk · contribs)[edit]

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia if needed

Motopark (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Motopark! How are you? Thank you for noticing my resources!! Why do you think they should be deleted? What guideline of the Commons have they violated? And what do you mean by "homepage material"? Also, what Wikipedia do you think this could be written to? I do not think my materials are appropriate for any of the Wikipedias because I feel they are Original Research. That is why I uploaded them to the Commons instead. --Charles Jeffrey Danoff (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry but they are out of project scope, some handmade pictures--Motopark (talk) 03:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Motopark! Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. :) I understand your point, but the scope is very nuanced and grey. I believe it clearly falls within the scope in the educational content context "However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects (so, scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope). Also allowed are files which embody something of value over and above raw text. For example, files consisting of scans of out-of-copyright books, newspapers and the like which preserve original font, layout, embedded images and the like are within scope." The pictures embody something of value over raw text. --Charles Jeffrey Danoff (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:ELEPHANTYEAR.NOV2013.pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep. The file is in use in Wikiversity, currently awaiting further peer reviews before consideration to include it in Wikiversity Journal of Medicine. I accidentally linked it by URL so I guess that caused it to not show up in "File usage". Mikael Häggström (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Hermógenes Teixeira Pinto Filho (talk · contribs) regarding files by Navy of Brazil[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Licensed with {{Attribution-NavyofBrazil}} (Marinha do Brasil) which I (finally) updated today, considering Template talk:Attribution-NavyofBrazil (in fact, a talk to myself): As of 6 February 2011***, Navy of Brazil's copyright policy has changed.

And btw, it appears that the template was never valid for the WHOLE site https://www.mar.mil.br (today https://www.marinha.mil.br) as claimed but only for a certain part of this site = the "Acervo fotográfico" / photographic archive. Unfortunately Commons is currently hosting several files from Navy of Brazil which in fact (IMHO) never were freely licensed (taken from several parts of the site: news, etc.), including files like File:Classe Aratu.jpg or File:Base Fluvial de Ladário.jpg, taken from a magazin http://www.mar.mil.br/hotsites/nomar/atuais/762/762.pdf, here allowing only transkription ("transcrição") of the material = only text, or File:Hidrovia Tietê-Paraná.jpg + File:Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira 2006-2.jpg + File:Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira 2006-1.jpg + File:Diretoria de Hidrografia e Navegação 2006.jpg + File:S Tikuna (S-34) 2006.jpg + File:S Tapajó (S-33) 2006.jpg + File:AviPa Marlim (LP-01) 2.jpg, taken from magazine http://www.agcabfrio.mar.mil.br/hotsites/nomar/atuais/774/774.pdf or File:Cisne Branco Velame.jpg + File:Base da Marinha Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo.jpg + File:NPa Macaé (P-70) 2010.jpg, taken from magazine http://www.mar.mil.br/hotsites/marinhaemrevista/imagens/marinha_em_revista.pdf (404).

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:MdB ({{MdB}} = the old name for this template: "MdB = Marinha do Brasil") from 2007 where @555: stated that "Please note: this statment is only for images at mar.mil.br/menu_h/fotos galleries, not for the entire website."

Nominated examples
Special cases

for today, only these two, there is more...

Considering that the uploader is still active he may try to obtain relative permission for all files below (this is only the tip of the iceberg, ignoring several files with doubtful copyright status due to time issues) and (taken the opportunity) for all files in Category:Images from the Brazilian Navy website.

***In fact sometime between 06.02. and 08.02.2011

Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Solicitação de Licença de uso[edit]

E-mail encaminhado para o Centro de Comunicação Social da Marinha.

Prezados

Na Wikipédia-pt que é editada por voluntários existem artigos sobre os navios e instalações da Marinha do Brasil com respectivas fotos, a maioria delas foi baixada de sites mantidos pela Marinha do Brasil inclusive notícias e Revista NoMar . As fotos serão apagadas dos artigos e eliminadas do banco de imagens da Wikimedia Commons, por violação de direito autoral. Pois o entendimento passou a ser que apenas as fotos publicadas no Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/mboficial) estão livres para cópias.

Para que isso seja evitado, partindo do pressuposto que o nosso entendimento está correto, é solicitado se possível o fornecimento de Commons:OTRS (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS) que estão sendo apagadas. Uma outra maneira de preservar estas fotos e outras para futuros artigos de outros navios é a disponibilização de imagens de todos os navios de todos os tempos no Flick com licença disponibilizando cópias.

Ainda sobre os artigos dos navios da Marinha do Brasil, é fácil verificar que estão incompletos e falhos quanto ao conteúdo. Os principais motivos são os poucos editores que se interessam pelo tema e a falta de material adequado para complementação dos artigos. Caso exista interesse em melhorar os artigos fico a disposição para ajudar a preparar editores dos quadros da Marinha do Brasil.

Solicito a gentileza de se manifestarem sobre o asunto, e fico grato antecipadamente.

Hermógenes Teixeira Pinto Filho (HTPF) portomanga@gmail.com

Este assunto está sendo discutido em (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Hermógenes_Teixeira_Pinto_Filho), cópia deste e-mail está sendo copiado para aquele local.

--HTPF (talk) 12:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by عثمان خان شاہ (talk · contribs)[edit]

Not entirely own works. Derivative works of CC-BY-SA maps, original author(s) not credited. Also these should be remade in SVG, not PNG.

Yann (talk) 18:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

All the Source Files credits goes to MOAZEN BILAL. And, in my opinion, these files should not be deleted because hundreds of articles needed these--Usman (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
@عثمان خان شاہ: Could you fix ALL files above with proper source and credit? If you don't these will be deleted. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عثمان خان شاہ (talk · contribs)

No source for background image(s), probable copyvios.

Yann (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

I created these two photos, Its my own work. -- Usman (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
@عثمان خان شاہ: Could you upload the background images if they are yours? If you don't these will be deleted. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I will fix all these in a few days. Usman (talk) 11:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Otto Baum, 031.jpg[edit]

Weil es meine Urheberrechte als Fotograf verletzt 93.221.236.13 19:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Wie das? Wer bist du? Für dieses Foto liegt eine Genehmigung bei OTRS vor. --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Dr. jur. Thomas Theisinger behauptet in einem Email vom 21. Februar 2015 an mich, dass das Foto von ihm stammt und er die Verbreitung im Internet nicht genehmigt. Das Foto sollte daher gelöscht werden.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Night flight over Moscow. (14161451684).jpg[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE: unidentifiable location, no usage, bad quality. A.Savin 19:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Because:
    • It's a road at night, not a personal or artistic image, therefore there is no reason to say it's not in scope.
    • There is no need to be an identifiable place to be in scope. Although, the image is detailed enough to be excatly identified (e.g. it can be identified just as a lot of unidentified places we have but nobody has checked) and descripton says it's Moscow. Therefore, even if unidentifiability were a reason to delete (which isn't) this image is identifiable.
    • The image is not a "low quality" one, although it's not a very but quality one, and it's good enough to be used. Quality would be a concern only if we had plenty of better images suiting all identifiable potential uses of this one.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

February 22[edit]

File:Carl brückel.jpg[edit]

Doubtful this is on work. See ligh-glare on the left side. The object in this image died in 1980, so this is most likely a COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Submarine and seaplane preparing the Lookout air raids.jpg[edit]

The file is a simple reproduction of a State of Oregon history marker whose copyright status is undetermined. In other words, this is a possible copyright violation. Yaush (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Arabic speaking world.svg.png[edit]

PNG version of File:Arabic speaking world.svgD Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Comment: there is 1 difference with the source: deletion of the Morocco-Western Sahara border (this change was done in all the 8 first files added by the user). Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:The Torch bottom view, Nov 2014.jpg[edit]

Buildings are subject to copyright in Dubai 1.136.96.47 00:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

There are hundreds of buildings images of Dubai, so why we should delete this one? If you think we must remove this image, give us more information of the supposed copyright of buildings in Dubai. Dr. 2000 (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC).
The UAE's copyright law (unlike that of the USA) does not grant an exception for taking pictures of copyright architecture, to publish this image with a CC licence you also need the permission of the architect. 101.172.127.243 21:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Correct, there's no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Arab_Emirates (and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama for are more general explanation). That makes further discussion here pointless. Jahoe (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Republic of Poland 1947.svg[edit]

Intentionally false POV propaganda tool of the uploader declaring (quote) "Polish Zone of occupation" [of Nazi Germany]. The borders superimposed by the uploader on the map of Poland from another Wikimedia file did not exist in this form ever, before or after the war. See: Commons: Criteria for speedy deletion for the Mainspace content of no apparent value, intended to promote a person. The user is edit warring in order to retain this outright falsification of history. Poeticbent talk 06:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

My source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map-Germany-1945.svg --Elevatorrailfan (talk) 06:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Please state why you claim the Polish Zone of occupation does not exist. One of my sources shows that it is there: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map-Germany-1945.svg --Elevatorrailfan (talk) 17:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Curzon line-fr.svg

The map is falsified to fit a revisionist and anti-Polish POV. It fails to show the postwar border shifts illustrated on the right, with outright offensive description of its actual content: i.e. the "Polish Zone of occupation" of Nazi Germany. Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion (quote from General reasons #1): "page containing nonsense or no valid content." Poeticbent talk 19:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Are you referring to both my file and the source or just my file? --Elevatorrailfan (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1985 Ford Escort Laser MKIV (7125341267).jpg[edit]

extremely big file (38 MB) for a low quality image; superseded by an improved version of 1.2 MB: File:1985 Ford Escort Laser MKIV (7125341267)-reduced.jpg A1AA1A (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I don't think your version is an improvement. Yann (talk) 10:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:1993 Panther Kallista 2.9i (14071675109).jpg[edit]

Low quality OSX (talkcontributions) 10:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I can't find any better image of a Panther Kallista from this point of view. Anyway, quality can be greatly improved by cropping out the person.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

What about File:Panther Kallista (4642443232).jpg and File:Panther Kallista 2.jpg also of Category:Panther Kallista? Once the person is cropped out, we would be left with only half of the car. I cannot see how such an image could be considered useful to the project. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CES1Logo.jpg[edit]

a new version of this file is available and I will upload it as well. Lourdeslanote (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


Kept: Not a valid reason for deletion. INeverCry 00:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:CES1Logo.jpg[edit]

Very old file, I would like to delete it. Lourdeslanote (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ESOL-logo1.jpg[edit]

This is an old logo, I uploaded the new one. Lourdeslanote (talk) 07:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


Kept: We rountinely keep old logos for historical purposes. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:ESOL-logo1.jpg[edit]

Old logo, we are using a new logo now. Please help me delete it. Lourdeslanote (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:James Napier Robertson - voice - en.flac[edit]

The person who was interviewed complained via OTRS (ticket:2015021110002892). He claims that he never gave permission to release this interview under a free license and that he had no idea that this interview was for use on Wikimedia Commons and the related Wikipedia page. Plus the subject told he was uncomfortable with this afterwards. The interview was held in they Netherlands so I believe that both the Dutch and the US-law apply or should apply per commons policy.

  • For the legal status in the Netherlands. Spoken text during an interview can be copyrighted. See here and here as a reference. However, under the Dutch law something needs to be a "work of..." in order to be protected by copyright law. It is mandatory that the creative choices are made consciously. I don't believe that this interview fits those standards and the correct license would be {{PD-ineligible}}.
  • While this might not be a copyright violation since the part used in this interview is below TOO there is also the ethical part of this situation. While the file is in use at en-wiki it can be considered unethical to publish this line of text without the subjects permission. While it was not illegal to record this conversation under Dutch law it might not be ethical to publish this conversation.

It would be great if 1Veertje wants to tell her side of the story so the closing admin can make a balanced decision. I will make it clear to the subject that it is possible that this file is kept and that there are no guarantees that this deletions request will lead to deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I made this recording at the International Film Festival of Rotterdam. This year I was granted a press accreditation as a photographer so I could document the festival for Wikipedia. In one of the first press briefings Robertson was listed as one of the people that could be interviewed for that day. I figured people on this list would go through a whole series of interviews so having me in that list wouldn't be much of a bother. I asked the press desk to make an appointment with him, thinking that since they had my credentials that they would communicate those to him as well.
Here there are already two assumptions on my part that didn't turn out to be true: Robertson made his way to the press desk especially for me and wasn't told I was a photographer for Wikipedia. Apart from being annoying for the both of us, this shouldn't have been a Big Problem. I introduced myself as a Wikipedian and asked him if I could take his picture. He declined and I accepted this. I asked him if he would be OK with recording a sound sample for the Wikipedia Voice Intro Project, explaining that we ask people to do this so we know how they pronounce their name and what they sound like. He agreed to this. I recorded him on my phone using this microphone.
I expressed regret at not being able to photograph him, pointing at my nice camera. He said we could just use some photo from an other event. I explained that we only accept media files with a free license. I gave him my contact card, which says I'm a Wikipediaan, and told him to contact me if he'd found a photographer willing to publish pictures under a free license.
In short: I repeatedly mentioned that I'm a Wikipedian and Wikipedia. I mentioned free licenses. He was aware of being recorded. He agreed to meet for the publication of an interview. It's regrettable that he somehow didn't understand me, but I don't think there is more I could have done to make myself clear. --Vera (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klippark ritade av Johan Rosenblad.jpg[edit]

Isnt this a work of art? If so its not old enough to be free. Hangsna (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I have tried to avoid a reproduction of someone elses piece of art. The models in the picture are built by me, but I wanted to give credits to the artist who gave joy to the model building by showing some of his publicly spread prints as a background. So the picture is not a reproduction of a piece of art. You could say that it is my adaption of a piece of art that was printed just for beeing adapted (built).

File:Oberzan1974.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

The photo is found on other websites precisely because it is PUBLIC DOMAIN. It is a photograph taken by a member in the audience of a panel discussion at the 2010 Sarajevo Film Festival. Mr. Oberzan gave his express permission for its use in the public domain. Teasle1 (talk) --Teasle1 (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

So this is not you own work. Where license statement could be found? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Michele Watley aka Midori.JPG[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Self-promotion Mike Hayes (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Panorama moulages.tif[edit]

mauvaise qualité AbrahamdeBaptista (talk) 18:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:MPCHoganJeep.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright protected packaging This was tagged as a speedy almost 3 years ago, and the tag was inappropriately removed by uploader. Converted to DR to discuss. Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per initial speedy tag. Not only is the product packaging eligible for copyright, even the plastic parts of the kit are. ""We have held that the copyright secured by Monogram on the F-105 Thunderchief kit, published in 1967, was a copyright on the kit, and is valid as to all components of the kit, including the plastic component parts." (Monogram Models, Inc. v. Industro Motive Corp., 492 F.2d 1281, 1284 (6th Cir. 1974)) That the photographer may have posed the objects in no way removes the copyright; it is at best a COM:DW. Эlcobbola talk 18:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:TBT Studio.jpg[edit]

Out of scope advertising. DLindsley Need something? 18:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment By principle, the photo can be used for showing, how a typical radio channel indoor rooms look like, but as this is promotion-only user, I am not against deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
You are right, and I agree with you. Like you, still, Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. DLindsley Need something? 01:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lauren-Benton-Historian.jpg[edit]

Uploaded at en-wiki as en:File:Lauren Benton (Historian).jpg at 19:54, 20 January 2015, with OTRS pending, by a different(?) user. Nothing has been received at OTRS, image on en-wiki is now tagged for deletion Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, new user here and not sure what this means. Laurie is a personal friend and asked me to put this picture onto her page. What's OTRS and how can I get this "tagged for deletion" undone, please? --Jerry.ryan (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

OK I believe I have marked the page as appropriate, and sent the necessary emails. --Jerry.ryan (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:EK Hochkreuz.jpg[edit]

Besserer Ausschnitt vorhanden Duschan1944 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:EdmundSchiefelingGrabEngelskirchen.JPG[edit]

Bessere Version vorhanden Duschan1944 21:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Leong IMG 1164 (6693238467).jpg[edit]

out of scope (don't tell me, we need doors #704) Pibwl (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Clearly in scope. We don't have anything equivalent in Category:704 (number). Since "we" must mean all people in the world searching for a free image for any potentially educative use, I'm sure that some of us, at some moment, will need a photograph of the number 704. Please don't keep your scope as narrow as illustrating a Wikipedia article about the subject of the image and read COM:SCOPE.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Yes, some of us need doors #704. Sounds petty and childish to want Commons to host real-life examples of all possible integers? Maybe, but not as petty and childish than to go through Russavia’s uploads and slap DRs around to see if they stick. (And I used to dislike the bloke: Pretty much my hero soon, if this witch hunt goes on…) -- Tuválkin 03:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't go through Russavia's uploads (whom I respect), but through uncategorized photos. If I see something out of real educational use IMO, I point it out so that the community can decide (and maybe someone finds an appropriate category, which I cannot). Since Russavia bulk uploads photos from Flickr, it is obvious, that among useful photos there are rubbish ones. I myself can't imagine use of a photo of #704 doors. Pibwl (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete I don't see the use for this. It is of bad quality, out of focus and underexposed. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Leong IMG 1896 (6684549451).jpg[edit]

out of scope - unusable small subject Pibwl (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep For two reasons:
    • It's a quite good image of the sky with a plane. Commons is an image repository intended to provide all people in the world searching for a free image for any potentially educative use, and there are potential uses for sky with a plane. Please don't keep your scope as narrow as illustrating a Wikipedia article about the subject of the image and read COM:SCOPE.
    • Regarding one of the subjects of the image (the plane), are you sure we have better images of this particular Cahtay Pacific aircraft for any potential use? If we have, the category for this aircraft - or this model of aircraft, if the individual aircraft is not identifiable - should be shown before proceeding.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • IMHO there's no real educational use of this photo. We have tons of Category:Cathay Pacific aircraft, while this one is not identifiable. But I don't insist. Pibwl (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:P1000512 (6641515477).jpg[edit]

unknown interior, no description, no cat. - useless Pibwl (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep In scope. It's a quite good image of a hall. It would be even more usable if we knew which building comes it from, but it's still usable as a generic hall at night.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:P1000965 (6594153737).jpg[edit]

no description, no cat, doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not sure, but we don't have anything equivalent in Category:Green water.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I just add a few cats, based on the geolocation and on what’s in plain sight. It was as fast as filing a DR, really. -- Tuválkin 03:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:P1170162 (6713783709).jpg[edit]

unknown subject - out of scope Pibwl (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Clearly in scope. Subject is rotation, and I can't find anything equivalent in category:rotation.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:P2113659 (6862310895).jpg[edit]

unknown place, no decription, no cat, no apparent value - useless Pibwl (talk) 23:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep In scope. It's a concrete structure showing pillars and beams, at building stage. It would be better to know where has it been taken, but lack of location doesn't prevent it to be used for most of purposes. Unless somebody showed that we have a better choice for ALL potentially educative uses that can be imagined, Commons mission requires to keep the image. Please don't keep your scope as narrow as illustrating a Wikipedia article about the subject of the image and read COM:SCOPE.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

February 23[edit]

File:Ahmet Davutoglu head (cropped).JPG[edit]

Source unknown. Claims to be cropped from File:Ahmet Davutoglu cropped.JPG, but that file has a different photo now. The uncropped version was uploaded there by Masri.eg, without citing a source, which is now reverted. Cfsenel (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh, and the five photos in the file history of File:Ahmet Davutoglu cropped.JPG also needs to be deleted, as well as one in the File:Ahmet Davutoğlu (cropped version).JPG. Masri.eg seems to have uploaded a lot of unfree photos on 29 August. His upload at File:Abdullah Gül Senate of Poland.JPG is already reverted, and his file was removed from history.--Cfsenel (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Douglasfugazi (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Douglasfugazi or this permanent link (serial copyright violator + uploader cleans his user talk constantly without archiving).

User (a Twitter and cycle fan) appears to be connected with all relevant Twitter etc. accounts and related news sites of Colombian cycle sport teams, uploading copyrighted files in the most cases shortly after they were publsihed by the original copyright owners on their (social media) sites. The user had chances to counter-arguing in several related deletion request, files tagged with no permission etc. and there was no reaction. Note that the uploader is able to crop files (removing watermarks etc.), details via (example) User talk:Douglasfugazi#File:Rigoberto Uran-Campeon 2015.png

Living examples of nominated files

or

File:Ciclistas de Colombia NC 2015.png (uploaded 03:04, 9. Feb. 2015) --> versus (example) https://twitter.com/mundociclistico/status/564420055925260289 (05:46 - 8. Feb. 2015, by "Mundo Ciclistico") = (even watermarked) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B9U5ACtIQAIloYJ.jpg:orig
Flickrwashing

Beyond this, the flickrreviewed uploads (not all nominated) by this user seems to be also problematic, see also as an (Flickrwasing) example: User talk:Douglasfugazi#File:Nairo Quitana-Team Movistar.jpg (more cases at user talk).

Living examples (and herby nominating too)


Gunnex (talk) 00:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Updated. Gunnex (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Super Chicha.jpg[edit]

It says "La foto la he sacado yo." (I tooked the photo) wich is a little bit hard since this is not a photo, but a derivated work. Apparently is a character for a carnival, but there´s not evidence of that and looks more like a joke. Article in es: is under "not notable" template. Thanks. Ganímedes (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files on User:Josve05a/Sony Music[edit]

per Category:Mynewsdesk-related deletion requests/deleted (Sony Music)

Josve05a (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Procedural keep: Some of them ( [1] [2] [3] ) look like they could've been taken by the PR dpt. itself; please renominate separately or only Symbol delete vote.svg delete the professional promotional shots of non-Swedish artists.    FDMS  4    01:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Per earlier DRS, the deafult license on MND is CC-BY-3.0 and after repearted attemts to reach Sony about if these licenses ever are valid (see 1 and 2) we haven't been able to get an answer. And since there is a precedence to delete images from Sonys MND-feed, these should also be deleted, pending possible OTRS. Josve05a (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
There are two different questions to be answered for each file:
  1. Does Sony Music Entertainment Sweden own the full copyright (or "usage rights") of the image? That's unlikely with non-Swedish artists and likely with Swedish artists on it.
  2. Do the PR people responsible for uploading to Mynewsdesk have the authorisation necessary for a release of the image? I'd say always likely, but almost definitely for nonprofessional shots. After all, Sony is not an SME.
   FDMS  4    01:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
You forgot Q3. If the license is set to a specific license (in this case CC-BY 3.0) by default, without them knowing, is then the license valid? We have in the past deleted all images from Sony Music, but I would be glad if these could be keeps. All for free media, as anybody else. Josve05a (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
But CC BY 3.0 isn't only the default option for Sony – I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to vote keep by itself, still I don't think this is the right venue to discuss what might affect almost 1.000 files more than listed here. "Unlike Sony other copyright holders might respond and confirm the release" is not how copyright works.    FDMS  4    02:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
But you're right. Refer to my comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cover Sjung.jpg. 'll stike those which I'll withdraw from this DR. Josve05a (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Even though I am the one who started this DR, per set principles of earlier DRs, I would "like" theese to be kept. As FDMS4's comment above states, there is no difference between Sony and any other company who uses MyNewsDesk. Please also refer to earlier deletetions on Category:Mynewsdesk-related deletion requests/deleted (Sony Music). Josve05a (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Right selection, Symbol delete vote.svg delete per above.    FDMS  4    21:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Permission for the files is not given by mynewsdesk.com. The permission is given by the copyright owner, who manages their accounts at mynewsdesk.com. Flickr does not grant us permission to use images. The flicker users do. This is the same thing. --Bensin (talk) 23:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
@Bensin: That is not the issue that is being discussed. Josve05a (talk) 03:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Puresalt.jpg[edit]

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 00:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Plakat Sabine Danicke 2015.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation. German election campaign poster. Uploader claims it as own work, but that's unlikely. Copyrights are almost certainly with the political party (die Grüne Partei). Image is on the front page of their website, see http://gruene-altmark.de/. Jahoe (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This is not a copyright violation! This poster is my work. I created ist. You can see it in the text on the right site of the picture: V.i.s.d.P.: Christian Franke .... that's me. ChristianSAW 24. February 2015

Of course it's quite possible that you are the designer of this poster, but are you still the copyright holder? To me it seems highly unlikely that a nation-wide political party in Germany would use election posters of which they didn't acquire the rights.
Also I noticed that another election poster you've uploaded was deleted as copyvio.
Anyhow, to keep the file on commons, I believe we need a clear confirmation about it's copyright holder and the license under which it's released from the Grüne Partei (Green party) to OTRS. For now, I'm retaining this deletion request. Jahoe (talk) 22:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Dismio channel ( nieuws ).png[edit]

Self promotion. Logo of "Dismio channel" uploaded by user "Dismio channel"... Jahoe (talk) 01:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ruben Montoya Arboleda.jpg[edit]

Non-notable image; probably self promotion. Jahoe (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Visa travel for Albanian citizens.png[edit]

Because is set incorrecly. Thanks Brizton (talk) 01:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Dimitri Qvintus.jpg[edit]

Author is given, but author is not the uploader, needs permission. Photo seems to be cropped from a group photo, no proper exif-data. Htm (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ciarawiki3.jpg[edit]

Probably copyright violation. Unlikely that this lowres image is own work by (brand new) user as claimed. Image can be found on several news and showbizz sites on the internet. Jahoe (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I have the same doubts about other uploads by the same User:Chelsea296:
I suggest they'd all be deleted. Jahoe (talk) 01:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Jane Trahey ad - What becomes a Legend most?.jpg[edit]

Commons:Derivative works 太刻薄 (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep poster originally created somewhere between 1952-53. It is in public domain. Jim Carter (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Vincent Gallo G STAR RAW.jpg[edit]

photo of a poster 太刻薄 (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Terminal Humberto Primo Montaje.JPG[edit]

Posible violación de derechos de autor; este usuario ha subido constantemente imagenes de terceros sin autorización y esta, que contiene el montaje de una futura terminal no parece ser la excepción, aunque no fue posible establecer el sitio de internet de donde fue obtenida. Nótese su escasa resolución y la ausencia de datos EXIF, que abonan la teoría de un copy&paste de alguna página web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Tonga исторический.svg.png[edit]

SVG available as File:Flag of Tonga (1862-1866).svg. Fry1989 eh? 02:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sabeenn-pti-flag.png[edit]

Version without wordmark: File:PTI-Flag-Facebook-Cover-timline-images.jpg. Fry1989 eh? 02:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete the JPG, and remove the watermark on the PNG. Illegitimate Barrister 13:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:299 450 28879 MG 7212b jen awad.jpg[edit]

Not own work as claimed, but grabbed from http://eyelikeyourstyle.blogspot.nl/2011/03/concept-los-angeles-fashion-week.html (roll down like two-thirds of the page to find it). Probably copyright violation. Jahoe (talk) 02:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Austin Werner.jpg[edit]

Out of scope. Selfie of new commons user. Jahoe (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Director Sunny Moodie Portrait.jpg[edit]

Artists is stated as Leonie Gibbs, yet uploader User:Oldgandalf321 claims it as own work. Copyright status unclear. Jahoe (talk) 02:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bubblegum alley pn3.JPG[edit]

пвыаыфааыа 5.76.238.255 04:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep No proper rationale for deletion and image is used on ruwiki. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Speedy keep According to Google-translate пвыаыфааыа is Belarus for pvyayfaaya. Image is perfectly all right and in use. Jahoe (talk) 10:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
    • пвыаыфааыа is a random combination of letters that are typed with a left hand with a standard Cyrillic keyboard.

File:Плакатик.JPG[edit]

Violates Trademark Policy. BaseSat (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. This is a photo of a protest paper, with a rough felt-tip-pen redraw of a (Russian?, Ukrainian?) wikipedia page on it. I didn't attempt to translate and understand the text, but wikipedia's layout is clearly recognizable.
All wikipedia pages are of course publicized under an open license and can be re-used freely (also I doubt if a mere layout can be copyrighted or trademarked).
The only thing visible that is trademarked, is wikipedia's logo in the upper left corner. The drawing is however so rough and sketchy, that no confusion can occur, and it would actually be quite hard to legally prove any trademark (or copyright) violation.
With so many verbatim screenshots of wiki's front page here on commons, including the logo, I see no problem in keeping this rough sketch. Jahoe (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I don't get what a protest paper has to do with trademark policy (other that we can consider it a derivative work, which is a reason to fix the description but not to nominate for deletion). We have a huge number of images in Category:Physical Wikipedia logos, and I don't see how this one is different — NickK (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Delete on the basis that it is out of scope since it is a poorly made photo of a poor quality poster of absolutely no notability. Alan Liefting (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Image is in use on several pages (currently three) on Ukrainian wikipedia, so apparently it's not out of scope. Jahoe (talk) 11:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep!!!!! This image is now on an English-language article as well- please see Ihor Kostenko, I have translated what was written on it so hopefully you will understand the significance and that A) it is not "of absolutely no notability" and B) I cannot imagine anyone at Wikipedia would see this as a trademark violation. Wikimandia (talk) 23:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I don't see that copyright violation issues would apply here as the sketch is an embellished version of Ihor Kostenko's Wikipedia page whose notability is well referenced and, considering that Kostenko was named Wikipedian of the year for 2014, I'd say that it meets with the notability is not temporary guidelines. If anyone genuinely feels that there are problems with this scrappy sketch as constituting a 'copyright violation', I'd suggest that they take it to Jimbo's talk page and check with him. I'll be translating the text of the placard ASAP, so perhaps the relevance may be a little clearer for all contributors. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Suzuki alto old.jpg[edit]

low quality, lots of better images available mr.choppers (talk)-en- 05:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Hytha6.jpg[edit]

out of scope, without use Don-kun (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Hytha7.jpg[edit]

out of scope, without use Don-kun (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:La liberación por el arte - Cristóbal Bustamante Aguirre (2013).pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, and see COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:WTO & GATT.pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, and see COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Раимов Тимур Фарходович.jpg[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this image of a Russian musician, probable COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:En sortant de l'école.pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, and see COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Low resolution structure and packing investigations of collagen crystalline domains in tendon using Synchrotron Radiation X-rays, Structure factors determination, evaluation of Isomorphous Replacement methods and other modeling..pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, and see COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per nom. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:TECNOLOGÍA Y SU USO EN LA EDUCACIÓN.pdf[edit]

Text only document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:الجدولة-الزمنية-لإمتحانات-البكالوريا-2014-2015.png[edit]

text only document, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Chelsea296 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvios, found on many websites, missing EXIF, some have low resolutions.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Faraj Aljarih.jpg[edit]

Smaller versions of this image are all over the internet prior to this upload. Not a selfie, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Faraj AlJarih (talk · contribs)[edit]

Two very similar files, one has the overprinting of the source on it - the other one has had the source overprinting removed. Both are claimed as own work, neither likely is - instead COM:COPYVIO.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:VocalTec S-1 Page 33.jpg[edit]

text only document, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:VocalTec S-1 Page.jpg[edit]

Text only document, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:VocalTec S-1 Cover Page.jpg[edit]

Text only document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:VocalTec - The CAT.jpg[edit]

Small size, no metadata, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bibliotheca Anonoma Logo.png[edit]

Uploader is not Lawrence Wu (see metadata) Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Antonizoon is my (Lawrence Wu) screen name, see http://github.com/antonizoon . I own all copyrights to this specific photo, and I released and uploaded it to under the Creative Commons license. Antonizoon (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:ThinkPad X60 Series with Libreboot.jpg[edit]

DWs of the images on the computer screens, probable COM:COPYVIOs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the screenshot shown on the computers in this image is of Libreboot. The background of this bootloader is derived from this GPLv3 licensed GNU artwork.

I'll be more careful with the stricter upload policies on the Commons, though this image is specifically my own work. Antonizoon (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

As the author of this photo, I am relicensing it under the GFDL-1.2 to match the license of the this GFDL licensed GNU artwork used as Libreboot's Background. Antonizoon (talk) 23:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Futaba Channel.png[edit]

COM:COPYVIO: A 'screenshot' of some TV channel is not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

True. I had difficulties tagging this image as "non-free fair use" (as used for the 4chan website screencap), so can we work together to create similar metadata for this image? Antonizoon (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Non-free fair use images are not acceptable here on commons. The example you give was uploaded to the English wikipedia, which has a (strict) policy on accepting fair use images under certain conditions. Perhaps your image would be acceptable there (I'm not sure really), but again, here on commons only free content is accepted. See COM:L for more explanation. Also, you shouldn't tag uploads as own work, when they're really someone else's work. Jahoe (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Alright then. I'll figure out an alternative method of representing the site. Antonizoon (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Helle Nice (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs, Four shots of same female, three cameras.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Fundaciones y Muros.pdf[edit]

text document with images embedded, no indication of any sources COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Luisrco (talk · contribs)[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these files, which are all scanned in upper left corner of image plate - but whole white image plate was uploaded to Commons! Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Orpheusband (talk · contribs)[edit]

A gallery of promotional images with no indication of own work. Band covers, band images, two uploads of same picture, all COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by ARENOSO (talk · contribs)[edit]

Family trees are outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC) ¿Cúal es el problema de esteárbolgenealógico para borrarlo?

File:Sepehr aliyar سپهرعلی یار.JPG[edit]

Unused image of child, out of COM:SCOPE - not personal photo album Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:سپهر علی یار sepehr aliyar.JPG[edit]

Unused image of child, out of COM:SCOPE - not personal photo album Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sepeh سپهر علی یار.JPG[edit]

Unused image of child, out of COM:SCOPE - not personal photo album Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:سپهر sepehr aliyar.JPG[edit]

Unused image of child, out of COM:SCOPE - not personal photo album Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Photo by امیرحسین مرامی.JPG[edit]

Description line seems promotional, image is of penknives, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't a place to advertise a photography studio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Natalia.menna (talk · contribs)[edit]

Two views, same guy - obviously not user's own work, one of them clearly shows the halftoning. COM:COPYVIOs without more information.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Akash looking handsome.jpg[edit]

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by IsmailAyaan (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope and see COM:NOTHOST.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Las TIC´S.pdf[edit]

Text only document, out of project scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Apa 6ta edición.pdf[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope and see COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of the American Nazi Party.svg[edit]

Of limited educational use, is rarely used, and does not appear on the organisations website in this form (and is therefore inaccurate). See [1] and [2]. Alan Liefting (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

It does appear on the org's website, so it is accurate. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Fry1989 eh? 16:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes it does appear on the website as I pointed out but this file it not an accurate rendition of it. In this version the UN flag in the middle is coloured but the one on the website is black and white. We should be striving for accuracy on Commons. Alan Liefting (talk) 16:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Soooooooooooo.....fix it instead of deleting it????? I can't believe I have to say that. In any case, your first source supports the globe being blue, so who knows which is right. Fry1989 eh? 17:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't really have te skills to fix it and IMO it is a wast of time because the file is of limited use. As for the accuracy surely we should use the version on the offical website rather than a third party source. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
What you consider a waste of time is really irrelevant to whether this image should be on Commons or not. We have a great many images with limited/no use, but they belong here because we are an image repository. Even if it wasn't in use at all, if it is a real flag, it belongs here. This DR should be closed immediately. Fry1989 eh? 17:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of the State of Finland (fictional).svg[edit]

Unused fictional flag that appears to be a personal graphic design. It is therefore not within scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 08:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep The reason for the removal is not serious.--Daverdis (talk) 08:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AURAK AR.pdf[edit]

Advertising this architecture school. Outside our scope Motopark (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AURAK ENG.pdf[edit]

Advertising this architecture school. Outside our scope Motopark (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1997.11 andersen windows.pdf[edit]

made for Mischief Ysjbserver (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:EAPoeStatue.jpg[edit]

No licensing information given on depicted 3D artwork. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Kelly (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Statue was publicly installed Oct. 20, 1921 before Jan. 1, 1923 and is thus not subject to panorama restrictions. See Inventories Catalog BalPhoto (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:80244 3bibliografi-thure.pdf[edit]

It is not needed ... Johan Löfström (talk) 10:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:80244 3bibliografi-thure.pdf[edit]

It is not needed ... Johan Löfström (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:80244 3bibliografi-thure.pdf[edit]

It is not needed ... Johan Löfström (talk) 10:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:80244 3bibliografi-thure.pdf[edit]

It is not needed ... Johan Löfström (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:80244 3bibliografi1940-2001.pdf[edit]

It is not needed ... Johan Löfström (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:George1.jpg[edit]

Not useful for educational purposes. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lauterburg Essingen.jpg[edit]

Meanwhile there is a much better version with a higher resolution avaiable File:Schwabenalb Tafel25, Lauterburg, F Keller247.jpg, so this version isn't necessary anymore Vexillum (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Study-of-Frankel-oil-on-panel.jpg[edit]

No indication of permission from the copyright owner of the work, presumed to be the painter Charles Church Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I posted this picture at the request of the artist Charles Church who has given me his permission in writing and explicitly agreed that it should be made available on a creative commons share and share alike licence --Alastair Nisbet (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Alastair Nsbet

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete unless a copy of the above mentioned permission is received by OTRS. Jahoe (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:T.Khris onoffapp.jpg[edit]

The claim that this is the author's own work is somewhat dubious. The image appears to be a posed publicity photo, and can be found used on L'Express (see [3]), and apparently on the subject's under construction web site (see [4]) Whpq (talk) 11:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Cris-002.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Estreno en.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:IT section.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lau Dino.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Familienrecht 2014.jpg[edit]

Please delete. Uploader request. Hausratte (talk) 11:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Maegan.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Nicole.JPG[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:NShrestha.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Online hvtservice.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Photo 00015 Sonya C Soles.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Que coisa nao ?.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:SlWcV89YdpE.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sunliangang.JPG[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bangalore in year 2013.jpg[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Estación de Autobuses 01.JPG[edit]

This file appears to have a COM:FOP#Spain issue, which is limited to "Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares ", considering derivated from an architectural sketch at a temporarly poster, which indicates to a construction (and which will disappear when the building was completed)... and looking at File:Vitoria - Estación de Autobuses 03.JPG (08.2014) the building is almost ready. Gunnex (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is not straightforward. According to Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Permanent_vs_temporary a work placed in a public place for its lifetime can be considered permanent.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
I doubt that (as a comparing example) an event poster displayed in public advertising for a temporarly exposition of works by painter de:Gerhard Richter to be happened on (let's say) 01.04.2015, showing on the poster one of his most valued painting, can be considered "permanent" due to the lifetime of the poster. The event poster itself may have a permanent property due to it's lifetime (after 01.04.2015 the poster will end in the garbage), but not the (derivated) content (the painting) displayed on the poster — as also the construction holding this architectural sketch. Gunnex (talk) 18:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


File:Logo Semantic Web.svg[edit]

Non-free logo. There is no justification for this at Commons, there is no need for it at Commons as it can be used at WP instead, under the terms of the W3C logo's licence. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This is somewhat complicated as there are a number of derivatives of this logo, both here at Commons and at WP. Also see en:Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2015_February_21#File:Sw-horz-w3c.png where the issue of deletion of the WP version has arisen. Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2013-12#File:W3C_Semantic_Web_Logo.svg is relevant too.

Logically, I can see only two consistent outcomes:

  • Commons sees this cube logo as acceptable to Commons. It, and its derivatives, appear at Commons. As they are at Commons, there is no need for them on the WPs.
  • Commons sees this cube logo as unacceptable to Commons. The cube and its derivatives are deleted from Commons. Copies are held on local WPs and used in the semantic web articles, as needed. This is justified under non-free content.

IMHO, the cube logo is unacceptable to Commons. It is licensed by the W3C here http://www.w3.org/2007/10/sw-logos.html#usage with usage restrictions that are tighter than Commons' free licence requirements. There is no "greater good" that Commons can appeal to, it's licensably as much as any project needs and can be held perfectly well per WP. There is neither need nor justification to have it here. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • That undeletion request for the composite image is just trying to haul itself up by the bootstraps. "Keep because the source image is kept" has some (OSE) logic behind it. However we can't then extend that into "Keep the source because a derivative was kept". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, you've said that. I happen to disagree. Now can we get any other opinions to break the stalemate? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Барон. Система римского гражданского права. Вып. 3.pdf[edit]

Please delete. Uploader request. Hausratte (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Барон. Система римского гражданского права. Выпуск 2.djvu[edit]

Please delete. Uploader request. Hausratte (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Барон. Система римского гражданского права. Вып. 4.djvu[edit]

Please delete. Uploader request. Hausratte (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Сталинская Конституция.jpg[edit]

Please delete. Uploader request. Hausratte (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:OtakuFest Peru Logo..jpg[edit]

Clearly not the own work of the uploader. Copyrighted image of a event logo. TheFarix (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Gaspare Di Caro Catedral de Brasilia..jpg[edit]

Publisehd in 2013 (http://247.libero.it/rfocus/18438996/0/ragusani-nel-mondo-la-storia-di-gaspare-di-caro/). OTRS ticket is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, ceci est photo de Gaspare Di Caro, fourni par lui-meme pour ilustrer sa page Gaspare Di Caro. Elle est libre de droit et peut etres utiliser par la communautee. --Aspano (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour. Il faudrait que l'autorisation du photographe soit envoyée en suivant cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr. BrightRaven (talk) 09:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Cristo Redentor-Gaspare Di Caro.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by BrightRaven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Living artist (fr:Gaspare Di Caro). No permission. Probably covered by Brazilian FOP, but this photograph was published previously ([5]), so OTRS ticket is needed. BrightRaven (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, je suis l'auteur de la luminographie et de la photo, j'autorise donc Aspano a l'utiliser pour l'ilustration de la page Gaspare Di Caro et par consequence libere de tout droit. Gaspare Di Caro

Bonjour. Pourriez-vous envoyer votre autorisation en suivant le procédure décrite ici : COM:OTRS/fr ? Merci beaucoup. Meilleures salutations. BrightRaven (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Oui tres bien, Gaspare Di Caro, l'auteur vas vous envoyer une autorisation sur l'email indiquer : permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org

File:Cristo-Redentor Art Light 2.jpg[edit]

No EXIF, a watermark. Is it really own work? (The statue and lightning is probably covered by Brazilian FOP). BrightRaven (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Published under a NC licence here: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/30378886. BrightRaven (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, la Luminaographie du Cristo redentor est l oeuvre de Gaspare Di Caro ainsi que de cette photo. Gaspare Di Caro en tant qu'auteur la fourni pour illustrer son art , sa page wikipedia et aussi pour la proposer librement a la comunater. --Aspano (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Pour Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6bGvuHsNP0

File:Narodowe.jpg[edit]

Proszę o usuniecie tego pliki - zaaploadowany został nie ten plik. Narodowe Forum Muzyki (talk) 13:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Google translates that into: Please remove the files - zaaploadowany was not the file. Jahoe (talk) 22:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Agata Buzek2.jpg[edit]

Copy of http://www.heightcelebs.com/celebphotos/agatabuzek.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep This file is in higher def than the supposed "source" (and it is 35kB while "source" is 10kB), and with full metadata. I think the copy is in the other direction. Esprit Fugace (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Comet Ikeya-Seki 1965.jpg[edit]

Questionable copryright status. This is obviously not comet Ikeya-Seki but comet McNaught (with its famous curved tail - comet Ikeya Seki never looked like that - twilight photo of ikeya-seki), but this is not the only mistake in the source web page [6], were work of ESA is mentioned as work of NASA. Moreover, in credit line mentions Credit: Unknown.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Halley's Comet.jpg. With such conflicting information, and knowing that images from that site are poorly documented in terms of subject and credit, I don't see a choice but to delete under the Rule of Caution. C messier (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Pablo plaul (talk · contribs)[edit]

These look like either unwanted advertising or copyrighted files for which we would need a written permission via OTRS (or both).

El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Blekinge sjofartsmuseum.PNG[edit]

På egen begäran Arbmusrian (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


File:Blekinge sjofartsmuseum.PNG[edit]

På egen begäran Arbmusrian (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Urmas Paet 2010.png[edit]

Unused crop; produces bad quality thumbnails due to no sharpening for PNGs. Can be recropped as JPEG if needed. 88.196.245.83 14:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by HanSangYoon (talk · contribs)[edit]

Files are not own work, but taken by someone else and either sent to this user, or uploaded through this account (it's a little unclear but see here: [7]). Either way there is insufficient information regarding a proper release of rights and these files should be deleted per COM:PRP. If COM:OTRS comes through they can be undeleted, or this DR can be closed as kept.

ColonialGrid (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Also affected are these files which were uploaded to English Wikipedia and transferred to Commons by Epicgenius:
I have notified Epicgenius about this discussion. ColonialGrid (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know they were not the user's own images. In that case, without proper licenses, they can be deleted. Epic Genius (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I didn't expect you to realise. I left a message as it is both courteous and mandated by convention that the uploader the notified of DRs. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are going to delete these, the source files and similar ones at Wikipedia should be deleted on the same grounds. That will solve a few problems. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Probably, any files that aren't free (and don't conform to fair use) should be deleted from Wikipedias, but that would be a matter to bring up at Wikipedia. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Opposed The entire gold line images are from me by my own hand, and therefore the deletion request for those should be immediately dismissed. As for the red line section and the purple section, I have another batch that I created, so for those, I don't know; I only know that I was given the ownership from the photographers for these. HanSangYoon (talk) 00:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Seeing as we don't know which ones are yours and which ones aren't, it would be best for you to mark or list the ones you took, or (and I would prefer this option) follow the procedures at COM:OTRS to certify copyright and the free licence. This has been made much harder by having the EXIF data stripped from all the image (well at least the ones I have properly inspected). Also, please note that being given a file is not the same as owning copyright; copyright generally resides with the creator and is transferred through documentation. You have created a fair mess here by using a single account for multiple people, in future only upload photographs you took yourself. If your friends would like to have their images kept, they should also follow COM:OTRS and send an email releasing them under a free licence. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
@ColonialGrid: I believe there was an option during the creating process of the images which lets you select if the picture was created by you, or was given to you. I believe I selected the one that they gave it to me? HanSangYoon (talk) 20:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Owning photos does not mean you own copyright. Only the copyright holder can release images under a free licence. ColonialGrid (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bleu Horses Three Forks Montana 02.jpg[edit]

Also:

Sculpture by living artist Jim Dolan. No evidence of permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Please check with User:Mike Cline, my understanding is that he's contacted Dolan and they are sorting out the OTRS situation. Montanabw (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Cline has been notified of this DR. It has been ten days since he incorrectly claimed that an OTRS permission had been sent. In my experience, there is little to "sort out" -- either the artist sends a license more or less immediately after contact or he says "I'll think about it" or words to that effect and then does nothing. If and when Dolan agrees to freely license these images, we can easily restore them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I always thought OTRS pending was that the request had been made and that we get a couple weeks to sort it out. Those of us who aren't up on the nuances of Commons admin are still acting in good faith. But OK... it's Mike's concern, I guess. Montanabw (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
{{OTRS pending}} begins:
"An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS (emphasis added),
so, no, it means that the licensor has sent the license and we're waiting on OTRS. The theory is that the closing Admin can then check the OTRS message before closure.
Perhaps we should have a template for "OTRS requested", but, as I said above, I'm not sure how useful it would be -- almost all the time, either the creator sends the license immediately or he doesn't send it at all..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Nudism in Hungary.JPG[edit]

Low-quality unused personal picture. Could have been taken anywhere, so it does not really illustrate its subject. Duplicates: File:Naturism in Hungary.JPG, File:Nude Hiking.JPG. 46.127.232.215 15:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by William Frey (talk · contribs)[edit]

Logo and mathematical tasks. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo of Heesen Yachts.png[edit]

Non-free image. Dima st bk (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Acceptable range of MSWD.png[edit]

I have been informed by a colleague that the calculations are incorrect. Therefore this file should be taken done before misleading people. Spenchristoph (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bere Rangel.jpg[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ali Hassan al-Jaber (Bayda,Libya).JPG[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Libya. I think, that this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Physiologyisbad.jpg[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:আরেফিন শুভ.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Amit sunil deepak , engg. students.JPG[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Social media activism.jpg[edit]

incorrect CC license Cmorath92 (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Zowaa.jpg[edit]

I think, that logo of Assyrian Democratic Movement is not own work. Better license is needed (or OTRS-permission, if this is really own work). Taivo (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Арутюнян, Арам Суренович (talk · contribs)[edit]

As medals are 3D objects, there are two copyrights here: the medal and the photograph. Whatever the status of the medals themselves, the photographs thereof are CC-by-ND per the source.

Эlcobbola talk 15:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Scottish merchants from the reign of James V.jpg[edit]

This is a photograph of a three dimensional carving, apparently taken around 1970. As such, while the copyright on the carving has expired, the photograph itself is almost certainly still in copyright in both the UK and the US. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Badge of Honored Mechanician Russian Federation.jpg[edit]

The purported source (http://award.adm.gov.ru) is not a working site. As the medal is a 3D object, the photo of the medal also has a copyright. No evidence that the photographer has freely licensed the photograph. The current license only applies to the medal itself. Эlcobbola talk 16:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:CH Schaffhausen Schweiz Bahnhof.jpg[edit]

Enthält persönliche Daten Nobvonriedern (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Пронін Євген Ігрович.jpg[edit]

Not applicable specific source, because it is impossible to establish copyright. Are suspected of copyright infringement. Максим Підліснюк (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rachelzolf2.jpg[edit]

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AmosBar2003.jpg[edit]

Out of project scope due to bad composition. Partly superseded by file:AmosBar2004b.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bratislavsky bal.JPG[edit]

Picture of the man doesn't seem to be in the public domain. 1989 17:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but lost now, what do you mean. The "Bratislavsky bal" event (Bratislavian Ball in EN) is an annual event run by his widow in the actor's birth town, so Satinsky is part of that. MiewEN (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Satinsky.JPG[edit]

Picture of the man may not be in the public domain. 1989 17:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but lost now, what do you mean. The "Bratislavsky bal" event (Bratislavian Ball in EN) is an annual event run by his widow in the actor's birth town, so Satinsky is part of that. MiewEN (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ніколи Знову.png[edit]

as uploader/ thank you! Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Uploaders do not hold rights to images they have uploaded. Image is PD. Fry1989 eh? 16:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9D%D1%96%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8_%D0%97%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%83_02.svg --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Державне агентство лісових ресурсів України.svg[edit]

as uploader Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement.png[edit]

as uploader Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Steenbergen vroeger.jpg[edit]

out of scope. Personal artwork. Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bdzprod.jpg[edit]

pisture collection needs local picture as source, not used Motopark (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Steenbergen vroegmodern.jpg[edit]

out of scope. Personal artwork. Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete per nom and as being unused and non-notable. Delete the others of the same type from the uploader as well. Alan Liefting (talk) 18:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Kalditch et Sallopard.jpg[edit]

google finds plenty of copies, can be screenshot from some video, see size Motopark (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rafael Martínez-Simancas.JPG[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 07.2014 by Pantojito (talk · contributions · Number of edits) for es:Rafael Martínez-Simancas (who died in 07.2014), the exif indicates to work made by "BEGONA RIVAS". A similar shot made on the same occasion was previously published via (example) http://www.europapress.es/cultura/exposiciones-00131/noticia-periodista-rafa-martinez-simancas-relata-sotano-octavo-lucha-contra-cancer-20131026131912.html (2013, credits: "Foto: BEGOÑA RIVAS ").

Permission from BEGOÑA RIVAS", a professional photographer, via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Clear copyvio. The uploader is not the owner of the rights. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ria Zmitrowicz.jpg[edit]

Ria has asked for this picture to be deleted as it's out of date and her agents don't want it to come up when she's googled. Spider23 (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. That is nothing to do with Commons? We have permission to host the image and being out of date is no reason to delete it. On that basis we should delete all the images that we have of people that are dead!! --Alan Liefting (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Image dorothea wierer.jpg[edit]

You can read in the picture Foto di Davide Magnaghi (photo by Davide Magnaghi). No release by the author in sight. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image 2 dorothea.jpg, dealing with a similar upload of the same biathlete by the same user. Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Image 2 dorothea.jpg[edit]

You can read in the picture Photo Serge Schwan. No release by the author in sight. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image dorothea wierer.jpg, dealing with a similar upload of the same biathlete by the same user. Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Picture dorothea.jpg[edit]

You can read in the picture Photo Serge Schwan. No release by the author in sight. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image dorothea wierer.jpg, dealing with a similar upload of the same biathlete by the same user. Mai-Sachme (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lioconcha arabica MHNT.CON.2002.1019. simple.jpg[edit]

Loss of information, be permanently decommissioned Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria del migrante.jpg[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[8] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria nacional de planificacion y desarrollo.jpg[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[9] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Scans of paintings/works by contemporary artists; Ukraine is pma +70. w:Kateryna Vasylivna Bilokur died 1961; w:Tetyana Yablonska died 2005; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 21:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete as per nom --BaseSat (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Works by en:Fedir Krychevsky, who died in 1947. Ukrainian is pma 70, thus not PD until 01.01.2018.

Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Derivative work; scan of publication

Эlcobbola talk 21:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Appear to be batch group of copyvios; lower resolutions, numerous different cameras (in this batch alone: SP510UZ, SP560UZ, MD9700, Canon PowerShot A430, Canon EOS 5D, DSC-W520, Canon EOS 1000D), many obviously from the internet (e.g., File:Шева13.jpg is here, File:Золоті ворота3.jpg is watermarked as all rights reserved and is here, etc.) Quack!

Эlcobbola talk 21:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Low res, no camera EXIF, all appeared here before upload to Commons, uploader is serial copyvio uploader (see above). Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 20:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Copyvio images taken from here. See matching watermark on File:1 10 Наконечники скифских стрел.jpg, for example.

Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria de educación superior.jpg[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[10] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Semplades.jpg[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[11] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria de comunicacion.jpg[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[12] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Logotipo republica ecuador-37 secretaria nacional administracion publica (1).png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[13] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria gestion politica.png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[14] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Logotipo republica ecuador-34 secretaria agua.png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[15] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Logotipo republica ecuador secretaria gestion riesgos.png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[16] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria de inteligencia.png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[17] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Basic text and geometry. Fry1989 eh? 18:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Secretaria de discapacidades.png[edit]

Hardly own work by uploader[18] and likely above TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Scans of paintings/works by contemporary artists; Ukraine is pma +70. w:Kateryna Vasylivna Bilokur died 1961; w:Tetyana Yablonska died 2005; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 21:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete as per nom --BaseSat (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Works by en:Fedir Krychevsky, who died in 1947. Ukrainian is pma 70, thus not PD until 01.01.2018.

Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Derivative work; scan of publication

Эlcobbola talk 21:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)

Appear to be batch group of copyvios; lower resolutions, numerous different cameras (in this batch alone: SP510UZ, SP560UZ, MD9700, Canon PowerShot A430, Canon EOS 5D, DSC-W520, Canon EOS 1000D), many obviously from the internet (e.g., File:Шева13.jpg is here, File:Золоті ворота3.jpg is watermarked as all rights reserved and is here, etc.) Quack!

Эlcobbola talk 21:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Low res, no camera EXIF, all appeared here before upload to Commons, uploader is serial copyvio uploader (see above). Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 20:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Palukopa (talk · contribs)[edit]

Copyvio images taken from here. See matching watermark on File:1 10 Наконечники скифских стрел.jpg, for example.

Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Old railway st., Buchach.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation: if the image above is likely to be in public domain due to its image, the image below is clearly modern and is copyrighted by pidzamochok.at.ua NickK (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Magda M 73 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, multiple personalites. Uploaded by Magda M 73 (talk · contributions · Number of edits) in a row on 16.02.2015 and authoring the files with "AmberExpo", all files were previously published via official site http://amberexpo.pl/title,Galeria_foto,pid,1573.html (All Rights Reserved MTG S.A. © 2012 AmberEXPO). Example:

Permission from "AmberEXPO" via COM:OTRS needed.

Nominating also:

  • File:Witold Bock.JPG (taken in 2009), uploaded 12.2014, and here authored with "wb" (= most likely Witold Bock)

Permission from whoever the photographer was - but most likely not Magda M 73 - needed.

Gunnex (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Los mamos (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Volker Pfüller 2012.jpg[edit]

Wish of the artist, no more in use. SpreeTom (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (2).JPG[edit]

Je demande la suppression de ce fichier car l'article pour lequel je l'avais importé n'est pas "accepté" sur Wikipédia. Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


Kept: Image is well inside commons project scope. JuTa 19:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (2).JPG[edit]

Je souhaiterais que cette image soit supprimé de Wikimedia Commons. Elle a été importé ici afin d'illustrer un article non admissible. Il existe d'autres images de trains routiers qui peuvent illustrer un éventuel article sur cette activité peu banale. Également, je ne suis pas le photographe de cette photo. Merci d'avance Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (3).JPG[edit]

Je demande la suppression de ce fichier car l'article pour lequel je l'avais importé n'est pas "accepté" sur Wikipédia. Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


Kept: image is well inside commons project scope JuTa 19:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (3).JPG[edit]

Je souhaiterais que cette image soit supprimé de Wikimedia Commons. Elle a été importé ici afin d'illustrer un article non admissible. Il existe d'autres images de trains routiers qui peuvent illustrer un éventuel article sur cette activité peu banale. Également, je ne suis pas le photographe de cette photo. Merci d'avance Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (4).JPG[edit]

Je demande la suppression de ce fichier car l'article pour lequel je l'avais importé n'est pas "accepté" sur Wikipédia. Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


Kept: The image is well inside commons project scope. JuTa 19:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (4).JPG[edit]

Je souhaiterais que cette image soit supprimé de Wikimedia Commons. Elle a été importé ici afin d'illustrer un article non admissible. Il existe d'autres images de trains routiers qui peuvent illustrer un éventuel article sur cette activité peu banale. Également, je ne suis pas le photographe de cette photo. Merci d'avance Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (1).JPG[edit]

Je demande la suppression de ce fichier car l'article pour lequel je l'avais importé n'est pas "accepté" sur Wikipédia. Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


Kept: Image is well inside commons project scope. JuTa 19:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Train touristique au Cap d'Agde (1).JPG[edit]

Je souhaiterais que cette image soit supprimé de Wikimedia Commons. Elle a été importé ici afin d'illustrer un article non admissible. Il existe d'autres images de trains routiers qui peuvent illustrer un éventuel article sur cette activité peu banale. Également, je ne suis pas le photographe de cette photo. Merci d'avance Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Gabriel148 - Copie.jpg[edit]

A work out of a personal archive which is reproduced is not own work. The user has also uploaded a number of drawings of furniture, where the furniture is not in the public domain. Basvb (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Bert kling (talk · contribs)[edit]

Reproductions of paintings by w:it:Augusto Antonio Dirani why died in 1983. Permission is needed.

Basvb (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sagar kumar at his hostel room, KIIT University.jpg[edit]

Unused personal image with heavy editing Basvb (talk) 21:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Qlexx (talk · contribs)[edit]

Images seem to be uploaded with advertising as a main purpose.

Basvb (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Tehsen Ullah Skt.jpg[edit]

Unused personal image without categories and incorrect date Basvb (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Masterplan Nordelta.jpg[edit]

Posible imagen satelital con derechos de autor, extraída de GoogleMaps o sitios similares. Es muy poco probable que se trate de un trabajo propio. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Replace this image - Ottoman.jpg[edit]

I am the uploader. This image will not be used for the purported use. Zoupan (talk) 21:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Wrong date[edit]

If the provided date is wrong, why not just remove it? Using a large message box template to tag wrong dates isn't useful for users in any way, and Incorrect date has a too broad scope to be of any use as a maintenance category.    FDMS  4    21:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Also, this isn't metadata-compatible, so tools such as the MediaViewer will still display the wrong date, without any warning.    FDMS  4    20:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The template needs improving but I think there is a need to be able to tag dates in descriptions which are obviously wrong (normally they are dates relating to upload or scanning rather than the event depicted). I'm not a wizard with these things - the template format was just grabbed from something else to get the ball rolling. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 12:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
@Railwayfan2005: Why do yo think that "there is a need to be able to tag dates in descriptions which are obviously wrong"?    FDMS  4    14:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Brijendra Pratap SIngh.JPG[edit]

Unclear copyright status (previously published elsewhere) / out of scope (article has been nominated for deletion).    FDMS  4    21:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark Ordesky.jpg[edit]

copyvio from http://www.courtfive.com/about-c5/who-we-are/mark-ordesky/ Rondador (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Poolee Training.jpg[edit]

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:355 Exercise.jpg[edit]

poor unusable quality photo of modern US soldier Pibwl (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Engelsewerksneeuw.JPG[edit]

not in use, no added value JrPol (talk) 22:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bankierzy mają pełne ręce roboty (6419214169).jpg[edit]

out of scope, along with File:Bankierzy (Twórcy gry) (6419313123).jpg and File:Bankierzy oferują fachowe doradztwo (6419366817).jpg - tests of a board game in a school, no real educational value, no encyclopaedic persons (description: "bankers have full hands of work"). Pibwl (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Celcareatransportatpustiul.jpg[edit]

book cover, probably copyrighted - the same for rest of user's uploads: File:Coperta4.JPG, File:Copertasg.jpg, file:La-templul-poeziei.jpg, File:Inpiataagralimentara.jpg, File:Ladictaduradelsilencio.jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Safety notice[edit]

The general disclaimer does not give warning about the content to the images hosted on this site, which makes the inclusion of this template and its wording misleading to anyone encountering it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Вікіекспедиція до Абхазії 15.JPG[edit]

This image (work of Zurab Tsereteli) violates No-FoP in Georgia and No-FoP in Republic of Abkhazia, and according to georgian and abkhazian laws and our, Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 23:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Monument on seafront of Pytsund.jpg[edit]

This image (work of Zurab Tsereteli) violates No-FoP in Georgia and No-FoP in Republic of Abkhazia, and according to georgian and abkhazian laws and our, Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 23:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:OpenGovernmentLicence.svg[edit]

The logo itself is not a free image in the UK - its country of origin. Before it was uploaded to en:wiki I enquired with the Uk government as to the copyright status of the logo. The reply was

From: Information Policy (PSI) [PSI@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 07 August 2013 09:33
To:
Subject: TNA130079496: Open Government Licence (Public sector information)
Dear N,
Thank you for your email dated August 6th, 2013. The OGL logo is Crown copyright, but as the re-use a logo is not covered under the Open Government Licence, or the Creative Commons Licence. The use of government departmental marks and logos is governed by an Delegation of Authority from the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery office, which gives each government department the rights over the re-use of these logos. Re-use of logos is rarely granted other than for official government or department usage.
However, as the body responsible for the administration of Crown copyright, and with the authority to grant permission for the re-use of the OGL logo, we would see no objection to its use in this way e.g.as an accompaniment to an article on the Open Government Licence on the Wikipedia site.
I hope this information will be helpful to you, but if you have further questions, please feel free to get in touch with me again. You might find the guidance on how the logo can be used helpful, and to this end I have included a link http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/government-licensing/ogl-symbol.htm
Yours sincerely
Judy Nokes
Information Policy Adviser

Nthep (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

That sounds like a waiver to me. Fry1989 eh? 01:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Roshan kamaing father & mother& brother.jpg[edit]

unused personal and family photos, out of scope - also rest of uploads: File:Image रोसन् पोख्रेल् म्यन्मार कामाई ठोईसायाड. Roshan kamaing.jpg, File:Image Roshan kamaing live in Thailand.jpg, File:Myanmar kamaing roshan pokharel live in thailand temporary 2014-04-07 20-41.jpeg, File:Thailand's in bangkok koh san road 2014-04-07 20-45.JPG Pibwl (talk) 23:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Fraser Health logo.jpg[edit]

Logo - not simple enough to be considered free Ldorfman (talk) 23:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Puffer 26.png[edit]

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:V3O6097.jpg[edit]

unused personal? photo, one of user's 2 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Volatile printing ink solvents.jpg[edit]

scanned table of data, which should be given as a referenced plain text. Same for File:Some solvents used in screenprinting inks.jpg Pibwl (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Suzuki alto grey.jpg[edit]

Low quality, better examples available at Category:Suzuki Alto IV. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Suzuki alto white.jpg[edit]

Low quality, better examples available at Category:Suzuki Alto IV. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Wizualizacja mebli kuchennych 0001.jpg[edit]

unused 3d visualisation of kitchen - out of scope. The other upload is an autopromo logo File:MARDOM logo.png of a small firm producing furniture, used only in user's sandbox (clearly connected with the firm) Pibwl (talk) 23:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития РФ № 335 от 10 апреля 2012 г..jpg[edit]

out of scope - scan of a Soviet order about adoption of AI-II first aid kits. Pibwl (talk) 23:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Toyota Celica Supra (9033062944).jpg[edit]

Low quality, better examples of this car available at Category:Toyota Supra (A60). OSX (talkcontributions) 23:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:L'EXPRESS.JPG[edit]

This is my personal file and I do not wish to have it posted on the internet. Chriswindw (talk) 23:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Hochstift Eichstaett coat of arms.png[edit]

Unused duplicate of a SVG by the same author (so the upload date should not matter). ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Собрание сочинений Эдгара По. Т. 1 (1896).djvu[edit]

Unused duplicate of File:Собрание сочинений Эдгара Поэ (1896) т.1.djvu. Hausratte (talk) 23:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Собрание сочинений Эдгара По. Т. 2 (1896).djvu[edit]

Unused duplicate of File:Собрание сочинений Эдгара Поэ (1896) т.2.djvu. Hausratte (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)