User talk:Arch/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hoi Arch. Ik zag dat jij ooit bovengenoemd bestand hebt geüpload. Ik zie echter een heel klein zwart streepje in het groene vlak. Hoort dit zo? Ook al zijn het maar details, ik dacht, ik meld het maar even. Groet, Pompidom (talk) 08:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hoi Pompidom, dat hoort er inderdaad niet. Ik had destijds een laptopje waarmee ik werkte, nu heb ik een beter scherm, en zie het inderdaad. Hij is inmiddels bijgewerkt. Vriendelijke groeten, Arch (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bedankt voor het snelle updaten! Groet, Pompidom (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ja, graag gedaan, en als ik wil kan ik snel zijn ;-) Arch (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gaasterland-Sloten wapen[edit]

File:Gaasterland-Sloten wapen.svg

It appears to me that the crown is not centered above the shield. Am I mistaken? Is this intentional?

And the color of the hare seems slightly off (not as rich/saturated as the blue, green and yellow hues) but that is just my uniformed aesthetic talking!

Gregors (talk) 08:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seemed to be that the crown was indeed a littlebit too far to the right. That has been resolved. About colors, I would not debate, they are identical to the existing arms, but feel free to improve them.

Arch (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not being Dutch nor having access to any original heraldry from the area, I'll pass on "improving" the colors (I have not seen a red hare for quite some time now and do not have anything to compare your work to). Gregors (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Official blason reads a red hareKnorrepoes (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You may assume that I know what I am doing. It is not the first coat of arms that I did make. I thought you meant a lighter shade of red or something and thats irrelevant in Dutch heraldric rules, except the use of different kinds of one colour etc. In this case a used a brighter colour for gold and blue. The hase should be red nothing else. (See picture of the original coat of arms on the official municipality website itself). If you lack any expertise, dont give criticism on irrelevant matters and please do not bother me anymore with trivial issues. This is such a waste of time, I can use my time so much better. Goodbeye. Arch (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Brummen[edit]

Volgens de officiële tekeningen hangt de braamstruik naar beneden, niet naar boven !Knorrepoes (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ten eerste, volgens aanwijzingen van ene Knorrepoes (zie archief) gaat het bij afbeeldingen van wapens om de officiele beschrijving in de regels van de heraldiek van de Hoge Raad van Adel, en die reppen in dit geval daar met geen enkel woord over. "zijnde lazuur (het schild) beladen met een klimmende leeuw, houdende een bloemstruik in deszelfs voorste klauwen, alles van goud". Er is zelfs geen sprake van een braamstruik. Ten tweede, de afbeelding is naar voorbeeld van de offcièle vlag die de gemeente voert, zie officiele site van brummen.nl. Ik zie het probleem dus niet. Arch (talk) 16:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oldambt[edit]

Hoi,

In het wapen van Oldambt staan de dwarsbalken te laag, die moeten als gewone dwarsbalken, dus in het midden van het schild staan. Zie http://www.ngw.nl/heraldrywiki/index.php?title=Oldambt voor de tekening op het officiële diploma.Knorrepoes (talk) 08:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Opmerkelijk. Ik had het wapen gemaakt naar voorbeeld van deze op Wikipedia. Mijn voorkeur geniet altijd de afbeeldingen zoals zij worden weergeven op officiele wapendiploma's. Dus ik heb de aanpassing meteen doorgevoerd, tevens de kleuren overgenomen van het diploma. Bedankt voor uw opmerkzaamheid. MVG, --Arch (talk) 08:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Hoorn_wapen_2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

132.229.236.12 15:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When I saw that image on the display of recently-uploaded files, it seemed too large in filesize given its visual simplicity, so I opened it in a text editor, and removed all useless code. (I don't actually use Inkscape to edit files, only to convert or test SVG files...). -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for this tip. Currently I am unfortunately without text editor, I shall try to get something I can use. Never crossed my mind to use a text editor, but its sounds very logical. Kind regards --Arch (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sure you have a default text editor on your operating system (Windows Notepad/Wordpad etc.), though it may be better to get one oriented towards programmers' use if you intend to do it frequently. SVG files are actually basically in text format (since they are an offshoot of XML). AnonMoos (talk) 16:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have to find out. Right now I am unable to open a file with Wordpad. I'll try to make an another attempt tomorrow ;-) I've been awake 20 hours now, I'm a litlebit fuzzy in my head right now... :-S Thanks for the tips anyway :-) --Arch (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Right click on the SVG file, and select "Open with..." then "Choose program" to let Windows know that Wordpad should be allowed to edit SVG files... AnonMoos (talk) 22:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
First test on File:Hoppenbrouwer_wapen.svg was successful, saved a lot of bits ;-) I will definitely continue with this experiment. Clearly a kind of bug in the program. Thanks again for your time :-) Arch (talk) 02:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Anne_Frank_waxfigure.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Middelburg[edit]

Hoi, Middelburg heeft een adelaar met gouden poten, dat is standaard, tenzij de beschrijving anders aangeeft. ook in het officiële register staat het met gouden poten ipv rood.Knorrepoes (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bedankt voor de tip, ik heb het meteen aangepast. Zal trouwens eerdaags eens een nieuwe maken. --Arch (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Coat of Arms Groningen[edit]

Hallo, is het mogelijk dat je voor /File:Groningen_coa.svg ook een restyle maakt? 15:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

edit: nevermind, na wat research kwam ik erachter dat deze al bestond maar nog niet gebruikt werd op de NL-wiki. Ik heb 'm geplaatst ;) mooi werk btw proficiat! Rickazio (talk)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arch!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arch!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arch!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grenspaal[edit]

Aangezien ik niet weet waar je hem precies voor gebruiken wilt, zoek je zelf even de juiste uit?

Groetjes, Ciell (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Echt geweldig Ciell! Bedankt voor de moeite, ik zag dat je ook al bij de lijst van rijkmonumenten hebt geplaatst, dezelfde foto die ik ook al geselekteerd had daarvoor :-)
Er zit een heel verhaal achter deze grenspaal. Ik zal er nog eens een lemma over proberen te schrijven, met leuke kaart erbij, dat lemma zal leuk aansluiten bij de kruiskapel in Hemden. Er is lang twist geweest tussen Münster en Gelre over de grens, met name de bepaling ervan. Er zijn legio verhalen overgeleverd over grensgeschillen, de komst van de grens, smokkelpraktijken, aktie tegen smokkelarij, komst commiezen (later douane), landmeters die jaren hebben moeten bakkelijen over de grens, uiteindelijk het verdwijnen van deze stenen grenspalen. De foto's zullen een waardevolle aanvulling zijn. Groetjes van --Arch (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ja, het kostte even meer dan een half uur zoeken, maar dan heb je ook wat ;-).
Ik zie je een wijziging op Wikipedia doen, maar klopt dat wel? 171 is het gedrukte nummer van deze grenspaal, maar zoals je op de foto's wel kunt zien is er ook een nieuwer nummer. Die staat ook bij de plattegrond aan de andere kant van het huisje, dus hij heeft er 2... Misschien iets met een oude en een nieuwe nummering? Ciell (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Kan ik me voorstellen dat je zolang moest zoeken, ik ben daar wel duizend keer geweest, maar die paal nooit zien staan, kan je nagaan!? Ik heb er weer 171 van gemaakt, het is kennelijk een oud in onbruik geraakt nummer, het "nieuwe" nummer 171 leidt naar Hammont (B). Intussen al bezig geweest met een opzetje over de paal. Ik heb helaas niet tijd genoeg om het vandaag af te maken. Maar wat in het vat zit, verzuurd niet. --Arch (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Het oude nummer is 171, het nieuwe nummer (op het metalen plaatje) is 749 ;-). Ciell (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok... Ik had het lemma grenspaal 171 (Aalten) genoemd, dit ter onderscheid van Hammont. Maar zo laten denk ik, aangezien 'ie ook als 171 te boek staat als monument. Groetjes --Arch (talk) 12:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is ook prima, ik wilde het je alleen even duidelijk maken ;-).
Ik was afgelopen weekend nog bij het overblijfsel van 't Waliën, waar ook een rand van wapens op staat. Volgens de beschrijving van het RCE zit hier ook het wapen van Münster tussen, maar wat ik zie heeft deze slechts 3 horizontale banden, in ieder geval op de de grenspaal. Hoe dan ook, ik moest weer even aan je denken: misschien kun je ze gebruiken.
Groetjes, Ciell (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ontzettend blij mee! En zeker weten bruikbaar! Ik had al eens slechte foto's gezien ooit, maar niet zo gedetaileerd als die van jou, geweldig! De eerste twee wapens herken ikFile:Wappen Münster Westfalen.svg, File:Gemen van wapen.svg in, de andere zou ik één twee drie niet kunnen thuisbrengen, daarvoor moet ik even wat archieven induiken. Mocht ik het kunnen achterhalen dan zal ik in elk geval de info op de foto's aanvullen. Groetjes --Arch (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Grappig is wel dat het Wikipedia artikel spreekt over 8 familiewapens, ik kon er slechts 6 onderscheiden. Mocht je een foto op een andere manier genomen willen hebben, laat het even weten. De eigenaren waren zeer meewerkend :). Ciell (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arch!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Aangaande plaatsing familiewapen Engelbrecht[edit]

Beste Arch, Gebruiker:Henk Obee heeft uw afbeelding geplaatst van het familiewapen Engelbrecht in het artikel van Willem Anton Engelbrecht en Willem Antony Engelbrecht. Ik begrijp dat deze afbeeldling van uw hand is, en u daarvoor de rechten kunt vrijgeven. Echter is dit wapen door de familie Engelbrecht vastgelegd bij het CBG. Gezien het feit dat ik uw afbeelding af vind doen aan het originele ontwerp, zal ik uw abeelding verwijderen uit dit artikel en het originele ontwerp uit het eigen familiearchief, CBG-archief, plaatsen. Ik hoop dat u hier begrip voor heeft. Met vriendelijke groet, Engelbrecht gebruiker:engelbrecht

Hallo Engelbrecht, juist i.v.m. met eventuele copyrights heb ik een eigen versie van het wapen gemaakt. Het is voor mij geen probleem om het originele ontwerp om te tekenen naar SVG mocht u dat liever zien, maar ik weet niet of dat ateursrechtelijk wel mogelijk is, dezelfde situatie doet zich voor met File:FamiliewapenEngelbrecht.pdf vrees ik. Uiteraard heb ik het volste begrip voor uw handeling. Ik zal de kwestie in elk geval even aankaarten bij de heer Obee. Vriendelijke groeten, --Arch (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Arch,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 English | Nederlands | +/−
Dear Arch,

We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win!

The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall.
Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone!

Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team
WCN 2011
Sent by Lucia Bottalk in 23:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arch!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Crown Royal and Prince's coat of arms Kingdom of the Netherlands 1806/1810[edit]

hello, I'm dunkerqueenflandre, I am researching coats of arms and crowns in the Kingdom of Holland from 1806 to 1810.

Could you tell me or do I look for on the net I can find nothing on the crowns of Prince and the Royal coat of arms of the first son of Louis Bonaparte (Napoleon Lodewijk):

Napoleon Bonaparte Karel,


The most important thing for me is the crown because I found the crown since 1815 to the present.


Thank you for your help Good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello dunkerqueenflandre, can it be the same crown as the one from Louis Bonaparte? I cannot find anything about Napoleon Bonaparte Karel. I'm sorry, bur I cannot help you any further. Wish you goof luck with your research. Greetings from --Arch (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good evening and thank you for your help

good evening to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]