User talk:

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons,!

Artocarpus treculianus[edit]

Hello the page you created Artocarpus treculianus has been deleted the trss used in the article is according to the description an example of Treculia africana the African breadfruit native to Southern Africa. Artocarpus treculianus although belonging to the same tribe, Artocarpeae, is of a different genus i.e. Artocarpus, and is endemic to the Phillipines. Unfortunatly we have no media on Commons of Artocarpus treculianus, and the gallery you created would by that count be empty and therefore speedy deletable.

If we were to receive media of the Artocarpus treculianus, then of course the gallery can be recreated. If their has been an misidentification of the file and the tree shown is in fact a Artocarpus treculianus and not aTreculia africana please let me know, and I'll do my best to work out what it is and to amend the description if needed.KTo288 (talk) 09:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Morinda citrifolia[edit]

Hi User: ( why don't you consider signing up for an account, you seem to be doing some great work, and it would great to credit it to you, signing up for a user name is pretty easy and painless.)

Thanks for creating the article Mengkudu, as you can no doubt see it has now been redirected to Morinda citrifolia, the scientific name for the species. Usually for this kind of gallery the scientifc name is prefered as the main name for the gallery, although its okay to create pages with the vernacular, popular names (which there can be very many) as a redirect to the main gallery, and make a note of the vernacular name in the main page. Have a look at Breadfruit/Artocarpus altilis for an example of what I mean. The images in your Mengkudu gallery which did not also appear in the existing gallery I have taken the liberty of adding. Again thank for your contribution and consider registering for an accountKTo288 (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Anonidium usambarense, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 13:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

List of culinary fruits[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg List of culinary fruits has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)