User talk:Adámoz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Adámoz!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Adámoz, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Ar127975627484243 (1).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Achim (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typhlodromus pyri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The pink panther.jpg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Russian Rocky (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Adámoz, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:The Pink Panther2.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Typhlodromus pyri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Typhlodromus pyri.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Obr1e.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Obr1e.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Obr1e.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Phytoseiidae dorsum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Phytoseiidae dorsum.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:T.pyri.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:T.pyri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:T.pyri.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Šternberk - tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Adámoz,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Nastavení data ve fotoaparátu[edit]

Zdravím. Všiml jsem si, že zřejmě u všech Vámi nahraných fotografií máte v metadatech EXIF neznámé datum a čas pořízení fotky, což pak při nahrávání fotky co Commons zdejší hloupý formulář převádí na nesmyslné datum 30. listopadu 1899. Vzhledem k tomu, že správné údaje o místu a času pořízení fotografie výrazně zvyšují její hodnotu pro encyklopedicky a faktograficky zaměřené projekty, doporučuji Vám, abyste se pokusil si ve fotoaparátu datum a čas správně nastavit, je-li to možné, a každopádně abyste při nahrávání fotek věnoval pozornost správnosti předvyplněných údajů a chybné či nesmyslné údaje opravil či odstranil.

Ještě co se týče věcné správnosti popisů, most v Čerčanech stojí ve skutečnosti v Choceradech. Popis jsem na stránce souboru opravil. --ŠJů (talk) 04:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day[edit]

Dobrý den, rád bych vás upozornil, že "As of 1 July 2007, all Pictures of the Day are chosen from among the Featured pictures of Commons.". Tento váš obrázek jednak není Featured picture a jednak jste jím nahradil FP od jiného uživatele. Pokud jste pro to měl dobrý důvod, rád si ho poslechnu, v opačném případě vás musím poprosit, abyste to už nedělal. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 07:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promoce autorem[edit]

Ahoj, všiml jsem si, že se snažíš o protlačení svých obrázků do QI, což je fajn. Moc fotek z Česka se tam nevyskytuje. Jenom tě prosím, abys nehlasoval promotion u fotek, které jsi vyfotil/nominoval. Je to výslovně zakázáno v pravidlech. Jinak máš některé fotky docela pěkné, tak ať se ti tu daří víc než na Wikipedii.

Měj se, --T.Bednarz (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrchotovy Janovice - castle - main gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK now. Fotíš celkem pěkně. --T.Bednarz 19:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plant on the wall2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:L GetsemaniUlivi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old veteran (old machine) in Olbramovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 15:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done --Adámoz 16:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vrchotovy Janovice Castle - main gate in the Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
  •  Support Quality image showing the subject better than File:Zámek Vrchotovy Janovice (7.).jpg (light, the gate is open, the windows are closed). Well described, used on several pages. Skimel (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quality Image Promotion[edit]

    Your image has been reviewed and promoted

    Congratulations! Vrchotovy Janovice - church of Saint Martin2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

    We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
    Comments
    See what you can do about the overexposed clouds, the purple fringing on the leaves (might be good to crop tighter) and the sunlight reflecting on the clock hands. --Daniel Case 02:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done Is that good? Remove fuzzy clock hands, is failed. Please contact for cooperation. --Adámoz 14:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
     Support OK (You could probably also stand to lose the contrail, though) --Daniel Case 03:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
    [reply]

    --QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Quality Image Promotion[edit]

    Your image has been reviewed and promoted

    Congratulations! Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

    We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
    Comments
     Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 20:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
    [reply]

    --QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Please read Commons:Licensing before uploading any more photos by other photographers. Photos with "All rights reserved" can't be uploaded on Commons. Thank you. --Cart (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Titanus giganteus[edit]

    Thank you for this appointment. It is a very impressive beetle, I regret not to know him, alive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the other side! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Quality Image Promotion[edit]

    Your image has been reviewed and promoted

    Congratulations! Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf with eggs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

    We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
    Comments
     Support Good quality. --Syed07 16:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
    [reply]

    --QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Valued Image Promotion[edit]

    Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
    Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
    Indian Scout.
    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

    Valued Image Promotion[edit]

    Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
    Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
    Church of Saint Martin in Vrchotovy Janovice.
    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

    Quality Image Promotion[edit]

    Your image has been reviewed and promoted

    Congratulations! Šumava National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

    We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
    Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    --QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Typhlodromus pyri - predatory mite.jpg[edit]

    Dobrý den, prosím o informaci ohledně autorství fotografie File:Typhlodromus pyri - predatory mite.jpg. Pokud nejste jejím autorem, je potřeba doložit, že je možné ji publikovat pod licencí Creative Commons (nejlépe zasláním svolení autora do OTRS). S pozdravem --Mates (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete picture page François Lunven Artist[edit]

    Hi,

    Can u please delete the picture on the article and on Commons of my grandfather ?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/François_Lunven.jpg

    I uploaded the image on Commons.

    Auto rights are of my own.

    Best regards,

    Кирилл Венедиктов (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Quality Image Promotion[edit]

    Your image has been reviewed and promoted

    Congratulations! Šumava National Park (the cross - Jesus Christ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

    If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

    We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
    Comments QI imo --Pandakekok9 12:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    --QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Identická fotka od dvou různých autorů?[edit]

    Dobrý den, uživatel Hwwo nahrál 24. 6. 2020 do projektu fotografii File:Chocerady, most přes Sázavu.jpg, která se nápadně podobá Vaší fotografii File:Bridge in Chocerady in the Czech Republic.jpg, resp. zdá se být totožná, velmi podobná jsou i metadata. Pokud tedy nejde o Váš druhý uživatelský účet, zdálo by se, že dotyčný uživatel si přivlastnil Vaši fotografii.

    Uživatel Hwwo k fotografii uvedl datum pořízení 9. 11. 2018, v metadatech fotografie se nově objevilo datum pořízení 14. 8. 2017 13:49:30 - Vaší původní fotografii v metadatech datum pořízení chybělo a do projektu jste ji nahrál 20. 7. 2018. Zdá se tedy, že Hwwo si vymyslel nepravdivé datum pořízení fotografie. Doporučuji prověřit, zda vám fotografie nebyla ukradena. ŠJů (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]