User talk:Achim Raschka

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Bildrechte Schloss Gymnich[edit]

Hallo Achim Raschka, wir organisieren und gestalten die Dauerausstellung über die Erft in der Gymnicher Mühle, die am 09.06.2014 eröffnet. In dieser Ausstellung wird es unter anderem auch um die Burgen und Schlösser gehen, die entlang der Erft anzutreffen sind. Auch das Schloss Gymnich wollen wir mit einbeziehen. Ich habe ein sehr gutes Foto gefunden, was wir gerne von Ihnen verwenden würden unter Nennung des Copyrights. Ist das möglich? Bei Fragen können Sie sich gerne auch an borowski@missallgiespartner.de wenden.


Siegessäule[edit]

Siegessäule TopView7.JPG

May I assume this is a photo from not of the Siegessäule, since I don't see the Siegessäule anywhere in the picture? - Jmabel ! talk 03:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. Shown is esp. the de:Charité, de:Berlin Hauptbahnhof. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Foto von dir in NRhZ[edit]

Hallo Achim Raschka,

gerade bin ich hier zufällig auf ein von dir gemachtes Foto mit m. E. unzureichender Urhebernennung gestoßen. Ich habe keine Ahnung ob und wie man dagegen vorgehen kann oder ob du das überhaupt für nötig hältst, wollte dich nur informieren. Gruß--ペーター (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hallo ペーター, ich denke es sit vollkommen o.k., so hoch schätze ich meine künstlerische Leistung bei dem Bild jetzt mal nciht ein. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 16:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 7440cd4b7d9c6b8bc1356db57ee73558[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Gaboon viper.jpg[edit]

When you uploaded this file you say that you have an meila from the Flickr author giving GDFL license. Could you possible email this to COM:OTRS as the image is licensed on Flickr as All Rights Reserved and this image could be deleted. Thanks. If you have any questions feel free to ask on my talk page. --Captain-tucker (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Gaboon_viper.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gaboon_viper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Willi_Hennig2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Willi_Hennig2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Achim, ich habe das rückgängig gemacht, weil dieses Bild hochgeladen worden ist noch lange bevor das OTRS-Verfahren hier etabliert wurde, und dieses Vorgehen bei Masur begründet. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 06:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Hallo AFBorchert, danke für deinen Einsatz - da dieses Verhalten mittlerweile regelmässig vorkommt und ich natürlich keine Mails aufbewahre, die 5 Jahre alt sind, habe ich es aufgegeben, zu antworten - dafür habe ich zuwenig Einblick und auch Interesse an den Commons-Regularien. Zu diesem Bild: Es wurde mir damals von dem Sohn Hennigs zu den üblichen Konditionen für GFDL zur Verfügung gestellt - beweisen kann ich es nciht mehr und ich werde ihn miot Sicherheit nicht erneut belästigen, nur weil der Bürokratismus im Projekt in überschaubarer Weise zugenommen hat. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Petersburger Platz.JPG[edit]

Hallo Achim, habe bei der Durchsicht der Category:Marble Deine Datei gefunden und in einem kleinen Detail umbeschriftet. Es ist ein Gneis und sehr wahrscheinlich der Vånga-Gneis aus Schweden. Hoffentlich ist die Änderung OK? Grüße --Lysippos (talk) 21:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Aber natürlich, danke -- Achim Raschka (talk) 05:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Microhyla-nepenthicola.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Microhyla-nepenthicola.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kimchi.sg (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

O.k. - taken from en where it was tagged as CC and thought it was o.k. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 06:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Lotti und Hildegard Krekel[edit]

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Lotti_und_Hildgard_Krekel_2010.jpg

Hallo Herr Raschka, die Dame links auf dem Foto ist nicht Lotti Krekel sondern die Schauspielerin Samy Orfgen. Da die Datei auch falsch benannt ist, müsste diese eventuell neu hochgeladen werden.

Samy Orfgen: http://www.google.de/images?um=1&hl=de&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Ade%3Aofficial&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=Samy+Orfgen&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

Lotti Krekel: http://www.google.de/images?q=Lotti%20Krekel&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:de:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=de&tab=wi

Viele Grüße --LarkCGN (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gymnich St. Kunibert vom Friedhof 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gymnich St. Kunibert vom Friedhof 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

ISK Knapsack Werkswohnheime.jpg[edit]

Hallo, zuerst mal: ich habe noch Null Erfahrung mit Commons. Bin aber sehr interessiert. Nun zum Thema: Das Bild zeigt die Gartenstrasse in Knapsack. Im Haus Nr 16 - der Eingang hinten links von der Strasse aus - dort habe ich zusammen mit meinen Eltern von ca 1963 -1973 gewohnt. Im vorderen Teil - Eingang über die Einfahrt - wohnte damals die Familie Opitz. Das Bild ist ca aus den 40er Jahren - und ganz sicher ist es kein Werkswohnheim, sondern dort wohnten die Chefs (Direktoren u.ä.). Daher konnte man auch nur in die Gartenstrasse, wenn man einen Schlüssel fürs Zugangstor hatte. (Ecke Kapellenstr.(heute Industriestr.) In dem Haus Nr 16 wohnte ab ? - bis 1963 Direktor(?) Querengässer. Das Doppelhaus ist ca 1974 abgerissen worden ( wegen der Umsiedlung und weil das Dach eine Erneuerung brauchte - zu teuer).

- Übrigens: Der Bereich Gartenstr./Dr.Kraussstr/(Grüner Weg) war die Beamtensiedlung und ein "eigenes" Dorf im Dorf Knapsack. --Alfredte (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)alfredte

File:ISK Knapsack Phosphorabstich.jpg[edit]

Hallo, was ist es denn nun wirklich ? Im Bildtext Phospohorabstich im Text Carbidabstich. Ich denke mal eher Carbid, ich habe Ende der 60er mal dort gearbeitet und denke, dass es passt. Ich finde es übrigens klasse, dass die Bilder von der "Chemischen" für alle verfügbar sind - die sind nämlich wirklich gut und wecken alte Erinnerungen in mir. PS: kenne wir uns nicht von einem Fest in Knapsack, Dr.Kraußstr ? --Alfredte (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)alfredte

A kitten for you![edit]

Cucciolo gatto Bibo.jpg

A kitten for you! As suggested in Kurier ;-D

Sargoth (talk) 09:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

aber eines reicht doch ;O) -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Ach du Schreck! Ist das ein Bug oder ein Feature ... ich habe zwar x-mal gedrückt, es gab aber nie einen sichtbaren Erfolg. Na Hauptsache du freust dich :D --Sargoth (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

Molino Kinderdijk 3.jpg WLM super uploader
Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- Effeietsanders (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Köln[edit]

WLM Köln 2011 Banner und Zeughaus.jpg Danke!
Auch du bleibst nicht verschont ;-) Ich finde, wir waren ein tolles Team, es war ein großartiger Tag, und es war wie immer ein Vergnügen, mit Dir für Wikipedia zu arbeiten - vielen Dank dafür! Elya (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Feierabendhaus[edit]

Feierabendhaus, Edit
Original

Hi Achim,

ich habe einen deiner aktuellen QI-Kandidaten aufgrund deiner Bemerkung bearbeitet. Someone35 hat mit seiner Bemerkung gemeint, dass die senkrechten Linien nicht exakt senkrecht sind. Das habe ich korrigiert, ebenso wie ich die Helligkeitskurve bearbeitet habe. Allerdings ist das schöne Tiefblau und der Lichteffekt natürlich nicht ganz so stark wie im Ausgangbild, dafür ist das Bauwerk heller. Will man beides: schönes Tiefblau und ein der Dunkelheit angemessene Helligkeit des Bauwerks muss man sich der HDR-Technik bedienen. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw, danke - die Aufhellung habe ich selbst ebenfalls versucht, dann aber aus den genannten Gründen verworfen - gefiel mir irgendwie nicht so gut wie die dunklere Version. Für die senkrechten Linien reichen meine Augen wohl nicht ganz aus (bin bei diesen Verzrrungsfragen eh immer ziemlich unsicher). Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 20:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue IBB.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue IBB.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Kölner Randkanal 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Randkanal 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Mellerhoefe windkraft 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellerhoefe windkraft 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Mellerhoefe windkraft 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellerhoefe windkraft 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Dahmeshöved 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahmeshöved 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Titz Dueppelsmuehle 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Titz Dueppelsmuehle 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schloss Schwarzenraben 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwarzenraben 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Dedinghausen Solaranlage 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dedinghausen Solaranlage 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Rixbeck Kirche 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rixbeck Kirche 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Balkhausen Kapelle 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balkhausen Kapelle 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Yolanda02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yolanda02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chevy Van BM.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevy Van BM.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Köln Komödienstraße 34 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köln Komödienstraße 34 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Achim Raschka,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quadrath-Ichendorf Glasbläser 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quadrath-Ichendorf Glasbläser 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin Kurfürstendamm 119 120 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Kurfürstendamm 119 120 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Viele Grüße -- Saibo (Δ) 15:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Titz Dueppelsmuehle 02.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Post mill Düppelsmühle Titz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Knapsack Zigarrenbunker 01-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knapsack Zigarrenbunker 01-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Berlin Kurfürstendamm 119 120 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Kurfürstendamm 119 120 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Dublette[edit]

Hallo Achim,

das von dir hochgeladene File:Lovis Corinth Tragicomedies The Women of Weinsberg 1894.jpg ist eine qualitativ schlechtere Dublette von File:Lovis Corinth Weiber von Weinsberg.jpg. Gibt es einen triftigen Grund, diese Dublette zu behalten? Wenn nicht, schlage ich vor, sie zu löschen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 10:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Prinzipiell o.k. - allerdings haben wir die vollständige Serie der Tragikomödien nur in eben dieser schlechteren Auflösung und s/w - für die gemeinsame Darstellung ist es also sinnvoll, auch die beiden weniger guten Dubletten zu behalten oder sich dahinterzuklemmen, alle Blätter in guter Qualität zu bekommen. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Die restlichen 7 gibt es in derselben besseren Qualität bei zeno.org. Drüberladen? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 14:14, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Wenn du magst -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
OK, aber erst, wenn die Server mal wieder etwas schneller sind als das Schneckentempo gerade. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

supported by WMDE[edit]

Hallo Achim, ich vestehe dein Anliegen mit der Kategorisierung, aber ich bitte dich dort etwas differenzierter vorzugehen. Meine WikiCon-Fotos etwa sind mit keinem Cent von WMDE finanziert worden. Ich war dort im Rahmen des Fotoworkshops, habe an die Medienakademie 85 Euro Teilnahmeberag (statt 45 für die Wikicon) gleistet, der Rest war vom Bayrischen Kulturministerium und der Zentrale für Politische Bildung finanziert. Da steckte kein einziger Wikimedia-Cent drin; im Gegenteil habe ich meine Arbeitszeit spendiert, um der WikiCon-Orga zu helfen (und habe ach dafür die sonst übliche Beitragsentlastung nicht erhalten). Ich sehe auch bei anderen Events, z.B. Skillshare 2010 einen deutlichen Unterschied zu Fotos, die mit direkter und erheblicher WMDE-Förderung entstanden sind wie etwa die Fotoflüge. Hier auf Commons wird die WMDE-Förderung ggf. von jedem Fotografen individuell per Baustein in der Bildbeschreibung angegeben. Bitte belasse es dabei. --Martina talk 13:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Identification[edit]

Thanks for identification of that guy.--Juandev (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I only initiated this - the guy who identified that lady was User:Accipiter ... -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WOA wiki burger 2010-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WOA wiki burger 2010-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liblar Friedenskirche 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liblar Friedenskirche 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Soest Bahnhof 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest Bahnhof 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Soest Skulptur Begegnung.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest Skulptur Begegnung.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Holidoptera griseoaptera Fluegel Schneider.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Benny Trapp Alytes cisternasii.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alytes cisternasii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gymnich Friedhofsmauer 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gymnich Friedhofsmauer 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Benny Trapp Alytes cisternasii.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benny Trapp Alytes cisternasii.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benny Trapp Alytes cisternasii.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Benny Trapp Anatololacerta oertzeni Rhodos.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benny Trapp Anatololacerta oertzeni Rhodos.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benny Trapp Anatololacerta oertzeni Rhodos.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Benny Trapp Pelophylax cretensis.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelophylax cretensis (Greek Marsh Frog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Ich dachte bisher eigentlich...[edit]

...dass ältere Streitigkeiten bereits vergessen seien, aber, wie ich heute feststellen musste, ist dem anscheinend nicht so [1]. Na gut, danke fürs Outing, - werd's mir gerne merken ;-) Mfg A.Savin 17:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Ach ja, Du pöbelst in Deiner altbekannten Weise rum und beschwerst Dich dann, dass das revertiert wird - absolut lernunfähig WWSS1 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Herzlich willkommen auf Commons - ich hoffe, du fühlst dich wohl hier, bei Fragen kannst du dich gerne an mich wenden. Frohes Schaffen! - A.Savin 18:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Du darfst gern auch mir drohen - auch ich bin hier ja schließlich ein Niemand; you also may try to threaten me 'cause I am a "nobody" too at commons. I am really impressed by mighty A.Savin .... -- Achim Raschka (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Achjöttchen... - A.Savin 20:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Sach ich doch - und wennze mal wieder auf Normalsterblichenniveau runtergekommen bist, könntest du ja vielleicht mal drüber nachdenken, dass deine heutigen Aktionen im Kurier und auf deiner Benutzerseite tatsächlich klassisch "scheiße" waren - vollkommen ohne Anti- oder Sym-pathien. Hubertl findet mich übrigens genauso scheiße wie du - vielleicht solltet ihr euch verbünden (Simpl wäre sicher auch interessiert) ... -- Achim Raschka (talk) 20:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Scheiße finde ich nur die deutsche Wikipedia mit ihrer Elite, die nach Belieben pöbeln und andere User als psychisch krank bezeichnen darf. Ich habe bereits Schritte eingeleitet, um meinen Account dort vom SUL zu trennen und das Passwort zu vernichten. Deinen etwas, hm, kindischen Vorschlag, mich mit irgendjemandem gegen dich zu verbünden, weise ich dankend zurück. Frohes Schaffen noch - Mfg A.Savin 20:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dirmerzheim Friedhof 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirmerzheim Friedhof 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dirmerzheim Friedhof 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirmerzheim Friedhof 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2012-05 Lippstadt Lange Strasse Glocken Jakobi 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Lange Strasse Glocken Jakobi 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Wasserturm 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Frage zu tierkarte[edit]

Hallo Achim,

Du hast dieses Bild hergestellt richtig? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oncifelis_guigna_dis.png

Ich mag gerne aehnliche Bilder herstellen, und arbeite momentan mit gis shapefiles von das IUCN. Ich hab aber probleme diese Dateien gut zu zeigen und nehme an ich benuetze ein falschen viewer. Ich nehme an Du hast etwas aehnliches gemacht, koenntest Du mir vielleicht kurz deine arbeitsweise erklaeren?

Schon mal vielen Dank, und entschuldige bitte mein Deutsch, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Achim Raschka. You have new messages at Mr.choppers's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Pastorat Gelting 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Pastorat Gelting 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Trips-Fahrt 36.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Trips-Fahrt 36.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Gelting 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Gelting 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Kronsgaard Strand 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kronsgaard Strand 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Nübelfeld Mühle 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Kronsgaard Strand 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kronsgaard Strand 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Trips-Fahrt 82-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Trips-Fahrt 82-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wacken pics[edit]

Hi ! Thanks a lot for your message and the use of my Insomnium photo on Wikipedia ! I still have some photos to sort out and upload :) --vip (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Achim Raschka,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen![edit]

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Achim Raschka,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 07.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Obertilliach Pfarrkirche St Ulrich 04.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Obertilliach Pfarrkirche St Ulrich 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Obertilliach Pfarrkirche St Ulrich 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-10-28 Friedhof Gymnich Schneider 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-10-28 Friedhof Gymnich Schneider 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 09.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Houseball_01.JPG[edit]

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA[edit]

Some images that you uploaded to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Houseball_01.JPG, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Houseball_02.JPG, and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Houseball_03.JPG were removed based on the receipt of a takedown notice made pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 512 (the “DMCA”). The Wikimedia Foundation (“WMF”) takes alleged copyright infringement very seriously and carefully examines each takedown notice received and the image in question for compliance with U.S. copyright law. This image was one of 59 photographs included in a DMCA takedown notice received by WMF of various publicly-installed sculptures around the world created by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen.

Some of these sculptures are located in countries that recognize “freedom of panorama” for sculptures, while others are not. Currently, U.S. copyright law does not recognize freedom of panorama for works of art, such as sculptures, and thus the copyright holder of a sculpture has the right to exclude others from publishing images of that sculpture, so long as it still enjoys copyright protection. While it is true that some of the sculptures in question here are located in countries whose copyright regime conflicts with the U.S’s regime, current U.S. conflict of law principles indicate that U.S. copyright law would apply in evaluating the scope of a copyright holder’s rights.

WMF strongly supports a change in U.S. copyright law that would extend freedom of panorama to artwork so that more people can experience beautiful and thought-provoking works of art that they would not otherwise be able to enjoy. However, WMF is a U.S.-based organization that must comply with U.S. laws as they presently exist, including U.S. copyright law, conflict of law principles, and the DMCA.

What can you do?[edit]

If you want to express your support for the extension of freedom of panorama to works of art (and you are a resident of the United States), you can write your U.S. senators and/or representative.

If you feel that this particular image does not infringe the alleged copyright holder’s rights, you can contest the takedown notice by submitting a “counter-notice” to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that WMF will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that WMF is unable to provide you with legal advice.

More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Filing a Counter-Notice[edit]

If you choose to submit a counter-notice, you must send a letter to legal@wikimedia.org asking WMF to restore this image. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:

  • A link to where the content was before we took it down;
  • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
  • Your name, address, and phone number;
  • If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
  • Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, WMF must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore this image within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

That's a joke, isn't it? It is YOUR job to repel such false DCMA-notices (the WMF knows EXACTLY that there is the freedom of panorama in Germany and that it also covers 3d-statues) and not the job of the uploader. --DaB. (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
See en:DMCA_takedown_notice#Notice_from_Copyright_Owner. There is no provision in DMCA for the WMF to challenge the copyright claims - that is absolutely on the shoulders of others, regardless of how obviously wrong the claim is. As en.wp has it: Instead of making a complex legal determination, OCILLA allows OSPs to avoid liability provided they comply with the terms of the statute, regardless of the validity of any claim of infringement. (emphasis added). Rd232 (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-10-28 Friedhof Gymnich Schneider.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-10-28 Friedhof Gymnich Schneider.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

11-11 Vogelsang 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11-11 Vogelsang 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

11-11 Vogelsang 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11-11 Vogelsang 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

11-11 Vogelsang 19.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11-11 Vogelsang 19.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Gogenbiwa.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gogenbiwa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BabelStone (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-08 Schleiprincess 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Schleiprincess 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

11-11 Vogelsang 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11-11 Vogelsang 06.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

12-12-15 Mahnmal Köttingen 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-12-15 Mahnmal Köttingen 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-12-15 Mahnmal Köttingen 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-12-15 Mahnmal Köttingen 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DcoetzeeBot (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 05.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim Wasserturm 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-03-17 Liblar Schloss Gracht 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Schloss Gracht 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

TUSC token bbfed95c466978cde2818947cca3a4f5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-03-17 Liblar Alban 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Alban 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-17 Liblar Ford WM 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ford WM 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-03-02 Wissersheim Friedhofskapelle 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim Friedhofskapelle 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express 2CV 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express 2CV 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-17 Liblar Ford WM 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ford WM 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express 2CV 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express 2CV 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2013-03-02 Wissersheim St Martinus 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim St Martinus 08.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-17 Liblar Ville Express Bus 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sculpture Koelner Zoo 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture Koelner Zoo 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Exif-Metadaten[edit]

Hallo Achim,

als ich mir die Bilder vom Festivalsommer angeschaut habe ist mir aufgefallen, dass was mit den Exif-Metadaten komisch ist: Bei vielen Bildern wie z.B. hier sind ganz merkwürdige Metadaten drin (etwa f/0.65 oder 1.043mm Brennweite). Hier hingegen gibt es keine Metadaten.

Hast du eine Idee woran das liegen könnte?

Viele Grüße, --Tobias (talk) 22:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe leider keine Ahnung von EXIFs, sorry -- Achim Raschka (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-03-02 Wissersheim Kriegerdenkmal 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-02 Wissersheim Kriegerdenkmal 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock Chelsea Grin 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Chelsea Grin 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Achim Raschka, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | +/−

INeverCry 05:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Achtung...[edit]

...beim Dateiverschieben. CommonsDelinker ist zur Zeit außer Funktion. Siehe "Watchlistnotice" LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 07:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

das bedeutet jetzt für mich? -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Dass die Dateieinbindungen manuell ersetzt werden müssen. Dafür gibt es einige Tools z.B. JustReplace.js oder Global Replace. Dess weiteren wird davon abgeraten Dateien mit einer hohen Verwendungszahl nicht zu verschieben.--Steinsplitter (talk) 07:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Wenn ich es richtig sehe, ist das automatisch bereits geschehen, siehe etwa hier. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Das Script versucht die Einbindung selbst zu ersetzen, wenn das Script nicht alles schafft dann wird ein Antrag angelegt (Hier wurden z.B. nicht alle Einbindungen ersetzt klick. Kann aber nicht bearbeitet werden weil Delinker schon seit Wochen down ist. LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
O.k., die beiden bekomme ich händisch auch noch hin - danke für die Hinweise. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Fujinon film camera.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Fujinon film camera.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar Hürlimann 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar Hürlimann 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar Hürlimann 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar Hürlimann 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

de:IF?[edit]

Hi Achim, in File:13-06-07_RaR_ADTR_Neil_Westfall_09.jpg steht als Kamerahersteller und -modell "IF" bzw. if mit (automatischer) Verlinkung zu de:IF. Wie kommt es dazu? Ich habe mal de:SEMC als Weiterleitung angelegt, um einem ähnlich gelagerten Problem abzuhelfen. Guß, --Emha (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Woher weißt Du, wie die ganzen Musiker (also die Nicht-Sänger) heißen? Und: hatte/n ich/wir Nikon-Kit I oder Nikon-Kit II?

Hi Emha, was mit den EXIF und der IF ist, kann ich dir nicht sagen - ich habe keine Ahnung, woher die kommen noch wie man die umstellt, alles voreingestellt. Zu den Musikern: Recherche auf den Websites etc. Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR LB Wes Borland 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR LB Wes Borland 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR The Bots 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR The Bots 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Ted Lundström 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Ted Lundström 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:2012-05 Lippstadt Synagoge 01.jpg[edit]

Im ersten Moment dachte ich: was lädt denn der Achim hier rein, viel zu starke Schatten... Aber in Gesamtansicht sieht es viel besser aus als im thumb. Für mich ist das schon so QI aber ich würde noch zwei Änderungen vorschlagen: dezente Aufhellung der Schatten und Beschnitt auf Quadrat. Während der lufenden Kandidatur mache ich das aber nicht ohne deine Zustimmung. Was meinst du? --Ralf Roleček 18:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC) PS: bewertest du auch mal ein paar Bilder?

Mach ruhig, it's a wiki. Zur Bewertung: Eher nicht, das überlasse ich lieber Leuten mit Fotografen-Sachverstand. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Das sehe ich anders. Du hast schon viele QI selbst gemacht, du hast eine Meinung und einen Geschmack. Vielleicht nicht die technischen Hintergründe aber wir bewerten ja nicht das perfekte Bild. Gerade bei biologischen Bildern wäre deine fachmännische Meinung wertvoll. Viecher und Gräser sind für die meisten von uns hübsch, scharf - also QI. Ob das wirklich so ist? Keine Ahnung. Andererseits ist beim Piepmatz XYZ vielleicht gerade was ganz Besonderes sichtbar? Wir wissen es nicht. Dein Foto habe ich drübergeladen, bei Nichtgefallen setze es einfach zurück. --Ralf Roleček 19:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR ADTR Neil Westfall 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR ADTR Neil Westfall 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR ADTR Kevin Skaff 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR ADTR Kevin Skaff 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-04-27 Groezrock Far from finished 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Far from finished 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2012-05 Lippstadt Synagoge 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05 Lippstadt Synagoge 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR LB Wes Borland 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR LB Wes Borland 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar MotoGuzzi 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-05-05 Oldtimerteffen Liblar MotoGuzzi 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 Hermann Lammers Meyer 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 Hermann Lammers Meyer 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-20 Amphi Impressionen 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Amphi Impressionen 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate TJ Bell 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate TJ Bell 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Tim Lyakhovetskiy 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Tim Lyakhovetskiy 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Nicholas Von Doom 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Nicholas Von Doom 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-08-01 Wacken Bowle 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-08-01 Wacken Bowle 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Bullet 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Bullet 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-08 Kahnstellen Maasholm 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Michael Money 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Michael Money 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate TJ Bell 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate TJ Bell 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Bryan Money 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Bryan Money 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Craig Mabbitt 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Escape the Fate Craig Mabbitt 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-08-01 Wackenschädel 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-08-01 Wackenschädel 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Aaron Minich 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Aaron Minich 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Alex Alereza 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Nekrogoblikon Alex Alereza 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 EH Hermann Lammers Meyer 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 EH Hermann Lammers Meyer 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 EH Arnold Terveer 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 EH Arnold Terveer 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Bullet 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Bullet 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 Truck Stop Cisco Berndt 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 Truck Stop Cisco Berndt 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 Truck Stop Andreas Cisek 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 Truck Stop Andreas Cisek 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 Truck Stop Andreas Cisek 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 Truck Stop Cisco Berndt 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

re: QIC Truck Stop[edit]

Hi! I have changed the status of your candidate from red to green, you have made a very nice reworking. There is still a little part of clipped whites on the hat, but that's completely unavoidable, so don't worry about it. Concert lights are usually too strong on a certain part, and that's a problem if it's white. I declined the nomination because most of the hat and the sleeves were blown, but a small part is more than acceptable. Next time I see such a problem I'll keep the nomination in blue. To avoid a centered composition and have more space where the singer is looking at, you might crop a bit of the right black part, but it is ok as it is now. Thank you for reworking! --Kadellar (talk) 18:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 Truck Stop Andreas Cisek 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 Truck Stop Andreas Cisek 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Rodhocetus.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rodhocetus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 11:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File-13-06-08 RaR Pierce the Veil Mike Fuentes 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! File-13-06-08 RaR Pierce the Veil Mike Fuentes 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File-13-06-08 RaR Pierce the Veil Vic Fuentes 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! File-13-06-08 RaR Pierce the Veil Vic Fuentes 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-09 RaR Bullet Adam Hector 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Bullet Adam Hector 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


File:Brühl Bildstock01.JPG[edit]

Hallo Achim, meinst Du hier vielleicht Category:Brühl (Rheinland)? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 19:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Ja, danke -Achim Raschka (talk) 22:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR Orsons Tua 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Orsons Tua 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06 Budapest Dancing Show.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06 Budapest Dancing Show.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06 Budapest Dancing Show 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06 Budapest Dancing Show 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR Orsons Maeckes 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Orsons Maeckes 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-08 RaR Tocotronic Rick 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-08 RaR Tocotronic Rick 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-08 RaR Tocotronic Rick 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-08 RaR Tocotronic Rick 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

BennyTrapp Rötliche Schlanknatter Platyceps collaris Bulgarien.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red whip snake (Platyceps collaris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Battery Point Lighthouse, Crescent City.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battery Point Lighthouse, Crescent City..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

താങ്കൾക്ക് ഒരു താരകം![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png അദ്ധ്വാന താരകം
For improving Category:Photographs by N. A. Naseer. You may also want to help with Category:Manojk's uploads (Joseph Lazer), which is also added to commons as very similar to N. A. Naseer's. Praveen:talk 18:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG[edit]

Hallo Achim, hast Du meine Bemerkung zu oben genanntem Foto entfernt? Wenn ja, warum? War das Englisch zu unverständlich? Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Scheint so - aber weder bewusst noch absichtlich; war wohl ein Editkonflikt mit Unfal, sorry - habe ich wieder repariert. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-10-18 Kranhäuser nacht 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-10-18 Kranhäuser nacht 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP promotion[edit]

Benny Trapp Epirusfrosch Pelophylax epeiroticus.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benny Trapp Epirusfrosch Pelophylax epeiroticus.jpg, uploaded by Benny Trapp and nominated by you on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benny Trapp Epirusfrosch Pelophylax epeiroticus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/JKadavoor Jee 05:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Benny Trapp Pelophylax kl grafi Grafscher Hybridfrosch.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benny Trapp Pelophylax kl grafi Grafscher Hybridfrosch.jpg, uploaded by Benny Trapp and nominated by you on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benny Trapp Pelophylax kl grafi Grafscher Hybridfrosch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/JKadavoor Jee 06:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hut A, Scott Base.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hut A, Scott Base.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Selection WikiCon[edit]

Hallo Achim Raschka,

ich habe schon einige meiner Bilder in die Category:Selection WikiCon 2013 gestellt. Falls dir ein Bild von ihnen nicht gefällt oder sie sind zu viel, sage ich dir welche Bilder habe ich ausgewählt: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Wenn du mehr Bilder brauchst, kannst du mir natürlich sagen. Ich glaube, dass dieses Bild mein bestes Bild bisher ist (du hast es schon gesehen (und danke!)), ich habe es bei FPC nominiert, ich hoffe, dass es FP wird. Einige deiner Bilder (z.B. 1 und 2) könnten auch FP werden meine Meinung nach, aber Konzert FP sind am schwierigsten. Grüße, Kadellar (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kadellar, prima - ich denke, ich lasse einfach alle drin und es dürfen gern ein paar mehr werden. Zu den Featured pictures: Ich trau mich nciht so richtig, aber mal sehen ... Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 02:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Selection WikiCon[edit]

Hallo Achim, ich bin zur Zeit in Urlaub und habe nicht jeden Tag Internetzugang, und wenn, dann extrem langsam. Es ist also daher einfacher wenn ich hier ein paar Vorschläge mache und Du Dir dann die Bilder auswählst und einstellst. Da die Convention in Karlsruhe ist, habe nur Bilder ausgewählt, die in Karlsruhe oder unmittelbarer Umgebung entstanden sind, das gibt etwas "Lokalkolorit". Als "Nichtschneckenbilder": Wespe, Kakaoblüte, Seelöwenskelett, Evolution des Pferdes und als "Schneckenbilder": Tenagodus trochlearis, Rhiostoma smithi (eine Schnecke mit "Schorchel"), Lambis millepeda und Cichoreus aculeatus. Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Danke dir, ich habe die Bilder vollständig aufgenommen. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikicon[edit]

Hallo Achim, wie kann ich denn hier was einfügen? Ich hätte vielleicht den einen oder anderen Beitrag, finde aber nicht die Stelle, wo ich ihn loswerden kann. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Spurzem, du musst nur die Kategorie zum Bild hinzufügen, dann wird das Bild in die Selection aufgenommen. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Ach ja, danke! Auf die Idee hätte ich eigentlich selbst kommen müssen. Aber manchmal hat man so etwas wie ein Brett vor dem Kopf. :-) Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist nicht aus diesem Jahr. Ich weiß ja nicht, ob es zufällig in der Cat. gelandet ist...--Ralf Roleček 19:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Ist vollkommen o.k. - ich habe einige etwas ältere Bilder dabei. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 20:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

BennyTrapp Pelophylax shquipericus Montenegro.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelophylax shqipericus (Albanian water frog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Benny Trapp Iberolacerta aranica.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iberolacerta aranica (Aran rock lizard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Hut A, Scott Base.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hut A, Scott Base (Antarctic Protected Area number HSM 75).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Amon Amarth Johan Hegg 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-10-18 Lightpainting 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-10-18 Lightpainting 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-03-30 Paaspop Liptease 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-30 Paaspop Liptease 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Biffy Clyro Simon Neil 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock The Kids Ludo Mariman 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock The Kids Ludo Mariman 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP Campspace 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP Campspace 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP Campspace 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP Campspace 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 05 Cleaning trucks.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-13 ADAC Truck GP 05 Cleaning trucks.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-06-07 RaR MC Fitti 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-20 Beauty of Gemina 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Beauty of Gemina 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-20 Beauty of Gemina 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Beauty of Gemina 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-08-01 Wacken Feuerschwanz Hodenherz 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-08-01 Wacken Feuerschwanz Hodenherz 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-30 Horrem Friedhof 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-30 Horrem Friedhof 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-30 Horrem Friedhof Kirchenkreuz 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-30 Horrem Friedhof Kirchenkreuz 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Nereis Kopf.png[edit]

Hi Achim Raschka. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-20 Amphi Ben Ivory 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Amphi Ben Ivory 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR Cro 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR Cro 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock Crossfaith Kazuki Takemura 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Crossfaith Kazuki Takemura 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Hallo Achim, herzlichen Dank für die Idee und Orgas des Festivalsommers Raymond 15:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Wow, ein Fotografenbarnstar - und das mir als Autoren ... ;) Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 15:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Dizzee Rascal 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Miracles Hugo Mudie 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Miracles Hugo Mudie 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Clutch Tim Sult 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Clutch Tim Sult 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-07-20 Amphi Agonoize Chris L. 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Amphi Agonoize Chris L. 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-20 Amphi Stahlmann AblaZ 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Amphi Stahlmann AblaZ 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-07-20 Amphi Voodooclub Phillip Boa 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-07-20 Amphi Voodooclub Phillip Boa 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-01-11 Yvi Quainoo Cologne 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock Kris Roe 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Kris Roe 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock Johnny Two Bags 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Johnny Two Bags 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-04-27 Groezrock Scorpios John Snodgrass 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Scorpios John Snodgrass 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Kakkmaddafakka Pål Vindenes 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Kakkmaddafakka Pål Vindenes 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-04-27 Groezrock Implants 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-27 Groezrock Implants 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-09-15 Steelwing Nic Savage 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-15 Steelwing Nic Savage 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Bühne.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Bühne.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friedrich-von-Thiersch-Saal Bühne.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katzenjammer - Greenville-Festival-2013-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge April[edit]

Achim, I would like if you could choose the challenge themes for April (and possibly May if you like). We need a couple of themes (the Traditions theme will carry over to April too). Any questions on suggestions or rules then feel free to ask. I know you like Concert Photography, but this may not be a theme many people can participate with :-(. Please let me know as soon as possible whether you will accept this responsibility -- you then have a few more days to make your mind up on the themes. You can reply here and I'll watch. -- Colin (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Colin,
thank you very much for asking me, it's a great honour. I will think it over and maybe discuss - but I think I will have some ideas. A first idea could be "Heavy Metal" (so including real Metal stuff libe chains, rings, whatever and concert photography on Metal), a second could be a coulour theme like "black and green" or a song phrases like "Who let the dogs out?" (for dog photography) or "We are the champions" (for sport photography and other competitions). Do you think this goes to the right direction? -- Achim Raschka (talk) 22:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
You can work out how to pick the themes any way you like -- discuss with me or post/request suggestions on the photo challenge talk page, or just choose for yourself. All that is needed is someone to make the final decision, so up to you how much you want to involve others in this. I found that leaving the decision to the community didn't work -- there are just too many reasonable choices that no consensus can be found. Some challenges will work better than others, which is fine. Personally, I like the first two more than the latter two. Mainly because I suspect I won't have the opportunity for those two, but of course many others may love those ideas and everyone is different. Colour combinations (or single colour) are I think good for a challenge as it gives a wide choice of photograph but still places a restriction that can be seen as something challenging. Have a think too about whether you want to place any "taken during challenge" restriction on one more themes. Also we could consider increasing the number of challenges running consecutively from three to four (including the one that is running from March-April already) -- it might be more different themes will keep interest up. And for many of us, Spring means better weather and we are more likely to want to get out with the camera. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Remember it is your decision. You may regret asking for ideas/opinions -- as I have found we generally can't all agree. My opinions are no more valuable than anyone else's. This is your opportunity to decide themes you think will work well. Other people will get their chance to choose themes (and realise how hard it is to please everyone :-). -- Colin (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

I like open discussion and then deciding - and it seems to work; so everything is fine ;) -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


Thanks for selecting the themes and organising the new pages. I've tweaked the voting page a little to include extra lines to help the votes go in the right place. Once we get some fancy voting system like POTY then this won't be needed. There were are couple of broken file links -- it is good to check over every image to make sure it displays as we wouldn't want someone to lose any votes. Again, I hope the task of creating voting pages can be automated -- I use Notepad++ with some macros and search/replace but it is tedious. As for adding up the votes, I have written a program to do that so don't expect anyone to do it by hand :-). But if you could look at the changes I made tonight that would be a big help for next month. Cheers, -- Colin (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Colin, I was in a rush in the morning to bring my son to the Kindergarten and go for office, so it was all a bit tight in time and needed more time than expected - for the next time I know this and will be prepared ... -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-09-15 Steelwing 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-15 Steelwing 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Achim Raschka,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-09-15 Steelwing Riley Erickson 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-15 Steelwing Riley Erickson 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:13-06-07 RaR hats 02.jpg[edit]

Hi, Achim Raschka, since you were the uploader, why this {{personality rights}} warning. Smile Lotje (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, it is fixed in the template Festivalsommer 2013. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Jürg Neuenschwander 2012.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jürg Neuenschwander.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-07 RaR LB Sam Rivers 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR LB Sam Rivers 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-06-07 RaR LB Fred Durst 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-07 RaR LB Fred Durst 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-03-09 Lommersum Kanaldeckel Weilerswist.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-03-09 Lommersum Kanaldeckel Weilerswist.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

13-03-23 e-tropolis Autodafeh 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-03-23 e-tropolis Autodafeh 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

13-06-09 RaR Hanni El Khatib Adrian Rodriguez 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-06-09 RaR Hanni El Khatib Adrian Rodriguez 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Piratenfest 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piratenfest 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Piratenfest 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piratenfest 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Category:Media without a license: needs history check[edit]

Etwa 50 Deiner Bilder von gestern sind ohne Lizenz und in dieser Wartungskategorie zu finden, bitte Lizenz hinzufügen und die Kat entfernen. Danke. --Denniss (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-04-16 Zülpich Bastion 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-16 Zülpich Bastion 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-04-16 Zülpich Designergarten 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-16 Zülpich Designergarten 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-04-16 Zülpich Srickbaum 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-16 Zülpich Srickbaum 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-04-19 DevilDriver Dez Fafara 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-19 DevilDriver Dez Fafara 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Photo challenge[edit]

Three open challenges come to an end tonight and two voting challenges close. Don't panic about trying to set up new pages, count votes or even set up the new challenges. The only vital thing is that we close the existing pages for new nominations and votes, and if you aren't around to do that tomorrow, then I'll try to do it some time in the morning. Just look at what I did to previous pages to mark them closed.

Have you decided on new challenges for May? I hope so :-). If you haven't then it isn't the end of the world if we are a few days late starting. I can prepare the voting pages tomorrow evening if you don't have time. If you do it yourself, please double-check every image displays correctly (no red-links) and the "collapse top/bottom" templates are in the right place. If you aren't sure, you could create the pages but don't link to them and I'll check them. I've got a program to do the vote counting so don't worry about that. -- Colin (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Colin,
just came back from a 3-day business trip from sweden - so no chance for tonight. I will prepare the new challenges tommorrow morning and maybe also the voting pages - depends of how much time my falily will give me at this free day ... Achim Raschka (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
I closed the previous challenges. I'll tally the votes later today and announce the winners. I did a practice-run last night and no more votes have arrived so it should be straightforward for me to just publish the results I've prepared (but don't have to hand right now). -- Colin (talk) 07:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
New challenges are started and I will promote the challenges today in the german Wikipedia's Kurier. I will not be able to work out the voting pages for the last challenges now, so maybe I will built them up tomorrow, if nobody else will do it so far. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
It's ok. I'll do the voting tonight. And I'll request a Watchlist notice once all the pages are set up. Are you able to translate the watchlist notice? -- Colin (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I've done the vote counting and results. But I haven't had time to create the voting pages, sorry. Either you can do it or ill do it tomorrow evening. I thought you might like to announce the results on the Photo Challenge talk page -- perhaps you want to say something about the entries/voting/etc. To announce the winners on the talk page, just use the template for winners -- see what I did before. And perhaps you could give out the prizes using the new template on people's talk page. -- Colin (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I see you haven't had a chance to do the voting pages. I've got some free time so I'll work on it and get them up tonight. -- Colin (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

I've done all the admin now. I wrote a program to create the voting pages. Makes it easier from now on. It adds some info about each photo such as author (hidden, but can be shown once voting over), date taken, date uploaded, size. We can use the dates to verify the images are valid for the challenge. Btw, all the previous and current challenges make no restriction on when the photos were taken. Do you think we should have at least one challenge with such a restriction? If you want to try that, the sports challenge could be restricted. And probably a good idea to put the restriction in bold. But it is up to you. Thanks for picking the new themes and helping with the challenges. I'll pick someone else for June/July to keep moving the responsibility around. -- Colin (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Derivative work[edit]

Hi. I uploaded a new version of a photo taken by you. I have proposed in QI.

The photo is very nice. That's why I worked. The original could also be QI--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi User:Lmbuga, thanks - from a concert photography point of view I would leave the microphone in since it is part of the concert equipment; but this is a question how one like it. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with you. They are different images.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-04-20 Mr Wallace Jelle Hoeksma 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-20 Mr Wallace Jelle Hoeksma 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-05-24 Kostümprämierung Der Tod 01 crop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-05-24 Kostümprämierung Der Tod 01 crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

14-04-20 Mr Wallace Jelle Hoeksma 04 retouched.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-04-20 Mr Wallace Jelle Hoeksma 04 retouched.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

14-05-24 Klapperritter 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-05-24 Klapperritter 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

14-05-24 Kostümprämierung Bruder Rectus + Waldelfen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-05-24 Kostümprämierung Bruder Rectus + Waldelfen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Lovis Corinth[edit]

Hallo Achim Raschka, auf der Arcadja auction results site gibt es schon wieder viele neue Werke von L, Corinth. Wenn Du Interresse daran hast, von dieser Seite Bilder und Graphiken von Corinth hier bei Commons hochzuladen, schreibe ich Dir gerne, wie man sie halbwegs groß herausladen kann. Ich selbst kann das nicht alles schaffen. Auf Deiner Seite Benutzer:Achim Raschka/Projekt Lovis Corinth ist dieses Bild möglicherweise die Nummer 31. Grüße --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
PS: als Beispiel sei hier nur das angeführt. --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Trzęsacz, vielen Dank für den Hinweis - diese Baustelle muss ich tatsächlich mal wiederbeleben und bin über Tipps, wie ich bsp. an den Schloßpark von 1908 (BC 356) komme, dankbar; mail an achim.raschka at wikipedia.de. Das Aktporträt ist nicht die 31 sondern die 34, habe ich soeben eingebaut; ebenso wie das lesende Mädchen (BC 55) - danke auch für diesen Tipp. Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)