User talk:大诺史

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%E5%A4%A7%E8%AF%BA%E5%8F%B2.

This is the user talk page of 大诺史, where you can send messages and comments to 大诺史.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2019.

Autopatroller[edit]

Hi, 大诺史. You have done a lot of good work and your edits do not need to be patrolled anymore, so I just gave you autopatroller right. Thank you for your work! Taivo (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for the work you are doing tagging Out of Scope photos for deletion. Keep up the good work. Graham Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

Hi 大诺史,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Commons Rollbacker.svg

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Female Champagne Burmese Kitten.jpg Good Patrolling
ː) Psypherium (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
@Psypherium: Thank you for the cat! 大诺史 (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi 大诺史, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− 1989 (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jivajivaka Bird-svg-version.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jivajivaka Bird-svg-version.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi 大诺史, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

mw.loader.load('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
mw.loader.load('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! -- T CellsTalk 13:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

@T Cells: Is it just me or the ‘license -‘ button doesn’t work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
I am sorry for this extremely slow response. I have been very busy offline. What response did you receive when you tried to review files? Regards. T CellsTalk 08:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
@T Cells: I will be brought to the edit page and a small tab pops up stating that User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js is deprecated. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Try mw.loader.load('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // Regards. T CellsTalk 13:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
@T Cells: Already have it in my common.js. @Majora: Pinging Majora for help. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
The loading of Visual File Changer from your .js was deprecated many years ago. mw.loader.load( 'ext.gadget.VisualFileChange' ); needs to be removed. You can reactivate VFC in your preferences. The use of that deprecated method is known to cause undesirable things when combined with the license reviewer script. Start with that. --Majora (talk) 02:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
@Majora: Nope, still can't. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Please don't have multiple instances of the script imported. Use only one. You have both ZooFari's and mine listed. --Majora (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘

@Majora: I removed ZooFari’s script and yours still in my common.js. However, I can’t seem to find any button to click whatsoever when at the file page. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Never mind, I've sorted it out. Thanks for your help anyways! (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Pixabay files[edit]

Hi, if you review a Pixabay file, please use the Pixabay template, see e.g. here. The Pixabay template includes the license, files without it will appear in the Files with no machine-readable license problem category. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I’ll take note of it. Thanks for pointing it out. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

DR input[edit]

Could you take a look at some of the DR's at the bottom of Commons:Deletion_requests/2019/04. The nom appears to be in Chinese and your input would be welcome Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Those filed on 30 April? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
@Gbawden: again because I didn't sign my reply properly. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Don't delete my screenshot Aid.jpg!!![edit]

Read https://legal.ubi.com/eula/en-US

(except if the Product enable You through a specific feature to create, generate or submit User Generated Content and for which You will need to create an Account and comply Terms of Use)

Uplay PC let me to make screenshot of game and I can use it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Mikharein: 1.1 states no commercial use. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: Wikipedia is commercial project?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Mikharein: Yes. Please see COM:L. Regards (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: I'm Russian. Why I need to speak with non-russian speaking person? Find administrator from Russia, please, and contact me with him.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: My English is not good. But why I can't use screenshot like illustration for the article??? EULA let me to do this.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@George Chernilevsky: Can you help? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@George Chernilevsky: Файл — иллюстрация к статье https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Аид, но этот администратор хочет беспощадно снести мой скриншот, который был сделан добросовестно и без нарушения лицензионного соглашения с Ubisoft.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikharein (talk • contribs) 07:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Russian: Удалено правомерно в соответствии с правилами лицензированя. Внимательно прочитайте условия лицензирования, особенно пункт 2. Лицензия дает Вам право поиграть, а не создавать производные работы (скриншоты и т.п.). С уважением
English: Deleted correctly in accordance with the rules of the licensed. Read the licensing terms carefully, especially paragraph 2. The license gives you the right to play this game, and not create derivative works (screenshots, etc.). Regards, -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

What license review?[edit]

Hi. I see you are using on a permanent basis F4 ("Failed license review") to tag for deletion images that haven't been submitted to a license review process. IMHO "License review" is a very specific procedure which these files were not involved in, since no license review tags were included. Strakhov (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

@Strakhov: Any suggestion on what I should change it to? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
When the uploader claims {{Own}} but you find the image published before somewhere-else-in-the-internet, people tend to use "F1" and/or a link to the image. Sometimes, when the copyvio is not that evident (it's based on a "FBMD-metadata-thing", but the reverse search is not successful), they start a deletion request. Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: Oh ok, but isn't it still a license review? My rationale is that I'm reviewing the license to see if it is stated at the source/or anywhere I find the file at (apparent own work). As for the FB thingy, the default FB license only licenses FB to use it for their own purposes (ad, settings, etc.) so by default, the file is a copyright violation unless stated otherwise. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
To me, it isn't, as said above. Wrt the second question, it's not, since the uploaders on Facebook still retain their rights to publish their images with other licenses. If you publish a selfie on facebook you still have the right to publish it with a CC license somewhere else. Thing is, in Commons, we often require COM:OTRS as a precaution, to be sure "大诺史" and the owner of the Facebook account are the same person. Strakhov (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: Oh alright. I'll think of a better way to phrase the tag. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: I've changed the FB tag to "Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation." and all instances of "License review NOT passed" to "Apparent copyright violation". (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Холодный свет при -29 градусах.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Холодный свет при -29 градусах.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Chenspec 10:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

My image[edit]

Hello 大诺史 my image is mine and i made it i dont know what the problem is can you please specify it! Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AmrTGC (talk • contribs) 22:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
@AmrTGC: I've started a deletion request and you can voice your comments there, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AmrTGC.jpg. Regards, -- (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Request to delete my photos[edit]

Hi, I will know why you have reported my photos. All the photos are mine, done only by me. I hope you withdraw your report, because it is not correct.

Benedetta

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BenedettaMazzante (talk • contribs) 13:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
@BenedettaMazzante: The files came from Facebook, as such, permission is needed by the original uploader for reuse. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This is not correct. Photos are in Facebook because I had published them in MY page, i didn't taken them by another person. So you, please, withdraw your request. Benedetta BenedettaMazzante (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@BenedettaMazzante: It cannot be determined whether the files are yours. You claiming that you published them is no proof that the images are allowed for reuse. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Remove notification about possible deletion[edit]

Hi! I think the case with my uploaded pictures is solved by OTRS now. How do I make the notification on the individual pictures go away?

Sinistra (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Sinistra: Thank you for sending in your permission. WIth regards to the notification and per COM:TALK#User talk pages, you may remove them but archiving is preferred. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of DEROUET_marie file[edit]

Hi,

You marked most (but not all) file by DEROUET_marie saying they « Came via Facebook » but could you give the actual URL where it come from on Facebook? Because, if it's published by the same person on the two websites, then there is no problem ; and if not, then the other photo should probably be deleted too.

Pinging also Ellin Beltz who performed the deletion.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: The files I've tagged as copyvio have a "FB metadata", the problem with such thing is that there is no way to determine if that is own work, + uploader's remaining file has metadata so why wasn't the original uploaded instead? I admit that the phrasing of the tag might not be good, as such, I have recently changed the phrasing to "Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation." (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Since the photo is deleted, I can't check the metadata (no that I know of anyway) but that's strange, I don't see anything in the last photo (which seems to be all part of the same serie). I this kind of case, I would tend to assume good faith. At the very least, I think we should do a proper deletion request and not a speedy deletion. Any objection for me to restore the photo and put them on deletion? Again ping Ellin Beltz what do you think?
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: No objections. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DEROUET marie. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

I just wanted to know regarding these images. Why these will be deleted?

  • File:East Bengal smoke show.jpg
  • File:East Bengal Ground.jpg
  • File:Salt lake Stadium.jpg
) Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 17:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
@Arnabsaha2212: Files seems to be from Facebook, as such, permission from the original uploader is needed via OTRS.
@大诺史: I uploaded the images on Facebook. I uploaded tgem here first, then in Facebook. I don't upload other's files. if I see any possible issue regarding any image, I ask here before uploading. Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 04:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@Arnabsaha2212: It seems that the files are from Facebook, could you send in your permission and/or original files to OTRS? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: I have sent the original files to OTRS. Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@Arnabsaha2212: Thank you for your cooperation and happy editing. Regards -- (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: thanks for helping me :) but i have a question. each time i upload a image, both here and facebook, i need to do OTRS? Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@Arnabsaha2212: I would say, yes. So to avoid the trouble, just upload the original file here instead of uploading to FB, downloading it and uploading it here. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
@大诺史: OK, thanks :) Arnabsaha2212 (talk) 10:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

first time post photo's problem[edit]

hello. how are you ? May i know any problem of my post photo?

thanks for your kindly advise and assitance

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritzyong (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ritzyong: Please do not use commons for self promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ritzyong: As 大诺史 have said, Wikimedia Commons is a not a place to self-advertise. We have a project scope to provide free educational media to all. Consider using alternate outlets such as Flickr. Masum Reza📞 13:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)