User talk:Alvesgaspar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to my talk page and let the light be with you!


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Palenis December 2021-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palenis December 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tibães March 2016-10a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tibães March 2016-23a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-23a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tibães March 2016-7a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Flowers Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flowers Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tibães March 2016-20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Watchduck 16:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Poster Gazania 2a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poster Gazania 2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Palenis December 2021-1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palenis December 2021-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palenis December 2021-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Santa Maria della Vittoria September 2015-3.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Santa Maria della Vittoria September 2015-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria della Vittoria September 2015-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alcobaça October 2021-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 17:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coimbra April 2018-21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Prburley 00:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coimbra April 2018-36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Coimbra December 2011-21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Perspective correction would be hilarious here. --Cayambe 19:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Coimbra April 2018-35a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-35a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, Good quality. --Cayambe 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gazania December 2021-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania December 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 23:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gazania December 2021-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania December 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 23:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Waves & sun Porto Covo January 2022-1a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waves & sun Porto Covo January 2022-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lobularia maritima Porto Covo 2022-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobularia maritima Porto Covo 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pallenis January 2022-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pallenis January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo January 2022-12a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-15a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-15a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tecoma Porto Covo January 2022-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tecoma Porto Covo January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. Please add a CAT for the location to make it more useful. --Tagooty 10:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Added location -- Alvesgaspar 11:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. The file name has Porto Covo so I added CAT:Porto Covo. Hope this is correct. --Tagooty 14:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Pictogram voting info.svg Info No, that is not the way to do it. Geocoding is enough. Alvesgaspar 16:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is no geocoding visible in the image page. --Tagooty 03:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Oops, sorry! Alvesgaspar 17:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Solandra maxima Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solandra maxima Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected - Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done - Corrected -- Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oxalis January 2022-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ostospermum Porto Covo January 2022-9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostospermum Porto Covo January 2022-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oxalis January 2022-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Osteospermum January 2022-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sta Clara January 2022-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sta Clara January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Porto Covo January 2022-22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]