User talk:Anwar2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anwar2!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Copyright status: File:2013-04-27 MG 2832.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2013-04-27 MG 2832.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Anwar2,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Anwar2,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Godzina Pąsowej Róży.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Godzina Pąsowej Róży.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Same for other book covers and commercial packaging. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

witam,mam tą książkę w swojej bibliotece więc zrobiłem plik,gdzie szukać uwag dot,zastrzeżeń co do fotografowania okładek książek?zrobiłem ich wiele i nie wiem czy je publikować do e-podręczniki.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Zaślubiny Polski z morzem.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zaślubiny Polski z morzem.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Zaślubiny Polski z morzem.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  • w sprawie pliku otóż rycina wisi u mnie w domu oprawiona,prawdopodobnie kupili ją moi rodzice ,lub ojciec dostał na jakieś imieniny w prezencie,ale rodzice nie żyją więc nie dowiem się skąd rycina pochodzi.--asiu (talk) 05:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

zaślubiny Polski z morzem[edit]

w sprawie pliku otóż rycina wisi u mnie w domu oprawiona,prawdopodobnie kupili ją moi rodzice ,lub ojciec dostał na jakieś imieniny w prezencie,ale rodzice nie żyją więc nie dowiem się skąd rycina pochodzi.

File:Bianka Zalewska.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bianka Zalewska.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Julo (talk) 21:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Pełnia 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pełnia 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stas (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Zdjęcia[edit]

Witaj – mam prośbę o pomoc / do Commons są wrzucane zdjęcia z Archiwum Instytutu Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu / to zdjęcie [1] jest opisane jako „Kościół - Proboszczowice”, a wydaje mi się kościołem św. Mikołaja w Warcie – choć może się mylę, jak sądzisz? Nie mogę odszukać informacji, czy w Proboszczowicach jest jakiś kościół – wiesz coś na te temat, byłeś kiedyś w tej okolicy? A jeżeli tak to czy przypadkowo nie widziałeś gdzieś takiej kapliczki [2] – również opisana jako Proboszczowice – być może jest to kapliczka z tej wsi, ale błędy „lubią” się powtarzać, więc wolę się upewnić – zdjęcie jest stare (1974), kapliczka mogła się trochę zmienić, ale wątpię by przestała istnieć – chyba, że kapliczka również jest źle opisana? – pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Witam masz racje to jest kościół ś.Mikołaja w Warcie -poznaje po wieżyczce gotyckiej specjalnie poszedłem z laptopem żeby porównać,może podobny tam jest ,ale to na pewno Warta,nawet drzewa są takie same,jeśli pomogłem to pozdrawiam

Bardzo dziękuję za pomoc – Darekm135 (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Te trzy zdjęcia wrzucone dzisiaj są pomnikami przyrody? Nawet jeśli nie spróbuj wpisać jakąś lokalizację – przynajmniej miejscowość / przy jednym jest Sieradz – czy dwa pozostałe są również z Sieradza? – Darekm135 (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, nie zauważyłem współrzędnych – Darekm135 (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Maksymilian Fajans 1850.jpg[edit]

Dzień dobry, link do Europeany jest błędny i nie działa - proszę o korektę.

Zauważ zresztą, że baza ta jedynie linkuje do innych repozytoriów, ale sama jako taka nie magazynuje skanów. Dlatego właściwszym źródłem jest strona instytucji, która faktycznie ów obiekt posiada. Cancre (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Tubądzin[edit]

Dzień dobry – mam pytanie – gdzie dokładnie zostały wykonane te zdjęcia [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] – podane współrzędne wskazują na skrzyżowanie ulic w Ozorkowie. Druga sprawa: niektóre Twoje zdjęcia wstawiłem do tej kat. [8] – sprawdź, czy się nie pomyliłem, czy wszystkie zdjęcia zostały zrobione w Warcie / pozdrawiam w nowym roku – Darekm135 (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Tubądzin[edit]

Dzień dobry-witam-zdjęcia zostały wykonane w zakładzie płytek Tubądzin w Ozorkowie-będą dalsze zdjęcia do artykułu o zakładzie stąd Commons-zmieniam tylko loko bo mam dokładny adres.--asiu (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

File:1 Otrębusy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1 Otrębusy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chrismahonevine (talk) 13:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)