User talk:AleXXw/Archive/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Template talk:Denkmalgeschütztes Objekt Südtirol

Hinweis auf Diskussion. Hältst du die italienische Flagge für sinnvoll? --Mai-Sachme (talk) 10:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Lithuanian road route numbers

Hello, you had been started to upload Lithuanian road route numbers, but stopped at K159-LT.svg. Could you complete uploading, finishing with 232 road? (and upload A19 road number)--Pdxx (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! The only list I fond back then stopped at 159 ;) I can add the missing shields, but please give me some days. Best --AleXXw 09:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Russenfriedhof 27.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russenfriedhof 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

AleXXw - Landtagsprojekt NÖ 2013 - Plenarsaal 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AleXXw - Landtagsprojekt NÖ 2013 - Plenarsaal 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Neue Version von File:Karin Scheele 1.JPG hochgeladen

Hallo AleXXw! Ich habe eine neue Version des o.a. und bei QIC nominierten Bildes hochgeladen, auf dem ich die starken Augenschatten korrigiert habe. Falls es dir nicht gefällt, einfach revertieren. Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Servus Tuxyso! Danke für die Änderung, ich lade immer meine Bilder immer nur maximal gedreht/gecroppt hoch, mehr kann ich nicht ;) LG --AleXXw 11:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC) PS: Hr. Laki werde ich neu geschinitten hochladen.
Adobe Lightroom in Kombination mit den Google NIK-Tools, insbesondere Viveza, kann ich sehr empfehlen. Ich bin auch kein Bildbearbeitungsprofi (an Photoshop etc. gehe ich nicht ran), mit Lightroom kann man neben den Bearbeitungsfunktionen die RAWs auch wunderbar verwalten. Du kannst dir ja mal Testversionen runterladen und ein wenig rumprobieren, macht wirklich Spaß. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Danke für die Tipps, ich werd aber eher dabei bleiben zu versuchen ein besserer Fotograf zu werden ;) LG --AleXXw 12:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Mach' wie du meinst. Ich denke aber in der digitalen Zeit gehört das alles zusammen. Um es in schönem Denglisch zu sagen: Zu einen digitalen RAW-Workflow gehört eine vernünftige Aufnahme genauso dazu wie ein gutes Post-Processing. Photoshop ist für Bildbearbeitungsprofis, Lightroom ist für Fotografen. Die Tatsache, dass man die Möglichkeiten der Bildbearbeitung nutzt bedeutet ja nicht, dass man ein schlechter Fotograf ist, im Gegenteil. Um mein Argument zu illustrieren: Gerade um den Dynamik-Umfang der Kamera optimal auszunutzen ist eine RAW-Bearbeitung der Lichter und Schatten sinnvoll:
Meine Fotos haben seit ich Lightroom nutze einen immensen Qualitätssprung gemacht. Auch wenn ich dich nicht überzeugen konnte, weiterhin gut Licht :)

--Tuxyso (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Das Beispiel ist beeindruckend, stimmt. Für meinen Teil ist es aber Zielführender bei einem Tag mit >600 Bildern (wie das Landtagsprojekt) möglichst wenig nacharbeiten zu _müssen_, so kann ich die Bilder schneller auf Commons bringen ;) LG --AleXXw 15:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Walter Laki 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walter Laki 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Walter Laki 6.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walter Laki 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bettina Rausch 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bettina Rausch 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renate Gruber 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renate Gruber 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Walter Laki 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walter Laki 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Walter Laki 6.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walter Laki 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bettina Rausch 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bettina Rausch 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renate Gruber 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renate Gruber 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karin Scheele 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karin Scheele 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Alfredo Rosenmaier 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfredo Rosenmaier 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gerhard Razborcan 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gerhard Razborcan 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Michaela Hinterholzer 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michaela Hinterholzer 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bernhard Ebner 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernhard Ebner 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karin Renner 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karin Renner 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Franz Gartner 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Gartner 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Karl Bader 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl Bader 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heidemaria Onodi 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidemaria Onodi 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Austrian Bowl 2013-129.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-129.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Austrian Bowl 2013-213.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-213.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Austrian Bowl 2013-103.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bitte um Löschung

Hallo AleXXw! Auf meiner Diskussionsseite in den Commons wurde ich von der Dame gebeten, ein Bild von ihr zu löschen. Ich nehme aber an, dass sie nur vom zweiten nix weiß. Kannst du daher bitte gleich die ganze [Category:Ruth Wittmann] löschen? Danke, --GuentherZ (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Günther! Würd dir gerne helfen, kann aber mangels Adminrechten nicht... LG --AleXXw 05:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Tschuldige, ich dachte, du bist. Oder warst du? ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Ich war noch nie, habs vor einiger Zeit einmal versucht zu werden, wie du siehst erfolglos ;) LG --AleXXw 18:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Danke, also weitersuchen ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Austrian Bowl 2013-375.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-375.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Austrian Bowl 2013-345.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-345.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Austrian Bowl 2013-413.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian Bowl 2013-413.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Eat_the_Ball

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pressekonferenz zur Kampagnenpräsentation (9405391571).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pressekonferenz zur Kampagnenpräsentation (9405391571).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 20:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:HSWikivoyage.svg

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, AleXXw/Archive!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

User111 (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

How may I help you? You uploaded the file so you should possily categorize it? Best --AleXXw 12:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikivoyage logo translation

Hi AleXXw. Could you create the Wikivoyage logo in Esperanto with the text "Viki vojaĝo"? Thanks. Ebe123 (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I'm Sorry I'm on vacation, I can create it when I'm back. Best --AleXXw 07:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Take your time. Ebe123 (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposal for a new mailing list : photoreporter:

I've launched a proposal to create a mailing list for photographers who cover sports, festivals... meta:Talk:Mailing_lists#Proposal_for_a_new_mailing_list_:_photoreporter Pyb (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Could you translate the Wikivoyage logo in Esperanto? The text is "Viki vojaĝo". The original thread is archived. Ebe123 (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Wohlmeyergrab 2.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wohlmeyergrab 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Raabgrab 2.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Raabgrab 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Andorra km 0.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Andorra km 0.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Karte A23

Hallo Alex!

In deiner Karte der A23 ist ein Fehler, dort ist noch die Verlängerungsstrecke von Hirschstetten zum Knoten Raasdorf einzeichnegt, diese wird aber nun zur Hälfte eine "Stadtstraße" und zur Hälfte Teil der S1. Gruß --26er (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear AleXXw/Archive,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear AleXXw/Archive,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion

Ernest Gabmann 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ernest Gabmann 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

erl --AleXXw 10:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | svenska | עברית | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear AleXXw/Archive,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Public Art team

Wiki Loves Public Art logo

erl --AleXXw 10:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest. erl --AleXXw 10:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)