User talk:Alberto-g-rovi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alberto-g-rovi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Categorization of pictures[edit]

You have uploaded lots of pictures with Espiritu de montjuic-montmelo....jpg. It would have been nice if you had edited more information about the model of the cars (e.g. there are several Lola T70). A better categorization would help also. I think Sports prototypes is not the right one for most of the cars. -- Qflieger (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC) I do not sit but know it the model of the cars that competian in this category, excuse to me for not being able to specify it.-- Alberto-g-rovi (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (9).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.150.155 14:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.150.155 19:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Be careful[edit]

Hi, please, be more careful with you edits. You just messed up the QI nominations page, deleting some of them. So, now, I will have spend some time to recover everything lost. Poco2 11:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fira del cantir-argentona-2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fira del cantir-argentona-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 14:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
good quality --P e z i 20:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (6).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Globos aerostaticos-la garrotxa-2011 (6).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Globos aerostaticos-la garrotxa-2011 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI and nice photo -- Spurzem 09:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 08:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Exteriores del monasterio-santes creus-1-2010 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exteriores del monasterio-santes creus-1-2010 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 09:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 09:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Repaired Link[edit]

Hi,
I've repaired your link to count quality images at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Quality_images_by_user.
Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gorilla-bioparc-valencia-2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorilla-bioparc-valencia-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Arles sur tech-2009 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arles sur tech-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Templo de wadi es-sebau-lago nasser-2007 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de wadi es-sebau-lago nasser-2007 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Interior del coliseo-roma-2011 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior del coliseo-roma-2011 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
F1 valencia-2010 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F1 valencia-2010 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
DOF could be better --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (17).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (17).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Iifar 18:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Marc marquez moto2-2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marc marquez moto2-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 13:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
L`hemisferic-valencia-2009 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L`hemisferic-valencia-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good --Diana Ringo 11:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Polynesia-port aventura-2008 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polynesia-port aventura-2008 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 13:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Tag gallery[edit]

Please have a look to the gallery Tag at the nominations. Please append your nominatons after (!) the gallery tag. Today I've repaired the structure (again). Thanks. --XRay talk 06:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Espiritu de montjuic-montmelo 2012 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-montmelo 2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very noisy, did you really need 1/4000 sec?--ArildV 07:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
In this part of the circuit it goes away to many speed--Alberto-g-rovi 19:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Ok.--ArildV 07:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cartoixa d'escaladei-2012 (12).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cartoixa d'escaladei-2012 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
L'agora-valencia-2009.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'agora-valencia-2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --A.Savin 11:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Acueducto de les ferreres-2012 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acueducto de les ferreres-2012 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 04:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Ermita de sant joan-montblanc-2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de sant joan-montblanc-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011 (19).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011 (19).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Pretorio romano-2008.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretorio romano-2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Well that's disturbing. --Mattbuck 23:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Delta del ebro poblenou (22).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del ebro poblenou (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (13).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Would like it a bit sharper, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Templo de dakka-lago nasser-2007 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de dakka-lago nasser-2007 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could be sharper, but ok --Poco a poco 20:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Port bo-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port bo-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

STOP MESSING THE QI TABLE[edit]

You were already warned by Poco² but you still continue to mess up the QI table. Either you start stick to the edit rules or you will face vandalism reports. Nominations have to be listed IN BETWEEN of the gallery tags. Thanks --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Excuse but till now not me habia in view of story of this mistake. A greeting and Graces(Alberto-g-rovi) 08:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding. It's always better to ask other wikipedians if you are not sure how to properly perform certain actions. Keep on with your good photography work :) Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Can bosc del far-dosrius-2012 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Can bosc del far-dosrius-2012 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 13:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canet-creu de pedracastell-2012 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canet-creu de pedracastell-2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Dubai creek-2011 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubai creek-2011 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, although it could be sharper --Poco a poco 23:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tumba del claustro-santes creus-1-2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tumba del claustro-santes creus-1-2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 11:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 14:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Olzinelles-2012 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olzinelles-2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Temps de flors-claustro de la catedral-ginona-2013 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temps de flors-claustro de la catedral-ginona-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Castillo de Pùbol-8-2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Pùbol-8-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 15:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Adrian sutil Grand prix de valencia-2010 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adrian sutil Grand prix de valencia-2010 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You should take photos of motor racing with 1/300 or maximal 1/500 but not with 1/2500 or more. For only these times of exposure make dynamical pictures. -- Spurzem 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
I for sports of great speed am in the habit of putting a bit high speeds, there are zones in the circuits in which it goes away very rapid --Alberto-g-rovi 06:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Santa maria de siurana-2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa maria de siurana-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Jorge lorenzo-motogp 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jorge lorenzo-motogp 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Delta del ebro (10).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del ebro (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Tilted horizon to the right --A.Savin 18:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the inclination is minim, but good your you decide --Alberto-g-rovi 06:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
OK to me, though I'd have preferred it sharper. Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (12).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Desierto de dubai-2011 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de dubai-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --Mattbuck 21:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (8).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Fuente publica-vulpellac-8-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente publica-vulpellac-8-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Delta del ebro faro 27.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del ebro faro 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Please, fix the ccw tilt Poco a poco 14:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (11).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. OK, thanks --Moroder 12:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (13).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Pantano de vallforners-2013 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pantano de vallforners-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice picture --Halicki 23:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Castillo de peñiscola-2011 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de peñiscola-2011 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support OK to me. --Hockei 12:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Salt de sallent-rupit-2005 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salt de sallent-rupit-2005 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good ! --EpsilonEridani 12:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Playa del Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa del Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality --P e z i 20:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Santes creus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes creus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I don't know... Could you try to crop the person on the left ? Pleclown 12:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I like it. Mattbuck 17:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG[edit]

Hola, lo siento pero este archivo no pertenece en Commons, en los EAU no hay Libertad de Panorama, saludos, Poco2 19:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Confusión en identificación de monumento[edit]

Hola, Alberto: Debo informarte que las fotos File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (2).JPG, File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (3).JPG y File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG que subiste bajo la categoría de "Cultural heritage monuments..." no corresponden a la iglesia descrita en la lista de Campdevànol. La que sí es monumento es la que hay cerca de un cementerio, también dedicada a San Cristóbal, al norte y a las afueras de Campdevànol. Comprueba las coordenadas. Retiro de los ficheros la ID del monumento en la descripción y el "Cultural heritage monuments..". Un saludo y enhorabuena por la calidad de las fotografias.--Isidre blanc (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nevada vallgorguina-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nevada vallgorguina-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Panoramica de los viñedos de montferri-2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramica de los viñedos de montferri-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could try to crop the branches in the middle ? Pleclown 12:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done I've already trimmed branches in general --Alberto-g-rovi 18:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 21:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (6).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 08:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and can you please describe images better? "Valencia 2009" is not a suitable image description for a statue of the Hulk. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I have already added another description -Alberto-g-rovi (Talk) 10:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:L`hemisferic-valencia-2009 (2).JPG[edit]

Good morning. I think, I will talk here about the photo, because with the last edit, you added a rotation and it is worse than before. I am sure, that we can make a QI of this photo in the end. The question is, what software do you use for untilting operation? Can you operate vertical untilting, horizontal untilting and perspective rotation with your software? If yes, I will give you tonight the correct values. If not, I could try it from scratch with your material in the highest available resolution you give me. What do you think about? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi
the problem is that computer that manipulated the pictures stopped working and I need to buy me a new one, at the moment I am working with my daughter's computer and software that has this very limited, vertical and horizontal movement operations are difficult to obtain, --

Alberto-g-rovi (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I cannot promote the photo with the inclinations. But I really want to help you. Want to send me the data and I do the perspective correction for you and send the photo back? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for everything, but don't want to bother you, try to send the next photographs as well as possible, I hope as soon as possible buy a new computer, a greeting --Alberto-g-rovi, (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
You are welcome. Perhaps you should withdraw the photo and renominate it when it is done? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
To properly withdraw, just edit the word "Nomination" to "Withdrawn". --just deleting the entry with an IP will be considered to be vandalism. This is why The Photographer reverted it. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 10:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 18:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Pantano de Siurana-2012 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pantano de Siurana-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pleclown 20:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (9).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (9).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | polski | română | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Portlligat-cadaques-2009 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portlligat-cadaques-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Left crop not the best, but just ok overall --Poco a poco 10:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sant llorenç de vilardell-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant llorenç de vilardell-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm not sure. I can't see anything especially wrong with it, but it doesn't quite strike me as QI. Possibly too deep DOF? Other opinions welcome. Mattbuck 21:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support It works for me.--Jebulon 11:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

L'arboç-la giralda-2010 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'arboç-la giralda-2010 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pleclown 13:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (6).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (14).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI to me now. I have corrected and expanded the English descr. --Cayambe 21:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (14).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (14).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (12).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (13).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (13).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (16).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (16).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (15).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (15).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (8).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (8).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (6).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (5).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Casey stoner.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casey stoner.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Casa gari-argentona-2013 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa gari-argentona-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Iifar 08:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

L'escaladei-el priorat-2011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'escaladei-el priorat-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Geocoding would be nice --Kreuzschnabel 08:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In the edition of the image not let me geocoding --Alberto-g-rovi 05:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Go here, Strg+click at the right spot, copy the {{Location … line and paste it into the file description. --Kreuzschnabel 17:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done> Thank you for everything --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
OK now. --Kreuzschnabel 19:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (15).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A little bit dark around the eye.Pleclown 13:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done> I already tweaked the image a little, but very difficult to differentiate the eyes are small and dark--Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
OK --Pleclown 19:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Monumento en el Mas dels arcs-2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento en el Mas dels arcs-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Titled Pleclown 13:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't understand what you mean --Alberto-g-rovi 06:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Pleclown tells you, that the column is inclined to the right side and that some perspective correction might enhance the photo. --Cccefalon 12:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done> corrected tilt --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Better, but the image is a bit dull - could you increase the contrast a bit (needs more high-end stuff). Also a mild sharpening wouldn't go amiss. Mattbuck 20:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done> retouched image --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
there were many things your new version was, a mild sharpening was not one of them. I have tried my own version. Mattbuck 21:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
OK. --Pleclown 12:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (11).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please sharpen. Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
tell me that needs to be sharpened --Alberto-g-rovi 18:52, 28 November 2013(UTC)
Just press the sharpen button on Photoshop. Mattbuck 22:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately I do not have Photoshop, sorry --Alberto-g-rovi 06:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
✓ Sharpened and mildly cropped. Mattbuck 20:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for everything --Alberto-g-rovi 18:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok now --Cccefalon 15:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
L'oceanografic-valencia-2009 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'oceanografic-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Monasterio de poblet-2011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de poblet-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

A slight perspective correction is needed imo, so as to straighten the tower and the shrine.--JLPC 17:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done> corrected tilt --Alberto-g-rovi 05:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Better now. --JLPC 08:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 10:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 10:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Siurana-2012 (11).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siurana-2012 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 13:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porsche Grand prix de valencia-2010 (10).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche Grand prix de valencia-2010 (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Okay for me. DerHexer 23:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
La banyera de la russa-calella de palafurgell-8-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La banyera de la russa-calella de palafurgell-8-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI IMO (though I would crop the tree on the left side) --P e z i 20:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (12).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, I added the species --Poco a poco 01:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Animales bioparc-valencia-2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice! --Moroder 20:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Nevada vallgorguina-2013 (8).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nevada vallgorguina-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 20:24, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad[edit]

Hola Alberto, te deseo a ti a los tuyos una feliz Navidad y mucha salud, así como preciosas imágenes, para el año que viene! Poco2 14:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

[[Muchas gracias por el detalle,te deseo tambien unas felices fiestas y que el año que viene hagamos mas grande la wikipedia.Un saludo Alberto-g-roviAlberto-g-rovi 09:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)]]

Wikipedia in the European Parliament[edit]

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (11).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Just ok --Poco a poco 09:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hachas artesanales-vallgorguina-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hachas artesanales-vallgorguina-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
IMHO the blurred background is oversharpened, otherwise OK. --Tuxyso 09:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good shot. I tried to crop it on the right and top:it looks more dramatic. Please add the English description to the file description. --Moroder 17:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina-2013 (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina-2013 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Casa de la calle de l'abat deàs-sant pol de mar-2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la calle de l'abat deàs-sant pol de mar-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Can colomer de subirans (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Can colomer de subirans (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Please add a descr. in English. A geotag would also be appreciated. --Cayambe 11:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done>Alberto-g-rovi 07:10,30 December 2013 (UTC)
Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Great shot. What about applying a little bit denoising and a somewhat tighter crop? I made a proposal and sent you by email. --Cccefalon 08:25, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done I've tweaked the noise and I have focused a little more the rider --Alberto-g-rovi 13:10,28 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better now. Very good retouchment and also great shot, considering the high ISO rating and the situation of a high speed object. Can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 12:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Angkor_Wat.2C_Camboya.2C_2013-08-16.2C_DD_085.JPG[edit]

Hi, please check your vote here - you said it's not qi, but added Symbol support vote.svg Support. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Poor promotion(s) on COM:QIC candidate list[edit]

I noticed you had promoted an image with approximately 1 Mpix resolution, here: [1].

As you may want to read from the guidelines, only images of 2 MPix and more are eligible for the QI status.

I've removed this picture from QI again and I hereby request you to regard the guidelines. Future promotions going against the rules may get your account blocked. Thanks. --A.Savin 07:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion FYI[edit]

Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 13:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Iglesia de prats de mollo-2009.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de prats de mollo-2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit soft, but still ok --Poco a poco 13:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Patrimonio natural[edit]

Muchas gracias por el cumplido :-) Estoy preparando las categorias de espacios naturales para el próximo concurso Wiki Loves Earth. Ya he visto que tienes buenas fotos y que ya participaste en Wiki Loves Monuments. Quizá te interesará esta nueva propuesta con el mismo esquema pero enfocado al patrimonio natural. Será en mayo. La información está en catalán en ca:VP:WLE2014 y en español en la web. Saludos. --V.Riullop (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Monumento a los caidos-ceret-2009.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Monumento a los caidos-ceret-2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Culex (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 09:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


català | Deutsch | English | español | galego | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2015!

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2015, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 25 countries.

You can find all your uploaded pictures in your upload log, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images (WLE is still running) and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Commons community meets in the Village Pump.

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Earth team
Wiki Loves Earth logo

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dubai fountain-2011.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dubai fountain-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (6).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (6).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (9).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Atlantis-dubai-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (4).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ücretsiz Kürdistan (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (4).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)



català | English | español | euskara | galego | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2016!

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2016, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Due to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 17 countries. The contest in other countries is still open.

You can find all your uploaded pictures in this category, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Wiki Loves Monuments and Wiki Loves Folk are just around the corner.

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. English speaking Commons community meets in the Village Pump.

You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Earth team
Wiki Loves Earth logo



català | Deutsch | English | español | galego | +/−

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again.

We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es

If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here.

We look forward to your free images!

Sincerely,

The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

File:172 Un poble empordanès, de Francesc Gimeno.jpg[edit]

¡Hola! He quitado la categoría Art in Torroella de Montgrí puesto que no se trata de un cuadro que esté expuesto en Torroella, sino que el pueblo es el motivo del cuadro, que está expuesto en el MNAC de Barcelona. --Enfo (talk) 10:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Rally Legend[edit]

Hola Alberto! Ayer borré la categoría a estas fotos por que esa categoría corresponde a una carrera en Italia que no tiene nada que ver con el World RX de Barcelona, por tanto no deberían estar en dicha categoría. Saludos Jorjum (talk) 08:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth Spain 2018 has started![edit]


català | English | español | euskara | galego | +/−

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

As every year, Wiki Loves Earth in Spain, an international photographic contest about natural heritage sites in the Spanish territory, started on May 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2018 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again to document biodiversity.

If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. You can review the rules of the contest in it official site (Spanish).

We look forward to your free images!

We take also the opportunity to invite you to Wiki Loves 2017 awards ceremony, which will take place on June 16th at 17:00 in the Medialab-Prado auditorium, in Madrid. Open entry until filled to capacity.

Sincerely,

The team of the Wiki Loves Earth edition in Spain
Wiki Loves Earth logo

--Rubén Ojeda (WMES) (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sirlanz[edit]

Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 04:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Castillo castellet-alt penedes-2010 (6).JPG[edit]

Hola. Esta fotografía, en la que figuras como autor, tiene una fecha en el cuadro resumen coincidente con la subida de la primera versión de este archivo (julio-2013) y los metadatos (exif) dan otra (19-06-2010). Esta última es la que utilicé para la categorización del archivo. Te agradecería si me confirmaras, o no, que la fecha de los datos exif es la correcta y si se puede utilizar este criterio con el resto de archivos que has subido como autor. Gracias y un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 ya ha comenzado![edit]

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España, nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 acaba de empezar. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre. Además, este año organizamos el concurso de fotografía en colaboración con Wikimedia Portugal, por lo tanto también puedes subir imágenes del país vecino.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactar con nuestro coordinador de programas: Rubén Ojeda (WMES).

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2019 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

Hi Alberto-g-rovi,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | español | മലയാളം | +/−

- FitIndia Talk Mail 12:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Foto a la portada de Viquipèdia[edit]

He posat la teva foto "Cova museu-l'espluga de francoli-2008.JPG" a la portada de la Viquipèdia.--FranSisPac (disc.) 23:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Dubai mall-2011-5.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dubai mall-2011-5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Salon de Comic-2018 (13).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Salon de Comic-2018 (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rivers of Baix Camp[edit]

Hola Alberto. Veo que dentro de la categoría Category:Rivers of Baix Camp has creado otras categorías por los diferentes municipios y las categorías de ríos que estaban aquí dentro las has colocado cada una en uno de los pueblos. Considero que no es correcto porqué la mayoría de estos ríos pasan por territorio de más de un municipio, por este motivo es mucho más útil tenerlos dentro de Rivers of Baix Camp y no dentro de categorías por los diferentes pueblos. Por ejemplo, "Riera de Maspujols‎ " la has puesto dentro de "Category:Rivers of Maspujols" pero este río (más bien arroyo) nace en el término municipal de Vilaplana, pasa por l'Aleixar, Maspujols, Riudoms y Cambrils. Y esto pasa con la mayoría. Creo que se deberían de revertir estos cambios. --Jordi G (talk) 14:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

¡Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado![edit]

WLE Austria Logo (transparent).svg

¡Hola! Nos alegra anunciar que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de España y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Por favor, consulta primero las bases del concurso en su página oficial. En ella también puedes conocer cómo participar. Si tienes alguna pregunta, sugerencia o comentario, por favor, no dudes en ponerte en contacto con nosotros.

Gracias,
el comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España - 09:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Estás recibiendo este mensaje porque ya participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores.

File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (5).JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (5).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: FoP Spain does not include building interiors
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (3).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (5).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cosmocaixa-2009 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Salon de Comic-2018 (5).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Salon de Comic-2018 (5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)