User talk:André Costa (WMSE)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive >

Not the same coin[edit]

Hi André. I see that File:Mynt av silver. Ett halvt öre. 1578 - Skoklosters slott - 109066.tif and File:Mynt av silver. 2 öre. 1573 - Skoklosters slott - 109067.tif cannot be the same coin. I was not able to find the correct reverse and obverse of this two coins. Can you find them and correct in the page the "other versions" ? Thank you so much. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've reported these two images over at Commons:LSH/Error reports. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please, can you control too the two coins (skillings of Frederik V of Denmark) File:Silvermynt, 1 skilling, 1763 - Skoklosters slott - 109611.tif and File:Silvermynt, 1 skilling, 1764 - Skoklosters slott - 109610.tif ? The crossing of theyr number of obverse and reverse is very strange... (for the coin of 1763 nr. 109611 and 109424. for the coin of 1764 nr. 109610 and 109425). Thank you very much. --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure I understand the issue with these two coins. Do you mind explaining further? /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Normally the numbers of the photographs of the obverse and reverse of a coin are in sequence. Here instead we have two coins that have crossed file numbers. I suppose that there is an error. But it could also be that they were photographed first the two reverse and then the two obverse. But IMO it should be checked. Unfortunately the two coins have not in the form features that allow to be clearly distinguished each other. --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't know how the image order is determined. But as you say it could be that they first photographed all of the reverses before turning all of the coins over to photograph the obverses. A quick look at the shape of the coins suggests that the linked images match though. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi André. There is also a problem with the coin in files File:Silvermynt från Rostock, 1381-87 - Skoklosters slott - 109186.tif and File:Silvermynt från Rostock, 1381-87 - Skoklosters slott - 109187.tif. The image does not match the description. Thank you. --DenghiùComm (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DenghiùComm: . Do you mind clarifying what the mismatch is on these as well? Makes it easier for me to report it to the GLAM. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you look at the images of these files and then at the description, they have nothingt to do. In the description the inscription of the coin is ERIC D G REX SVECIE. On the pictures you read MONETA NOVA. So the image does not correspond to the description. Or the description does not correspond to the images. --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. I made an entry for this on Commons:LSH/Error reports. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 10:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for all André. Best wihes, --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Australian Capital Territory Heritage Register[edit]

Hi,

I was told to contact you regarding the Australian Capital Territory Heritage Register. At this stage it isn't fit to add to Wikidata and the "ACT Heritage Register" needs to be added as an "Identifier", which currently does not exist. Bidgee (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. The details on what I've tried to do are over in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230715 (if you are comfortable with Phabricator it's better to continue the discussion there). I've requested access to the google doc you linked to. The data I managed to extract has multiple id's and it's unclear to me which is the one we should be using as an identifier. Once I know that I can start the process of getting an Wikidata identifier property for the ACT Heritage Register. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bok - Skoklosters slott - 99888.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bok - Skoklosters slott - 99888.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Content made available through Wikimedia Sverige competitions[edit]

Why not make Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Sweden a subcategory of Category:Content made available through Wikimedia Sverige competitions? Multichill (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Primarilly because PAGESINCATEGORY can't handle subcategories =( /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ehh, you know that some point in the future someone will add the categories again and undo your edits with a link to COM:OVERCAT? Multichill (talk) 20:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hidden categories have tended to survive such action before since they normally fill very different purposes. We have a similar system for GLAM cooperation uploads and community supported uploads. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 06:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About Wikimedia logo family complete-2021.svg[edit]

Hi, can you replace current Wikimedia logo (B&W) looks like File:Wikimedia logo family complete-2016.svg? --Jelican9 (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see the discussion linked from the 2016 image. The B&W logo is that of the Wikimedia Foundation whereas the Wikimedia Movement logo has not been upfated (this is currently used in the center of the 2021 version). See also m:Logo. /Lokal_Profil 22:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Neg 13741 Kaudern Maguga 1912 Kameleont (full neg) Bild 21743. Madagaskar - SMVK - 021743.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Neg 13741 Kaudern Maguga 1912 Kameleont (full neg) Bild 21743. Madagaskar - SMVK - 021743.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Neg 13743 Bild 21745 Kameleont från västsidan (Cameleon verruessus) 9 cm 37. Madagaskar - SMVK - 021745.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Neg 13743 Bild 21745 Kameleont från västsidan (Cameleon verruessus) 9 cm 37. Madagaskar - SMVK - 021745.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tonton Bernardo (talk) 14:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lågupplösta RAÄ-bilder[edit]

God dag! Igår eftermiddag så letade jag efter högupplösta bilder på den svenska Kallebystenen på Commons, och märkte att många av dessa var mycket lågupplösta, så att det var svårt att urskilja detaljer i runornas former. Men, när jag gick in på RAÄs sida forndok upptäckte jag att mycket högupplösta och detaljerade versioner av samma bilder fanns, varefter jag laddade upp några av dessa. Se File:Tanum_Kallebystenen_-_KMB_-_16000300017876.jpg för ett exempel.

Jag insåg dock att detta rörde betydligt fler filer än blott en runstens; troligen flera tusen eller tio-tusen, och därmed är alldeles för stort för att rätta manuellt. Därför skriver jag och vill fråga om Ni kunde köra en bot-operation för att tillrättaställa detta.

Tack för Din uppmärksamhet, Mårtensås (talk) 21:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hej. På grund av lång ledighet såg jag ditt meddelande först nu. Det är först (relativt) nyligen som RAÄ gjort de högupplösta bilderna tillgängliga. Vi tittar just nu, tillsammans med RAÄ, på hur vi bäst skulle kunna uppdatera alla de lågupplösta bilderna utan att skriva över eventuella retuscheringar/beskärningar som gemenskapen här har gjort. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Hello André Costa (WMSE), I noticed that your signature uses an older method to translate the "talk" link. This method does not work for all languages, and may not be supported at all in the future. To fix this, please change <span class="signature-talk">talk</span> to <span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span> in your signature preferences. For more information, please see the discussion at Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Signature talk page link translation. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I updated the signature. Note howver that {{int:Talkpagelinktext}} gets replaced by {{SUBST:int:Talkpagelinktext}}. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for this fix. Jonesey95 (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries. Thanks for caring about the linting =) /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 15:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:U1006 Lejsta - KMB - 16001000540165.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:U1006 Lejsta - KMB - 16001000540165.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macuser (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]