User talk:Alberto-g-rovi

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alberto-g-rovi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Categorization of pictures

You have uploaded lots of pictures with Espiritu de montjuic-montmelo....jpg. It would have been nice if you had edited more information about the model of the cars (e.g. there are several Lola T70). A better categorization would help also. I think Sports prototypes is not the right one for most of the cars. -- Qflieger (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC) I do not sit but know it the model of the cars that competian in this category, excuse to me for not being able to specify it.-- Alberto-g-rovi (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (9).JPG

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.150.155 14:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011.JPG

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.150.155 19:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Abu dhabi-2011.JPG

And also:

• File:Edificios abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG
• File:Edificios abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG
• File:Edificios abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG
• File:Edificios abu dhabi-2011.JPG
• File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG
• File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (8).JPG
• File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011.JPG
• File:Historia de abu dhabi-2011.JPG
• File:Maquetas de edificios-abu dhabi-2011 (5).JPG
• File:Maquetas de edificios-abu dhabi-2011 (6).JPG
• File:Maquetas de edificios-abu dhabi-2011.JPG

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (7).JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (3).JPG

And also:

• File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (8).JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (4).JPG

And also:

• File:Ski dubai-2011 (4).JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dubai mall hotal-2011 (2).JPG

And also:

• File:Dubai mall hotal-2011.JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (2).JPG

And also:

• File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011-10.JPG

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Be careful

Hi, please, be more careful with you edits. You just messed up the QI nominations page, deleting some of them. So, now, I will have spend some time to recover everything lost. Poco² 11:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Fira del cantir-argentona-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:12, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments good quality --P e z i 20:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Globos aerostaticos-la garrotxa-2011 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (3).JPG

And also:

• File:Interior del burj al arab-dubai-2011 (4).JPG
• File:Interior del burj al arab-dubai-2011 (6).JPG
• File:Interior del burj al arab-dubai-2011 (9).JPG

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI and nice photo -- Spurzem 09:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Exteriores del monasterio-santes creus-1-2010 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 09:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Arenys de munt -can jalpi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 09:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Repaired Link

Hi,
I've repaired your link to count quality images at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Quality_images_by_user.
Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chimpance-bioparc-valencia-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Arles sur tech-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Templo de wadi es-sebau-lago nasser-2007 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Interior del coliseo-roma-2011 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! F1 valencia-2010 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments DOF could be better --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (17).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Marc marquez moto2-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! L`hemisferic-valencia-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good --Diana Ringo 11:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Polynesia-port aventura-2008 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Tag gallery

Please have a look to the gallery Tag at the nominations. Please append your nominatons after (!) the gallery tag. Today I've repaired the structure (again). Thanks. --XRay ^talk 06:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-montmelo 2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Very noisy, did you really need 1/4000 sec?--ArildV 07:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC) In this part of the circuit it goes away to many speed--Alberto-g-rovi 19:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Ok.--ArildV 07:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cartoixa d'escaladei-2012 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! L'agora-valencia-2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 11:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Acueducto de les ferreres-2012 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 04:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ermita de sant joan-montblanc-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011 (19).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pretorio romano-2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Well that's disturbing. --Mattbuck 23:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Enduro indoor barcelona-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Delta del ebro poblenou (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Peratallada-forallac-8-2013 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Would like it a bit sharper, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Templo de dakka-lago nasser-2007 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Could be sharper, but ok --Poco a poco 20:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Port bo-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

STOP MESSING THE QI TABLE

You were already warned by Poco² but you still continue to mess up the QI table. Either you start stick to the edit rules or you will face vandalism reports. Nominations have to be listed IN BETWEEN of the gallery tags. Thanks --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Excuse but till now not me habia in view of story of this mistake. A greeting and Graces(Alberto-g-rovi) 08:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. It's always better to ask other wikipedians if you are not sure how to properly perform certain actions. Keep on with your good photography work :) Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Can bosc del far-dosrius-2012 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Canet-creu de pedracastell-2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dubai creek-2011 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Ok, although it could be sharper --Poco a poco 23:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tumba del claustro-santes creus-1-2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 14:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Olzinelles-2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Temps de flors-claustro de la catedral-ginona-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Castillo de Pùbol-8-2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Adrian sutil Grand prix de valencia-2010 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment You should take photos of motor racing with 1/300 or maximal 1/500 but not with 1/2500 or more. For only these times of exposure make dynamical pictures. -- Spurzem 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC) I for sports of great speed am in the habit of putting a bit high speeds, there are zones in the circuits in which it goes away very rapid --Alberto-g-rovi 06:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Santa maria de siurana-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Jorge lorenzo-motogp 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Delta del ebro (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Tilted horizon to the right --A.Savin 18:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC) I believe that the inclination is minim, but good your you decide --Alberto-g-rovi 06:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC) OK to me, though I'd have preferred it sharper. Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Desierto de dubai-2011 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Fuente publica-vulpellac-8-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Delta del ebro faro 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC) Please, fix the ccw tilt Poco a poco 14:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. OK, thanks --Moroder 12:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pantano de vallforners-2013 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Nice picture --Halicki 23:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Castillo de peñiscola-2011 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support OK to me. --Hockei 12:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Salt de sallent-rupit-2005 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good ! --EpsilonEridani 12:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Playa del Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 20:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Santes creus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I don't know... Could you try to crop the person on the left ? Pleclown 12:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC) I like it. Mattbuck 17:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Antiguo corral-jaraba-10-2010 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG

Hola, lo siento pero este archivo no pertenece en Commons, en los EAU no hay Libertad de Panorama, saludos, Poco² 19:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Confusión en identificación de monumento

Hola, Alberto: Debo informarte que las fotos File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (2).JPG, File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (3).JPG y File:Iglesia de sant cristofol-9-2013 (4).JPG que subiste bajo la categoría de "Cultural heritage monuments..." no corresponden a la iglesia descrita en la lista de Campdevànol. La que sí es monumento es la que hay cerca de un cementerio, también dedicada a San Cristóbal, al norte y a las afueras de Campdevànol. Comprueba las coordenadas. Retiro de los ficheros la ID del monumento en la descripción y el "Cultural heritage monuments..". Un saludo y enhorabuena por la calidad de las fotografias.--Isidre blanc (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Nevada vallgorguina-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Panoramica de los viñedos de montferri-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment Could try to crop the branches in the middle ? Pleclown 12:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)  Done I've already trimmed branches in general --Alberto-g-rovi 18:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (6).JPG

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 08:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and can you please describe images better? "Valencia 2009" is not a suitable image description for a statue of the Hulk. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I have already added another description -Alberto-g-rovi (Talk) 10:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:L`hemisferic-valencia-2009 (2).JPG

Good morning. I think, I will talk here about the photo, because with the last edit, you added a rotation and it is worse than before. I am sure, that we can make a QI of this photo in the end. The question is, what software do you use for untilting operation? Can you operate vertical untilting, horizontal untilting and perspective rotation with your software? If yes, I will give you tonight the correct values. If not, I could try it from scratch with your material in the highest available resolution you give me. What do you think about? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi

the problem is that computer that manipulated the pictures stopped working and I need to buy me a new one, at the moment I am working with my daughter's computer and software that has this very limited, vertical and horizontal movement operations are difficult to obtain, --

Alberto-g-rovi (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I cannot promote the photo with the inclinations. But I really want to help you. Want to send me the data and I do the perspective correction for you and send the photo back? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for everything, but don't want to bother you, try to send the next photographs as well as possible, I hope as soon as possible buy a new computer, a greeting --Alberto-g-rovi, (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome. Perhaps you should withdraw the photo and renominate it when it is done? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

To properly withdraw, just edit the word "Nomination" to "Withdrawn". --just deleting the entry with an IP will be considered to be vandalism. This is why The Photographer reverted it. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 10:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pantano de Siurana-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (9).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Alberto-g-rovi, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Portlligat-cadaques-2009 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Left crop not the best, but just ok overall --Poco a poco 10:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Sant llorenç de vilardell-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I'm not sure. I can't see anything especially wrong with it, but it doesn't quite strike me as QI. Possibly too deep DOF? Other opinions welcome. Mattbuck 21:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Support It works for me.--Jebulon 11:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! L'arboç-la giralda-2010 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 13:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ferrari world-abu dhabi-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Museo principe felipe-valencia-2009 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales del oceanografico-valencia-2009 (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI to me now. I have corrected and expanded the English descr. --Cayambe 21:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (14).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (14).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (12).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (13).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (13).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (16).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (16).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (15).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (15).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011.JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (8).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (8).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (6).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (5).JPG

File:Sheikh zayed-abu dhabi-2011 (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.63.107 13:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Casey stoner.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Casa gari-argentona-2013 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! L'escaladei-el priorat-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Geocoding would be nice --Kreuzschnabel 08:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC) Comment In the edition of the image not let me geocoding --Alberto-g-rovi 05:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Go here, Strg+click at the right spot, copy the {{Location … line and paste it into the file description. --Kreuzschnabel 17:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC)  Done> Thank you for everything --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC) OK now. --Kreuzschnabel 19:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment A little bit dark around the eye.Pleclown 13:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Done> I already tweaked the image a little, but very difficult to differentiate the eyes are small and dark--Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC) OK --Pleclown 19:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Monumento en el Mas dels arcs-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment Titled Pleclown 13:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment I don't understand what you mean --Alberto-g-rovi 06:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)  Info Pleclown tells you, that the column is inclined to the right side and that some perspective correction might enhance the photo. --Cccefalon 12:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)  Done> corrected tilt --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Better, but the image is a bit dull - could you increase the contrast a bit (needs more high-end stuff). Also a mild sharpening wouldn't go amiss. Mattbuck 20:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)  Done> retouched image --Alberto-g-rovi 18:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC) there were many things your new version was, a mild sharpening was not one of them. I have tried my own version. Mattbuck 21:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC) OK. --Pleclown 12:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vall de nuria-ripolles-2009 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Please sharpen. Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC) tell me that needs to be sharpened --Alberto-g-rovi 18:52, 28 November 2013(UTC) Just press the sharpen button on Photoshop. Mattbuck 22:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC) Comment Unfortunately I do not have Photoshop, sorry --Alberto-g-rovi 06:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)  Sharpened and mildly cropped. Mattbuck 20:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Thank you for everything --Alberto-g-rovi 18:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok now --Cccefalon 15:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! L'oceanografic-valencia-2009 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Monasterio de poblet-2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments A slight perspective correction is needed imo, so as to straighten the tower and the shrine.--JLPC 17:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)  Done> corrected tilt --Alberto-g-rovi 05:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 08:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Roc de sant gaitá-2012 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Siurana-2012 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Porsche Grand prix de valencia-2010 (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Okay for me. DerHexer 23:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! La banyera de la russa-calella de palafurgell-8-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support QI IMO (though I would crop the tree on the left side) --P e z i 20:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Alberto-g-rovi, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Ok, I added the species --Poco a poco 01:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales bioparc-valencia-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Nice! --Moroder 20:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Nevada vallgorguina-2013 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:24, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad

Hola Alberto, te deseo a ti a los tuyos una feliz Navidad y mucha salud, así como preciosas imágenes, para el año que viene! Poco² 14:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

[[Muchas gracias por el detalle,te deseo tambien unas felices fiestas y que el año que viene hagamos mas grande la wikipedia.Un saludo Alberto-g-roviAlberto-g-rovi 09:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)]]

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Jardines de cap roig-calella de palafurgell-8-2013 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 09:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Hachas artesanales-vallgorguina-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments IMHO the blurred background is oversharpened, otherwise OK. --Tuxyso 09:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Animales del l'oceanografico-valencia-2009 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good shot. I tried to crop it on the right and top:it looks more dramatic. Please add the English description to the file description. --Moroder 17:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ernesto ezpeleta-vallgorguina-2013 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Casa de la calle de l'abat deàs-sant pol de mar-2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dolmen de ca l'arenes-dosrius 2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Can colomer de subirans (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Please add a descr. in English. A geotag would also be appreciated. --Cayambe 11:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)  Done>Alberto-g-rovi 07:10,30 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Espiritu de montjuic-clasicas-montmelo 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Great shot. What about applying a little bit denoising and a somewhat tighter crop? I made a proposal and sent you by email. --Cccefalon 08:25, 28 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I've tweaked the noise and I have focused a little more the rider --Alberto-g-rovi 13:10,28 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Much better now. Very good retouchment and also great shot, considering the high ISO rating and the situation of a high speed object. Can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 12:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Angkor_Wat.2C_Camboya.2C_2013-08-16.2C_DD_085.JPG

Hi, please check your vote here - you said it's not qi, but added  Support. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Alberto-g-rovi⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Alberto-g-rovi,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Can bordoi-llinars del valles-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Poor promotion(s) on COM:QIC candidate list

I noticed you had promoted an image with approximately 1 Mpix resolution, here: [1].

As you may want to read from the guidelines, only images of 2 MPix and more are eligible for the QI status.

I've removed this picture from QI again and I hereby request you to regard the guidelines. Future promotions going against the rules may get your account blocked. Thanks. --A.Savin 07:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009.JPG

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion FYI

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 13:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Iglesia de prats de mollo-2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments A bit soft, but still ok --Poco a poco 13:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Patrimonio natural

Muchas gracias por el cumplido :-) Estoy preparando las categorias de espacios naturales para el próximo concurso Wiki Loves Earth. Ya he visto que tienes buenas fotos y que ya participaste en Wiki Loves Monuments. Quizá te interesará esta nueva propuesta con el mismo esquema pero enfocado al patrimonio natural. Será en mayo. La información está en catalán en ca:VP:WLE2014 y en español en la web. Saludos. --V.Riullop (talk) 08:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Monumento a los caidos-ceret-2009.JPG

File:Monumento a los caidos-ceret-2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Culex (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (8).JPG

And also:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011.JPG

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 09:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2015! Dear Alberto-g-rovi, On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2015, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 25 countries. You can find all your uploaded pictures in your upload log, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images (WLE is still running) and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Commons community meets in the Village Pump. If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Earth team

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (11).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG

File:Emirates palace-abu dhabi-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dubai fountain-2011.JPG

File:Dubai fountain-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (6).JPG

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (6).JPG

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (9).JPG

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011 (9).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011.JPG

File:Atlantis-dubai-2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 11:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (4).JPG

File:Burj khalifa-dubai-2011 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dubai mall-2011 (4).JPG

Yours sincerely, Ücretsiz Kürdistan (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (4).JPG

File:Exposicion comics-valencia-2009 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2016! Dear Alberto-g-rovi, On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2016, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Due to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 17 countries. The contest in other countries is still open. You can find all your uploaded pictures in this category, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Wiki Loves Monuments and Wiki Loves Folk are just around the corner. If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. English speaking Commons community meets in the Village Pump. You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Earth team

---

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming! Dear Alberto-g-rovi, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (2).JPG

And also:

• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (6).JPG
• File:Edificios de dubai-2011 (7).JPG

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)