User talk:Actia Nicopolis
File tagging File:Nikos Κarabelas 2007.jpg
|This media may be deleted.|
|Thanks for uploading File:Nikos Κarabelas 2007.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (firstname.lastname@example.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Thank you for pointing out that permission was missing. This is my own work and I grant permission under terms of Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 for my work to be used. I hope this clarifies the matter and you could make the necessary ammendments to the file.
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.
I have moved this page to User:Actia Nicopolis/Postcards by Aspiotis because it does not conform to the requirements of a Commons Gallery. The page, as it is, would probably be useful at WP:EN or WP:GR. Or, you could transform it into Commons gallery format, see, for example, Lighthouses in Maine. Once that is done, simply copy it to the same place I moved it from.
If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
I have deleted Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη. We do not keep two different galleries that are identical except for language. If you with to create a bi-lingual gallery, you may, but the title must be in one language or the other and a redirect for the title in the other language. The reason for this is simple -- having two versions of the same gallery makes it much less likely that both will be maintained -- you may plan to do this, but where will you be 10, 20, 50 years from now?
I note also that you recreated Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη after one of our colleagues deleted it for good reason. That was a serious violation of our rules and if you do it again you may be blocked from editing here. You may appeal deletions at COM:Undeletion requests, but you may not recreate content yourself. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for directing me to create a gallery for Aspiotis' postcards. Your advise is much appreciated and useful. I will reform the page and upload it when ready.
It was not me that recreated Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη. I was advised to move w:el:Κατάλογος καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη to the Commons Gallery, and I did so by creating Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη. This page was speedily deleted for good reason. The user who advised me to move my article w:el:Κατάλογος καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη into Commons as a gallery, created the page Καρτ ποστάλ Ασπιώτη again. So, please, do not blame me for recreating this page in Commons. I hope you will realize the whole story if you look carefully into it.
In anyway, your advice has helped me understand how a gallery should be formed in Commons. Thanks again and wish you a very happy new year!
- Yes, with the modification I made I think it is fine, thank you for your effort. The reason for the change to default gallery size is simple. For 80% of all users, it doesn't matter, but for the others, having the default size means that the images will show up on their screens at the size they have specified in their preferences. This is important for user of small screens -- it will allow them to see whole images, rather than having to scroll. More important, it is important to vision impaired people who use very large screens and who want to see only one gallery image on each screen, so they specify their default size as the whole screen. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Prevesa postmarks on Ottoman revenues
You uploaded some amazing pictures of Ottoman revenues, really nice.
The Ottoman Empire 10 paras brown and yellow, proportional fee fiscal stamp was intended for usage in the Constantinople administrative area according the handbook by Suleymaniye. The issues in same design and same year but in blue and black were for use in provinces (10pa no. 4544). Prevesa is clearly not in the Constantinople administrative area. This makes me doubtful about the postmark. Any sources backing that its genuine? Suleymaniye could have the usage area of two designs mixed up too, which seems unlikely to me.Arno-nl (talk) 17:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Although intended for usage in the Constantinople administrative area, i found another revenue (Sul. 4513) which was used in Alexandria, the cancel looks genuine to me. This rules out sole use in the intended area. Arno-nl (talk) 10:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)