User talk:דניאל צבי

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi, fellow Hebrew Wikipedian. I see you also discovered WikiCommons. :-) MathKnight 17:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

As you can tell from my belated response, I haven't really discovered it. user:דניאל צבי 13:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

! אתה בצרות[edit]

...kidding :) Gridge 16:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC). רגע, עוד לא עשיתי כלום... Daniel Tzvi 16:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Madaba Jerusalem Mosaic Closeup.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Done. Daniel Tzvi 06:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 360b1c578b3e2948e4bded63ddbe6aa4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category: Gesetzl Geschützt[edit]

I do not understand the sense of this curious named category?

„gesetzlich geschützt“ means in German “law protected”. A possible abbreviation is „gesetzl. geschützt“ (with fullstop respectively dot and lower case letter at the beginnings). But in this way it means nothing!? And what is it good for?--Kürschner (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Its good for nothing - it just shows that I don't know German, and I thought that Gesetzl Geschützt is the name of the illustartor. I'll have the category deleted. Daniel Tzvi 18:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Theodor Herzl? ;) --Kürschner (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 03:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Avraham Schwadron.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Avraham Schwadron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ldorfman (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)