User talk:Ankara/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ankara!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Strandvägenvinter[edit]

Good morning,

Very beautiful picture!

Sincerely

Jpbazard, France

Thank You! (sorry i didnt see you message before). Best Regards, --Ankara (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Ankara/Archive!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Hasselbygard.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Hoteldesuede6.jpg[edit]

File deletion warning File:Hoteldesuede6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eusebius (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Parkeringshus Dockan.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Fasaddetalj.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Bohlin high.tiff has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 11:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Re File:FitzRoyfromtheroad.JPG[edit]

Hello Ankara. I just wanted to say that this is a good photo, in both edits, but with a small camera you will almost never achieve a photo sharp enough for Featured Picture. The lens is not sharp enough. Also, you should always use a photo-editor on your images to ensure you have the full range of black to white (use the histogram), to ensure you obtain the colors you want, and to sharpen the image. I sympathize because I had a small camera and I was always frustrated by the quality. Downtowngal (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bohlin.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bohlin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Nagy 15:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Que? I have provided a " link to an appropriate webpage with license information".--Ankara (talk) 16:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Alvikstorg.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ST ERIk 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST ERIk 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Djurgårdsbrunnsviken.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsbrunnsviken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Tack you[edit]

Tack för nomineringarna av bilderna inifrån Vasa. Dom är ju rätt unika men jag trodde inte att dom skulle betraktas som tillräckligt intressanta för QI.

Peter Isotalo 13:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Jag råkade titta på bilderna du tagit från Vasa, vilket arbete du lade ned med att ta och ladda upp alla dessa bilder! Jag tycker kvalitén är imponerande, i synnerhet med tanke på kameran och förhållandena. Kul att de klarade bedömningen. --Ankara (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Tack för uppskattningen. Jag gick, satt, klättrade och krälade runt i nästan två timmar för att få dom där bilderna. Kul men rätt ansträngande.
Intressanta kanske var fel ord när jag tänker efter eftersom det är väldigt intressant med fria bilder inifrån Vasa. Snarare var jag övertygad om att den tekniska kvaliteten skulle underkänna dom oavsett hur unika dom var; jag är inte någon stjärnfotograf, min kamera är rätt kackig och jag är inte särskilt kunnig vad gäller att bedöma hur bra ett foto är. Det finns ju i så fall fler bilder som jag tog som skulle kunna vara rätt intressanta. Jag tänker främst på bilderna på ankarbetingen (anchor bitts) och från hålskeppet (hold).
Fast med tanke på hur lite jag kan om bildbedömning så tänker jag nog undvika att nominera något på egen hand...
Peter Isotalo 22:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PuntaTombo2007c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PuntaTombo2007c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Rosenborgshuset.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AlbergetPanorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AlbergetPanorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Kvarteret Gråmunkeholmen[edit]

Hej Jag hittade en tom kategori som du skapade. Har kategorin råkat tömmas av misstag, eller är det en överbliven kategori som kan anmälas till snabbradering? /Ö 13:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Det är en felaktig namngiven kategori som jag skapade av misstag och missat att lägga in begäran om snabbradering på. --Ankara (talk) 20:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

FishinginSarıyer3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FishinginSarıyer3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kanlica.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanlica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hammarbysjöstadpanorama2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammarbysjöstadpanorama2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Mårtendal.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Djurgårdsvarvet2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Speedy versus Bad Name on Categori:Lindgården[edit]

By the way, I really like the panorama at the top of User:Ankara -- we've been to Stockholm twice and it's fun to see a different view. I also like File:Djurgårdsvarvet2010.jpg -- we've been there, by water, but not in winter....

I've made the same sort of mistake several times, so I learned the hard way -- please use {{bad name|Category:Lindgården}} when you need a naming mistake deleted. It saves the new page patroller (me, in this case) and the admin who does the deletion from having to figure out what happened.

You might also ask for autopatroller status on Commons. It does nothing for you, but saves others from having to patrol your work on Commons. Thanks, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 13:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the information and advice. Next time I will use Template:bad name. I have asked for autopatroller status. Best Regards, --Ankara (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Note that the template documentation says "This template should only be used for files" and the instructions in the template is specifically about files (CheckUsage and {{Universal replace}} does not work for non-files). /Ö 20:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
True, but as a practical matter it works fine for all Commons space, although it does render the name of the gallery or category a little strangely. I probably should have added that it should be used only when you have just created a badly named file, category, or gallery, realized it, and want to get rid of it quickly -- in that case (CheckUsage and {{Universal replace}} aren't needed. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 23:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Taynal Mosque2009a.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taynal mosque, Tripoli, Lebanon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Comment by Ottava Rima[edit]

If you try to re add a spoof comment to the top of that proposal, you will most likely be blocked. You do not have the right to add statements pretending to be Jimbo nor do you have the right to make such statements that are out of policy and bounds. Jimbo has the right to put forth such things with WMF approval, and you do not have the right to make attacks on it in such a manner. If you do not like it, complain on the talk page and do not stoop to vandalism, attacks, and now an attempt to edit war your attacks back in. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Que? --Ankara (talk) 18:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Ankara's signature is now appended to the comment. Which is entirely factual, as there is no consensus for the actions Jimbo is taking. Take your hyperbole elsewhere. Roux (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Consensus doesn't matter to be blunt (even though there is strong consensus and has been for a long time) - the core policies are determined by the WMF, and this is one of their actions. Posting your personal opinion on that page is the definition of vandalism. Remove it yourself or you will go the way of the last two people who tried to use the page for their political statements. This is highly inappropriate action. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
You treat a user with 17 000 edits on the Wikimedia projects as a vandal. You are terribly arrogant and rude and spreading false claims about me, I have never pretending to be Jimbo and i have never add a spoof comment. It is typical that you can not even distinguish the guidelines from and Jimbo. I did not edited in a text by Jimbo, but in a policy that everyone has the right to edit.--Ankara (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Ankara is clearly not a vandal; but a highly-trusted contributor. Please don't berate Commons editors this way. SJ+ 09:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Intresting to read this Edit Counter for Ottava Rima, Total editcount: 124. --Ankara (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Pejorative insults seem to be flung around very easily in emotional situations. Labeling others is something all people should strive to do conservatively if it be necessary at all. Ty (talk) 02:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Kategoeriseringar[edit]

Tack för att du har hjälpt mig att kategorisera "mina" bilder. /Fluff (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Det var så lite så. Det här är förresten en mycket fin bild File:100502_Göteborgshjulet1.jpg.--Ankara (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Nordiskamuseet.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nordiska museet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helags2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helags2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Järnia.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Järnia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?»ABF is back to cabale! 18:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS Polar Star1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Polar Star1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Helags2.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helags mountain, Sweden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Storskär2010d.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär2010d.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nordiskamuseet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordiskamuseet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hägerstensåsen2010d.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hägerstensåsen2010d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hägerstensåsen2010e.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hägerstensåsen2010e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Körsnär[edit]

I am waiting for a picture of a Swedish furrier's shop? ;-)
Do you have one for me? Maybe we can exchange, something from Düsseldorf to you ;-)

Greetings from Germany, the --Kürschner (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll see if I can find someone in Stockholm. There are not many left, animal rights activists make life hard for them. Best regards--Ankara (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Long live Wikipedia - thank you (you must document them, before the last one is mobbed. We come back again - sometime... [1] see here)!--Kürschner (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Degeln 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Degeln 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aspel3-5.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspel3-5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Danebrog and swedish orders[edit]

Thank you for answering. I hereby dedicate the following award to you for your kind explanation.Clin--Jebulon (talk) 23:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Friendly to Ankara
Thank you!--Ankara (talk) 10:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

PanoramafromTorkilstötenJune2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PanoramafromTorkilstötenJune2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Utö kyrka 2010e.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utö kyrka 2010e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Utö kyrka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utö kyrka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Vålåsjön2010.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Hagakyrkan 2010e.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


File:Hagakyrkan 2010.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


File:Göteborgs domkyrkan.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Staty Victor Hasseblad.JPG[edit]

Hello. As you can see, I've promoted your photo of the statue in QIC. I'm happy of that. This is only to make you notice a mistake in the name of your file. It is "HasseLblad", as you know, and not "Hasseblad" without L. It could be a problem for a future use (search by name ?) of this picture in projects...
Kind regards from Paris
--Jebulon (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks! I have asked for rename. Best Regards from Stockholm.--Ankara (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Victor Hasselblad.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Victor Hasselblad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Göteborgs domkyrka (Gothenburg Cathedral), Gothenburg, Sweden - 20100924.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göteborgs domkyrkan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Stigbergsliden september 2010d.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helags october 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helags october 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Amerikahuset september 2010b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stigbergsliden september 2010b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stigbergsliden september 2010b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stigbergsliden september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stigbergsliden september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Nösund september 2010b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skanskaskrapan september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skanskaskrapan september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Kvarteret Dihlströms september 2010.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eriksberg september 2010b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriksberg september 2010b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thamska huset.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thamska huset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sjömanskyrkan.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjömanskyrkan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sahlgrenska huset september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahlgrenska huset september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Homemade cloudberry jam.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cloudberry jam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Homemade cloudberry jam.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Homemade cloudberry jam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Eriophorum scheuchzeri in Ljungdalen Sweden september 2010.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Edshultshall panorama september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edshultshall panorama september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Makrill.JPG – nu förstår jag[edit]

Aha, nu förstår jag! Josve laddade upp en nedskalad version av bilden, som han sedan skalade upp vilket gör bilden till sämre kvalitét. Heymid (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Ja det blev nog lite fel för honom.--Ankara (talk) 21:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ms Ballerina.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ms Ballerina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helags Panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helags Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Elevator espiritu santu[edit]

Hello,

I'm working on a video for an exhibition of design in France about transport in cities, and I would like to use your videos, which permit a good point of view on the city. Would you allow me to use it? And if yes, do you want me to attribute you the work, and if yes, what is your name you want me to use?

Thanks a lot for your help, and sorry for my mistakes in english...

Alice.

Elevator espiritu santu[edit]

Hello,

I'm working on a video for an exhibition of design in France about transport in cities, and I would like to use your videos, which permit a good point of view on the city. Would you allow me to use it? And if yes, do you want me to attribute you the work, and if yes, what is your name you want me to use?

Thanks a lot for your help, and sorry for my mistakes in english...

Alice.

Hey Alice,
You are of course welcome to use the video. This video is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Please use my name here, Ankara. Best Regards--Ankara (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nacka strand september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nacka strand september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Typhon 16 November 2010c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typhon 16 November 2010c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lumafabriken november 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumafabriken november 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Park inn Hammarby Sjöstad.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stora tullhuset november 2010b.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora tullhuset november 2010b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kolingsborg from Katarinahissen September 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolingsborg from Katarinahissen September 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Vikdalen september 2010b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Riddarhuset november 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddarhuset november 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Juvelkvarnen september 2010b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juvelkvarnen september 2010b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ostindiska huset september 2010b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostindiska huset september 2010b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Norra Hamngatan 2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Norra Hamngatan 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hamngatan 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cityvarvet september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cityvarvet september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Danviks hospital december 2010b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kvarteret Dihlströms september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Dihlströms september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sergelgatan from Mäster Samuelsgatan september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sergelgatan from Mäster Samuelsgatan september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Instabil2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ulvsunda slott december 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulvsunda slott december 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lumakranen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumakranen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Happy New Year![edit]

Ankara, happy New 2011 Year! --Vizu (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Thansk! Happy new year!--Ankara (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Norra Hamngatan 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hamngatan 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Norra Hamngatan 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hamngatan 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torkilstöten Panorama October 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten Panorama October 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bankogatan from Axel Dahlströms torg september 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bankogatan from Axel Dahlströms torg september 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Norra Hamngatan 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hamngatan 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI: New version[edit]

Hello Ankara, there is a new version of the picture on the QIC. I think know that it is okey now. alofok* 20:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello,
It looks good now. Regards--Ankara (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Underneath the Tranebergsbron, Stockholm, Sweden - 20101212.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underneath the Tranebergsbron, Stockholm, Sweden - 20101212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


South Melbourne Townhall.jpg[edit]

Dear Ankara. I sincerely thank you for your finding and pointing out of my QI candidate image South Melbourne Townhall.jpg error. I would not find this incorrect blending of the stitched image by myself without your careful review/checking. Also this is a good point for me to learn in photograph, especially in the post photograph processing. Thanks again for your support. Donaldytong (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. Sincerely --Ankara (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Tyska bron september 2010c.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


File:Tyska bron september 2010b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

To complete my review[edit]

I would like to take the time to tell you some other things that, I hope, will make sure I get understood.

1) I love the mood that comes out of those old cameras. It is strong and full of life. I'm sure you made a very good purchase with this camera and that you will get marvelous results with it.

2) It's sad but people in QI images are a bit rough and I get influenced sometimes. But one thing is for sure: these people will go and look at pixels and size first, picture next. So noise is realy hard to pass. (Personaly, I have to downsize my pictures to get them trough so people won't look at pixels in a 15 megapixels picture) My guess is, unless if you get a picture in a perfect condition with a realy unsensitive film, you won't get a QI label with pictures from your Nikon FM. You'll have to be proud by yourself... By the way this one is great!

3) I've come to an understanding lately and I would like sharing it with you. It is fun to get a QI label, but the best part of what we do is to go out and have fun taking pictures! When I think that way, I get less frustrated when people tell me that I have 0.05% of pixels of my picture that are blown and therefore my picture isn't good.

So in the friendliest way, I hope you will continue your beautiful work and have fun with your new full frame! Take care, Letartean (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I understand, and you are absolutely right. Thanks again. I look forward to seeing more of your great pictures from Québec. Take care, --Ankara (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Makaronifabriken 2011b.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karlsbodavägen december 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlsbodavägen december 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.