User talk:メルビル

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, メルビル!

File tagging File:1000cello_hiroshima_2010-05.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1000cello_hiroshima_2010-05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1000cello_hiroshima_2010-05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kam Solusar (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, メルビル!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foto[edit]

Hello. What is this on your foto File:Slagwool.jpg? Is it a slag wool or stone wool? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 11:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This is slag wool. It is not asbestos( = stone wool?).--melvil (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have to clarify something. Google translate translates ロックウール as Rock wool or stone wool. Is it correct? Maybe it would be correct to translate ロックウール as a Mineral wool? So, can one create a category Slag wool and put this foto into there, if it is a slag wool? And why did you put this file File:Slagwool2.jpg into the Category:Rockwool if it is a slag wool as you say? By the way, can you add an information about the producer of this wool in the description of the file? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do not know which company has made this. Now I understand your intentions. This insulation is called rock wool (ロックウール)in Japan. It is the same as Stone wool in English. (We do not call Stone wool in Japan). In Japanese the name of Stone wool is not common. If someone uses the word Stone wool, I think many Japanese people are usually misunderstood asbestos.--melvil (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry, but you did not answer all my questions. There are 3 types of the mineral wool in the world. They are glass wool, slag wool and rock or stone wool. Slag wool is made from liquid slag, which is produced for example in a blast furnace during the smelting of pig iron. Rock wool or stone wool is a wool wich made mainly melting of rocks - stone. In the descriptions of your files you are using both words slag wool and rock wool. But slag wool and rock wool are not the same things. So, what is that on your fotos? Slag wool or rock wool? I ask you because I need an illustration for my article. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 07:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Japanese building industry does not distinguish between slag wool and rock wool. They are distributed as a whole in the name of "rock wool". Therefore, we can not distinguish whether this picture is slag wool or rock wool.--melvil (talk) 13:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, I understood. Thanks for answers. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HDR画像?に関して[edit]

山岳系の記事を多く編集している者です。File:Atsosa Nupuri-201709.jpgを拝見いたしまして思ったことあったのでご連絡いたします。おそらくHDR設定で撮影された画像だと思うのですが、他の同様のファイルも見させていただいたのですが、HDRの効果が強すぎなので、撮影時に機材の設定もっと弱くされた方がよいと思います。もし後から加工されてこのようなったのであえば再度のアップをおすすめいたします。ここまで効果が強いと記事には不適です。以上何卒ご理解のほど宜しくお願いいたします。--Batholith (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

こんにちは。そうですね、新しいカメラの効果をまだ把握できていなかったので、強すぎる効果となってしまいました。資料用としては、もう少し効果を落として撮影するようにしたいと思います。ありがとうございます。--melvil (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition.svg
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

Twitter Logo Mini.svg #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Linkedin icon.svg Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]