Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
21,963 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
19,141 (87.2%) 
Undecided
  
1,198 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,624 (7.4%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-20 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno palace, exposure from ESE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Plebania w Trzebieszowicach 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-20 22:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, exposure from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Plebania w Trzebieszowicach 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-20 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, exposre from E
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Remiza OSP w Starym Gierałtowie 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-20 22:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Stary Gierałtów, fire station
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Hipparchia fagi MHNT CUT 2013 3 30 Cahors male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-21 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Hipparchia fagimounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes cyrene MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Costa Rica male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-21 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes cyrene mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Treviso) - Interior - High altar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-21 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Treviso Cathedral - High altar.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Commando Memorial at Spean Bridge.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-21 06:21 (UTC)
Scope:
The Commando Memorial, Spean Bridge, Scotland - from the south
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grampian Mountain panorama from the Commando Memorial.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-21 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Panoramic south view showing the Grampian Mountains from the Commando Memorial, Scotland

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In this case the scope of which would be better linked to Grampians. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done, thanks Jacek, I agree and have followed your recommendation. DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Elne Maillol Terrus.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-21 11:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Étienne Terrus by Aristide Maillol, Elne, France.
Open for review.
Rajshahi university stadium 1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-07-21 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Rajshahi University Stadium - South exposure.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. Image does not represents the scope, because trees are covered almost the entire stadium, which should be visible. ~ Moheen (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (Venezia, 1949) - BEIC 6346672.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) on 2016-07-21 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
This historical 1949 photo by Paolo Monti offers a unique POV of the Campanile of St. Mark's Basilica, seen behind one of the St. Mark's horses.
Reason:
Paolo Monti was a notable photographer from Italy. He lived in Venice for years and captured its fascination in many shots. -- Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It seems difficult to label this type of work, in VI. It is a unique piece of art, it should be subject to the FP contest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you! Unfortunately the resolution is not so high (<2MP), so I fear it is be not possible. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
      • We made this mistake for the digitization of Fond Trutat. We decided to start with a better resolution. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
        • Unfortunately the digitalization of the archive was made some years ago, in 2009. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
The Kelpies - June 2016.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-21 21:37 (UTC)
Scope:
The Kelpies - from the south-east

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry, but this picture have better light. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, I agree Jacek that the light is better in the other one, but this one is less cluttered with distracting people, so perhaps more useful. DeFacto (talk). 06:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK to me. Useful. ~ Moheen (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Ebbinghof aerial view 2016.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2016-07-21 20:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Ebbinghof
Used in:
en:Ebbinghof, de:Ebbinghof
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Szeroka Kopa, Masyw Śnieżnika.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-21 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Śnieżnik Mountains, Szeroka Kopa

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Szewczyk (Hraniční vrch), Góry Złote.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-21 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Złote Mountains, Szewczyk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Słupiec.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-21 21:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Krowiarki, Słupiec

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Tablica pamiątkowa na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-21 21:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Złote Mountains, plaque on Gierałtowska Pass

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Alabama State Capitol, Montgomery, West view 20160713 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2016-07-21 23:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Alabama State Capitol, West facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hipparchia fagi MHNT CUT 2013 3 30 Cahors male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Hipparchia fagi mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes cyrene MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Costa Rica male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes cyrene mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Museo Civico (Treviso) - Fontana delle Tette.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Museo Civico (Treviso) - Fontana delle Tette of Treviso

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.086.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Elephant head

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.088.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Crab claw

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.089.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Fish

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montesquieu Arnaud Guillaume 1374.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-22 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France: Funerary inscription for Arnaud Guillaume de Montesquieu (+ 1374)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montesquieu Pierre Bergoïoni.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-22 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France: Funerary inscription for Pierre Bergoïoni (13th ctry).

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montesquieu-des-Albères Saint-Saturnin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-22 14:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France (view S).
Reason:
Annotated image showing the position of two medieval funerary inscriptions. -- Palauenc05 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Steve Jobs building at Pixar.gk.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2016-07-22 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Steve Jobs Building at Pixar
Used in:
en:Pixar
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective needs to be corrected. ~ Moheen (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Logo of rajshahi university.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-07-22 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Logo of Rajshahi University
Open for review.
Cochlicella acuta raphidia 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-22 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. raphidia, pale form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, stajnia i spichrz 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, barn and granary

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, outbuilding
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Zespół pałacowy w Żelaźnie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno palace park

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Post office in Strzelin, exposure from SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Glas Bheinn (Assynt).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-22 22:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Glas Bheinn, Assynt - a 776-metre-high mountain in the North Highlands of Scotland - viewed from the north-west

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, thanks Archaeodontosaurus, but, following a comment at QI, I've uploaded an increased contrast version of the image. Please confirm your opinion. DeFacto (talk). 09:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
No problem it was already very well before. Face-smile.svg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Tobermory Distillery.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-22 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Tobermory Distillery - from the east

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes meridanus MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Parque Nacional Henri Pitter (Rancho Grande), Venezuela dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes meridanus mounted specimen dorsal male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Psilogramma increta MHNT CUT 2010 0 50 Ban Kheum Laos dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Psilogramma increta mounted specimen dorsal male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cagnan della Roggia (Treviso).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cagnan della Roggia or Siletto in Treviso. View from ponte dei Mussolini

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.090.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Swordfish

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.093-fond blanc.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Catfish
Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.094.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, crocodiles
Open for review.
Église de Cognin (2016).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Floflo (talk) on 2016-07-23 09:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Cognin
Reason:
I think this picture is at present the best in scope for this church (which is not easy to photography because of surrounding trees hiding some parts). -- Floflo (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Céret portal inscription 1398.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-23 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal inscription at Église Saint-Pierre de Céret (France): construction dated 1398.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pélopée courbée - Nids en terre - 2016-07-23 - 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-23 14:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Sceliphron curvatum nest, opened
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For this type of image, indicate the size of the object in the caption or even put a scale directly on the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Too late for the scale, but I added an other field to the description. -- Mathieu MD (talk) 07:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Peak Free Korea north face routes.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Grtek (talk) on 2016-07-23 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Free Korea Peak
Used in:
cs:Pik Svobodnaja Koreja, de:Pik Swobodnaja Korea, ru:Свободная Корея (пик)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montesquieu Guillaume Joer 1298 (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-23 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France: Funerary inscription for Guillaume Joer (+ 1298).
Used in:
de:St-Saturnin (Montesquieu-des-Albères)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stosicia houbricki 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-23 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Stosicia houbricki, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Post office in Strzelin, avant-corp

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dom Książąt Brzeskich w Strzelinie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House of the Dukes of Brzeg in Strzelin, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes meridanus MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Parque Nacional Henri Pitter (Rancho Grande), Venezuela ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes meridanus mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Idaea macilentaria MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Idaea macilentaria dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiese di San Vito e Santa Lucia (Treviso) - Viste della Piazza San vito.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Churches San Vito e Santa Lucia of Treviso, views from San Vito Square.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 Eglise Sainte-Catherine tabernacle chapelle du Sacré-Coeur.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 09:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-24 09:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tabernacles in Lille Church holy Catherin (Lille)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sharpness is poor (ISO 3200). Such images make up a tripod. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment difficult to repair, the church is particularly dark.--Pierre André (talk) 19:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lac de Filleit - 2016-07-03 - 23.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-24 17:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Lake of Filleit, from the dam

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lac de Mondély - 2016-07-03 - 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-24 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Lake of Mondély, view from West
Open for review.
Abdul Karim Sahitya Bisharad (1871-1953).svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Abdul Karim Sahityavisharad, Illustration
Used in:
See Global Usage
Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, sigbal box, exposure from NE
Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 4.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, signal box, exposure from NW
Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, pierwsza wiata peronowa.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, first platform shed
Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 19:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, second platform shed
Open for review.
Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2016 G2.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2016-07-24 18:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Yaremche, exterior
Used in:
uk:Яремче
Reason:
Good quality, geocoded, used in article. And most illustrative image of whole church. -- George Chernilevsky talk
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]