User talk:AVM

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Information icon.svg
This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.


AFTER SOME 2,550 EDITS, THIS EDITOR HAS LOST ALL BELIEF IN THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF WIKIPEDIA, AN ENCYCLOPEDIA WHERE DISREGARD FOR THE TRUTH PREVAILS.

AS A REGULAR USER, WILL HENCEFORTH REGARD MOST WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES WITH SUSPICION, OR AT LEAST, WITH CAUTION.

ACCORDINGLY, EDITING OF ARTICLES HAS STOPPED INDEFINITELY, UP TO WHEN SOME HOPE RETURNS THAT IT CAN BE TRUSTED -IF EVER.

MAIN REASON: WP:Verifiability, WHICH I DO NOT AGREE WITH AND NEVER WILL. TO ME, TRUTH IS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE, FAR ABOVE "VERIFIABILITY"(*). IT IS A PITY WIKIPEDIA FOUNDERS AND POLICYMAKERS DO NOT BELIEVE THAT.

(*) A million houseflies will "verify" that "excrement is delicious", but is that true?


As matters stand now (2010), Wikipedia's slogan could well be:

WIKIPEDIA, THE ENCYCLOPEDIA THAT CANNOT BE TRUSTED.


"THERE IS NO RELIGION HIGHER THAN TRUTH."

-Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (The Secret Doctrine, Vol. II)



Image Tagging Image:Antonio Lauro - María Carolina (Dany Fariña).ogg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonio Lauro - María Carolina (Dany Fariña).ogg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

Sorry, the copyright is related to the author and the performer. Lugusto҉ 02:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Olá, te respondi por e-mail, já que abri a minha caixa postal antes de passar no Commons. Caso não tenha recebido a mensagem ou necessite de ajuda em algo, basta voltar a me procurar. Lugusto҉ 16:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, AVM!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Chile.svg[edit]

¿Qué tienen que ver? Que ambos llevan una corona naval. Como la del escudo italiano estaba mejor diseñada que la presente en el escudo italiano, copié la corona italiana y la coloqué sobre el huemul y el cóndor. Saludos, B1mbo (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Baraja-aces.jpg[edit]

Según la web de Naipes Heraclio Fournier: Las imágenes de las mismas, registradas por Fournier, se han difundido por todo el mundo convirtiéndose en parte de la iconografía histórica nacional [1]. Salud. --Javier ME (talk) 10:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Commons:Deletion requests/Heraclio Fournier cards[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Commons:Deletion requests/Heraclio Fournier cards have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Javier ME (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Maracaibo Basin.png has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message is only to advise you that the image may be deleted. I'm not 'excited to delete something O_o you have really misunderstood what I meant with that automatic message. However, I've fixed the image you linked me. Please calm down the next time. Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 15:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scleroderma Patient Arm Photo[edit]

Your photo was excellent Very upclose capture of this disease

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Left_Arm_Scleroderma_Patient_.jpg showing sign lesions

attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

 If someone was to use this photo,
what is the method you prefer
so that it is known that this
photo belongs to you of 

attributing the work to you? Your name is not listed on jpg file

and only other info is user AVM

File:FireOverEnglandVivienLeighLaurenceOlivier.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:FireOverEnglandVivienLeighLaurenceOlivier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Yellow 2012 Watercolor and Acrylic.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yellow 2012 Watercolor and Acrylic.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | magyar | Nederlands | polski | português | sicilianu | suomi | svenska | Ελληνικά | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | македонски | русский | українська | हिन्दी | বাংলা | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文(中国大陆)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | עברית | العربية | +/−


Hello AVM, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Yellow 2012 Watercolor and Acrylic.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Touron cartoon.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Touron cartoon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Signature on cartoon (bottom right corner) indicates an author other than the uploader
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

IagoQnsi (talk) 05:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


WHAT "Copyright violation"??? - all I did was to shrink the size of the same image found in your Commons-- What the heck, I couldn't care less! -- I'm REALLY quitting, for good! --- 'BYE! --AVM (talk)