User talk:Aisano

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Oberth hermannstadt.jpg[edit]

Apparently this image is used and misattributed by transylvania.info here. They claim the image was from September 30, 2006, and owned by transsylvania.info, when you uploaded it here at the Commons on October 2, 2005. They even left your EXIF data intact... Lupo 12:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Aisano!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Ort vs Orth[edit]

Servus! Beide Schreibweisen sind möglich (zB schlossorth.com), wobei du recht hast, Ort ist deutlich üblicher ;) LG --AleXXw 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke! Na, dann lass' ma 's halt, zum Unterschied zu Schloss Orth in Niederösterreich. -- Aisano (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Recht hast, hifts nicht schadets nicht ;) LG --AleXXw 20:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Altötting, Rathaus 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altötting, Rathaus 1.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

About File:Koh Poda 16.jpg[edit]

Hello, if possible to remove the catamaran (without problem for the picture ?) it will be beter for make this picture a very good view (postcard). You can give your vote to make it QI if you agree with me, my critics where only on details - Best regards - Siren-Com (talk) 10:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. I uploaded the modified picture, and it displays correctly in the 1:1 scale. But for anything I tried I could not get it to display in any scaled-down size (I purged my browser cache, used Shift-F5 and Ctrl-Shift-R, added "?action=purge" to countless URLs, all to no avail).
Maybe to-morrow will be another day, and the Wikimedia server will have purged its caches. In the meantime you can see the new version using a non-standard picture size, such as 1025 instead of 1024.
-- Aisano (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 2.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 2.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wasserburg am Inn, Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserburg am Inn, Max-Emanuel-Kapelle 1.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Forte Marghera, rulilo.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forte Marghera, rulilo.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seefeld in Tirol, Straßenlaterne 2012 1.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seefeld in Tirol, Straßenlaterne 2012 1.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Un problème aux images de qualité, réponse[edit]

Bonsoir Aisano,

Je n'arrive pas à retrouver l'incident dont tu me fais part.
Je n'ai en aucun cas volontairement supprimé ou altéré ton commentaire sur l'image dont tu parles, je ne me le serais pas permis.
Si j'ai un désaccord avec le jugement d'un contributeur, je le lui fais savoir par les voies normales, ce n'est pas le cas en l'occurrence.
Il doit donc s'agir d'une erreur de ma part, ou d'une fausse manoeuvre, et je te prie en conséquence de m'en excuser.
As-tu un moyen technique de me montrer plus précisément l'endroit où j'ai fait une bêtise ? Je cherche et ne trouve pas.
En tous, cas, je te renouvelle mes excuses pour cet méprise probable.--Jebulon (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Ne s'agirait-il pas plutôt d'un conflit d'édition (edit conflict) ?
Nous avons dû intervenir en même temps, et le système aurait mélangé les deux interventions en privilégiant la mienne ? --Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Non, ma modification n'a pas été perdue, je faisais juste l'ajout du signe Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose en "Consensual review", pour que ce soit plus clair pour le futurs reviewers.
Ravi de te croiser également, merci de ta gentillesse ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Vulpen inkt.jpg[edit]

Please review it one more time now that I've photoshopped the box --Vera (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Antwort[edit]

Hallo, Ich habe dir auf User_talk:Steinsplitter geantwortet. LG -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:PR4-06-2012.jpg[edit]

Bonsoir, j'ai amélioré la légende du fichier plus deux autres.

+http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR1-06-2012.jpg +http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR2-06-2012.jpg

Sincèrement, Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 20:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I promise to be a good boy. (Btw I have reviewer status on the German and the Esperanto Wikipedias.). -- Aisano (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pomnik Kilińskiego 2012.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Kilińskiego 2012.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Heilbronn, Postamt 2t.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heilbronn, Postamt 2t.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Appologise[edit]

Hello Aisano, I do appologise if you thought my comments left were a bit pretentious, This was not in anyway my intention and appologise again if you thought that. When reading peoples comments i feel this helps with my learning as alot of people on wikicommons have been on the site for ages and have a wealth of knowledge to offer including your good self. I have found alot of people review pictures and add a one word comment like 'QI' or 'QI for me' etc which is good for a person having there picture reviewed but doesnt give alot away as to why it is QI, again with comments which are not QI valid reasons are something to be taken into consideration and learnt by which is how we all learn. This is also the same when comments are left in different languages which someone like me who is learning all the time cannot benifit from your comment which is well worth knowing, only to not be able to understand it, but i fully understand how hard learning other languages and how difficult it is and only wish I could have learnt other languages. As for the Union Jack on my WP page this is not meant to be a 'being proud to be' icon but to let others know where in the world I am from, thats all that is. I do hope you except my appologies as there was nothing meant by it. Kind Regards --Danesman1 (talk) 13:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Aisano,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gedenktafel im Bahnhof von Kronstadt 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Straßenbahn München, Bildschirme, 1.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Straßenbahn München, Bildschirme, 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 10:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)