User talk:AndreasPraefcke

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Earlier entries: User talk:AndreasPraefcke/archive

Wie blasonierst du das?[edit]

Hasenweiler Pfarrkirche Epitaph.jpg

Viele Grüße --Historiograf (talk) 01:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Franz von Stuck:Salome[edit]

Du hast vor einiger Zeit mal eine bessere Version von dieser Salome hochgeladen. Nach persönlicher Betrachtung musste ich feststellen, dass die Leute beim Yorck-Project die Dame wohl ins Sanatorium geschickt haben ;-) --Wuselig (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Anton_of_Montfort-Pfannberg[edit]

Category discussion warning

Anton of Montfort-Pfannberg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18775 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18655 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 17474 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 16210 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC))

Category:Iron_curtain[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Iron_curtain has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Guck mal[edit]

Aus File:Oskar Begas Portrait Mathilde Begas 1883.jpg wurde Elisabeth Heegewaldt, 1883, siehe https://www.imhof-verlag.de/media/catalog/product/pdfs/6edcd91c13bd8c582787ce32cea8e2ae_Oscar%20Begas_Blick%20ins%20Buch.pdf (Seite 53) Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Benedict of Nursia[edit]

Hello Andreas,

Can i ask your opinion regarding this matter:you created this category "Category:Benedict of Nursia" and not "Category:Saint Benedict of Nursia"? Thank you, regards.--Carolus (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

It is about a real person, not a legendary creature. I don't believe in saints. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlbberlin (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlbberlin (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Adolph Kummer Brief aus Westafrika 1816.jpg[edit]

Hallo Andreas, mal ´ne kurze Frage. Wenn ich nicht irre, steckst Du hinter der Datei. Auch, wenn ich es bei Deinen unzähligen Beiträgen für eher unwahrscheinlich halte. Hast Du zufällig noch weitere Bilder des Briefes irgendwo gespeichert? Mich würden insbesondere die in der Beschreibung erwähnten Adressdaten interessieren. Auf Bassenge ist der Brief nach der langen Zeit leider nicht mehr zu finden. Vielen Dank im Voraus.--S. F. B. Morse (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Nein, nur diese Datei, die "gerettet" wurde, weil sie eben bei den Auktionshäusern nach langer Zeit wie immer nicht mehr auffindbar ist... --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Andreas, wie ich gerade sehe, hattest Du doch noch geantwortet. Ich danke Dir für diese Rettung. Adolph Kummer stammt hier aus der Region.--Viele Grüße aus EE S. F. B. Morse (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Kroatischer Arbeitsdienst-Mann StAF W 134 Nr. 026025 Bild 1 (5-92161-1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kroatischer Arbeitsdienst-Mann StAF W 134 Nr. 026025 Bild 1 (5-92161-1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.216.58.195 04:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Eduard Gaertner Schlossfreiheit.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Eduard Gaertner Schlossfreiheit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Ravensburg: Frage zum Standort bei der Aufnahme eines Bildes[edit]

Hallo Andreas,

vielen Dank für Dein schönes Bild File:Ravensburg Mehlsack und Obertor.jpg

Im Wikipedia-Artikel Ravensburg lautet die Bildunterschrift: Blick von der Veitsburg: rechts das Obertor, links der Turm Mehlsack

Könntest Du das bitte prüfen? Ich habe meine Zweifel, dass es sich um den Blick von der Veitsburg handelt. Eventuell könntest Du den korrekten Standort mitteilen, von dem aus Du die Aufnahme gemacht hast?

Danke Dir und viele Grüße! --Olli1800 (talk) 21:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Anfrage an den Support zu einem Bild[edit]

Eucharius Rößlin Rosgarten Childbirth.jpg

Moin Andreas,

über den Support erreicht uns eine Anfrage aus Kanada zu diesem Bild.

Sie kommt vom CONSEIL DU STATUT DE LA FEMME Québec (Québec) G1R 6E2

mit der offiziellen E-Mail-Adresse einer kanadischen Behörde.

Kannst Du bitte mit dem Betreff [Ticket#2021031110011805] eine E-Mail an permissions-fr@wikimedia.org schicken, damit wir Dich in die Kommunikation einbinden können? Und bitte kurz dazu schreiben, ob Französisch okay für Dich. Als Kanadierin können wir die Absenderin bestimmt auch bitten, auf Englisch umzuschalten.

Dafür dankbar, beste Grüße --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt. Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:City_walls_of_Nördlingen[edit]

Category discussion warning

City walls of Nördlingen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zimtstern 2k (talk) 20:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)