User talk:Anonymous101/A1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Thanks.. Well. Your Spanish is good.. jeje. by the way i used the picture. Thank you. My english is not good. =S see ya! - MokoFix - (BlackBeast) 18:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sites that have were voted as one of the 10 most popular UK locations on April 9, 2008.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sites that have were voted as one of the 10 most popular UK locations on April 9, 2008.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 08:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

MY mistake. Anonymous101 08:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for welcoming me! Cirt 12:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry[edit]

I withdraw my opposition to your request for flickr review fact as an admin from another project you should get approval. Floral designs on shoes are open to interpretation, and I had no right to call you out on a reasonable interpretation. -Nard 00:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Strong City, New Mexico.svg[edit]

I fixed this image for you but I'm having issues trying to upload it today (it justs times-out). Anyway, I didn't forget about it and it'll be uploaded as soon as the site let's me. Cheers, Rocket000 02:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Anons on Flickr upload bot[edit]

Fixed. IP addresses are no longer valid usernames. Thanks for the heads up! -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token b84b718d302b2cc9fc5bc75d3ffc569c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re :Three Millionth file[edit]

Wow!! =D Thanks for the notification & press release. :) - Cheers, Mailer diablo (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Flickr images[edit]

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{user trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Cheers, —Giggy 11:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Anticline (PSF).png[edit]

Hi Anonymous101, I left a question for you regarding this nomination. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Marking of "Chahine directing The Magnificent Vanes '48" photo as copyright violation[edit]

Hi, why was the photo"Chahine directing The Magnificent Vanes '48" marked as copyright violation? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

The image on Flickr uses the cc-by-nc-sa license which is not allowed on commons. Anonymous101 talk 15:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...
Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−

Anonymous101, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ Also consider joining #wikimedia-admin, the cross-wiki coordination channel for Wikimedia administrators. Any member of the channel can invite you in temporarily, but you need an invite exemption from a channel operator to get in whenever you want. Please come to #wikimedia and ask for an invite. Any admin from any project is welcome.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....

Thanks for helping and do ask if you need any assistance. Regards --Herby talk thyme 08:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Anonymous101 talk 08:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the team. Rocket000 (talk) 12:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations! Cirt (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations (though I wasn't involved in your rfa due to my wikipause). --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Congrats Anon! <3 Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 14:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks everyone Anonymous101 talk 16:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to have missed the vote. Congrats from me as well. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Flickr review start[edit]

Can you take a quick look at my recent {{Flickrreview}} work and see if I am doing things okay? Cirt (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

From the ones I looked at you seemed to be doing everything OK. Anonymous101 talk 06:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Great, thanks. Cirt (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Natasha Poly.jpg [edit]

Hi Anonymous101,
could you undelete Image:Natasha Poly.jpg as the requester (and eventually you too) didn't take into account[1] that two former RFDs for the same reason as this one were retracted because the uploader is identical to the Flickr account owner; for details see the links on Image talk:Natasha Poly.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Replied here Anonymous101 talk 13:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Stahlkocher images[edit]

I have restored 2 images that you have deleted. Image:LS8a.jpg and Image:Ls-4.JPG. More details here: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Attention#Images_of_User:Stahlkocher. Beware of this kind of anonymous contributions, I fell down in the same trap some days ago, and Cecil warn me about this. Cheers, KveD (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

replied Anonymous101 talk 04:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


Image deletion warning Image:Benazir_Bhutto_with_birth_and_death_date.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mangostar (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating it. As the source was deleted as a copyvio, this should also be deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Congrats[edit]

Thanks for the support. Cirt (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


Hi! If a I wont to propouse an image to be featured but it has been propoused yet before my canidature What I do? Replace the old nomination? Thanks, --Tintero (talk) 13:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC) PD: Sorry for my english

Pienso que usted debe crear la página del nombramiento en Commons:Featured picture candidates/<image name> (2nd nomination). Anonymous101 talk 13:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Apesadumbrado mi español no es bueno. Anonymous101 talk 13:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
¡Muchas gracias! --Tintero (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


Hi! Could you remove my PNG graphic because I've uploaded a new SVG version. File is here. Thanks in advance! Regards, Patrol110 dyskusja 13:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done Anonymous101 talk 13:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Regards, Patrol110 dyskusja 13:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


Could you undelete this? The Flickr user changed the license. -Nard the Bard 10:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done. Anonymous101 talk 15:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Old postcards[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Konigstein81.jpg is very interesting, and it would be nice if we could extract from it some useful policy or at least guidance as to how old postcards should be handled. I have hundreds which I could upload, but many will raise the same issues as this, and I don't want to have to go through the same old arguments every time. Even better would be to work out some rules on anonymous images generally, but I suspect from past discussions that that will be much harder. I am thinking of working up a policy page on postcards, at least. If you have any thoughts on the general principles that should apply, could you leave me a note on my talk page? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Closing rationales?[edit]

Hello. I've got no problem with your close of Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Nicaraguan Embassy Moscow.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:German Embassy Mosfilmovskaya Street.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Embassy of Kuwait in Moscow.jpg, but I do have questions. Why just these? Is there some difference with the others on the same day or did you just not have the time or inclination to close them? Why delete the Bulgarian one here? Why is COM:FOP not relevant here? I think those are the main things. You can leave a note here. I'll check back later. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


We have been discusing the issue here, and we reached the conclusion that the design of the mask is copyrighted, so those images, all presenting tha mask as the main thing, fall under deritivative. Cheers, Gizmo II ¿Eu? 20:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)