User talk:Сергей 6662

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Сергей 6662!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Biktop.024.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mealing stone and mano.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The diggers in Adygea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Chief Crazy Horse.jpg[edit]

Give a proof that your request is right - or please let it be. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes:
  1. http://www.american-tribes.com/Lakota/BIO/LittleBigMan.htm
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Big_Man
  3. Photo: "Little Big Men. Photo from U.S. Signal Corps" // "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" by Dee Brown. Picador. Pan Books Ltd. London. 1970 ISBN 0-330-24569-4.

Сергей 6662 22:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Native American = USA[edit]

Please stop. Category:Native American canoes refers to Native American canoes in the United States, so it's in Category:Native American culture (USA-only). Category:Native North American canoes (which should be renamed) refers to Indigenous canoes from North America, so it's NOT a sub-category of Category:Native American culture (USA-only). - Themightyquill (talk) 12:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

What!? What the United States? These categories relate to the Indians, not the United States. Let me work. And what fool put the Caribbean to North America? Does geography confused? --Сергей 6662 12:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
You're clearly misunderstand the terminology, and if you persist, I'll need to mark it as vandalism. As for Caribbean, please read en:Caribbean before you accuse anyone else of being a fool. - Themightyquill (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
You have already joined the Caribbean to North America? Smartly. Then, and South America will connect. --Сергей 6662 10:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Other_birch_bark_canoes[edit]

P 1 9 9   17:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name[edit]

I just reverted a number of your edits removing categories from Category:Indigenous peoples of North America by name. Please explain your edits so I can understand your intention. Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Why put the people of Mesoamerica to the North American Indians? They have their own, distinct culture and history. For them there is its own category. --Сергей 6662 12:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Each Indigenous people of North America has its own distinct culture and history. If they are being categorized my continent, those from Mexico belong in the category for North America. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Сергей 6662, please stop edit warring. I have tried to engage with you to discuss why your categorization does not match with the existing categorization scheme, and why it's inappropriate. I have encouraged you to stop creating new categories until you can understand how categorization works at commons. Instead, you have twice emptied and deleted my categories, and continued to create awkward new categories that don't match the existing tree. Please reconsider your actions and continue discussion before making further edits. Thank you. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Trees are not my concern. I see that Wikimedia Commons is in chaos. So trying to bring that to scientific notation. If you don't want it, I spit and leave. --Сергей 6662 12:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism is not appreciated[edit]

العربية | বাংলা | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Tok Pisin | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−


float You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Emptying others' categories without consensus is disruptive vandalism. Please don't do it.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Кто тут занимается вандализмом!? Сами ничего не понимаете и мешаете работать другим. Можете заблокировать меня и убрать мой аккаунт. --Сергей 6662 15:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)