After the Wikimedia/Wales/FoxNews "porn purge" affair, I'm vigilant towards possible drifts, notably in terms of abuse of power from Jimbo Wales and/or admins, but also in terms of extreme censorship and/or puritanism against sex illustrations and nude pictures. That said, I agree that these topics have to be treated with caution (especially in terms of copyright and personality rights).
This user has been on Commons for 11 years and 10 months
Unused doesn't mean useless. Commons is not only made for illustrating Wikimedia projects but also for providing various pictures on the subjects developped on Wikimedia projects. How useful would it be to mention a link to Commons on a Wikipedia article if the reader only finds the files used in the article ?!
Personal template for uploads / Modèle personnel pour les téléchargements
[[Category:Photos by TwoWings (CC-BY-SA)]]
[[Category:Photos by TwoWings (CC-BY)]]
[[Category:Photos by TwoWings (PD-self)]]
[[Category:Sounds by TwoWings]]
[[Category:Videos by TwoWings]]
[[Category:Works by TwoWings]]
"Note: After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes. Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror/Firefox: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5."
This edit made my day  :-D. I truly appreciate you helping to categorize nudes and sexually provocative images so that people can find images specific to their search without being exposed to images that they would not anticipate. FloNight♥♥♥ 15:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Other Wikimedia accounts / Autres comptes Wikimédia