User talk:1971markus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Benutzer-1971markus.png


Hello,

for Contact use my german User talk: →Benutzer Diskussion:1971markus!

Contents

File:Spionage HighTech.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Spionage HighTech.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Graffiti in Wuppertal[edit]

Du fügst Category:Graffiti in Wuppertal hinzu, die Bilder stehen aber schon in Category:Murals in Wuppertal. Wie ist die Abgrenzung? Sind sie gleichzeitig beides? Oder was? ;-) --Atamari (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari, warum gibt es beide Kategorien? Sollten nicht vielleicht beide Kategorien zusammengeführt werden? Gruß --1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 22:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Selbst Hier wird klar unterscheiden zwischen Graffiti und Murals. Also sollten wir keine künstliche Vermischung verursachen, sondern lieber nach den Kriterien forschen - diese zu unterscheiden. Ich denke Murals (Wandmalerei) ist eine geplante legale bemalte (Wand-)Fläche. Graffiti sehe ich eher als eine illegale bemalte Fläche, die mal so eben über Nacht entstanden ist. damit ist beispielsweise dieses Bild: hier bestimmt kein Graffiti. --Atamari (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear 1971markus,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Metropolis .jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Metropolis .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FordPrefect42 (talk) 09:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Terroristen Fahndungsplakat.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Terroristen Fahndungsplakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 11:43, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Terroristen Fahndungsplakat .jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Terroristen Fahndungsplakat .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.7.227.111 22:32, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Externe Nutzungen[edit]

--Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

--Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

--Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Aachenerin.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Fernwärmetunnel Köln (3).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fernwärmetunnel Köln (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 17:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Musketiere in Dortmund 2jpg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Musketiere in Dortmund 2jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rudko (talk) 23:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Musketiere in Dortmund 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Musketiere in Dortmund 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rudko (talk) 23:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Musketiere in Dortmund.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Musketiere in Dortmund.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rudko (talk) 23:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear 1971markus,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear 1971markus,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear 1971markus,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo 1971markus,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel[edit]

Hallo Markus,

Snowman drawing.svg

Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerbs zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!

Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.

Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.

Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).

Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.

Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!

Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo 1971markus,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Commons:Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder[edit]

Hallo Markus,

danke für den Link. Da werde ich mal meine besten Fotos als Qualitätsbilder nominieren. Was mir gerade wieder einfällt: Bitte mich nicht vergessen, falls Ihr nochmal eine Exkursion auf die Dächer des Kölner Doms organisiert. :-)

Gruß Wikimatze

Hallo Wikimatze,
die Dom-Führung wird nicht vergessen, wird aber dieses Jahr nichts mehr...
Zu den Qualitätsbildern, tu Dir bitte selbst den Gefallen und beobachte mal ein paar Tage die Kandidatur und die Kritike(r)n um zu sehen wie so ein Vorgang abläuft, denn manchmal können Wikipedianer etwas unschön kritisieren...
Ich wünsche Dir viel Erfolg
LG aus Köln --1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 14:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Sag niemals nie...[edit]

Lieber Markus, mach ruhig mal eine Pause .............. aber komm dann bitte wieder zurück! --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Bitte nicht auch Du noch unter die Räder kommen...die dokumentarische Bilderwelt vermisst Dich...--Geolina163 (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)



Gruß an Aachen... --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

NoFacebook[edit]

Hallo Markus,
ich bin auf deine No Facebook-Vorlage aufmerksam geworden. Ich wollte dich fragen, ob es für dich ok ist, wenn ich noch ergänze: "Das beinhaltet auch Instagram, WhatsApp und alle weiteren Dienste von Facebook, Inc,". Dann würde ich die Vorlage nämlich gerne auch benutzen. Danke, und schöne Grüße aus Düsseldorf,
--Rogi (talk) 09:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hier (Template:NO Facebook Youtube license) ist die Vorlage die im Template-Namensraum steht. --Atamari (talk) 10:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
@Rogi.Official:, natürlich darfst du! So bin ich auch zu der Vorlage gekommen...
@Atamari:, danke für den Hinweis, diese Vorlage kannte ich noch nicht.
LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 17:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Danke Markus, mein Hinweisschild wird dadurch viel verständlicher Face-smile.svg. Danke auch @Atamari: für diese Vorlage! Grüße, --Rogi (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Stolpersteine in Salzburg[edit]

Hallo Markus, ich habe bei einigen Gebäuden in Salzburg die Stolperstein Kategorie entfernt (z.B. [1]), mir erscheint es nicht sinnvoll, diese Kategorie für Bilder zu vergeben, die vielleicht etwas mit dem Namen auf einem Stolperstein zu tun haben, oder wo der Stolperstein ev. mit der Lupe auszumachen ist (Vielleicht kannst du ja die Steine im Bild markieren). In diese Kategorie gehören mE nur Bilder, wo man die Aufschrift auf dem Stolperstein lesen kann.

@Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Salzburg: Entweder ist das Bild bereits einer Kategorie zu einem denkmalgeschützten Objekt zugeordnet (File:Stolperstein Salzburg, Andräkirche (Mirabellplatz 5).jpg), dann gehört diese Kat nicht nochmals auf das einzelne Bild. Oder es gibt eine solche Kategorie für das denkmalgeschützte Objekt nicht, dann braucht es die id {{Doo}} in der Bildbeschreibung (File:Stolperstein Salzburg, Wohnhaus Pfeifergasse 4.jpg). Stolperstein begründet jedenfalls keinen Denkmalschutz. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, ich füge die Stolperstein Kategorie deshalb zu den Wohnhäusern weil es sich hierbei um die Häuser handelt vor denen die Stolpersteine verlegt wurde. Ich bin kein Freund Bilder die mE zusammen gehören durch Kategorien wieder zu trennen... Daher finde ich deine Lösung jetzt neue Kategorien nach Hausnummern zu erstellen sehr elegant! Und zu den Denkmalnummern werde ich mich bemühen diese auch noch in die Bildbeschreibung aufzunehmen. LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 22:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Die Kategorie heißt Category:Stolpersteine in Salzburg, ist eine Objektkategorie und da gehören nur Bilder hinein, die Stolpersteine in Salzburg zeigen. Oder Unterkategorien mit solchen Bildern, also etwa Stolpersteine nach Bezirk. Oder Menschen beim Verlegen solcher Stolpersteine. Bilder von Häusern oder Kategorien zu Gebäuden sind keine Stolpersteine und gehören da nicht hinein. Das ist also nicht die Kategorie, in der Bilder zusammengehören. Wenn eine Kategorie pro Gebäude (wenn mehr als 2 Bilder, IMHO) für dich passt, dann ist es gut. Die Kategorie pro Gebäude ist auch viel leichter zu warten, als deine other_versions. Bitte schau, bevor du eine Kategorie anlegst, ob sie eventuell schon existiert und hab ein Erbarmen auch mit den Bildern des Gebäudes, die nicht von dir stammen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Herzi Pinki, ich bin da etwas anderer Meinung. Die Stolpersteine werden gezielt an einer bestimmten Adresse verlegt mit der Aufschrift HIER WOHNTE, oder HIER WIRKTE etc, somit gehören mMn die Häuser auch mit in die Kategorie. Wie gesagt meine Meinung, ich kann aber auch damit leben wenn du andrer Meinung bist und die Kategorien entfernst... LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Schau zum Vergleich mal in anderen Städten, ob da die Häuser als Stolpersteine kategoerisiert sind. Mir ist das bisher noch nicht untergekommen. Aber es ist gut, dass du die Verlegestelle und die Umgebung mitfotografierst. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Beispiele gibbet... (z.B. Category:Stolpersteine in Cologne). Auch wenn ich anderer Meinung bin bin ich dir doch sehr dankbar wie du hinter mir in den Kategorien aufräumst... Deshalb hier nochmal ein nettes Dankeschön. Lieben Gruß aus Köln --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.


Code issues in User:1971markus/monobook.css[edit]

Hi 1971markus, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:1971markus/monobook.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new prettyCss issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 7 char number 83 - Evidence: 12px
  2. WARNING: unknown-property:font-color: line 19 char number 3 - Evidence: font-color

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC).


Code issues in User:1971markus/monobook.css[edit]

Hi 1971markus, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:1971markus/monobook.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 5 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 2 char number 83 - Evidence: 12px
  2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 16 char number 8 - Evidence: 2px
  3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 19 char number 15 - Evidence: 2px
  4. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 19 char number 19 - Evidence: 2px
  5. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 19 char number 23 - Evidence: 2px
  6. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 19 char number 27 - Evidence: 2px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC).

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear 1971markus,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hallo 1971markus, du bist jetzt Dateiverschieber! Bitte beachte die folgenden Hinweise, wenn du Dateien verschiebst:

  • Bitte benutze den Link zum CommonsDelinker in der {{rename}}-Vorlage um den Bot zu beauftragen, alle Verwendungen des alten Dateinamens zu ersetzen. Falls es keine solche Anfrage gab, benutze bitte den Tab Verschieben & Ersetzen.
  • Bitte nominiere keine Weiterleitungen mit {{speedy}} zur Schnelllöschung. Andere Projekte, z. B. solche die InstantCommons verwenden, könnten die Datei verwenden obwohl dies nicht bei der Dateiverwendung angezeigt wird. Das Löschen der Weiterleitungen würde deren Dateiverlinkung zerstören.
  • Bitte beachte und befolge die Empfehlung zum Verschieben von Dateien.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Danke, Steinsplitter... nee wat war dat früher schön Andere für sich arbeiten zu lassen... LG --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 14:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg-2017.jpg








Hallo 1971markus!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC))

Haydn's Katze[edit]

Cute grey kitten.jpg

...sagt Hallo & Danke :)

Geolina mente et malleo 23:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Landaulet Kutsche[edit]

Landaulet may be a part of its correct name but this vehicle is not a landaulet and cannot be classified as such. Your ref "horse droshke indulgent relationship. The one-span half-covered landaulet carriages were the typical hatchback vehicles of old berlin. They represent an ubiquitous appearance around 1900. usually they had seen better days" with the help to me of Google translate, does not make it clear.

Are you quite sure this sign belongs to the vehicle in the picture?

Where does the landaulet part of its name come from? Can you provide another citation? Can you provide one other photograph of a similar vehicle and of the same type-name? Thanks and regards, Eddaido (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Pferdedroschke - Infotafel.jpg

Is not my description. Please read the official german description of the Deutschen Technikmuseum Berlin. Thanks --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 19:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Moving File:Lily Collins, Jamie Campbell Bower ans Kevin Zegers by Gage Skidmore (crop) 1.jpg[edit]

Can you movie this file to a correct title due to a single misspelling (ans)?PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

done... --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 21:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Qwertzu111111 Klenkes.jpg[edit]

Hallo! Bist du sicher dass das Bild urheberrechtlich ok ist? Die beiden Figuren aus den Peanuts halte ich nicht für Beiwerk. --Don-kun (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Du weist schon, dass er der Veranstalter der Comiciade ist? --1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 18:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Der Erbe von Charles M. Schulz ist der Veranstalter der Comiciade? --Don-kun (talk) 10:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Qwertzu111111 Klenkes.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Qwertzu111111 Klenkes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Don-kun (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)