User talk:Alma Pater/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Vilnius[edit]

Если у Вас будет свободное время, проструктурируйте, пожалуйста, эту страницу по образцу Warszawa. Я думаю, что Вы больший специалист в этом вопросе, чем я :-) Спасибо. --EugeneZelenko 03:31, 7 May 2005 (UTC)


Image:Brazauskas.jpg[edit]

Hi, you claim that this photo is public domain. However, your source, English Wikipedia, has no mention of image license. You need to add a source who can verify that the photo indeed is public domain. Images without enough information may be deleted. Thuresson 20:49, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

In my opininon this is the official public photo by Mr. Brazauskas, see
At the bottom of the page © III BJŠJŽ puslapius kūrė Lietuvos sporto informacijos centras. --EugeneZelenko 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
This have relation not with picture but with www pages (= "Lithuanian sport information centre" creates "Baltic sport games pages")Alma Pater 10:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
They may be not own copyrights on picture but could license it (so they don't violate copyrights). Please ask web master who is copyrights holder and then communicate owner directly. --EugeneZelenko 13:42, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

... without any copyright notice Alma Pater 13:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)


Image:Adamkus.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Adamkus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thuresson 13:36, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Image:Brazauskas.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Brazauskas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thuresson 01:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:VUstamp.jpg, Image:VUcover1979.jpg[edit]

Are you sure that these images in PD? I have several envelopes printed in 1979 and all of the copyrighted by Министерство связи СССР (printed on back side).

Please also read comment to Category:Stamps.

EugeneZelenko 7 July 2005 06:00 (UTC)

Are my images of post stamps also copyrighted?!
On back side of envelope Image:VUcover1979.jpg printed: LTRS Rysiu ministersijos ledinys, dailininke M. Cepukiene, LKP CK spaustuve 1978 m., i. e. edited by Ministery of Communications of Lithuanian SSR, artist M. Cepukiene, printing-house of Central Committee of Lithuanian Communist Party, without any copyright notice. Alma Pater 7 July 2005 16:18 (UTC)
Absence of copyrights symbol doesn't mean that this images is not copyrighted (same case with stamps). At least it have author and will be PD after 70 years after author death as described in Lithuanian copyrights law. Please try to find images which published before 1973 and could be placed under PD-Soviet. --EugeneZelenko 8 July 2005 03:50 (UTC)

Vilnius StNicholas Orthodox church vs St. Parasceve Orthodox Church in Vilnius[edit]

Dziękuję za poprawkę. Wojsyl 8 July 2005 16:49 (UTC)

Image:Neris Salomeja.jpg and other[edit]

May be {{PD-Soviet}} is more correct tag in that case? --EugeneZelenko 22:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

О да! Alma Pater 11:27, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning The image Image:VUstamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.
Image deletion warning The image Image:VUcover1979.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 10:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)


Image:Dekada litovskoj literatury v Moskve 1948.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dekada litovskoj literatury v Moskve 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

|EPO| 19:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wilno Kosciol Misjonarzy Zygmunt Vogel.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Wilno Kosciol Misjonarzy Zygmunt Vogel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:StJohnsChurchVilniusInside2.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:StJohnsChurchVilniusInside3.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:TadeuszKostuszkoPlaqueStJohnsChurch.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:SarbeviusStJohnsChurch.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Martynas_Kukta_Vilnius.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Martynas_Kukta_Vilnius.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 05:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

2007 2010[edit]

Commons:Geocoding[edit]

Hello Alma Pater/Archive, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 13:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Catherine_I_from_Russkaja_Starina_1879.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 07:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Хотел бы посоветываться[edit]

Доброго времени суток. Есть у меня фотография Вильнюсской Знаменской церкви, хочу загрузить, но не знаю как это будет по английски. Полное название - Знамения Пресвятой Богородицы - Sign of Holy Theotokos??? Также хочу спросить кто это так мастерски перевел - Dormition of Theotokos ? У меня в словаре таких слов нет, хотя сам словарь толстый - 53 000 слов. Спрашивал в посольстве Википедии - assumption знают, dormition - нет. ;)))--Umnik 19:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Фотографию я б назвал нахально Znamenskaya Church in Vilnius, в описании дал бы русское название, а там, глядишь, со временем англ. перевод бы кто-нибудь и присал бы. Про другое — это ж такая специфическая лексика и соответствующая догматика, см.: en:Dormition of the Theotokos, причём православная dormition приниципиально отличается от католической assumption en:Assumption of Mary, лучше не путать — ещё гореть потом вечно за ереси... --Alma Pater 22:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Да, мне все так и советуют - назвать транслитом. Еще вопрос - сфотографировал статуи апостолов-евангелистов с фасада Вильнюского кафедрального собора, тоже не знаю как назвать, кто из них кто. Там один со львенком, другой с орленком, третий с бычком, четвертый с ангелочком. Может вы разбираетесь в этом?
Традиционно львом символизируется Марк, орлом Иоанн, тельцом Матфей, Лука ангелом.--Alma Pater 20:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vileishis Palace5.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Vileišis palace[edit]

Labas, I see you wrote a very nice article about Vileišis palace on RU wiki. While some time ago I created an article on this same palace in EN part However I am lacking info about its architecture and interior. Your RU version have all this info, so I thought maybe you could help improving EN article on this matter? Спасибо, M.K. 09:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, my english skills are not very good, especially on this particural subject. I think my vocabulary is not strong with interior and architectual terms. My apologies.--Alma Pater 19:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you can advice sources, which I could to use on these issues? M.K. 22:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
http://www.llti.lt/rumai.htm http://www.heritage.lt/epd/2006/vilnius/pristatomi_objektai.htm in Lithuanian; If I find anything more useful, for example a book or guide in English I will inform you.--Alma Pater 20:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I just noticed that you have managed to infiltrate into Presidential Palace. Maybe you made photos of Palace interior? It would be great edition to WP articles. Bets, M.K. 18:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately no. Generally this seems possible (during the excursion) unless it's strongly prohibited to make photos in this palace.--Alma Pater 20:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I initially thought those pic. there taken with excursion. While yes, AFAIF, in order to have access to excursion in Palace, people should register by phone (+370 5) 266 4011 (if not changed ) in advance. M.K. 22:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Не подскажете, что за статуи на костеле миссионеров?[edit]

Добрый день. Я сегодня сфотографировал их, а как назвать - не знаю. --Umnik (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Честно говоря, не знаю, хотя и пытался разобраться. Тоже было снял когда-то, один дед там чуть ли не с кифарой, а кто - так и не выснил.--Alma Pater (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
А это еще актуально? Там один, с западной стороны, с книгой - Моисей, а с восточной с каким-то музыкальным инструментом - Давид, середина XVIII века.--Alma Pater (talk) 17:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Sgraffito in the Vilnius University[edit]

Unfortunately these works are copyrighted and freedom of panorama in Lithuania is insufficient; thus your photos had to be deleted from Commons. This case is similar to former deletion request of your other photo.

Regards, A.J. (talk) 08:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Tirgoņu iela 10 01.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Stepono gatve 30 02.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Evaldas Ignatavičius 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:36, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


File:StJohnsVilniusNorthernFacade3.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Vladimiras Korobovas 2.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Vladimiras Korobovas 1.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Teofilo (talk) 06:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Pikk 20.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

что это за улица?[edit]

Здравствуйте. Может вы знаете, что это за улица File:Vilnius316.jpg ? Что то знакомое, а где это сфотографировано понять не могу.--Umnik (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Честно говоря, не узнаю. Можно предположить: если справа ближе из-за домов выглядывает колокольня костела Всех Святых, а вдали слева колокольня Св. Иоанна, то это снято откуда-то со стороны ул. Вингрю, возможно, это улица Лигонинес или Жямайтиёс, ну вряд ли Руднинку. Не, не узнаю.--Alma Pater (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Это улица Шв.Степоно, а сфотографировано с балкона гостиницы Власпа--Umnik (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Рассматривал такую возможность теоретически, примерял на GoogleMaps, может ли такое быть, но показались, что что-то не соответствует; значит, там башня Всех Святых справа?--Alma Pater (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Да. Эти развалины по центру уже отреставрировали и там сейчас нормальный дом--Umnik (talk) 06:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
User_talk:Alma_Pater#Не подскажете, что за статуи на костеле миссионеров? ещё актуально? Давид и Моисей.--Alma Pater (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Загрузил :)--Umnik (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Классные снимки, кстати говоря. Я б так не смог.--Alma Pater (talk) 18:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Самые лучшие фотографии выходят при ярком освещении. Чем больше солнца, тем лучше.--Umnik (talk) 11:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Statue of saint jesuit in Vilnius2.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot