User:Romanceor/QI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
OldManonPhotoshop1850.jpg
fr-2
en-2
es-2
Click to see my photographs.

category

www

Wikipedia-logo.png  • Wikipédia-fr|Applications-office.svg Presa de decissions.png UserIconMail.svg  38094-canon.svg  • My pictures|Presa de decissions.png 
Commons-logo.svg  • Wikimedia Commons|Applications-office.svg Presa de decissions.png 



Nominations aux images de qualité de RomanceorRomanceor quality images nominations
Quality images logo.svg Dernière mise à jour par — Last update by :
OldManonPhotoshop1850.jpg  Romanceor[parlons-en] 12:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

N.B. : Seules les images acceptées sont encore mises à jour ici. 19:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)



Acceptées[edit]


Ecluse du bord de Marne arround Dormans[edit]

Ecluse du bord de Marne.jpg

  • Nomination Ecluse du bord de Marne arround Dormans, Aisne, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good timing, QI -- Ianaré 22:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp and CCW tilt. Lycaon 08:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Sharped and tilt corrected. Romanceor 12:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now is ok - Pudelek 10:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 Result orginal: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> promote -- carol 16:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lestat 10:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
this last vote doesn't count since it wasn't a draw but nothing changes with or without it. -- carol 16:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hôtel des abbés de Cluny[edit]

Hôtel des abbés de Cluny.jpg

  • Nomination Musée national du Moyen Âge (Hôtel des abbés de Cluny) in Paris, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice composition, but it could be lightened, there are 2 spots in the sky (clone out), and it's a little blurry (try shrinking ?) --ianaré 13:20, 10 March 2008 EDT
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lightened, sharped, and sky artefacts corrected. Romanceor 20:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The spots are still there (deux grains de poussière dans le ciel vers le centre-droite). Much better now otherwise :-) . -- Ianare 00:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Blurriness is probably due to small aperture (f/29), but there is still a high level of detail that would be destroyed by downsampling. --Stefan Vladuck 17:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Wow, you made me discover it ! That's crazy... i'll use less my 29 for now on. Romanceor 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think you have blown some highlights in your lightened version. How did you do the lightening? Maybe try using curves to lighten only the dark parts a little bit... --Stefan Vladuck 23:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info That's right ; I had done it with a photoshop brush. I just corrected that (better lightened) and distortion. Romanceor 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks nice, not very good detail but high resolution. --Beyond silence 17:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose -> promoted to QI --Aqwis 00:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Nuit de fête Place Flagey[edit]

Nuit de fête Place Flagey.JPG

  • Nomination Nocturn activity in Place Eugène Flagey in Brussels --Romanceor 01:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice, but needs CCW rotation. --Dilaudid 10:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Judging from the electric poles I think it's already level. --Lerdsuwa 13:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Which are more likely to be completely vertical, poles or buildings? :) --Dilaudid 19:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I rotated 0.9° left ; I think it's all right now. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support still has my support. --Lerdsuwa 16:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? carol (talk) 03:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks! –Dilaudid 10:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Cobblestone reparing.jpg[edit]

Cobblestone reparing.jpg

  • Nomination Cobblestone repairing in Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good. Yann 20:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very noisy (and it is not the dust). Lycaon 19:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg QuestionWhat about this new version ? --Romanceor 21:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose underexposed. --Afrank99 12:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg QuestionWhat about this new version ? --Romanceor 08:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
      • Not yet the exposure level I would move it to, but better. --Afrank99 06:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok, meets the criteria. --High Contrast 13:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think after those two corrections, it is fine now. Maedin 17:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Maedin 16:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg[edit]

Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg

  • Nomination Ernesto Cardenal read his poems in Santiago of Chile. --Romanceor 20:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good portrait --Mbdortmund 02:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IMO it's too noisy. --kallerna 10:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Ok now. --kallerna 10:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Romanceor's picture show sometimes little technical weaknesses, but they tell a story and are very good concerning atmosphere and composition, I think the noise is acceptable here because of the other qualities. It's an available light picture and a flash would have reduced the noise but destroyed the atmosphere. --Mbdortmund 14:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Atmosphere well captured, available light snap shots cannot always be technically perfect. -- Smial 21:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All this needs is proper editing, it's a great shot. The problem is that it's not only got noise (and color noise), it's got jpeg artifacts in the noise. If you want to upload the original, I can fix it for you. Then I'd even support it as FP. --Calibas 01:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Marcok 23:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree that the noise issue could easily be addressed, I'll support it if that has been properly done. -- H005 21:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Issue sucessfully resolved. -- H005 16:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I denoised it a little bit, please have a look --Mbdortmund 14:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me --George Chernilevsky 13:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The new denoised version is nice. Jonathunder 14:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --High Contrast 20:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? George Chernilevsky 06:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


Refusées[edit]


La Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris vue du pont d'Arcole[edit]

La Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris vue du pont d'Arcole.jpg

  • Nomination Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris seen from Arcole bridge, by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image is tilted, should be fixed first -- Richard Bartz 12:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tilted corrected. Romanceor 00:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I feel circular lens flare, slightly detail, lens distortion of right building. And could you add location? _Fukutaro 11:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentLens flare and lens distortion corrected -- Romanceor 14:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposePersonally i dislike the "ghost" that is standing in the midle of the image -user:LadyofHats 10:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per LadyofHats -- ianaré 12:52, 10 March 2008 EDT
 Result: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> not promoted to QI -- Lycaon 06:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Grand Trianon[edit]

Grand Trianon.jpg

  • Nomination Grand Trianon, dans le parc du château de Versailles, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Did you correct color or contrast? I think this is artificialy color. And tilt. _Fukutaro 16:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
    • No, it's the original picture, the colors are real. Romanceor 17:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Not retouched: If so, did you use proper white-balance when time you shoot this? I seem still that slightly too amber (and tilt) Fukutaro 10:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
        • The photo has been taked arround 19h. Could it be the sunset that gives you this impression ? Romanceor 12:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- I think it is on the edge of being acepted, i wouldnt try to fix the color. it may end seeming even more artificial -- LadyofHats
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good composition and color, support if slight tilt is corrected -- ianaré 16:51 5 March 2008 EDT
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - hmmm... a little dark - Pudelek 11:57, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad perspective, bad crop, too dark. --Lestat 10:54, March 7, 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info bright and tilt corrected. --Romanceor 15:40, March 9, 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the very tight crop bothers me. --Rampensau 13:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose -> not promoted to QI -- Lycaon 06:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Conciergerie in Paris[edit]

Exposure 20 seconds.jpg

  • Nomination Conciergerie in Paris, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A really good and pleasant illustration of nocturn long time exposure B.navez 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice typical image that is the slow shutter shot at the night time. But I think that at the left buildings are not good sharpness. And it need to add some [[Category:]] and some location. _Fukutaro 14:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Location et categorization done. Are you sure sharpness of the walls of the building is what makes quality or not of thess kinds of long exposure pictures with moving objects ? --B.navez 18:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Yes. I meant historic building's sharpness for QI. The road at the lower right in focused. _Fukutaro 11:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it's too dark and too soft (coincidence btw : I shot a panorama of this from the same location, but threw it because one of my pics was blurred... ;) ) -- Benh 21:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It dearly needs a better filename --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 02:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 Result orginal: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> decline -- carol 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Sommet de la tour de Beurre de la cathédrale de Rouen[edit]

Sommet de la tour de Beurre de la cathédrale de Rouen.jpg

  • Nomination Sommet de la tour de Beurre de la Cathédrale, Rouen, France, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A vertical composition would be more appropriate --ianaré 13:02, 10 March 2008 EDT
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, in fact the subject of the photo is the top of the tower and not the tower herself... Romanceor 20:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think for an encyclopedia there is greater value in showing more of the tower. --ianaré 01:34, 11 March 2008 EDT
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with the fact that it is important to have the whole tower, but I don't think it has to be the only photo : it is possible that a part of the article about the Cathédrale de Rouen is specific about the top of this famous tower, which has a very rare structure : an octogonal crown instead of the top initialy planed. Romanceor 11:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with ianare. _Fukutaro 14:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice, good detail. --Beyond silence Sort both.svg 17:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 Result: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> (decline?) -- carol 17:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not enough space in the top of the image. The very top of the tower seems to be cut off. sfu 10:28, 17 March 2008

Ouagadougou fishery[edit]

Pêche rustique à Ouagadougou.jpg

  • Nomination Fishers and their fishing net in Ouagadougou --Romanceor 12:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good composition and nice colours. --Ikiwaner 08:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Really! This is too noisy to pass QI's technical requirements. Lycaon 22:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Couldn't you do something about it ? Have I to reduce the size ? Romanceor 18:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
    • It's difficult. I removed some of the noise, but more would compromise the details of the image! Sorry. Lycaon 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Beyond silence 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too noisy, not qualifiable for a day light picture. --B.navez 17:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose washed out, low detail --Simonizer 07:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Result: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose -> not promoted -- carol 14:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ac Simonizer, Lycaon and B.navez. --Lestath 10:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with voting after the allotted time! --carol 14:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Carapils[edit]

  • Nomination Carapils bier cans, --Romanceor 13:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The photograph is good and the events that cause these photographs are often good as well. What I don't support, however, is under-age consumption of alcohol and in the blurry parts of this image, such questions arise. Heh. It is very good to have a foundation of fun without external assistence first. -- carol 05:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Uhuh... there is no underaged consumer in this picture, and neither arround the cans. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 16:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Those are man-legs, aged 15 to 25 years. Typical man-legs thicken after the age of 25, sometimes before. -- carol (tomes) 11:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it seems jpg artifacts on the red part. And somehow, very complicated. _Fukutaro 14:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I just don't understand what's complicated ; is that the composition that disturbs you ? --Romanceor 16:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unneeded noise in the out-of-focus parts. Lycaon 05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I tried to reduce the noise by JPEG compression by 5%, but I'm not sure what means "Unneeded noise" : how is it possible to have a needed noise ? --Romanceor [parlons-en] 10:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Unneeded or unnecessary or could/should have been avoided. Lycaon 12:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Lycaon 05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Clochard parisien à Bercy[edit]

Clochard parisien à Bercy.jpg

  • Nomination Clochard à Bercy, Paris --Romanceor 18:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this picture more for its composition rather than its technical qualities. The lighting conditions were tough, and there is considerable clipping in the highlights, as well as alight noise overall. I'm supporting it, it still is a good pic. --Dschwen 00:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It has problem so that, I think it needs discuss and some opinion. _Fukutaro 15:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good --Beyond silence 21:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Compositional not bad but technically insufficient for QI (clipping and noise). Lycaon 11:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Lycaon --Simonizer 22:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? carol (talk) 03:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Tour NE de la bibliothèque François Mitterand[edit]

  • Nomination Tower of the French national library. --Romanceor 03:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Low noise, good sharpness, exposure, not tilted... Looks fine to me Benh 08:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeStill no Freedom of Panorama in France - Building is under the copyright of the architect. esby
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You shouldn't correct distortion in Photoshop because it just corrects the angles but not the shortening. Use Hugin instead. --Ikiwaner 15:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Préparation de grenouille.jpg[edit]

Préparation de grenouille.jpg

  • Nomination Frog preparation --Romanceor 13:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even with the description "frog preparation" I can't work out what the subject of the image actually is. TimVickers 18:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Lucky you ;-(. Lycaon 06:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Ha! Probably very true. I'll hold on to the idea that it is some kind of root vegetable! :) TimVickers 15:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I actually like it. Wouldn't try eating this though! Adamantios 18:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. --Kosiarz-PL 05:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too noisy. Lycaon 06:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not clear to me what to look at exactly in the picture. Besides, I like them fried, but I don't want to know about the whole process! :-P --Eusebius 09:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Gnangarra 15:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Cycliste à place d'Italie-Paris.jpg[edit]

Cycliste à place d'Italie-Paris.jpg

  • Nomination Cyclist in Place d'Italie, Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too noisy --Ianare 06:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg QuestionWhat about it now ? --Romanceor 12:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately denoising removed too much detail. --Ianare 16:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the colors. Yann 22:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Ianaré, the de-noising has removed detail and texture. I really like the picture, otherwise, is it possible to re-process from raw . . . maybe try a little less de-noising with some downsampling? Maedin 17:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
    • Reprocessing, yep, but please do not advocate downsampling: that's akin to throwing away part of your image. Lycaon 21:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Maedin 16:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Parisian dog walker.jpg[edit]

Parisian dog walker.jpg

  • Nomination Parisian dog walker. --Romanceor 15:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentI like colours and atmosphere but perspektive should be corrected --Mbdortmund 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I don't understand what I should do to correct the perspective ? Is it tilt you mean ? --Romanceor 17:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
      the vertical lines on the walls are tilt to the left, and this tilt seems to be stronger on the left part of the picture, that's why I think the perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 23:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentI think this is optical illusion due to angle of shot because photoshop's 'repères' doesn't indicate any tilt on any vertical line. --Romanceor 12:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment just to show what I mean, I'll delete the copy tomorrow, red lines are vertical File:Parisian dog walker copy.jpg --Mbdortmund 15:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
          • Oooops. I was looking my file and not the one online... it's obiously tilted, I corrected.--Romanceor 16:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
            • Symbol support vote.svg Support good --Mbdortmund 17:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There is still a significant noise issue. Lycaon 17:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good. Yann 14:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not sure what to call it technically, but some of the edges have been degraded. Look, for example, at where the lady's scarf meets her coat. Was this caused by excessive noise reduction? Maedin 19:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very good view, like impressionistic painting... by technically is not perfect. --George Chernilevsky 07:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Maedin 13:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Retirées des nominations[edit]

Serge Toubiana à la Cinémathèque française[edit]

Serge Toubiana à la Cinémathèque française.jpg

  • Nomination Serge Toubiana animating the yesterday's discussion about "Was May 68 filmed ?" at the Cinémathèque française --Romanceor 03:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Significant motion blur on the hand and microphone. --Lerdsuwa 05:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Microphone and hand are not the subject of the photo, and their blurness contribute to the effect of dynamisn of the picture, which name is Serge Toubiana "animating". --Romanceor 05:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
    • You gotta clean your sensor, dude. --Dschwen 00:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Yes I know ; it's a catastrophy... But I've been told that's VERY expensive. May I ask where do you see it in this picture ? --Romanceor 10:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
        • It's not expensive. You need lint-free paper tissue and Methanol. I've done it twice before (and I'm overdue too :-) ). Spots are all over the bg.--Dschwen 12:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
          • Well if you were speaking of lenses that's not the problem : it really is the dust arrived on the sensor in Ouagadougou (a very dust&dirty city, true horror for SLRs, overall when you need objective changes). But in fact I'm just discovering the "Dust correction" tool in Capture NX which will permit me to wait until I have the 25€ asked by Nikon to clean the sensor... 'cause yes, I prefer to let doing it by professionals : to risky. Thanks anyhow. --Romanceor 12:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
            • Of course I'm talking about the sensor! First time is always the scariest. But then again, I had a nicely equiped lab to do my cleaning in. --Dschwen 12:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Serge Toubiana is too much blury, even if he has a very expressive face on the picture. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 17:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Anciennes versions de fichiers —- candidature actualisée[edit]

Oiseau hein[edit]

Oiseau hein.jpg

  • Nomination Juvenile gulls (Brijuni archipelago, Croatia), possibly yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis), by Romanceor 16:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition is nice, sharpness seems to be good enough. sfu 18:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very noisy, and id not sufficient. Lycaon 20:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why do you think ID is not sufficient ? Romanceor 15:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
      • Because possible is not a sufficient identification. Lycaon 09:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
        • Hm that's right, and corrected. Romanceor 13:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very noisy, sorry --Beyond silence Sort both.svg 17:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I don't understand that noise ; isn't it just water vapor ? Romanceor 12:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
      • I think most of the noise is due to heavy compression (jpeg artefacts). Lycaon 19:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
        • Yes, I think you may be right, so the version issued from the RAW original file will soon be online. Romanceor 21:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> not promoted to QI --Fukutaro 11:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Non révisées[edit]

Oiseau hein[edit]

Oiseau hein.jpg Oiseau hein edit.jpg

  • Nomination: Juvenile yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) (Brijuni archipelago, Croatia), by Romanceor 11:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Review
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Colours are superb, but the picture seems noisy (look at the water). I think the upper part should be cropped, as it adds nothing to the picture. Update: edited picture is fine for me -- Stephanemartin 07:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alessandro Zangrilli 11:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I have uploaded an edited version (cropped and noise filtered). --Stefan Vladuck 21:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both images are colorful waterdrops. --Fukutaro 14:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I believe that this is a natural phenomenon due to dispersion of the sunlight in the water drops, and not a technical flaw of the photograph. --Stefan Vladuck 15:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image is oversharpened. Lycaon 15:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I'm not sure ; what does it mean ? And what can I do about it ? --Romanceor 16:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentOT: I would have nominated some of your other pictures, e.g. Flore de Bercy 11.JPG, if you would provide a description. --Mbdortmund 17:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Stefan Vladuck, don't you support the new version of the picture ? Romanceor 12:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
    • I certainly do (otherwise I wouldn't have submitted it), but as far as I know as a co-author I cannot be counted... --Stefan Vladuck 14:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
      • What if I do the crop ? huhu... third time the picture has been declined. --Romanceor 12:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Interesting how editing only disqualifies you as a voter -- at least it is to me. -- carol 13:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose ->  (a draw) -- carol 20:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Paulownia_tomentosa_à_Place_d'Italie.jpg[edit]

Paulownia tomentosa à Place d'Italie.jpg

  • Nomination Paulownia tomentosa on Place d'Italie, in Paris --Romanceor 17:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Discussion Misidentified. This one seems to be Paulownia tomentosa. Change name please. --B.navez 18:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Done. Thanks. --Romanceor 21:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --Eusebius (talk) 17:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)