User talk:Renardo la vulpo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Aisano)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image:Oberth hermannstadt.jpg[edit]

Apparently this image is used and misattributed by transylvania.info here. They claim the image was from September 30, 2006, and owned by transsylvania.info, when you uploaded it here at the Commons on October 2, 2005. They even left your EXIF data intact... Lupo 12:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Renardo la vulpo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Ort vs Orth[edit]

Servus! Beide Schreibweisen sind möglich (zB schlossorth.com), wobei du recht hast, Ort ist deutlich üblicher ;) LG --AleXXw 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke! Na, dann lass' ma 's halt, zum Unterschied zu Schloss Orth in Niederösterreich. -- Aisano (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Recht hast, hifts nicht schadets nicht ;) LG --AleXXw 20:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Altötting, Rathaus 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altötting, Rathaus 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

About File:Koh Poda 16.jpg[edit]

Hello, if possible to remove the catamaran (without problem for the picture ?) it will be beter for make this picture a very good view (postcard). You can give your vote to make it QI if you agree with me, my critics where only on details - Best regards - Siren-Com (talk) 10:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. I uploaded the modified picture, and it displays correctly in the 1:1 scale. But for anything I tried I could not get it to display in any scaled-down size (I purged my browser cache, used Shift-F5 and Ctrl-Shift-R, added "?action=purge" to countless URLs, all to no avail).
Maybe to-morrow will be another day, and the Wikimedia server will have purged its caches. In the meantime you can see the new version using a non-standard picture size, such as 1025 instead of 1024.
-- Aisano (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 2.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 2.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wasserburg am Inn, Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserburg am Inn, Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Forte Marghera, rulilo.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forte Marghera, rulilo.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seefeld in Tirol, Straßenlaterne 2012 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seefeld in Tirol, Straßenlaterne 2012 1.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Un problème aux images de qualité, réponse[edit]

Bonsoir Aisano,

Je n'arrive pas à retrouver l'incident dont tu me fais part.
Je n'ai en aucun cas volontairement supprimé ou altéré ton commentaire sur l'image dont tu parles, je ne me le serais pas permis.
Si j'ai un désaccord avec le jugement d'un contributeur, je le lui fais savoir par les voies normales, ce n'est pas le cas en l'occurrence.
Il doit donc s'agir d'une erreur de ma part, ou d'une fausse manoeuvre, et je te prie en conséquence de m'en excuser.
As-tu un moyen technique de me montrer plus précisément l'endroit où j'ai fait une bêtise ? Je cherche et ne trouve pas.
En tous, cas, je te renouvelle mes excuses pour cet méprise probable.--Jebulon (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Ne s'agirait-il pas plutôt d'un conflit d'édition (edit conflict) ?
Nous avons dû intervenir en même temps, et le système aurait mélangé les deux interventions en privilégiant la mienne ? --Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Non, ma modification n'a pas été perdue, je faisais juste l'ajout du signe Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose en "Consensual review", pour que ce soit plus clair pour le futurs reviewers.
Ravi de te croiser également, merci de ta gentillesse ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Vulpen inkt.jpg[edit]

Please review it one more time now that I've photoshopped the box --Vera (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Antwort[edit]

Hallo, Ich habe dir auf User_talk:Steinsplitter geantwortet. LG -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:PR4-06-2012.jpg[edit]

Bonsoir, j'ai amélioré la légende du fichier plus deux autres.

+http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR1-06-2012.jpg +http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR2-06-2012.jpg

Sincèrement, Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 20:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I promise to be a good boy. (Btw I have reviewer status on the German and the Esperanto Wikipedias.). -- Aisano (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pomnik Kilińskiego 2012.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Kilińskiego 2012.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heilbronn, Postamt 2t.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heilbronn, Postamt 2t.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Appologise[edit]

Hello Aisano, I do appologise if you thought my comments left were a bit pretentious, This was not in anyway my intention and appologise again if you thought that. When reading peoples comments i feel this helps with my learning as alot of people on wikicommons have been on the site for ages and have a wealth of knowledge to offer including your good self. I have found alot of people review pictures and add a one word comment like 'QI' or 'QI for me' etc which is good for a person having there picture reviewed but doesnt give alot away as to why it is QI, again with comments which are not QI valid reasons are something to be taken into consideration and learnt by which is how we all learn. This is also the same when comments are left in different languages which someone like me who is learning all the time cannot benifit from your comment which is well worth knowing, only to not be able to understand it, but i fully understand how hard learning other languages and how difficult it is and only wish I could have learnt other languages. As for the Union Jack on my WP page this is not meant to be a 'being proud to be' icon but to let others know where in the world I am from, thats all that is. I do hope you except my appologies as there was nothing meant by it. Kind Regards --Danesman1 (talk) 13:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Renardo la vulpo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Straßenbahn München, Bildschirme, 1.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Straßenbahn München, Bildschirme, 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 10:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Für das Bild des Altöttinger Rathauses! Aarp65 (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Bild Schloss Schleißheim[edit]

Hallo Aisano, am reintrodus la propunerea ta categoria ştearsă. Te felicit pentru calitatea bună a fotografiilor tale. Multe salutări din Bavaria de sud !


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Renardo la vulpo. You have new messages at User_talk:Strainu#Muzeul_de_Istorie_Na.C8.9Bional.C4.83_.C8.99i_Arheologie_din_Constan.C8.9Ba.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Copyright status: File:Plzeň, Kostel sv. Jana Nepomuckého. 3.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plzeň, Kostel sv. Jana Nepomuckého. 3.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Thank you for pointing out this omission; I just added a license. Until a couple of days ago the upload form used to check for the existence of a suitable license and would reject an upload without one, so I never paid too much attention to this aspect. Now this check seems to have disappeared, as well as the automatic generation of an {{information}} template. It was easier before; maybe it is on purpose to discourage newbees (why?). I will do my best to adapt to the new form. -- Aisano (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't do anything with the upload form. You should bring your concerns to COM:VP. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps for some reason the ImprovedUploadForm gadget isn't loading for you? Such as due to disabled JavaScript or due to it being deactivated in the gadget preferences? That seems like the most likely cause of your symptoms. darkweasel94 18:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
@Darkweasel94: Dankon pro via konsilo! Fakte, "ImprovedUploadForm" estas markita, kaj mi ricevas la malnovan ŝablonon je la unua uzo post ensaluto, sed poste plej ofte ne. Tial mi supozas ke temas nek pri javaskripta, nek pri agorda problemo.
Estas utile scii ke tiu ŝanĝo en la alŝuta ŝablono ne estas intenca. Do mi serĉos pri la kaŭzo; ĝis nun mi supozis, ke la aŭtomata kontrolo simple ne plu ekzistas. Ĉion bonan! -- Aisano (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Für das Bild der Margarethenkirche in Großbrannenberg! Aarp65 (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
@Aarp65: Vielen Dank! -- Aisano (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Euro-Gedenkmünzen[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Renardo la vulpo. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (Germany).
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Correction[edit]

Thanks for your comments. Will try to fix the problem as soon as I get a better Internet connection. It is quite slowwwwwww right now or most of the time disappear altogether. Or if you'd like, you can remove the picture. Cheers --Mattis (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

@Mattis: Danke, ich habe das Bild durch ein Bild des Kastulusmünsters ersetzt. -- Aisano (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Esperanto[edit]

Hallo Aisano, eine kleine Frage in sprachlicher Angelegenheit: Spricht man in Esperanto das "j" als "i" oder als "sch" aus? Ich hätte letzteres in Erinnerung, kommt mir aber jetzt oft eigenartig vor. Gruß --Eweht (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

@Eweht: Genauso wie auf Deutsch, also als "i", nur dass es keine Silbe bildet. Du meinst eventuell ĵ (mit Zirkumflex oben drauf), das spricht man aus wie in "Journal". darkweasel94 10:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Ah, danke, alles klar. --Eweht (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Da bleibt nichts hinzuzufügen. -- Aisano (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Neuer Haltepunkt auf der Mangfalltalbahn[edit]

Es wäre sinnvoller, wenn du die alte Karte überschreiben würdest, statt eine neue Datei anzulegen mit zu 99% gleichem Inhalt. Das verwirrt nur. Trotzdem Danke für den Hinweis. --Vuxi (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Vuxi: Danke, das habe ich mir natürlich überlegt. Aber es ist nun mal eine andere Karte, und die Richtlinien von Commons sagen zum Beispiel, dass man ein altes Firmenlogo nicht überschreiben soll, wenn eine Firma ein neues annimmt. Es könnte ja jemand die bisherige Karte verwenden, um die Entwicklung der Mangfallbahn zu illustrieren. Aber Du kannst die neue Karte gerne als neue Version der bisherigen hochladen, und wenn Du für die neue einen LA stellst, widerspreche ich nicht. -- Aisano (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Sollte jemand wirklich mal die alte Version brauchen, dann kann er sich die ja immer noch aus der Versionshistorie rausholen. --Vuxi (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mangfalltalbahn, Karte Dezember 2014.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mangfalltalbahn, Karte Dezember 2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vuxi (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Fotomapping in OpenStreetMap[edit]

Hallo, dürfen deine Bilder zum Fotomapping in OpenStreetMap verwendet werden, d.h. die dargestellten Dinge werden mit Hilfe von Satellitenbilder eingezeichnet und ihre Eigenschaften erfasst? --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Rolf Eike Beer: Hallo, was ist denn dieses Fotomapping? Ich kenne das "Dieses und weitere Bilder auf OpenStreetMap" (über tools.wmflabs.com), aber dazu braucht man ja nur Koordinaten anzugeben (was ich nach Möglichkeit tue). Du meinst anscheinend etwas anderes? Was müsste ich da tun? Gibt es einen Beschreibungstext? -- Aisano (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Aisano: Du müsstest gar nichts tun außer ja sagen ;) Ich (oder jemand anderes) würde sich ein Bild nehmen, von dem er die ungefähre Position kennt, und die abgebildeten Dinge in OSM taggen. Also z.B. die Eigenschaften dieses Signals eintragen, das würde dann am Ende etwa so aussehen. --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Rolf Eike Beer: Ich habe gar nichts dagegen. Ich mache die Fotos ja, damit vielleicht jemand was damit anfangen kann, und das sieht ganz nützlich aus. Also nur zu.
Wenn Du mir auf meiner Seite schreibst, brauchst du übrigens kein {{Reply to}}. -- Aisano (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Danke! --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Detaliu1.jpg[edit]

Bon soir,

la 2013-04-19 tu as ajouté l'image Detaliu1.jpg à la catégorie Bridge of Lies, Sibiu,

J'ai vue le pont des mensonges beaucoup de fois mais je n'y ai jamais remarqué une pièce de bois (il est fait de fer de fonte). Est-ce que tu es sur? Où se trouverait ce meneau bien formidable?

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Guten Abend,
Entschuldigt meine Deutsch, aber mein Esperanto ist noch schlimmer.
Ich bin nicht der Autor von Detaliu1.jpg, ich habe gerade von der rumänischen wikipedia übertragen. Ich hielt die Beschreibung des originalen Fotografen.
Ich bin damit einverstanden, ein Stück aus Holz auf einer Brücke aus Eisen bizarr scheint. In meiner Erinnerung ist diese Skulptur auf dem Platz auf der anderen Seite des "hala a macelarilor" befindet.
Sie können den Hintergrund des Bildes mit dem roten Haus oben auf diesem Bild zu vergleichen. Wann ich sicher bin, würde ich sagen, dass es das Ziel ist, die hinter dem Zelt überschreitet ...
Keine Problem fur mich, ob Sie die Kategorie ändern.
--Zeugma fr (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
PS:Félicitation pour ton français, qui, même si il n'est pas complètement parfait, est parfaitement compréhensible !
@Zeugma fr: Salut, et merci de m'écrire en allemand. Comme mon français est « compréhensible » pour toi je continue de t'ecrire dans cette langue; je suis bien conscient que je suis loin d'être parfait mais, selon mon expérience, l'espéranto aide beaucoup pour s'exprimer de manière compréhensible (pas toujours correcte) dans des autres langues, avec un répertoire bien limité.
Evidemment tu n'es pas l'auteur de la photo mais il est interessant que c'était l'auteur original qui l'a déclaré «pont des mensonges». C'est une théorie interessante que la sculpture soit l'objet vertical derriere du parasol sur cette photo de la maison des arts (casa artelor) mais je crois que ce soit seulement un autre parasol, celui-ci fermé.
Je vais changer la catégorie, et peut-être quelqu'un va identifier la sculpture tôt ou tard…
-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Monument istoric}}[edit]

Hi. This template should only be added in the category completely matching the monument, since a robot uses the data to add the category in the lists (which in turn means that new images uploaded from the lists already have the correct category). For instance, Category:Castra Apulum, porta principalis dextra is a subcategory of Category:Castra Apulum, which has the code AB-I-m-A-00001.01 , so it shouldn't have the same code itself.--Strainu (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

@Strainu: Bine, înțeleg. Mulțumesc -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:GPS-Verbot, 1.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:GPS-Verbot, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Thanks for pointing this out but I do not understand what is missing or contradictory. Just in case the objects depicted are under somebody's copyright I mentioned {{FoP-Austria}}. But since the image is not just a 2D copy of a 2D object it also contains a (marginal) contribution from myself as photographer, so I gave it
What else can/should I do?
-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
@Magog the Ogre: Sorry. I just noticed that I added cc-zero only after your warning. The system somehow still showed me your message as unread, and after six weeks I had forgotten. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Weilheim, Münchner Straße 30, 1.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Weilheim, Münchner Straße 30, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Geiselgasteig, Robert-Koch-Str 34, 1.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Geiselgasteig, Robert-Koch-Str 34, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bregenz, Kirche Maria Hilf vom Gebhardsberg, 1.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bregenz, Kirche Maria Hilf vom Gebhardsberg, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Máte to v kapse.jpeg[edit]

http://www.itesco.cz/cs/qr ist Dekodierung des QR-Codes. (QR Droid auf meinem Handy liest es. Online-Dekoder scheinen nicht zu wirken.) BartekChom (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

@BartekChom: Dziękuję! -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Linz, Kremsmünsterer Stifthaus, 15.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Linz, Kremsmünsterer Stifthaus, 15.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Montegiardino, blazono, 1.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montegiardino, blazono, 1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Amoklauf in München am 22. Juli 2016, 4.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amoklauf in München am 22. Juli 2016, 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Charmbook (talk) 17:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 15.jpg[edit]

Hi, I saw your comment about the architect of the House of Free Press (I expected the monument to be much older) and started a DR for that. A pity, though. Best, Poco2 20:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: Si, es una lástima. Yo tenía una imagen del palacio parlamentario a Bucarest, y tenían que borrarla. Lo mismo con una placa conmemorativa a Brașov. Es dificil en Romania. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 09:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

File:MVG-Betrieb-eingestellt-2016-07-22, 1.jpeg - Symbolbild?[edit]

Hallo Renardo la vulpo, du hast das Bild "MVG-Betrieb-eingestellt-2016-07-22, 1.jpeg" eingestellt. Es erscheint im De-WP Artikel Amoklauf in München. Ist dieses Bild ein Symbolbild oder wurde es am Ort, Datum und Zeit des Amoklaufes in einer dortigen U-Bahn-Station gemacht? Güße --94.219.18.137 20:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@94.219.18.137: Hallo, das Bild habe ich während der Ereignisse am 2016-07-22 im Münchner U-Bahnhof Josephsburg gemacht. Das sieht man auch an den Kategorien (Josephsburg) und an den EXIF-Daten (Datum, Uhrzeit). Grüße -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pasing, Rathaus, Westseite, 2.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pasing, Rathaus, Westseite, 2.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Windmill tower KKE, Soroni, Rodos[edit]

Thankyou. I think you have identified a camera fault since the spot (vignette) appears on other images taken with this old Panasonic. Best regards Notafly (talk) 12:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

@Notafly: You are welcome, glad if I could help. As a matter of fact I was unable to see the spot without increasing contrast by a factor of 10; so in my opinion it does not really do any harm. But I do not have a good eye for details; reviewers nearly always find fault with my pictures. BTW I am using a Panasonic, too, (TZ 61), and my conclusion is that pocket cameras just do not produce the quality required for a QI. What's your experience?
Have a fine day! -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
All these photos were taken with compact cameras Quality Photographs by Notafly. Leica and Ricoh.The Panasonic has the same lens (maybe higher quality control) and I have the Panasonic equivalent of the D-lux and it is excellent.Because of the small sensor compacts are superb for close ups (high DOF) less good for buildings (small lens, perspective problems). More soon. Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
@Notafly: Concerning your Windmill tower picture, you could crop the left part and re-submit it. – If you have any hints for me concerning my camera I certainly would appreciate them. Just as an instance, a couple of days ago I took Tivoli-Kraftwerk in München, 6.jpeg, in bright sunlight, so as to increase DoF and reduce axial CA; still it was judged as “not sharp enough”. Do you think using “aperture priority” rather than “shutter priority” would improve things? The picture was taken with f/4.1. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
The camera seems to have focused on the foreground rail not the building. Can you change to central focus on the
camera rather than the camera averaging the focus by choosing several points? I always use “aperture priority” except for snapshots usually a high aperture if the light is good. Sometimes I use a wide aperture so that the background is not sharp and the high shutter speed can eliminate blur (but one reviewer did not agree- he wanted the distance sharp).A tripod is best but mine is very heavy.
Here is the advice Hubertl gave to me
Use always the RAW versions, not JPGs out of the camera. There is a really big difference!
When focussing, take the spot meter. Otherwise the camera doesn´t know, which is the subject.
Use a tripod as often you can. I always work with a tripod, even a monopod is better. We both are not teenagers any more ;-)
Learn how to process your pictures. Use a software like Lightroom (if you can and will afford), but also Raw Therapee (free) or Darktable (also free, but only for Linux) can do a good work. Gimp is good for clearing some perspective problems. Every good photographer use some of this tools.
Don´t use any of the Creative Programs of your camera, Use the AV-Mode. You are the photographer, not the camera!! Try to control everything - the camera itself will do it wrong! Don´t belive your camera manufacturer in any case, whatever he say, its for idiots and not more than jakediyak blah blah.
The most important thing for a good picture is sharpness. Sharpness. Sharpness. Try to start with this.
Do some experiments with the same motif. You will understand it better during the postprocessing.
Get up early in the morning, the sky is clear, the light is much better. Avoid to make pictures with hazy environment until you know, how to handle it. Make pictures with a really clear blue sky. If you don´t have a blue sky, make close up images of houses or other objects. Or people - but only if they want it!
Read the f***ing Manual! Skip everything, were you find the word "automatic".
If you mean, that something might be a good subject, just take some time to understand it. Don´t rape the motif (I mean it)! Be respectful. ::::Sometimes I spent hours, even days to understand it. Especially architectural motifs. Take a walk, go farther, than closer. Get into the idea. And then, make your pictures. And make plenty of them and decide later, which represents the idea which makes this building interesting for you. Plenty pictures means eventually sometimes hundreds! From the same subject!
If you work manually, use ISO 100 or 200, 200/sec, f/8. If possible. And always try to have the sun in the back.
If this is not possible in the morning, try it on late afternoon.
Best regards Notafly (talk) 12:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Notafly (talk) 12:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
@Notafly: Thank you for that whole bunch of advice! I have Raw Therapee and GIMP on my Linux box and use the latter a lot – even if only for cropping and perspective, sometimes stitching. I already follow your hint about center focus vs. multi-focus because multi-focus has spoilt me a lot of pictures. Yet I do not understand how misfocussing could have affected my Tivoli picture since the “foreground rail” (I assume you mean the metal balustrade in front of the left building) is almost as far away as the building itself.
I took the liberty of indenting your text, and to put asterisks in a word I do not want on my discussion page. (In the present case I would prefer the word “fruitful”.) Thank you again. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Tried that windmill crop.What do you think? I can see why multi-focus is useful sometimes but it is prone to error. Like you I found out the hard way. I am using manual focus. Does your Panasonic have that option or focus lock. Keep getting comments on suboptimal lighting. In Ireland optimal lighting is 2-7 days a year.atb 20:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)~
Just supported promotion of your windmill picture. You might want to change Widmill to Windmill in the description. I just noticed.
A bright blue sky is marvellous but “suboptimal lighting” is not necessarily a drawback. I have seen (and commented) pictures where part was in bright sunlight, with an ugly dark shadow extending over a significant part of the picture. In such a case overcast weather is better. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Breitbrunn am Chiemsee, Messe dauert zwei Wochen, 1.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Breitbrunn am Chiemsee, Messe dauert zwei Wochen, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

GETTY IMAGES[edit]

hi, I have received your notice, I would say that the 'EERA author died in 1958, the license was right,, but for the event is for the logo from the problemmi you think,, no because I put in all the right information, paying attention to the slightest sign of infringement of copyright, you can say the problem? :)--Глинистый сланец (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Глинистый сланец: Hello Глинистый сланец, Face-smile.svg Thank you for getting back.
Говорю (очен) немного по-русски а не знаю если ты руский.
The problem is that you indicated that the picture was taken by Philipp Kester, who lived until 1958. While he lived he held the copyright for the photo. Afterwards there is a time of, in many countries (including Germany), 70 years when his heirs hold the copyright. This time is not yet over.
Maybe you want to take this discussion to the discussion page.
I shall be glad if the picture can be kept.
-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
ok grazie per l' interessamento ma adesso vadar via cul --Глинистый сланец (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
@Глинистый сланец: Mi pare che non sei molto gentile, e lontano da presumere la buona fede. La licenza della tua immagine non era valida, e senza una licenza valida occorreva cancellarla. Non era la mia decisione. E ti prego di non mettere linguaggio offensivo sulla mia pagina di discussione. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Renardo la vulpo, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/− lNeverCry 20:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Jöchlstuhrn[edit]

Ciao, sono d'accordo nel cambiare nome della categoria con il nome "corretto". Tanti auguri di Buone Feste !Chesipiero (talk) 22:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wappen Tyrlaching.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappen Tyrlaching.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bodrogszerdahely, blazono.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodrogszerdahely, blazono.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Urheberrecht bei Zeitungsartikeln?[edit]

Hallo Renardo la vulpo, deine Furcht kann ich beruhigen. Einverständnisse wurden erteilt, wären aber gar nicht notwendig, da ich zitiere. Eine bildliches Datail eines Druckwerkes wird nach geltendem Recht genauso als Zitat gewertet wie als Zitat gekenntzeichnete wiedergegebene Sätze oder Gedanken eines Druckwerkes. Grüße User:Andreas Bohnenstengel 13. Mai 2017

@Andreas Bohnenstengel: Danke! Du kannst mir übrigens solche Antworten gerne auf deiner eigenen Diskussionsseite schicken, wenn du (wie ich hier) die Vorlage {{Reply to}} einfügst. Dann bekomme ich eine Benachrichtigung, und was zusammengehört, bleibt beisammen. Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
@Renardo la vulpo: ;-) Grüße User:Andreas Bohnenstengel 13. Mai 2017

File:Timișoara, ortodoksa preĝejo Iosefin, 11.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Timișoara, ortodoksa preĝejo Iosefin, 11.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Turbojet (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timisoara, katedralo, 50.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Timisoara, katedralo, 50.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Turbojet (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timișoara, katedralo, 49.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Timișoara, katedralo, 49.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Turbojet (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timișoara, katedralo, 51.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Timișoara, katedralo, 51.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Turbojet (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your acceptance about the Orthodox Cathedral in Timișoara. All Orthodox cathedrals in Transylvania and Banat, except for Sibiu, were built after WW1. Thank you for visiting Romania. :) --Turbojet (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
@Turbojet: Placere. Am fost în România deja mai mulți decât zece oare, pentru o cooperare științifică. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 08:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Danke...[edit]

...für deine Fotos aus Augsburg und Umgebung! --Neitram (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Berchtesgaden, Franziskanerkirche von Westen, 4.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


File:Zuriko, Maĥmud-moskeo, 17.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)