User talk:Ankry

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives:


Marcin Bielski's "Prophetic rams in Cracow"[edit]

Wow, that was fast, Ankry. It would have taken me some hours to suss out, including these copyleft notices in metadata.

Bows, Zezen (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Bajki Fredry[edit]

Czy mogę prosić o ukrycie pełnej wersji? Obawiam się, że to będzie na razie 140 lat od daty wydania, bo nie znam daty śmierci ilustratora. Z góry bardzo dziękuję. Wieralee (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Wieralee: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[]

PD-Polish czy PD-Ukraine[edit]

Dzień dobry, użytkownik Alexkrakovsky wgrywa pliki (np. File:CDIAK 966-1-16. Heraldyka W.Wielądko.pdf, File:CDIAK 966-1-23. Skorowidze.pdf) w języku polskim z szablonem PD-Ukraine. Nie widzę daty powstania w tych plikach, ale ze stylu pisma na skanach wnioskuję, że są one bardzo stare, prawdopodobnie jeszcze przedrozbiorowe, gdy na terenie Ukrainy były obszary, których prawnym spadkobiercą jest chyba Polska. Czy nie powinny w związku z tym w tych plikach być szablon PD-Poland czy PD-Polish zamiast PD-Ukraine? Mahnka (talk) 04:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Mahnka:
  1. Nie jestem specem od prawa międzynarodowego i nie jestem pewien, czy obecne państwo polskie jest formalnie następcą prawnym czegoś wcześniejszego niż Księstwo Warszawskie.
  2. Te spisy są na pewno późniejsze; widziałem tam datę 1840; mogą być nawet powojenne
  3. Jeśli chcesz je zgłosić do usunięcia - twoje prawo; status prawny tych spisów jest niejasny: prawdopodobnie stanowią utwór jako opracowanie, jeśli autor nie jest znany, to bieg wygasania praw autorskich zarówno w .pl jak i w .ua liczy się od ich pierwszej publikacji, czyli? Co więcej, w EU publikujący takie coś, jeśli nie było wcześniej opublikowane, sam nabywa wyłączne prawa. Więc mamy dość skomplikowaną sytuację. Ankry (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Dziękuję, w żadnym razie nie myślałem o zgłaszaniu do usunięcia, jedynie o korekcie licencji. Mahnka (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]

NAC[edit]

Bardzo proszę o pomoc.

Nieumiejętnie przesyłałam portretowe zdjęcie Abdona Stryszaka, znalezione w zbiorach NAC; SM0_42-L-471.jpg (301×400). To chyba jest domena publiczna (licencja CC?). User:JuTa usunął je z Commons, a ja obawiam się, że popełnię kolejne błędy ponawiając próby przesłania.

Byłabym bardzo wdzięczna, gdybyś znalazł wolną chwilę i przywrócił ten portret. Serdecznie pozdrawiam, --Joanna Kośmider (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Zakładam, że chodzi o File:Abdon Stryszak.jpg. Ze zdjęciami Hartwiga z NAC jest ten kłopot, że nie do końca wiemy jaki jest ich status prawny, a zgodnie z zasadami, to do zamieszczającego zdjęcie na Commons należy wyjaśnienie wszelkich wątpliwości. Jeśli zdjęcie było gdzieś w Polsce opublikowane przed marcem 1989 bez zastrzeżenia praw (trzeba wskazać dokładnie: gdzie i kiedy; jak tu lub tu, to jest ono PD ({{PD-Poland}}). W przeciwnym razie, prawa wygasną dopiero w 2074 i do tego czasu potrzebujemy wolnej licencji od właściciela praw. Ze standardową "licencją" udzielaną przez NAC jest ten problem, że nie wspomina ona o tworzeniu utworów pochodnych (co jest na Commons wymagane) i nawet nie wiemy, czy NAC posiada prawa by jej udzielić (zależy od tego jakiej treści umowę archiwum zawarło z Fundacją Edwarda Hartwiga lub z jego spadkobiercami bezpośrednio). Być może @Polimerek potrafiłby coś więcej powiedzieć w tej materii (jeśli jest jakaś zgoda w OTRS), ale wątpię. Wg mnie potrzeba by tutaj działań jakiegoś wolontariusza we współpracy z NAC, który by kwestie prawne mógł wyjaśnić.
PS. Podobny problem (nieprawidłowy szablon licencji) dotyczy również innych zdjęć Hartwiga (i nie tylko Hartwiga) z NAC i, moim zdaniem, kwalifikują się one do usunięcia, jeśli ktoś zgłosi zastrzeżenia. Ja takich działań nie mam w planach. Ankry (talk) 06:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Szkoda! Bardzo dziękuję za wyjaśnienie (informacje na stronie NAC były niejednoznaczne). Pozdrawiam--Joanna Kośmider (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Copyright status: File:PL Kraków i Lwów w cywilizacji europejskiej.djvu[edit]

Copyright status: File:PL Kraków i Lwów w cywilizacji europejskiej.djvu

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PL Kraków i Lwów w cywilizacji europejskiej.djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Cepeda[edit]

Hi Ankry, it was my own photo, because it was taken by me. It is not a Cepeda selfie, someone else changed the file name, but it is not true, and maybe here was the missunderstading. In fact, the file itself was cropped and I appear besides him. Please change this advisory message. Thanks for your work. --Patrick (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Patrickpedia: Doubts need to be resolved. And contacting VRT seems to be the right way. Ankry (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

FMM-1992 (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Sanah[edit]

Za każdym razem wywalacie zdjęcie sanah, które udało mi się zdobyć dla wiki.... To bez sensu... Proszę o informację co muszę przesłać do Was żeby zdjęcie było ok ??

W jaki sposób mam przesłać kopię emaila od managera sanah ?? Oto mail ctrl/c ctrl/v


Jasna sprawa. To prosze tylko o aktualizację daty premiery plyty w angielskiej wersji wpisu - bo tam ciagle widnieje dzisiejsza data, a poprawna to 8 maja Dzieki!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Mar 2020, at 19:18, [redakted] wrote: > >  > Z zasady Wikipedia podaje tylko encyklopedyczne dane. Podawanie daty pojawienia się na Youtube poszczególnych kawałków raczej nie należy do wiedzy encyklopedycznej i szybko zostało by to usunięte przez innych użytkowników portalu. Takie dane każdy kto jest zainteresowany znajdzie dość szybko w historii youtube. Pozostaje liczyć dalszych sukcesów by zbierać te najważniejsze info, wszak to dopiero początek. Pozdrawiam i dziękuję za materiały. > > Łukasz Świerczewski > > Dnia 27 marca 2020 15:41 [redacted] napisał(a): > > Witam ponownie, > > Dzięki za dodanie zdjęcia sanah do wpisu – a czy jest szansa na uzupełnienie także tych informacji, o których pisałem poniżej? > > Z góry ogromne dzięki, > > maciek > > > > From:[redacted] > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 1:21 PM > To: [redacted] > Subject: sanah wiki - materiały > > > > Hej, na prośbe ludzkości 😉 przesyłam zdjecie sanah do publikacji, mam nadzieję, że jest OK? > > > > Przy okazji mala prosba: we wpisie angielskim jak można to podmiencie datę premiery płyty „Krolowa dram” na nową – 8 maja. W polskiej wersji jest OK. > > > > I jeszcze do polskiego wpisu – w 2019 roku ujawniliśmy w streamingu audio i video trochę więcej utworów , także po było ich więcej, czyli jeżeli jest szansa na update tutaj to pełna chronologia wygląda tak: > > 11.02.2019 Bez słów > > 01.05.2019 Cząstka > > 19.05.2019 Siebie zapytasz > > 12.07.2019 Solo > > 29.08.2019 Aniołom szepnij to > > 06.09.2019 Idź > > 11.10.2019 Proszę pana > > 30.10.2019 Koronki > > 06.12.2019 projekt nieznajomy nie kłamie > > 03.01.2020 Szampan > > 28.01.2020 Melodia > > > > I Zuza (sanah) pytała czy jako zawód można dopisać także na końcu „skrzypaczka” – w orkiestrze na studiach gra w orkiestrze na skrzypcach 😊 > > > > Z góry dzięki za poprawki i ogólnie też dzięki za fajną robotę przy tych wpisach! > > Pozdrawiam, > > maciek > > > > > > [redacted] > > project manager > MAGIC RECORDS Sp. z o.o. > 02-384 WARSZAWA, UL. WŁODARZEWSKA 69 > TEL.: [redacted] NIP:113-19-68-978 > www.magicrecords.pl > > > > > — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyku new (talk • contribs) 20:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Cyku new (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@Cyku new: Zgodę musi przesłać osobiście właściciel praw: czyli albo fotograf, albo osoba, która zawarła z fotografem umowę o przeniesienia praw autorskich, wraz z tą umową. Wolontariusze VRT nie mogą akceptować kopii umów przesyłanych przez pośredników. Formą jaką musi mieć zgoda znajdzie na tej stronie. Zgoda "do publikacji" jest bezużyteczna. Jeśli agent nie jest fotografem, musi wykazać, że fotograf mu przekazał swoje prawa. I pamiętaj, że zamieszczanie na wiki cudzych danych osobowych jest poważnym naruszeniem zasad. Swoje można, cudzych nie. Ankry (talk) 22:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Gustavo Mohme[edit]

Hello, sorry for not having responded and about the license is that I have seen that several images in Wikipedia have it. Now about the author I have no idea who he is but I am giving a reference to where I found the photo that comes from the page Gustavo Mohme Foundation , the image is not edited at all and I decided to upload it since I saw that several Politicians articles have no photo on them. I did not have any bad intention of uploading it without giving credits about where the image comes from and I hope they can restore it just like the other image of Henry Pease. Greetings--Junior2912 (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Junior2912[]

@Junior2912: We cannot host images without evidence of free license (granted by the photographer) until their copyright expires (in US: 95 years after publication or 120 years after creation). In order to upload such photos you need either (1) meet the polititian and made him a photo yourselves, or (2) identify the photographer and convince them to grant a free license (that allows eg. derivative works and commercial use), or (3) find a photo that has already been published under such a license by the photographer. Some Wikipedias (eg. English) allow non-free photos under Fair Use; but this generally applies to images of deceased people only. False licensing claims are copyright violation, which is against Wikimedia Commons policies and violation of law. Ankry (talk) 08:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[]

Regarding the Possible Sock Behavior of Marco56333, Adad01023, and Tmc210523[edit]

Hello. I'm Timmyboger from zh.wiki and I'm currently looking into the possible sock relationship that exists between the accounts Marco56333, Adad01023, and Tmc210523 on a local discussion page here. As a result of one of the participants of the discussion @Itcfangye: requested comment from a current steward, I would like to ask for your opinion on this subject and the possibility to conduct a checkuser request on commons, given that you were part of the discussion on an undeletion request that involves the members I'm suspecting to be either socking or meatpuppetry to disrupt zh.wiki, shown here and here.
Some relevant discussions in the past for your information: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2021/9#Marco56333, zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2021/9#Marco56333_2, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:自拍11.jpg.
So what happened was that I was looking into zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2021/9#Marco56333, a page for requesting checkuser on meta since the local checkusers were suspended by office action, and I noticed that the image Tmc210523, a suspected user, was constantly attempting to add is the same image Adad01023 has imported on commons, which is now requested for deletion by another user. Then I looked into the deletion requests and found that Marco56333 and Adad01023 seems to have a relationship, given they participated in the same undeletion request for M自拍照, which you participated, and have shown an odd relationship to me. You may have noticed that when Marco56333 claimed authorship on the file M自拍照, the authorship actually belongs to Adad01023, showing an interesting relationship, in my opinion, between these two accounts.
I also looked into the files Adad01023 have uploaded and noticed an odd pattern. He or she has been using signatures on the files he or she uploaded that does not correspond to the username, shown in File:自拍11.jpg and File:Catcodle.jpg. It is suspicious to me that he or she would not use his or her own signature, and, most importantly, I wonder why he or she would use the name "test" when labeling the author for the image on File:Catcodle.jpg.
Another component regarding this when the checkuser requests were done locally is that during requests like zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2021/9#Marco56333 and zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2021/9#Marco56333_2, there are already other members of the community showed that there is a correlation between Marco56333 and Tmc210523 regarding their editing interest.
However, there is a previous checkuser request that the steward indirectly showed my flaw in this argument. In meta:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-09#Marco56333@zh.wikipedia, the steward who conducted the checkuser marked the users Marco56333 and Tmc210523 as Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely. As we all probably know, checkuser is a method that checkusers use technically and might not reflect the actual outcome. Given that the comment the steward gave in meta:User_talk:Sotiale#Would_a_checkuser_between_different_projects_be_possible? in response to this subject that involves the disruption in both the commons and zh.wiki community, I would like to request your opinion on this subject, and, given that the previous checkuser result does not indicate the IP relationships between these accounts, would it be reasonable to suspect that these accounts are meatpuppetry instead of just normal socks?
Thank you for taking your time to read this and provide me with constructional feedback regarding this subject, in advanced. --) 08:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Editor note: Sorry for the texts that were not formatted correctly, and I'm sorry for the inconvenience for your need to translate some Mandarin (and possibly English) into your home language. --) 08:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[]

@Timmyboger: I am sorry, but I am afraid that I cannot help you. Sockpuppetry investigation is out of scope of my Commons activity. Ankry (talk) 08:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Would you mind to at least provide me with some information regarding the images themselves and your opinion about the problems? Like is the misuse of signatures prohibited based on commons policy? I'm a mainly zh.wiki editor so I'm not quite familiar with the system here. --) 08:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@Timmyboger: Generally, only photos that are original, non-preprocessed versions from the camera and that were never published before can be uploaded as {{Own}}. In other cases, the uploader is required to provide an evidence of free license. If signature in EXIF points to anybody else than the uploader, it is also a copyright doubt. Watermarked photos are not original. But the uploader can try to convince the comunity that they are indeed the author in case of doubts. Ankry (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[]

You are invited to comment on a subject at "COM:VP/C"[edit]

As you took part in the previous discussion surrounding this template, I would like to invite you to the current discussion about the template "PD-South VietnamGov" as editors over at the Vietnamese-language Wikisource have been debating its validity and seek help from users who have more experience in dealing with these kinds of copyright © disputes. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Bot help needed[edit]

Hi, we need help in re-categorizing contributions of Wiki Loves Monuments Junior participants who have uploaded photos through the main competition uploader instead of the Junior Campaign. We need to have them in the appropriate school categories (here is a list of usernames and categories). I will be very grateful for your help :) Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 10:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:LL-Q809 (pol)-Olaf-absolutystka.wav[edit]


File:LL-Q809 (pol)-Olaf-absolutystka.wav has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Olaf.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[]