Hello Donald: Just wondering why you recently have declined the picture
as a quality image. This a sample picture from Quality Images page.
Here is the link to that Quality Iamges page. If you think the picture I nominated is blurred, what about this picture? The picture is about flower. Which part of the flower do you want to see very clearly?
The image "Kiss me quickly" is definitively unsharp because of the small DoF (Large aperture). And it is noisy. Why did you use ISO200? You could go to 100. The second image is really good. By the way, why did you change the nomination? --donald- 20:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there any useful reason you made this change? It stuffs up the links to the templates used on that page so that when you're editing nominations you end up with a messed up preview etc - all in all a right pain. I'll wait a while before reverting it in case you're still editing and have some way of fixing the problem. --Tony Wills 11:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support! I didn't know that the image had been nominated until I was told that it had been promoted; it was a pleasant surprise. Cnyborg 20:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
QICbot for consensual review?
Have you got any comments about my proposal for QI consensual review revamp to assist QICbot use for Consensual Review decisions. --Tony Wills 22:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Commons Picture of the Year 2007 Competition
Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. --miya 16:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Donald, du hast am 30. September 2008 die Abbildung “Sütterlinschrift.svg” mit einem Textbeispiel in der Sütterlinschrift erstellt. Leider enthält sie in der achten Zeile einen Schreibfehler: “Kurrnetschrift” statt “Kurrentschrift”. Kannst du das bitte korrigieren? In der früheren Version “Sütterlinschrift.png” war es noch richtig. --184.108.40.206 20:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)