User talk:Сдобников Андрей/Archiv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please give images better names[edit]

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded some images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.

Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename each image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing! Platonides 17:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Has corrected. Сдобников А. 18:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Yablochkov_1.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yablochkov_1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image is taken from English Wikipedia. The author is unknown and has died more 70 years ago, so this image {{PD-old}} Сдобников А. 08:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Бычьи головы[edit]

Сегодня одна румынка из Баден-Вюртембурга загрузила новые "Бычьи головы". Причем одна - 1862 года. Что это такое? Мы, кажется, об этом у себя в статье не писали. Кроме того, она записала поверх марки в 40 парале новый файл - с худшим изображением и гашением. Думаю, надо залить на новую страницу предыдущий файл. Пусть будут оба изображения. Может, потом добавить к нам в статью новые картинки? --Michael Romanov 18:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Марка 1862 года выпущена после создания Королевства Румыния. Она объединяет в себе гербы Валахии (орёл) и Молдавии (бычья голова). К "Бычьим головам" Молдавии эта марка отношения уже не имеет. Сдобников А. 18:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User name[edit]

Может, на Складе тебе лучше быть записанным латинскими буквами? --Michael Romanov 00:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

А смысл? Сдобников А. 14:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Хозяин - барин. :) --Michael Romanov 16:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Просто после моей попытки транслейтироваться, у меня перестала работать ссылка на мою галерею, а это весьма не удобно. :) Сдобников А. 17:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Провизории.Ру[edit]

Видел? --Michael Romanov 18:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

А вот еще клоны:
http://www.ru.volgota.com/index.php/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F
http://wiki.traditio.ru/index.php/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%82%D0%B0
Оба отсекаются спам-фильтром Викимедии. --Michael Romanov 18:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Жалкие обрубки статей, в наглую сворованные. Сдобников А. 19:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ага. А у нас, смотрю, новый наблюдатель из Киева появился. --Michael Romanov 20:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Да, причём сразу с места в карьер. :) Сдобников А. 20:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Марки виртуальных государств[edit]

Интересная информация. Может, отдельные "страны" выделять с помощью == ==? --Michael Romanov 20:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Это пока черновик, я ещё подумаю, как её оформить. Возможно, что и так. Сдобников А. 20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:USSR stamp Belka-Strelka.png[edit]

Пане Сдобников, чи не могли б Ви описати рік марки, бо я не зміг визначити. Мабуть ,ви більший філятеліст і краще знаєтесь на цьому.--Albedo-ukr 20:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Це 1960 рiк, вже додав :) Сдобников А. 22:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Dubasov_I.I.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dubasov_I.I.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ~ putnik 05:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Флаг Вам в руки, господа удалисты. Сдобников А. 09:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Telegraphstamp.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Telegraphstamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nickpo 04:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stamp of Principate de Trinidad.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :-) --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 18:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps of Hervam[edit]

see Commons:Deletion requests/Stamps of Hervam --Butko (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ru:Картмаксимум[edit]

Привет, Андрей! Хорошо бы нам и этот паровоз в статью загнать. Только грузи на всякий случай в ВП, потому что у меня есть сомнения. --Michael Romanov (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CPU[edit]

До сих пор мы не так указывали ЦФА - CPA. Не забывай, пожалуйста. И еще не используй точек внутри названий. Потом викификатор по умолчанию делает в этих случаях автоматический пробел, и картинка в ВП уже не отображается. --Michael Romanov (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czechoslovakian stamps[edit]

I noticed that you changed the text on the Category:Stamps of Czechoslovakia page from no PD to all stamps being PD. Could you tell me where there is a verifiable source for the Czech stamps being PD? I was told they are not PD, but have no source for either info. The current Commons info I find seems to only refer to Czech Republic only. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 02:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Лента ордена Жукова.[edit]

Добрый день! Только сегодня обратил внимание, лента ордена жукова перевёрнута. Должны быть цвета бело-сине-красные, а на рисунке наооборот красно-сине-белые.

«Лента к ордену Жукова - шелковая муаровая шириной 24 мм, по краям две полосы золотистого цвета шириной 6 мм каждая, в центре - три полосы: белая, синяя и красная по 4 мм каждая»

С уважением, Kornilov S. (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Дело в том, что по геральдическим законам чтение эмблем происходит зеркально, то есть не слева-направо, а справа-налево, так что лента изображена правильно. В подтверждение своим словам даю вот эту ссылку. С уважением, Сдобников А. (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Геральдические правила мне известны, но, боюсь, что те кто составлял описание... Логичнее предположить что цвета должны соответствовать гос. флагу.

Например: «Левая половина ленты красного цвета. На правой половине ленты — пять продольных равных по ширине чередующихся полос: три чёрного и две оранжевого цвета и по краям — по одной узкой оранжевой полосе шириной 1 мм. Медаль номера не имеет.» А лента то изображается как? Слева от смотрящего... Сравните. Или я запутался окончательно, или всё таки... Kornilov S. (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.planki.ru/empty.html Kornilov S. (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Согласен, каталог несомненный АИ. Так что сейчас переделаю. Сдобников А. (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zelenko_E.I.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

AVRS (talk) 13:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

С чего там PD-old? --AVRS (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Сдобников Андрей!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Dominica.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


Просьба[edit]

Добрый день. Может, не будешь обрабатывать марки в фотошопе (или улучшать цветность и контрастность)? А то цвет получается совершенно неестественный. Мне, к примеру, интересен как филателисту как раз настоящий цвет, а не чтоб всем было красиво:) Сравни, к примеру, настоящий вид марки (50-50-50) --Vizu (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Это уже не сколько от обработки зависит, а от того как сканер сканирует. У меня сканы получаются изначально несколько других цветов, с каким-то голубоватым оттенком. Так что волей-неволей приходится обрабатывать. Кстати, сканер мой практически из строя вышел, так что в ближайшее время, я вряд ли что буду сканировать. Сдобников Андрей (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Жаль, что вышел... Только дело, наверное, в настройках программы, которой сканишь. А эту марку номер по каталогу не можешь посмотреть: [1] --Vizu (talk) 17:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Посмотрел, уже добавил номер. Не, дело не в настройках, а в лентопротяжном механизме. Надо в ремонт отнести, да всё руки не доходят никак. Сдобников Андрей (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо! А вот эту перевести описание не можешь? --Vizu (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
С переводом сложнее, я сам с помощью электронного переводчика перевожу, а что там за бред может получится при этом не знаю. Сдобников Андрей (talk) 03:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright status: Image:10krooniEesti.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:10krooniEesti.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Quibik (talk) 00:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: Image:20krooniEesti.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:20krooniEesti.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Quibik (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: Image:50krooniEesti.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:50krooniEesti.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Quibik (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:PilotCosmonautOfTheSovietUnion.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PilotCosmonautOfTheSovietUnion.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:PilotCosmonautOfTheSovietUnion.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you take the photograph yourself? --Eusebius (talk) 12:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove problem tags[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 09:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:PilotCosmonautOfTheSovietUnion.jpg[edit]

File:PilotCosmonautOfTheSovietUnion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

estonian contemporary stamps[edit]

Hallo, copyright of estonian contemporary stamps belongs to Eesti Post. [2] Hence don't upload them to Commons without Eesti Post's permission. --WikedKentaur (talk) 11:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eesti Post is a state company, postage stamps - the state of postage payment, as well as banknotes. Is not it? Sdobnikov A. (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Андрей, появилась ли ясность по поводу эстонских марок, выпущенных после 1991 года? Они до сих пор числятся как представленные к удалению. --Dnikitin (talk) 20:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Почта Эстонии на мой запрос дала следующий ответ:

"Mы сoглaсны с испoльзованием марoк Эстонии при услoвии сoxpaнeнии opигинaльныx pиcyнок марoк

С уважением,

Ain Muldmaa

Manager

Estonian Stamp"Sdobnikov A. (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Что это означает? что можно снимать шаблон "к удалению"? --Dnikitin (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
А его и вешать не стоило, поскольку марки в Эстонии выпускаются государственной компанией Eesti Post и являются государственными знаками оплаты (почтовой) наряду с банкнотами. На них АП не распространяется, согласно закону Эстонии, что и было отражено при лицензировании данных изображений. Eesti Post не возражает, чтобы изображения марок Эстонии использовались для иллюстраций статей. Думаю, что шаблон нужно снять. Sdobnikov A. (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made the deletion request, because of the following response from Estonian Copyright portal (http://www.autor.ee):
Eesti: Postmargi kujundus on autoriõigusega kaitstav teos ja selle autoriõigused kuuluvad üldjuhul Eesti Postile.

Seega võib postmarkide koopiaid kasutada ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks ja õppetöös. Internetis üldsusele kättesaadavaks teha neid ilma Eesti Posti nõusolekuta ei saa.

autor.ee

rough translation of which is:

Design of postage stamps is copyrightable work and Eesti Post is usually the copyright owner. Therefore the copies of stamps can only be used for personal and educational use. Publication of stamps on the Internet to make them available to the general public is prohibited without the consent of the Eesti Post.

autor.ee

--WikedKentaur (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised by your position. You live to Estonia, your native language Estonian. Make inquiry Eesti Post. It is easier to you to come into with them contact. They have answered me, what not against use of images of stamps of Estonia. It is the most easier to remove, and here to receive the permission as it was made by the inhabitant of Faeroes at the mail, not to everyone under force. Sdobnikov A. (talk) 05:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My position is that we follow the license guildlines, I've nothing against the fact that stamps could illustrate eg Wikipedia articles. Likely the same goes for prespeaker, who made original deletion requests. You were the one that wanted to use drawings of Estonian stamps in Wikimedia projects and uploaded these, so it's up to you to properly tag and prove that you have the permission to use.

At current state we can keep non of newer Estonian stamps that you have uploaded as they are falsely tagged — so do something about it if you like these to be kept in Commons. However, you were replied there is restriction to derivative works in permission and derivatives must be allowed, I suggest first asking the experts about it still being OK to find out whether there is something you can do.

Also, deletion request tags mustn't be removed and licence missing tags mustn't be removed by ignoring the problem. Coming up with odd and weak interpretation to licensing policy is not a solution. Neither as you did here or here by telling that heavily stylized design is ineligible for copyright. 193.40.10.181 11:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Burelage and the inscription is not design, it's PD-trivial. Drawing at burelage does the special machine tool which does not possess copyrights. Do not lead up to the point of irrationality, make inquiry on Eesti Post is better. You so zealously protect their rights, at all not having asked their opinion. Sdobnikov A. (talk) 11:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:StampVatican1929Michel8.jpg[edit]

File:StampVatican1929Michel8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:StampEstonia1991Michel165.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:StampEstonia1991Michel165.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Quibik (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's coat of arms of Estonia (PD-EE-exempt) Sdobnikov A. (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:StampEstonia1992Michel177.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:StampEstonia1992Michel177.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Quibik (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's coat of arms of Estonia (PD-EE-exempt) Sdobnikov A. (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the coat of arms in the centre of the stamps is in the public domain, but that does not release the rest of the stamp into the public domain. The rest of the design still falls under copyright. —Quibik (talk) 13:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by design? This PD-trivial. Sdobnikov A. (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with that assertion, but I changed the speedy deletion to regular deletion nomination, so the discussion can be continued there. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:StampEstonia1992Michel177.JPG. —Quibik (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Да мне уже пофиг. Sdobnikov A. (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WysockiMalaGruzinska.jpg[edit]

File:WysockiMalaGruzinska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Долбоёбы, что ещё сказать. --Sdobnikov A. (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image source[edit]

Do you have the source for this stamp you uploaded: File:Stamps1871.jpg. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have. Added. --Sdobnikov A. (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Сдобников_Андрей/Archiv&oldid=54142748"