User talk:Andrei Stroe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Română: Bunvenit la Commons, Andrei Stroe!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png Primii paşi

Tutorialul primilor paşi şi întrebările frecvente vă pot ajuta. Vi se explică modalitatea prin care puteţi personaliza interfaţa (de exemplu pentru limba de afişare), cum să încărcaţi un fişier, fără a uita însă de licenţele de utilizare. Competenţele tehnice nu sunt indispensabile. Fiţi curajos şi asumaţi bune intenţii din partea celorlalţi utilizatori. Aceasta este o wiki - nimic extraordinar de complicat.

Icon apps query.svg Cum să obţii ajutor

Mai multe informaţii sunt disponiile la portalul comunităţii. Puteţi pune întrebări la Cafenea, sau pe IRC, pe canalul #wikimedia-commons. Puteţi de asemenea contacta un administrator pe pagina sa de discuţii.


Stimate dl. Andrei Stroe

Cu privire la imaginile (fata, verso) ale CD-lui "Si gandurile plang si lacrimile dor DAN IAGNOV" (File:Iagnov7.JPG si File:Iagnov6.JPG, din pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia),CD comandat de mine 2013, in memoriam Dan Iagnov si platit integral de mine (2900 EURS (am contract si facturi),va rog sa-i contactati pe dl. Ovidiu Komornyic Directorul OVO MUSIC si dl. Lucian Nuta Directorul artistic OVO MUSIC pentru a va confirma cele spuse. Imaginile sunt facute de sotia domnului Lucian Nuta, graficiana, (eu propunand initial altele) si am fost de acord cu ele considerandu-le mai potrivite pentru felul de a fi al lui Dan Iagnov. Nu exista nici un plagiat. Vorbiti va rog cu cele doua persoane care va pot confirma cele spuse de mine. In concluzie nu sunt de acord cu scoaterea acestor doua imagini din pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia. V-am mai scris si mai scriu o data de ce am facut aceasta pagina Wikipedia. Dan Iagnov fiind un om foarte introvertit, de-a dreptul ascuns, nu se stia mai nimic despre el (nici anul nasterii care pe INTERNET aparea 1949, corect 1935). Ceea ce pe de o parte e bine pentru ca s-au evitat barfele dar pe de alta parte este rau pentru ca se incepuse o serie de nereguli in legatura cu cantecele lui. Pentru a clarifica toata discografia lui am facut Tabele intregi cu ordinea aparitiei cantecelor, CD-urilor, casetelor cu titlul, Casa de discuri, anul aparitiei, textierul, si interpretul respectiv interpretii. Nu a fost de loc usor. Mi-au trebuit cateva luni sa fac pagina sub forma DOC si sa platesc pe cineva pentru a o trece pe INTERNET. Consider ca pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia este foarte reusita si corecta din toate punctele de vedere (fara nici un plagiat). Ca sa evit si alte comentarii pe pozele din interiorul paginii va lamuresc eu. Pozele din casa sunt facute de mine (amenajarea posterelor pe pereti e munca mea, casa este mostenire lasata de Dan Iagnov si pe care vreau s-o fac Casa Memoriala asa cum apare si in imaginea verso a CD-ului). Placa comemorativa care apare pe zidul blocului eu am comandat-o 950 RON), eu am fotografiat-o. Mormantul eu l-am facut (3000 RON). Eu il intretin facand diferite aranjamente florale (deja au trecut 4 ani (va rog examinati adresa: "Category:Grave of Dan Iagnov - Wikimedia Commons" sa vedeti cele 28 de ipostaze ele mormantului Dan Iagnov. Eu cred ca in lume nu este asa ceva. Uite ca ma mandresc cu asta). In legatura cu emisiunea "Pe malurile Senei" realizata de Dan Iagnov in anii 2001-2003. O bijuterie de emisiune despre Paris si Chansoneta franceza. Fotografia CD-ului eu am facut-o (CD-ul imi aprtine. El s-a distribuit gratis dar acum nimeni nu-l mai poate avea deoarece nu se distribuie in nici un fel). Aceasta emisiune a fost realizata la Radio Romania Muzical, emisiune care s-a transmis, la inceput in direct si mai apoi, pana in 2013 in reluare. In 2013 Radio Romania Muzical a pus 30 de episoade din cele 50 pe INTERNET (si le multumesc pentru acest lucru),la adresa: "Pe malurile Senei cu Dan Iagnov - Radio România Muzical". Va rog sa clicati in GOOGLE pe adresa si sa ascultati macar un episod. Am trecut aceasta adresa in pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia, nu ca reclama, ci ca multi ma intreaba unde pot sa asculte sau sa cumpere vreun CD cu aceasta frumoasa emisiune. Consider ca Radio Romania Muzical ne-a facut un cadou regal punand-o pe INTERNET. Asa ca eu le dau adresa. Nu este nici o neregula de vreme ce ei au pus-o pe INTERNET. Si ca sa imi fie mie mai usor am considerat ca e mai bine sa citeasca pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia si in felul acesta sa afle si de emisiunaea "Pe malurile Senei" si alte informatii, respectiv ca cele 2 CD-uri "Si gandurile plang si lacrimile dor DAN IAGNOV" si "LOUISAMOUR Luiza Cioca/Dan Iagnov" eu le distribui gratis. Va rog sa lasati pozele in pagina pentru ca nu exista nici un dubiu de pagiat, de fals sau altceva. In alta ordine de idei, dumneavoastra care aveti simtul esteticii (vad pozele frumoase pe care le faceti, mult high quality sau valuables) dar imi uratiti mie pagina. Daca ati scos pozele de la CD-ul LOUISAMOUR Luiza Cioca/Dan Iagnov" de ce nu scoateti si carapacea goala?. Pagina pare foarte inestetica. Eu am scos aceste carapace dar dumneavoastra le-ati pus la loc. Mie pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia mi se pare foarte frumoasa asa cum am facut-o eu Si corecta. Sper ca v-am dat toate lamuririle. Cu stima pentru frumoasele poze pe care le realizatt Mirela Britchi--Britchi Mirela (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


Transmission icon.png Unelte şi sfaturi
  • Puteţi adăuga formate Babel în pagina dumneavoastră personală pentru ca ceilalţi utilizatori să ştie ce limbi vorbiţi.
  • Toate informaţiile despre fişierele încărcate de dumneavoastră se găsesc aici.
  • Vă rugăm să semnaţi mesajele din paginile de discuţii prin tastarea ~~~~
  • Utilizaţi unealta CommonSense pentru a găsi categoria potrivită pentru fişierele dumneavoastră.
  • Pentru a crea o legătură către un fişier, tastaţi : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], ceea ce dă : Image:Foo.jpg
  • Dacă doriţi să importaţi fişiere dintr-un alt proiect, utilizaţi unealta specializată.
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png În cazul în care aţi făcut o eroare:
  • Doriţi să redenumiţi un fişier? Încărcaţi noul fişier şi adăugaţi în vechiul formatul: {{bad name|NOUL NUME CORECT}}
  • Pentru mai multe informaţi citiţi regulile de ştergere
(P.S. Puteţi trimite o critică sau un comentariu despre acest mesaj de bunvenit)

Sdrtirs (talk) 09:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Andrei Stroe!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 9980292bd45b7466534f77f944d5ffe7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File source is not properly indicated: File:T-55_kosovo.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-55_kosovo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:T-55_kosovo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Bradentonpic1.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bradentonpic1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

Sighisoara - covered staircase - inside view.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sighisoara - covered staircase - inside view.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sighisoara - covered staircase - inside view.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sinaia steam engine 230039 cropped.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinaia steam engine 230039 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category moves[edit]

Hello. Regarding your category move request, how would you feel about leaving off "The"? I don't think many of our category names begin with "The". Wknight94 talk 16:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

The wooden church[edit]

Hallo, I don't think that "The wooden church in xxx" is a correct syntax (only "the" is too much, the rest is excellent). It is "Roman bridge in xxx", "Stone church in yyy", ""ANcient Greek ...", "Gothic church in ...", "City hall ..." ...--Foroa (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

OK.—Andrei S. Talk 17:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Te rog, la încărcarea automată a imaginilor cu biserici de lemn să adaugi şi categoria "wooden church in ..., ...", vezi exemplul recent al bisericii de lemn din Tătărăşti un am adăugat manual a doua categorie, "Category:Wooden church in Tătărăşti, Hunedoara".Albabos (talk) 06:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO BZ Palat Comunal frontal straight cloudy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO BZ Palat Comunal frontal straight cloudy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


File:ChicagoThomasPainewikiMontage.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ChicagoThomasPainewikiMontage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

re: Romanian language upload form[edit]

Hi Andrei, I am no longer an admin, so I'm afraid you will need to find someone else to help you with the localisation. You could post a message at COM:AN? cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 08:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Orthetrum cancellatum steel pole.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata steel pole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

OI nominations[edit]

Hi, Andrei Stroe!

Please, add an original user name in QI nominations. It is now fixed.
You can see it as examples. Thanks.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO IF Mogosoaia Palace watchtower 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO IF Mogosoaia Palace watchtower 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO VN Marasesti mausoleum 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO VN Marasesti mausoleum 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Offf, andrei[edit]

Pînă și aici am probleme cu fișierele frate! De ce ai șters-o? --Ervin C. (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

File:RO VL DN7A road 2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Bildbeschreibung[edit]

Hallo Andrei Stroe, wollte von Mircea Țetcu gerade einige Bilder vom Transfăgărăşan hochladen; dabei habe ich gerade gesehen, dass Du es schon getan hast. Ich werde diese (einige) noch beschreiben. Grüße, --Stoschmidt (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Traducere: Descriere de imagini,

Bună seara Andrei Stroie, chiar vroiam să încarc unele imagini de pe Transfăgărăşan de la Mircea Ţetcu, cînd am văzut că d-voastră faceţi asta. Unele din ele am să le descriu şi pe germană. Cam asta a fost scrisul meu în germană, sorry! Numai bine, salutări --Stoschmidt (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO SB Transfagarasan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SB Transfagarasan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

User:Andrebot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll put it to good use.—Andrei S. Talk 16:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Perspective correction[edit]

Hi, your current quality image nomination has been declined due to perspective distortion. Do you know how to correct it? If not I could create a corrected version and upload it. In my view your image is otherwise interesting and QI-worthy. Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 07:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I can try to correct it, I've done it before. However, I don't have time to tinker with it until tonight or tomorrow night, so if you think you can do it sooner, please do. Thanks for the message.—Andrei S. Talk 07:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done and moved to /Discuss. Regards from Berlin. --Iotatau (talk) 08:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO DB Targoviste metropolitan church 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO DB Targoviste metropolitan church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO DB Metropolitan church bell tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO DB Metropolitan church bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO DB Chindia Tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO DB Chindia Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Arieşeni, Alba[edit]

Buna ziua Andrei Stroie, ai deschis inca o categorie la Commons pentru Arieşeni, Alba. Aceasta nu ar fi fost nevoie, pentru ca din 2007 a existat deja categoria Arieşeni. Poate le-poti aduna. Salutari, --Stoschmidt (talk) 20:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Hanescu Davis Cup.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Hanescu Davis Cup.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO B Stakhovsky Davis Cup.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Stakhovsky Davis Cup.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Kretzulescu church 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Kretzulescu church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dolyna.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dolyna2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vagon_zluky.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vagon_zluky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vagon_zluky.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Глиняни._Костел_Святого_Духа.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Глиняни._Костел_Святого_Духа.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Глиняни._Церква_УСПІННЯ_ПР._БОГОРОДИЦІ.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Глиняни._Церква_УСПІННЯ_ПР._БОГОРОДИЦІ.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna3.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna3.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna4.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna5.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna5.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Diagrams of route signs in Romania[edit]

Hi Andrei, I would like to ask whether I can substitue the your diagrams of road numbers in Romania with the diagrams with correct font (SNV) - which is used in Romanian signage. Thanks for reply. --Rl91 (talk) 15:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure you can. I couldn't find the exact font at the time. Also, if you would like to redo them, maybe you'll also make the letter smaller (for roads such as 1B), as the Romanian signage is made.—Andrei S. Talk 11:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for permission :)--Rl91 (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PL DW Wroclaw town hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PL DW Wroclaw town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

CZ Prague funicular.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CZ Prague funicular.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

HU Budapest Parliament.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HU Budapest Parliament.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Libellula quadrimaculata steel pole.jpg[edit]

Hi, this QI of yours doesn't show Libellula quadrimaculata but a different species, probably Orthetrum cancellatum. Could you please check/correct this? Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

If you believe the species is different, you can change it, I don't mind.—Andrei S. Talk 14:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
It is your responsibility to make sure the species is correct, especially since this one is supposed to be a quality image. I cannot surely identify the species from this angle since I am no expert for the dragonflies of Romania. But I can say for sure that this is not L. quadrimaculata since it shows only one spot per wing (compare Libellula quadrimaculata). Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction, I asked for a second opinion and this is indeed probably an aged female of Orthetrum cancellatum. I requested a rename of the file. Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO SV Vatra Dornei railway station 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SV Vatra Dornei railway station 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Cornelchiriac.jpg[edit]

also, wie beim bild beschrieben, von WP.ru- über die dortigen lizenzen kann ich nat. gar nix sagen..., wäre schade, wenn´s bild weg wäre!gruß,--Hungchaka (Diskussion) 17:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC),--Hungchaka (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File:PL_DW_Wroclaw_cathedral_1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PL_DW_Wroclaw_cathedral_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Łukasz Łoziński (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B triumphal arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category names[edit]

Hi Andrei! Please look around before you create a new category! „Chimindia“, „Hărău“, „Brănișca“, „Baia de Criș“ had already existed. There is no real need to add „Hunedoara“, these locality names being unique, but now you created duplicates... --Oguszt (talk) 00:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO GR Comana monastery church 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO GR Comana monastery church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO SB Balea cabin clouds 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SB Balea cabin clouds 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renaming of "File:Bistriţa River in Colibita.jpg"[edit]

Hi. You have asked for "File:Bistriţa River in Colibita.jpg" to be renamed to remove the diacritical because it is causing some sort of problem at ro.wikipedia. Can you be more specific about the problem? Other language projects do not seem to be having a problem, and it is better for file names to be as accurate as possible. — Cheers, JackLee talk 05:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi. At ro.wp, so far, we've been using the diacritical characters ş and ţ instead of the Romanian ș and ț due to missing font support. Right now, we are switching back and every character in every page is automatically switched between the former set of characters to the latter, unless surrounded by <span lang="tr"></span>. This has an impact on some images that contain these diacriticals in the file name, as they cannot be used in pages. The file whose rename I requested has already been uploaded back to ro.wp as a workaround.—Andrei S. Talk 20:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I see. Would you like me to rename the file using "ţ" (which I presume is "t" with a cedilla), or just remove the diacriticals altogether? — Cheers, JackLee talk 08:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
For sake of simplicity, removing the diacritics altogether would be great. I do that with all the files I transfer to Commons from ro.wp without much loss of file name descriptivity.—Andrei S. Talk 08:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done. Thanks for your input. — Cheers, JackLee talk 19:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO AG Mateias mausoleum 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO AG Mateias mausoleum 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Sanja_papic.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sanja_papic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

rugaminte[edit]

Buna ziua Am o intrebare legata de una dintre imaginile Dvs, va rog sa-mi spuneti o adresa de mail unde va pot contacta, sau scrieti-mi pe adresa design@edituragama.ro Va multumesc

Dacă e vorba de o imagine a mea de aici, îmi puteţi scrie chiar în această pagină. Dacă sunt chestiuni confidenţiale, vă rog să vă creaţi un cont şi să scrieţi un e-mail folosind linkul din stânga paginii („E-mail this user”). Dacă doriţi să folosiţi o imagine de a mea într-o lucrare, o puteţi face fără probleme în condiţiile licenţei (să scrieţi cine este autorul şi, chiar dacă o modificaţi, să o puneţi la dispoziţie sub aceeaşi licenţă - CC-BY-SA).—Andrei S. Talk 12:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

PI memorization[edit]

Andrei:

I have an edit I'd like to make to the table you submitted to wikipedia about PI memorization history. It's not clear to me how to proceed. Can you give me any advice on who to talk to, or how to submit an edit and information?

Regards, Brian iiyt@comcast.net Iiyt (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure what edit you're talking about exactly. For hints about editing Wikipedia, see en:Wikipedia:How to edit a page.—Andrei S. Talk 12:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The graphs and data at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PiDigits.svg were transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by User:Andrei Stroe using CommonsHelper. There also appears to be a bot that is keeping several sites synced. So, it's not clear to me where I should make the change -- wikipedia, wikicommons, some other database elsewhere, or all of the above. I was the record holder at date 1973.75, at 956 digits, and I'd like to get that event recorded in the public domain. Thank you for your continued advice / assistance. <brian

75.71.122.105 21:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Salut![edit]

Te-am propus ca administrator pe commons aici. Consider că meriţi, eşti destul de ocupat cu ro.wp, însă sunt sigur că-ţi vei putea face treaba şi aici. Io zic să accepţi. Baftă :) Memo18 (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B male and female duck in Titan Park 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B male and female duck in Titan Park 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO OT Slatina St Nic church 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO OT Slatina St Nic church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO OT Slatina center from Gradiste hill 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO OT Slatina center from Gradiste hill 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO OT Slatina bridge over Olt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO OT Slatina bridge over Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

andrebot[edit]

Hi, please check andrebot. As can be seen in File:RO MM Ruscova 3.jpg, it often inserts sequences like |}[[Category:Ruscova, Maramureş]], which makes in many cases that the category is not properly interpreted. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 08:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll look into it, but this image seems ok. Is there any example where the sequence is actually badly interpreted? |} is the end of the ro.wp contributions list. Maybe I should add some newlines in between, and I will, but other than that I don't see the problem.—Andrei S. Talk 08:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
It has probably more to do with the bad interpretation of the categorisation bot. Plenty of examples in Special:Contributions/Haros but I guess that it is related equally to categorisation bot that since a couple of weeks don't count non existing cats anymore as valid categories. To add to the confusion, several "non existing" categories do exist now as they pop up in Special:WantedCategories and get created soon. Anyway, an additional new line before the category would not harm I guess. --Foroa (talk) 09:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO IF Pantelimon Lebada restaurant.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO IF Pantelimon Lebada restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Problem[edit]

I-am scis un mesaj lui Strainu pe ro, poate poţi rezolva tu. Cezarika1 (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Photos from Romania[edit]

Hi Andrei, I see that you are taking many photos in Bucharest, and I was hoping you may be in the position to be able to help with getting photos from Romania as outlined at en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Romania - basically the Russian embassy in Bucharest, and the Russian consulate in Constanta - if you know of anyone in Constanta I could approach for assistance, I'd be most appreciative. Cheers, russavia (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

I know where the Russian embassy in Bucharest is and I'll keep your request in mind. In the next week I'll try to go there and snap some photos of some historic buildings in the area, including the embassy (I hope they will let me). About Constanţa, I'm not sure, but you can ask at the Village Pump from ro.wp.—Andrei S. Talk 08:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PL GMB Malbork castle Water gate.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PL GMB Malbork castle .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO GJ Tg Jiu Holy Voivods church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO GJ Tg Jiu Holy Voivods church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re: Monument tag[edit]

Foto is in Category:Malbork Castle and there is a Template: {{zabytek}}. Bartek444 (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Patriarchy belfry.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Patriarchy belfry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Bucur church 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Bucur church 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EE HJ Tallinn St Nicholas church 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn St Nicholas church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

EE HJ Tallinn city walls towers 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn city walls towers 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO CL Plataresti monastery church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO CL Plataresti monastery church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hala Traian[edit]

Hello! Regarding the category of File:Hala Traian (1).jpg, I'm not sure if it's correct to include it in the Markets in Bucharest category. It's true that it used to be a market, but now it is only a Mega Image store. Razvan Socol (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

It's fine by me if you want another category. I was just trying to clean up an overcrowded category (Category:Buildings in Bucharest).—Andrei S. Talk 17:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PL DW old city hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PL DW old city hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO BZ Pietroasele winemaking research center 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO BZ Pietroasele winemaking research center 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Stavropoleos church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Stavropoleos church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO BZ Courthouse 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO BZ Courthouse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EE HJ Tallinn Orthodox St. Nicholas church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn Orthodox St. Nicholas church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

BG TX Balchik queen Maria castle 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BG TX Balchik queen Maria castle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

PL KR Wawel thieves tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PL KR Wawel thieves tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Andrei Stroe,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

rotation tag at File:Manastirea Rameti vara 4.jpg[edit]

Hallo Andrei Stroe, you rotation tag at File:Manastirea Rameti vara 4.jpg was incorrect. Please always specify the rotation based on the thumbnails and/or try to use the RotateLink.

By the way: the RotateLink gadget can be translated to Romanian - would you like to help? :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Great, thank you! :-) Is "imagini cerere de rotaţie" correct? Or do you have a better translation for the label/link text: "request rotation"? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:58, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
It should be "Cerere de rotaţie a imaginii" or better just "Cerere de rotaţie".—Andrei S. Talk 07:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! - I have updated it to Cerere de rotaţie. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 18:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Village museum Dumbraveni homestead 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Village museum Dumbraveni homestead 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO B Patriarchy belfry 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO B Patriarchy belfry 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:Uwlsubst/ro[edit]

Hallo Andrei Stroe, thanks for translating Template:Uwlsubst/ro! A question: Did you intentionally not link Commons:Marcaje pentru drepturi de autor instead of Commons:Copyright tags? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

No, but I'm not sure which would be best. The English language list is far more comprehensive.—Andrei S. Talk 16:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, okay. Then maybe the English is better. The Romanian version is linked at top anyway. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC) PS: no talkback please :)

File:An-124 a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa.jpg[edit]

Hallo Andrei Stroe, can you help me? Does the text at File:An-124 a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa.jpg "An-124 la Platforma avioane grele a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa - Aurel Vlaicu în data de 02.02.2007, poza realizatǎ imediat dupǎ parcarea aeronavei, asteptându-se incarcarea aeronavei LearJet." mean that it is Self-photographed / Own work? I was a bit too fast in transferring it to Commons - I thought I have found a upload by the same user with the same camera (according to EXIF) from a different place but it turned out to be the same place so he simply could have downloaded three images from one source in the internet. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

It means "An-124 at the heavy airship platform of the Bucharest-Băneasa Aurel Vlaicu International Airport on 02/02/2007, picture taken immediately after the airship was parked, waiting to load the LearJet airship." It is implied, apparently, that it was self-taken, but not explicitly stated.—Andrei S. Talk 09:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I think it is assumable then - also was uploaded only 18 days after capture (according to EXIF). However he uploaded also many files which were not by him... What is your feeling? Thanks for your help! --Saibo (Δ) 14:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
My feeling is he didn't know he was supposed to state explicitly that the image was taken by him (it was a dark time in the ro.wp image management). He's providing enough detail as to the circumstances the image was taken to lead me to believe it's his own. Since the image doesn't appear to be taken from anywhere else, I think it's safe to be kept.—Andrei S. Talk 16:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thank you very much for your comment, Andrei! File:Aerogara_Baneasa_fata.jpg and File:Aerogara_Baneasa.jpg were taken (apparently) with the same camera but some month earlier. Yes, think it is assumable unless there is any other spark of something to the contrary. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:PaoloBorsellino.jpg[edit]

Hi Andrei. Would you be so kind to look at File:PaoloBorsellino.jpg and see if you can find further information. At this stage it is more likely to be deleted due to it not being demonstrated as being pre 1976. That being the case, you may look to having the photo undeleted at itWP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coa Amara IL RO.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coa Amara IL RO.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Prof. Professorson (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

File:RO_GJ_Tg_Jiu_Endless_Column_park.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO_GJ_Tg_Jiu_Endless_Column_park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:105_Red_Army_soldiers_in_Bucharest_1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:105_Red_Army_soldiers_in_Bucharest_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Fotografie [[File:PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg|PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg]‎]

Draga Andrei,

In primul rand eu sunt nou pe Wiki. Daca am gresit te rog sa ma ajuti ca sa remediem situatia.

Lucrurile au stat in felul urmator:

1. Am gasit poza pe: http://www.basilica.ro/ro/stiri/ps_corneliu_episcopul_husilor_la_11_ani_de_arhierie_9174.html 2. Am modificat-o in Photoshop, pastrandu-l doar pe Episcopul Corneliu. 3. Atata timp cat El este o persoana publica si faptul ca am modificat-o, consider ca sunt autorul acestei noi opere. Este foarte posibil sa gresesc.

Daca incalca drepturile de autor, crezi ca putem modifica licentierea? Eu nu stiu cum sa o fac. Te rog sa ma ajuti. --Seminarx (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Prin modificarea imaginii, se obţine o operă derivată. Drepturile de autor în cazul operelor derivate sunt împărţite de autorii modificărilor şi de cei ai operei iniţiale, indiferent ce reprezintă ele. O operă derivată nu poate fi liberă decât dacă toţi autorii consimt la aceasta. Singura modificare ce ar putea duce la păstrarea ei ar fi o dovadă clară că autorii ei au publicat-o sub o licenţă liberă.—Andrei S. Talk 14:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Ca sa dovedesc acest lucru, cred ca ar trebui sa ma adresez site-ului Basilica.ro si sa-i intreb daca au publicat-o sub licenta libera, fara drept de autor. Corect? Si daca am raspunsul lor scris as putea sa il postez aici sau sa va trimita un mail? --Seminarx (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Da. Aveţi instrucţiuni la commons:OTRS, inclusiv adresa la care trebuie trimis răspunsul şi ce trebuie să conţină - anume o declaraţie explicită din care rezultă că respectiva persoană a înţeles ce înseamnă o licenţă liberă (anume, că oricine poate folosi imaginea respectivă în orice scop, inclusiv cel comercial, şi că poate realiza şi opere derivate care să fie publicate sub o licenţă similară) şi că acceptă publicarea sub această licenţă.—Andrei S. Talk 15:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit]

Salut!


Intradevar acest logo are copyright, dar am drepturi pe el.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Logo_-_Festivalul_Ecoul_Pietrei_Craiului.jpg

Cum pot dovedi acest lucru, cat ami simplu ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Creat2010 (talk • contribs)

Dacă sunteţi sigur că vreţi să-l publicaţi sub o licenţă liberă, trimiteţi un e-mail, de pe o adresă direct asociată entităţii pe care o reprezintă, conform instrucţiunilor de la Commons:OTRS. Adăugaţi {{OTRS pending}} pe imagine şi lăsaţi o notă şi la propunerea de ştergere, ca să se ştie.—Andrei S. Talk 10:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Intrebare copyright[edit]

Buna ziua

Reprezint o firma mica din Romania care produce (in scop comercial) magneti turistici. Am folosit imaginea "http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:RO_B_triumphal_arch.jpg" intr-um montaj. La un numar de magneti am uitat sa adaugam autorii fotografiilor (printre care se afla si poza "http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:RO_B_triumphal_arch.jpg"). Putem sa vindem magnetii la care am uitat sa adaugam sursa foto?

Multumesc O zi buna— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan P BP (talk • contribs)

Dacă numărul celor fără autor specificat este puţin semnificativ în raport cu numărul celor la care este specificat (să zicem, cel mult 1:3), din partea mea îi puteţi comercializa şi pe cei fără autor specificat.—Andrei S. Talk 09:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


Va multumesc


Buna ziua

Va deranjez din nou cu o clarificare in legatura cu nespecificarea autorului pe magnetii turistici. Nu mai colaborez cu acea firma, insa la data la care am incetat colaborarea, numarul magnetilor vanduti fara sursa foto era de aproximativ 400, iar al celor cu sursa foto era de doar aproximativ 120. Cei fara sursa au fost facuti in graba si vanduti cu ocazia finalei UEFA Europa League. Initial am mizat pe faptul ca voi colabora pe termen lung cu firma respectiva si vom vinde mult mai multi in continuare. Sa imi spuneti daca aveti vreo pretentie materiala.

Multumesc O zi buna— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan P BP (talk • contribs)

Nu, nu am niciuna.—Andrei S. Talk 12:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Multumesc— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.156.140.4 (talk • contribs)

File:Terry riley.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Terry riley.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:PragueSpring.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PragueSpring.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:PragueSpring.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Bz nicu constantinescu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bz nicu constantinescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 09:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Simoneweil.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Simoneweil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Widerborst (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:RO B triumphal arch.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO B triumphal arch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

128.250.5.245 07:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Palatul Navigatiei.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Palatul Navigatiei.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

128.250.5.245 07:57, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:RO SM Satu Mare city hall.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO SM Satu Mare city hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

128.250.5.250 04:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Andrei Stroe,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 19:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Polarlys (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs[edit]

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:GreecefightsonBig.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GreecefightsonBig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Map of RDM-1917.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

DR restart[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I restarted your DR, since you hadn't informed the user of its existence --Vera (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

File:RO HR Odorheiu Secuiesc szekler heroes monument.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO HR Odorheiu Secuiesc szekler heroes monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Majic6.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Majic6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mj12hoaxwriter (talk) 00:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 16:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors[edit]

See User_talk:Strainu#Category:Pages_using_Information_template_with_syntax_errors. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Budva-Muntenegru-„Balerina” si Orasul vechi vazute dinspre plaja Mogren.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Budva-Muntenegru-„Balerina” si Orasul vechi vazute dinspre plaja Mogren.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:42 (UTC) 22:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Palatul Elisabeta din Bucuresti vazut peste gardul ce-l desparte de Muzeul Satului..jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Palatul Elisabeta din Bucuresti vazut peste gardul ce-l desparte de Muzeul Satului..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:46 (UTC) 22:46, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Mausoleul din Parcul Carol cu hemiciclul-panorama.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mausoleul din Parcul Carol cu hemiciclul-panorama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:52 (UTC) 22:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Constantin I. Istrati - Parcul Carol-2013-cod LMI B-III-m-B-20007.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Constantin I. Istrati - Parcul Carol-2013-cod LMI B-III-m-B-20007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Friday, 22 November 2013 11:55 (UTC) 11:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Bucharest Geology Museum.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bucharest Geology Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Friday, 22 November 2013 13:10 (UTC) 13:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Andrei Stroe,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:RO BH Oradea Ady Endre statue.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO BH Oradea Ady Endre statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Aurel Lazar.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aurel Lazar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:RO B city hall.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RO B city hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pol 01 facultate.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pol 01 facultate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Andrei Stroe,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo


File:Dragan Djilas 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dragan Djilas 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 09:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fridtjof Nansen Berlin NH.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fridtjof Nansen Berlin NH.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fridtjof Nansen Berlin NH.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TLSuda (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Multumesc[edit]

Legea este interpretabila,trebuie inregistrata,platesti anual taxa ca la masina,in plus ei iti vor monta un chip ca sa stie in permanenta unde te afli cu drona.dar nu este o lege finalizata.Riscul de a te amenda este foarte mare! Sper ca am te-am ajutat!

Commons bot inactivity[edit]

Hello! Your bot User:Andrebot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Andrei Stroe. You have new messages at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_uploaded_by_Mmoru.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Stergere fisier[edit]

Draga Andrei, te rog sa initiezi si procedura pentru stergerea fisierului File:ROU CJ Cluj-Napoca CoA.png, din aceleasi motive ca cele care au stat la baza fisierului similar in format .gif. Multumesc! --Mihai Andrei (talk) 22:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Bz monument 1907.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bz monument 1907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 14:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO BZ Chiojdu blazons house 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO BZ Chiojdu blazons house 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO SB Council tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SB Council tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO BZ Fundeni Marghiloman mansion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO BZ Fundeni Marghiloman mansion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO SB Bridge of Lies 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SB Bridge of Lies 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RO VL Ramnic All Saints church 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO VL Ramnic All Saints church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Removal[edit]

Are you sure about this one? A number of over 150 individual graves are also listed as monuments in the list, not just the cemetery as a whole. Salutări, --Mihai (talk) 03:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quite sure. It's an ensemble, of which each tomb is an element. It's the same categorization decision as for the subcategories of Category:Alba Iulia Fortress or Category:Princely Court in Curtea de Argeș. The subcategories are already in the historical monuments tree by being a part of the larger site and should not be placed in the level above.
It's particularly important for the Bucharest category, which is terribly overcrowded and should be somehow broken down (I don't know how, yet).—Andrei S. Talk 12:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, but by this line of reasoning the graves of Adrian Păunescu or V. Tudor — to name but a few recent ones — would also be historical monuments, which I doubt. If the Commission had intended that, they probably wouldn't have bothered to list the individual ones. If overcrowding is a problem, we might create a subcat titled Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest--Mihai (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, they are not historical monuments by themselves, but they are part of one, so I wouldn't go out of my way to try to remove images of tombs in Bellu that are not historical monuments themselves from the historical monuments tree. A different example would be the Dumbrava cemetery in Buzău: only a few elements are listed as historical monuments, while the cemetery in its entirety is not, so the Dumbrava cemetery category should not be in the tree.
Or, we could categorize everything in Bellu that is not a historical monument under a subcategory of Bellu cemetery dedicated to tombs not listed as historical monuments themselves. But I still think they should be in the tree while the entire cemetery is listed.—Andrei S. Talk 15:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I totally agree that every picture of the cemetery should also remain in the tree, as a member of the Bellu Cemetery category. In order not to overcrowd Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, what would you think of the option to file Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery both under Category:Bellu Cemetery and Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, while keeping them close to each other by using the same sorting key? That would surely be a bit redundant, but it would highlight the individual ones while not overcrowding the Bucharest category.--Mihai (talk) 16:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
For now, I'm organizing the counties' categories, hopefully collecting wisdom about how to organize Bucharest's category, so I don't have an opinion for now.—Andrei S. Talk 06:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Emilian_of_Durostorum_church_in_Ogrezeni,_Giurgiu[edit]

Ai amestecat mai multe biserici aici. Cea din Obedeni are hramul Sf. Nicolae, Sf. Dimitrie și Cuvioasa Paraschiva. [1]--Strainu (talk) 09:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Brașov Fortress & friends[edit]

Categoria Category:Brașov Fortress e folosită pentru Cetățuie, iar tu ai creat cateogrii pentru fortificațiile orașului de tipul Category:South-West side of Brașov Fortress. Cred că ar trebui ceva de tipul Category:South-West side of Brașov city walls--Strainu (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Oricum va trebui să revizitez, dar dacă crezi că e o greșeală evidentă, poți corecta.—Andrei S. Talk 08:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team![edit]

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Conacul Procopie Casota 4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Procopie Casota mansion in Casota, Buzău County, Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RO SB Lutsch house.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RO SB Lutsch house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File renaming[edit]

Hi Andrei Stroe, is there a specifici reason why you want images to be renamed with files like this, this or this to commence with RO NT? Thank you for your time. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 13:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

All my location-relevant images (except some of my old uploads) are named using this convention: <country code> <administrative unit code> <settlement> <description in English>. I'm trying to unify those few from the old days with the ones here. The one you're asking about also has the description in Romanian, so all the more reason for me to move it to the new style. Here, RO is the country (Romania), NT is the county (Neamț) and Roman is the settlement.—Andrei S. Talk 13:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Yordan Stratiev.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yordan Stratiev.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Saint Nicholas' Orthodox church in Mănăstirea, Cluj[edit]

Hi! It seems to me that in the Category:Saint Nicholas' Orthodox church in Mănăstirea, Cluj the photos of two different churches are mixed. One has the code CJ-II-m-B-07702 (Saint Nicholas) and the other CJ-II-m-B-07703 (Holy Cross). Could you separate them? --Hkoala (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll look.—Andrei S. Talk 14:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Muntii John Crow.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Muntii John Crow.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 7 March 2016 17:34 (UTC) 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Muntii Albastri 2.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Muntii Albastri 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 7 March 2016 17:34 (UTC) 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Salut[edit]

Am încercat să o încadrez ca logo, dar spunea ceva cu ștergere rapidă. Cum fac să apară ca logo legitim, cu tot cu justificare UC Logo? Corvin Victor Paul (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Doar dacă logoul este liber (autorul l-a eliberat, drepturile de autor au expirat sau este unul foarte simplu) poate fi păstrat la Commons, vedeți Commons:Licențiere.—Andrei S. Talk 09:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Salut, Andrei! Te rog să arunci o privire aici: [2]. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Coperta albumului Târziu cu autograf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests[edit]

I have scanned my own CD cover, it contains also the autograph of the author, I am the legal representative of Emeric Imre and I am authorised to use the image of his album covers. The copyright of the cover of the album belongs to Emeric Imre that entitles me to use it on wikipedia. If you need an official paper to solve this copyright warning that never cease I can deliver you from this official facebook page https://www.facebook.com/emericimreofficial/ that I manage or by mail at emericfolk at gmail.com with the condition not to distribute the documents.

Liancu (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please state this in an OTRS message sent from an address that can be linked with Emeric Imre.—Andrei S. Talk 13:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

OTRS? sincer nu vreau sa fiu admin wiki ca sa inteleg toate sistemele alambicate prin care mesajele si drepturile de autor pot si dovedite. Aveti niste sisteme care nu sunt user friendly si trebuie sa fii iesit de la Oxford & Yale & Cambridge ca sa pricepa omu' ceva. V-am propus un raspuns pe mail, facebook chiar si telefon cu posesorul drepturilor de autor mai mult nu am timp sa fac. Fac de 30 de ani sisteme informatice da unu' asa de rau facut asa de NU user friendly pentru editori nu am vazut. Probabil ca o sa piara si asta cu timpul din cauza "complicatimii" sale. Ciao --Liancu (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Nu văd ce e așa de complicat; dumneavoastră trebuie doar să trimiteți un e-mail. Dedesubturile OTRS-ului poate sunt complicate, dar doar voluntarii care-l folosesc se confruntă cu ele. —Andrei S. Talk 15:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Iarna mea cu ochii mari scanat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion request[edit]

I have scanned my own CD cover, I am the legal representative of Emeric Imre and I am authorised to use the image of his album covers. The copyright of the cover of the album belongs to Emeric Imre that entitles me to use it on wikipedia. If you need an official paper to solve this copyright warning that never cease I can deliver you from this official facebook page https://www.facebook.com/emericimreofficial/ that I manage or by mail: emericfolk at gmail.com with the condition not to distribute the documents

Liancu (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)